Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational structures analysis
Functional departmentalization
Introduction of organization structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational structures analysis
Organisation structure presents the workflow of the whole organisation. In general, a prescribe outline of organisation structure lays out the network of relationships clearly to make it easier for employees to know who they should be reported to in various conditions hence increasing the efficiency of an organisation. Besides, it saves time by creating solid tracks for the employees to focus more on achieving their objectives and also help to avoid uncertainties while performing their tasks. Currently, Under Armour’s organizational structure is functional departmentalization as shown in Exhibit4.1. Functional departmentalisation is a proper system to separate the tasks performed within a company into various groups that are distinguished by …show more content…
Hybrid structure increases the adaptability of an organisation and makes it more flexible. As two organisations combine, there would be significant differences in production lines, service lines, market dominance, alignment of employees and organisation goals. By the implementation of hybrid structure, it can enhance a healthy relationship and communication between the managers and the employees through regular feedback due to its flexibility. A healthy relationship and good communication within the organisation can build up trust, teamwork and avoid conflicts in workplace. Consequently, the problems of employees can be solved easily. Additionally, the company incorporate can recognise the differences of culture and come out with solutions during the merging period in order to accomplish a success alteration. Moreover, reducing internal conflicts in the workplace will lead to an increment of effectiveness from the employees so that the employees can focuses more on contributing good performance within the organisation. Hence, hybrid structure results in growth of output and increases the profits of business. As an evidence, the Disney company with hybrid structure shows their good social relation with its employees as their motto is to treat its employees like customers through good communication and they appreciate their effort with the best …show more content…
Generally, changes occur in business management structure when companies combine. If Under Armour is combined with its competitors which are a decentralised company, a change of organisational structure from functional departmentalisation structure to hybrid structure would aid the companies to merge prosperously. After mergers reorganised the management structure, the organization would be decentralised. Authority of Kelvin Plank to take control over the organisation will be reduced significantly. Decentralisation is needed to develop individuals’ skills and the potential of employees as the employees are a vital part of the development of an organisation. Empowering the lower level of management to voice out their opinions and make small decisions can boost their self-confidence and it will be advantageous to the organisation’s
The Organisation structure of a company addresses the fact that every organisation has specific units that are responsible for different roles and actions in the organisation and that no department within the organisation stands alone, they are intertwined. The organisational chart or structure should be designed to divide up the work load, responsibilities and roles to be done
fail (Cheng, 2012). Mergers and acquisitions are much common in these days and only a few of them are end up in successes. Even though mergers and acquisitions are not result much successes rate, many organizations are still preferring it because, it is used as a cooperative strategy but nowadays it is used for cooperative development. The cultural differences and merger integration can be considered as an important factor for the failure rate but this study mainly focused
People feel more important to an organization when they feel like they are an individual, not just another member of the group. Everyone has differing opinions and ideas for how they think the organization should go. “By reaching out to everyone on [the leader’s] team, [the leader can] gain the benefit of a variety of perspectives.” (Cockrell 41). It is vital for leaders to listen to these different ideas because the organization could change for the better. If leaders do not listen to each individual, then members may feel like their voice does not matter to how the organization is
A merger is a partial or total combination of two separate business firms and forming of a new one. There are predominantly two kinds of mergers: partial and complete. Partial merger usually involves the combination of joint ventures and inter-corporate stock purchases. Complete mergers are results in blending of identities and the creation of a single succeeding firm. (Hicks, 2012, p 491). Mergers in the healthcare sector, particularly horizontal hospital mergers wherein two or more hospitals merge into a single corporation, are increasing both in frequency and importance. (Gaughan, 2002). This paper is an attempt to study the impact of the merger of two competing healthcare organization and will also attempt to propose appropriate clinical and managerial interventions.
Under Armour is a leading athletic clothing line directed towards the overall athlete who is looking for the most comfort during extracurricular activities. The mission of the company is, "to provide the world with technically advanced products engineered with exclusive fabric construction, supreme moisture management, and proven innovation. In short, every Under Armour product is doing something for you; it's making you better."
