Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical reflection on participation in group work
Reflection on engaging in group work
Reflection on engaging in group work
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical reflection on participation in group work
A followership is a process by which the individual performs the role of a follower or a supporter. These people would support the leader’s or the company’s goals and ideas and work towards achieving these desirable objectives (Uhl-Bien, Riggio, Lowe, & Carsten, 2014). The focus of Kelly’s Typology of Followership is on the followers’ behavior and thinking elements. Kelly described different types of followers: sheep, alienated, yes person, survivor, and effective supporter. These categories also connect to dependent and independent critical and uncritical thinking. The model states: followers are more or less productive participants in the company’s activities and more or less in the critical thinking processes (Bjugstad, Thach, Thompson, & Morris, 2006, p.309). Kelly believed there are passive …show more content…
As a leader, you regularly need to direct them. The alienated, on another hand, represents a category of people, who think their impute are not valued, so they don’t have the desire to create new ideas or share thoughts. These types of followers need to improve their confidence and communication skills. As a leader, you need to include these kinds of employees in contribution to company’s work so that they would feel more valued. The “yes person” is a type of followers with any suggestions, but don’t have any critical thoughts. As a leader, the best approach is to create tasks where employees will start to develop critical thinking and higher effectivity. They are hard workers and will do what was told; however, it can create some dangerous situations since these people will follow orders without any questions. In contrast, the survivor followers are real strategic employees; this type of individuals would analyze the present situation and what leader wants; after that, they would reflect whatever is more suitable to increase the chances of
Leadership is the most important part of running a successful operation. In the opening paragraph of the Blue Ocean Leadership article, the author explained to the reader that poor leadership is a key cause to why employees may be disengaged. When an employee is disengaged, they will be less productive thus harming the organization as a whole. In Blue Ocean Leadership, we will identify who the disengaged employees are, and how we can convert them to engaged employees. This article presented a very special leadership framework, that I will reflect on in this essay by summarizing the article, discussing the application of this framework, as well as critically analyzing the issues presented in this article.
The diversity among people is widely spread throughout the world. One can be grouped into various ways. People come in all shapes, sizes, colors, personalities, genders, and interests. LIfe would be hectic for someone to try and categorize people in every way possible. At least people are not the only thing impossible to fully separate. Animals and plants can also be placed into different categories. People can be classified into three categories: Leaders, Followers, and Independents.
Küpers, W. (2007). Perspectives on Integrating Leadership and Followership. Retrieved 4 22, 2014, from International Journal of Leadership Studies: http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss3/kupers/kupers.htm
In this book, the authors Tom Rath and Barry Conchie examine the question “What are the keys to being an effective leader?” To answer this question they had a team that reviewed data collected from Gallup polls. The data came from interviews from 20,000 senior leaders, over a million teams and more than fifty years of Gallup Polls of the most admired leaders in the world. The authors then had the team do a study of more than 10,000 followers to find out why they follow the influential leaders in their life.
Effectiveness of organizations depends on various factors. Nonetheless, it is firmly believed, by most practitioners and behavioural scientists, that leadership is a phenomenon which is crucial in achieving this goal (Yukl, 2013). As leadership is contextually bound, it cannot be completely understood from a single perspective. There are other elements that must be considered in order to do so, such as: the leader, the follower, the context and the interactions among them (Rumsey, 2013). The topic is even more fascinating in regards to the fact that most individuals are in some way a leader, a follower, or both. Despite the fact that most of these relationships go without particular notice, others have tremendous influence on the today’s world.
Conformity and Obedience in Society The desire to be accepted and belong to a group is an undeniable human need. But how does this need affect an individual? Social psychologists have conducted numerous experiments and concluded that, through various forms of social influence, groups can change their members’ thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In her essay “Group Minds,” Doris Lessing discusses our paradoxical ability to call ourselves individuals and our inability to realize that groups define and influence us.
