Mediation Practicum
A mediator can be described as a “go-between” whose primary role involves resolving a dispute. A good mediator possesses specific characteristics including but not limited to the following. Being prepared for the unexpected. This would imply adaptability and open-mindedness. Good listening skills and empathy are essential characteristics that all mediators should have. Trust, neutrality, confidentiality, punctuality, knowledgeability, and optimism are some of the traits that a mediator should also possess (Shachar, 2011). Neutrality means taking no sides; confidentiality ensures that whatever is disputed remains among the present parties and no additional person should know of the disputes, knowledgeability means knowing how to solve a dispute while optimism implies a mediator should be realistic.
Mediation can be
…show more content…
The mediator was confidential and neutral. In this case scenario, the mediator first explained the rules, processes, and procedures to be followed in the mediation. Each party was given an opportunity to describe why they should be given custody of the child. The mediator portrayed neutrality by asking each party the same questions to have a good grasp of what the terms and reasons for custody are. The mediator had one private meeting with each parent to get a good understanding of every participant's side of view to access possible solutions to the problem and if the possibility of fifty-fifty custody were present. To reach an agreeable solution, the mediator put the agreement in writing for future reference (Shachar, 2014). Each of the parents was supposed to have a signed copy of the alleged agreement. No solution was reached even after each party was issued with a copy of the agreement, so the mediator took the case directly to court. The mother of the child felt as if she wasn’t being considered having raised and catered for the child over the
When might a supervisor benefit from using trained mediators, such as NCRC mediators, rather than mediating a conflict him- or herself? Why would the experts be important in these situations?
By using The Case of Sally for this case study, I will work through the ethical decision making model to decide the best course of action. The Case of Sally can be found in Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions (8th edition), chapter 6 Confidentiality: Ethical and Legal Issues (p. 255). The therapist is having difficulty in determining if she has the ethical and legal responsibility to breach confidentiality. This case involves a 12-year-old girl named Sally, who experienced a brief encounter of sexual fondling by her intoxicated father. The father has no previous history of molesting his daughter. He has agreed to seek substance abuse counseling as a result of his inability to recollect the fondling incident. The family is
A glaring question raised from the inspection of institutional rules on arbitration is whether privacy and confidentiality are different or not. To answer this very question, a crucial distinction should be made between both the terms. They have been presumed to be the core principles of any arbitral proceedings; this does not mean these two different concepts are implied to be one and the same thing. In fact they are corollaries to each other, since the reason of privacy is the concern for confidentiality. Privacy will be meaningless without confidentiality. Various scholars have made quite a number of distinctions as to what is exactly the concept of privacy and confidentiality.
This report explores Breaching Trust in Medicine and more specifically Doctor-Patient Confidentiality. We will discuss the parameters of confidentiality in medical practice, including how it is defined and why it is essential for the both the heath of the patient and the public health. We will evaluate how breaches of confidentiality are regulated, looking at particular cases as well as the circumstances where doctors can divulge patient information.
There are a number of problems that present in modern practice that can significantly affect or compromise confidential client information. Primarily, these types of problems are usually categorized as belonging into one of two areas of violation that provide unauthorized access to confidential information. The first area of disturbance of confidentiality occurs when the professional boundaries of the client-therapist relationship are breached, such as when practitioners partake in multiple relationships or decide to access public information about a patient online.
Following a placement with a private and charity funded organisation located in Wales, this essay aims to discuss the main national policies that focus on maintaing patient confidentiality and consider how these policies are implemented locally in relation to the placement undertaken.
This concept was taken from module 3"ethical principles", sub topic 3" confidentiality, equality and fairness".
According to Stanford & Connor (2014), as quoted by Hillary Clinton, “In almost every profession-whether it is law or journalism, finance or medicine or academia or running a small business- people rely on confidential communications to do their jobs. We count on the space of trust that confidentiality provides. When someone breaches that trust, we are all worse off for it (p.59).
The similarity between confidentiality, privilege information, anonymity, and protected health information is small when comparing their differences. Although they all protect clients in some extent, they are distinct from one another regarding their boundaries. Confidentiality focuses on protecting information shared between a client and social worker. To keep confidentiality between a social worker and clients, the social worker must keep the information away from the media, and away from court unless they must report it under law. Privilege information is any information that cannot be disclose, and cannot be part of a testimony in court. Anonymity is when the clients’ identity is kept a secret. Protected health information is any information
Nurses are faced with countless ethical issues in carrying out their professional responsibilities, like compassion, consent and safeguarding just to mention a few; this essay will explore the importance of confidentiality in relation to Mental Health and Child Nursing incorporating aspects of diversity.
Mediation is essential in the workplace because it affords an opportunity for employees in dispute to communicate their position as well as consider the perspective of the other party ("Mediation in the Workplace – A Proactive Approach to Preventing Litigation and Promoting a Healthier Work Environment," 2011). The mediation process helps improve employee engagement and reduce the number of issues referred to a higher authority. The Employment Practices website (http://www.epspros.com/news-resources/whitepapers/2013-prior/mediation-in-the-workplace.html) provides useful information about the importance of mediation in the
Poitras, J. (2009). What Makes Parties Trust Mediators? Negotiation Journal, 25(3), 307-325. Retrieved January 22, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1823235871).
The Data collected may be passed onto interested parties but this must be only the appropriate information. Schools hold lots of information about pupils, staff and parents. Confidentiality A key component for relationship building and sustaining relationships is confidentiality. Confidentiality in any workplace is of utmost importance. It is an important right for every individual.
Although functions of mediators and arbitrators have several characteristics in common, there are significant instrumental differences that make them distinct from one another. Firstly, whereas the arbitration process is similar to litigation in its adversarial nature, in which parties have the objective to win the dispute, the fundamental goal of mediation is to bring the disputants to settlement through compromise and cooperation without finding a guilty party. In arbitration, parties compete against each other in “win-lose” situation. During mediation, parties work on mutually acceptable conditions with the assistance of a facilitator. In this process, mediators do not have power to make decisions, they work to reconcile the competing needs and interests of involved parties. The mediator’s tasks are to assist disputants to identify, understand, and articulate their needs and interests to each other (Christopher W. Moore,
Mediation is a way to solve a dispute without having to resort to court procedure which sometimes could turned out to be rigid, formal and time consuming especially when it needed a lot of paperwork and the possibility of adjournment which could consume years. Besides that, unlike in court, mediator as a third impartial party did not acted as a judge who decides on the resolution however, the mediator will help the parties to explore the needs and issue which before preventing them from achieving a mutual resolution and settlement. The mediation process gave the authority towards the parties to agree with each other and open up the chance for the parties to meet with a resolution at the end of the mediation session.