Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cell phones and driving dangers
The dangers of using a cellphone driving
Cell phones and driving dangers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cell phones and driving dangers
Tucson Motor Vehicle Crash Rates In 2017 Tucson was reported to be the 6th most dangerous big city in the country (Arizona Daily Star). One of the contributing factors to this national rating was the amount of motor vehicle accidents that occur in Tucson, Arizona. In 2016 Pima County roads claimed the lives of 112 people (ADOT). Arizona Department of Transportation Director John Halikowski couldn't have said the following statement better, "making travel safer begins before the driver turns on the ignition" (Arizona daily Star). Tucson's motor vehicle crash rates would see a decline with firmer highway enforcement policies and increasing community awareness about highway safety.
Arizona Department of Transportation states revealed in 2016
…show more content…
We learn by example, and sometimes at the expense of others, meaning if we see that someone that was sternly punished for driving while using a cell phone, we would think twice before posting a snap chat video while driving. Even though Tucson my crack down on these violators by making the consequences stricter, the Patrol officers can not pull over a car solely for the reason of seeing the driver on a cell phone, the driver must be pulled over for another reason. Knowing this, it seems that this may need to be addressed on a higher level, to give police officers the authority to pull over anyone who they see using their cell phone, whether that are violating a traffic policy or not. The police vow to protect and serve, if they see a potential dangerous situation shouldn't they be held accountable to handle …show more content…
Property damages, injuries, or fatalities, these are the results of some motor vehicle accidents and the city has to suffer. Pima county reported 1,246,292,000 economic losses due to Motor Vehicle crashes (ADOT). Statewide Arizona seen a 10,707,244,000.00 loss sue to these accidents. Breaking down these losses in Tucson/pima county seen an economic loss of 649,600,600.00 in fatalities related to Motor Vehicle accidents and a loss of 568,864,000.00 in injuries due to Motor vehicle accidents. These accidents cause not only emotional and physical pain to the victims but also economic loss to the city and state. Just imagine if there were some changes made to insure the safety of the motorist and pedestrians, not only would the crash rates decrease but so would the economic loss. Decreasing the economic loss would allow the city to put money into more areas the help Tucson roads become safe. Repaving roadways, more sidewalks, bike lanes, and more cross walks, more educational resources for new drives, hiring more patrolling officers to cover more areas to insure our safety, the possibilities are endless if we can work together to decrease the amount, frequency and severity of the motor vehicle
Several surveys have shown the city of Miami to be one of the least preferable cities in which to drive. Every morning there is an exodus of Biblical proportions, as thousands or cars tightly pack into highways six lanes wide. More discouraging about driving in Miami is the mind-numbingly slow pace with which traffic moves. Moreover, bumper-to-bumper traffic causes many minimal damage accidents that ironically have larger, more negative, effects on traffic congestion than they actually should. Other factors such as construction and aggressive drivers create more hazardous conditions for commuters. The roads and highways of Miami are a world of danger that creates the unpleasant experience it is to drive in Miami.
Dangers on roadways is an issue that describes the discrepancy between perception and reality of road rage. The media, for some odd reason, tends to make road rage a huge controversial issue. As seen on talk shows from Oprah Winfrey to CNN, they reveal to people that road rage could happen at any time and to always be looking over your shoulder. These talk shows and news programs also put fear into our minds by explaining that most roadragers often use guns to kill or injure their victims. Glassner contradicts the media's speculations by stating that out of approximately 250,000 people killed on roadways between 1990-1997, AAA attributed that one in one thousand was an act of road rage (pg.5).
Star Tribune mentions that according to the Department of Public Safety, "distracted driving causes on in four Minnesota car crashes and results in at least 70 deaths and 305 serious injuries a year." This statistic appeals to logos by explaining how distracted driving is a serious matter. The statistic conveys an informative tone. Star Tribune incorporates the statistic to build their ethos. The statistic makes car accidents seem more realistic to their audience. This causes the audience to get alarmed about car accidents as well. Then, Star Tribune writes that the U.S. Department of Transportation reports, "Nationally, highway deaths spiked to 35,092 in 2015, the highest one-year increase since 1966." Star Tribune includes this statistic to explain how deadly car crashes are. This establishes a fretful tone. The statistic appeals to the audience's logical reasoning about how car accidents need to stop. The statistic also builds Star Tribune's ethos by quoting the U.S Department of Transportation: A trusted source. Star Tribune also adds that the U.S. Department of Transportation blamed the 7.2 percent of deaths per miles traveled on drunken driving, speeding, distracted driving from a phone or other hand held device. The data concluded "that about 10 percent of fatal crashes in 2015 involved at least one distracted driver." The statistic means that for every 3,509 car accident death, at least one death was from
"CDC -Injury - Teen Drivers: Fact Sheet." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web. 23 Mar. 2010. .