Looking at these reasons it is easy to see why followers are becoming pickier about the leaders they follow. The leveling of communication through social media and other technologies has created a more complicated hierarchy within organizations – especially in technology driven ones such as distance education. Where once the professor would teach to students now online classrooms are using teaching methods and theories, such as Connectivism, which makes the student’s experiences just as important as the information being given. In this arena of flattened communication structures, followers will need to be recognized for the value they are providing and Kellerman’s research can help leaders begin to do just
Hinojosa, A. S., Davis McCauley, K., Randolph-Seng, B., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 595–610. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.002
It has been stated how the transformational effect of charismatic leaders lead to increased follower motivation (Humphreys, 2009). Due to the various attributes that transformational leaders have, such as charisma and understanding, they are likely to motivate others to follow after the examples that they may display. There is also Effective followership. Effective followership prepares a person to be an Effective leader since being a follower is considered as a prerequisite to leading. According to Humphreys (2009), organizations are comprised of groups of followers and leaders, who are listening and taking direction from one
In perspective of the model of transcendent leadership, the proposal is that subordinates need to show aptitudes that reflect those of their pioneers and propose transcendent followership as a mapping for the commitments of devotees in contemporary various leveled circumstances. A transcendent follower is somebody who communicates ability as far as their administration of relations with self, others and association. Ability in the area of self alludes to being mindful and proactive in creating unique qualities. Ability in the area of others alludes to the procedures of interpersonal effect, in connection to pioneers and associates. Ability in the area of association alludes to aggregate support and change. The article offers an incorporated perspective of the parts and obligations of followers in dynamic hierarchical situations, introducing them as colleagues as opposed to subordinates.
Ivey Business Journal. (n.d.). Followership: the other side of leadership. Retrieved January 14, 2014 from http:iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/leadership/leadership/followership-the-other-side-of-leadership#.UtbFeaFMHIU
Leaders with idealized influence serve as role models to their employees and emphasize the mission’s importance of the mission. Mark Zuckerberg runs his company based on the principle that, “I will only hire someone to work directly for me if I would work for that person” (Weiss). Zuckerberg wants to assure that his employees share his thinking about Facebook’s mission and how Facebook progresses. He makes sure that his employees understand his ideal and are influenced by his passion for Facebook. In the book “Think like Zuck: The Secrets to Facebook 's Success” Ekaterina Walter, mentions what Zuckerberg believes in when he hires people for the company: “No one can achieve success alone. So hire people who share your values and beliefs. And hire for attitude: skills can be taught, passion can’t” (Walter). Through these elements of what he believes in, Zuckerberg has shown that he is very focused on influencing his employees through his passion and emphasizes the importance of the mission because only people with passion can overcome the obstacles that they deal with in their job. He wants to assure that his employees can overcome all the obstacles with not just the skills they have but with their determination. This is one of the examples of how he influences his followers as the leader or serves as a role model for his
According to Sherman (2012), followers greatly contribute to the success of their leaders, and one must give their participation, support, acceptance of the challenge, open communication, trust and give their feedbacks. Behind every successful leader is a motivated and responsible follower.
Another author that has investigated the followership topic but asserts a few qualifications between her work and others is Kellerman. She characterizes her work as more descriptive than prescriptive as she considers there must be such a variety of variables impacting the followers behaviors that it is hard to be instructive. According to Kellerman (2008), there are two conceivable definitions about followers: “Followers can be defined by their rank: They are subordinates who have less power, authority, and influence then do their superiors”. And “followers can also be defined by their behavior: they go along with what someone else wants and intends”. Kellerman (2008) uses rank and behavior as determinants to characterize followers, focusing
One of the most important components of leadership is the leader. A leader is responsible for his or her followers and the overall goal of the group or organization. Leaders are the people held accountable or everything that happens, good or bad. On the other hand, the second major component of leadership is the followers. Without followers, a leader would be worthless. Followers make up the backbone of a leader because they are the masses that get goals accomplished. A leader is just one person, but the number of followers is countless. In order to be an effective follower, there are a countless number of characteristics that allow a follower to be the best they can be. Five of these characteristics include a positive attitude, communication skills, being part of the process, being open to new ideas, and patience.