The soft factors can make or break a successful change process, since new structures and strategies are difficult to build upon inappropriate cultures and values. These problems often come up in the dissatisfying results of spectacular mega-mergers. The lack of success and synergies in such mergers is often based in a clash of completely different cultures, values, and styles, which make it difficult to establish effective common systems and structuresBased on the case study, extensive research and annual reports of AT&T the writer has mapped AT&T in the different domains. AT&T should strive to attain a perfect circle as close to the centre as possible, which indicates total synergy, order and equilibrium. Where the circle is skewed drastic change is needed as it moves closer to the outer ring of chaos:
What makes a person choose one brand of clothing over another? Is it the price? Or is it the style of the clothing? There are numerous factors that will play a key role in determining who will purchase your products and why they will choose to purchase your product. Kevin Plank, the founder of Under Armour and former captain of the special teams on Maryland University’s football team, would become infuriated at the amount of times he was forced to change his undershirt during games and practices due to how heavy with sweat they would become. He set out to create a shirt that would help keep an athlete cool and dry during intense physical activity. This simple idea would develop into a powerhouse in the sports apparel industry and has broken into the sports equipment industry as well.
That brings a great challenge to succeed, and lets the leadership work in new and innovative ways to make such a merger successful. McClelland’s theory states, in regards to the need for achievement, that people strive “To excel one’s self.to rival and surpass others. to increase self-regard by the successful exercise of talent” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010, p. 215). By this definition, the merger would motivate leadership to excel in the face of a challenge, and to increase their professional self-regard in their success in doing so. On an individual level, you are asking the performers and employees to recognize both economic and social climates, and to come together in action to save both their careers, as well as their passion for life....
Many global companies like Nike, Inc. are seen as role models both in the market place as well as in society in large. That is why they are expected to act responsibly in their dealings with humanity and the natural world. Nike benefits from the global sourcing opportunities, therefore areas such as production and logistics have been outsourced to partner companies in low-wage countries like China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result the company is limited nowadays to its core competencies of Design and Marketing.
Organisational Structure, Culture, and Management Style of a Business C2 An Analysis of How the Organisational Structure, Culture And Management Style of the Business Affects its Performance and Operation and Help It to Meet Its Objectives The organisation structure of Wednesbury IKEA The organisation structure in the ‘Appendix section’ belongs to the Wednesbury branch of IKEA. Wednesbury IKEA is a large formal organisation and it is best suited to a hierarchical organisational structure. This is because; there are more employees as it goes downwards from each level.
Business structure is a critical factor to determine a company 's success or failure. Generally, larger organization has a more complex organizational structure. In the case of H&M, they had adopted matrix structure, one of the traditional organizational structure, into their business. As shown in figure 1, range of functional groups is listed horizontally across the table and on the other is product/task with a manager taking control of each. The functional structure is divided
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.
This memo is to advise solutions for improving the likelihood the new organization will be successful. The major obstacles to the success of the merger are individual and organizational forces. Such forces encompass organizational structure, the mission and vision, and organizational culture. Other obstacles include poor communication.
Matrix structure is first introduced in the aerospace industry in the 1960s and become one of the popular organizational design options in today’s business and industry (Derven & Alexandria, 2010). Burns and Wholey (1993) poinited out that matrix structure were used in advertising agencies, aerospace firms, research and development laboratories, hospitals, government agencies, and universities. Matrix structure is the combination of two or more different structures and take the advantages of the pure functional structure and the product organizational structure (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 497). The employees in the matrix may have two bosses: their functional department managers and their product managers. For example, all engineers may be in one engineering department and report to an engineering manager, but these same engineers may be assigned to different projects and report to a project manager while working on that project. In many organizations, a matrix structure is implemented to address the requirement to do more with less and become more agile. The matrix structure, which focuses on horizontal as well as vertical management, has become more widespread as a result of globalization and the...
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.