Law enforcement officers make an oath to serve and protect, and they are expected to uphold this oath to the best of their ability, but recently there has been an increase in the number of civilian deaths at the hands of law enforcement. Since the rise in this alarming trend, public distrust of law enforcement officials is at an all-time high. This has caused the public to demand the use of body worn cameras be made mandatory. Some people argue that imposing this new technology can cause unintended problems such as, violating privacy laws or interfering with how police interact with the public. However, these concerns can be easily solved once more policies are created to guideline usage. High profile
injuries and fatalities” (PHGR). “One of the cardinal features of sprawl is driving, reflecting a
According to the Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, "automobile crashes are the leading cause of death for those aged 3 to 33, with 43,005 (118 per day) Americans killed in 2002 alone" (Clayton, Helms, Simpson, 2006). Worldwide, vehicle accidents consist of 1.2 millions deaths per year, "behind only childhood infections and AIDS as cause of death amount people aged 5 to 30 years old" (Clayton., 2006). The annual cost of road accidents is estimated about $518 billion"(Factor, Yair, Mahalel, 2013). The fact alone of being in a moving, heavy vehicle is a danger in itself but individuals that do not wear their seat belts, talk on the phone, text, and do other distracting behavior also put themselves in even more harmful situations.
Montana needs safer drivers, on the roads that connect us to the places that we need to go. If a driver is not responsible, then all drivers are at risk. When a person is driving, their life and their passenger’s lives are in their hands. Families on both sides of a drunk driving accident experience consequences. This is why Montana needs stricter laws. On one side when the victim is a parent, children will have to grow up without that parent and family unit. On the other side, the drunk driver’s family is also victimized because he/she is incarcerated, costing them more than a loss of a vehicle. If the driver is the breadwinner of that family, then a paycheck is gone. Money is tighter now more than ever in these families. Stricter laws could prevent this. Insurance costs also go up for both the families. "You Drink & Drive. You Lose" and "Friends Don’t Let Friends Drive Drunk” ("Impaired Driving...” 1). These statements are factual and the words of these statements make people think more about their part in preventing drunk driving. The people drinking and driving are not only playing Russian roulette with their own lives; they are playing with other driver’s lives. Montana can fix these problems as a State if it works together to pass better laws for drunk
2,796 people were injured. There were also 17 deaths caused by distracted drivers in 2013.
In 1966, the National Highway Safety Bureau (NHSB) was designed by the Highway Act. NHSB’s director, Dr. William Haddon, noticed that he could prevent motor-vehicle injuries by applying public health methods and epidemiology. Various passages demanded the government to set standards for the highway and motor vehicles. The federal government responded by developing new safety features in cars such as safety belts, head rests, and shatter-resistant windshields. Barriers, reflectors, and center line strips were placed on roadways to provide direction and illumination. Traffic safety laws, wearing a safety belt, and public education encouraged drivers to make safer decisions. The use of safety belts has skyrocketed from 11% in 1981 to 68% in 1997 and decreases When the community and government understood the necessity for motor-vehicle safety, various programs such as Prior to the implementation, the rate stood at 18 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1925; however, the rate stood at 1.7 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1997. With all of the new safety features with cars, public education and enforcement of safety laws, “motor-vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of injury-related deaths in the United States.” Over 23.9 million vehicle crashes were reported in 1997; estimated costs were around $200 billion.
“In 2008 nearly 6 000 Americans died in crashes involves driver, who were busy doing something other than driving.”
Every person who has gets behind the wheel of a motor vehicle will be involved in some sort of automobile collision at some point in his or her lifetime. Traffic accidents account for over twenty thousand deaths each year and more than ten times as many injuries. There are a number of factors that contribute to these types of collisions, however, new and evolving laws can account for a large portion of successful preventable measures. In order for laws to be changed or added for the purpose of safer roads and highways, lawmakers have to first look at what factors contribute to such unsafe conditions. The top five causes of automobile accidents that cause injury are distracted drivers, driver fatigue, drunk driving, speeding, and aggressive driving. Laws can be proposed to reduce and even eliminate each of these risks.
To begin, Karl Vicks makes use of many personal stories from police officers in his article. His goal is to make his audience sympathize with the obstacles the police face when dealing with the public. One of the obstacles is camera phones. Vicks writes, “[t]hey hold them out from their bodies, like shields, and up in the faces of officers, like taunts” (34). Although Vicks makes a valid point, the way people use their phones today can be very rude, but why would this action be threatening to a police officer? Someone who’s been through training, who supposedly has no intention of harm, should not be bothered by this. Vicks describes the police as “watchmen who are used to being watched” (34), yet the use of camera phones makes them uncomfortable. If they’re carrying out their duties like they should, then camera phones wouldn’t be
The use of mobile phones while driving are a major destruction to the drivers, it is definitely no different from a mother trying to nurse a baby at the back sit. A good percentage of road accidents has been attributed to driver destruction. (David and William, 2001) There are evidence of cell phone related road carnages and this remains to be a concern. In 1999 a girl was killed by a driver when he got destructed by a phone, same case reported last year and even the death of a state corrections officer on North Carolina. However much drivers say they have a right to use their mobile phones, they should know of the destructions it causes when
“The one thing that unites all human beings, regardless of age, gender, religion, economic status, or ethnic background, is that, deep down inside, we all believe that we are above-average drivers” -Dave Barry, comedian. The number of accidents over the last ten years have drastically increased, drivers are paying less attention to the road itself. Many individuals behind the wheel of a car believe that their driving does not affect the road conditions, however it always will. The driving habits of today are catastrophic due to the reasoning that the driving will affect other lives through reckless or distracted driving, and disobeying traffic laws.