Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Status of women in medieval and renaissance
Women’s roles in the 16th century
Status of women in medieval and renaissance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Status of women in medieval and renaissance
Christine de Pizan is a woman who experienced multiple societal roles throughout the late Medieval and Renaissance time period. She made a living from her writing concerning the debate over misogyny. Pizan’s handbook The Treasure of the City of Ladies serves as a behavior manual for women during the medieval era of harsh realities (Dufrense, 1995). Women are seen as inferior to men, with limited roles such as mothers, daughters, wives, nuns, or prostitutes (Dufrense, 1995). Hierarchies of society are divided into three classes: clergy, nobility, and peasantry. Pizan educated all women of this time, from those with power and authority to the poorest peasant women (Dufrense, 1995). The same societal concerns can be applied to influential women today, specifically Hillary Clinton’s behavior in the media following her email scandal. A comparative analysis of Pizan’s behavioral guidelines to Hilary Clinton’s actions will determine if wealthy women of the 21st century are still following the advice from The Treasure of the City of Ladies. Christine de Pizan’s early life influences her behavioral theories concerning women. She was born in Venice in 1363, and followed her farther to France where she received education and experienced royalty due to his physician consulting skills for King Charles V of …show more content…
France (Dufrense, 1995). Her continuous dedication to intellectual pursuits enabled and inspired her to educate women on how to behave and live life based upon their status in society (Dufrense, 1995). The Treasure of the City of Ladies was one of the first pieces of women’s rhetoric.
Her vision of a “feminine college” included three allegorical daughters of God—Reason, Rectitude, and Justice who “represent the Three Virtues most important to a women’s success”(Redfern, 1995, 74). Pizan does not consider herself a rhetorician, nor does she label her work as rhetoric, but “her instruction from the book provides the empowerment of women’s speech in both private and public matters” (Redfern, 1995, 74). From Pizan’s work, “her most important lesson is that women’s success depends on their ability to manage and mediate by speaking and writing effectively”(Redfern, 1995,
74). Pizan’s female figures display her knowledge of previous communication theorist, such as Plato and Aristotle. Pizan expresses concern for the importance of communication skills, especially among noble women. For example, in her book, the female character of Reason reassures that “God endowed women with the facility of speech”(Redfern, 1995, 81), and through Rectitude honorable women are “to say and uphold the truth”(Redfern, 1995, 81). Pizan also comments on the importance of achieving success through men, “even in roles subordinate to men’s, women could increase their strength and influence by attending carefully to the cause, appearance, and consequence of each interactive behavior”(Redfern, 1995, 88). Noble women obtaining professional relationships with men for advantageous purpose is still valued today. Pizan also focuses on women attaining the vital skill of peacemaking, “and so this lady will be…an advocate and mediator between the prince and her husband and her people”(Redfren, 1995, 86). She believes that women of higher class “must know the right things to say so that lower class visitors feel comfortable in her home”(Redfern, 1995, 90). Pizan emphasizes the importance of women speaking the truth, for example, “In truth they are good manners and behavior. And what is the use of these good manners and behavior? They perfect the noble person and cause her to be well regarded”(Redfern, 1995, 87)”. Pizan believed truth and discourse should be a part of every woman’s moral existence. From her perspective, “it is more important to speak the truth than with a persuasive eloquence”(Redfern, 1995, 87). Christine de Pizan’s behavioral manual can still be applied to noble women of today’s society, such as Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton was elected to the U.S Senate in 2001, and she became the only American First Lady to hold national office. In 2009, President Obama appointed her to Secretary of State, and in 2015 she announced her plans to run again for the U.S presidency. Similar to Pizan’s guidelines, Hillary’s marriage to former President Bill Clinton allows her to achieve immeasurable accomplishments as a woman. In 1998, she was engulfed with the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, but chose to stand by her husband, while her private life was continuously investigated and shared with the public—another direct correlation to Pizan’s concerns for women’s private affairs becoming public. However, Hillary is currently embroiled in controversy pertaining to her use of a private email system while she was Secretary of State. The email scandal raises various issues concerning national security, but according to the Wall Street Journal, Clinton’s response is “it was for convenience, I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and my personal emails instead of two”(Strassel, 2015, para 2). Clinton continues to avoid the truth by stating, “there is no classified material,” when 400 of the emails handed over contained classified information. She also publically stated, “[the sever] had numerous safeguards. It was one property guarded by the Secret Service”(Strassel, 2015, para 4), when there is evidence of her server being attacked at least five times from hackers in Russia. One of Pizan’s focuses regarding noble women is their ability to speak the truth versus the use of persuasion. In this case, Hillary Clinton does not speak the truth on multiple accounts throughout the email scandal in attempt to maintain her reputation and image. The concept of women’s roles has immensely improved since the medieval era, however women holding political positions still deal with some of the same challenges, for example creditability. It is apparent in Clinton’s previous years of her life, she was within Pizan’s guidelines of trying to make peace with other countries, or welcoming people into the White House while she was the First Lady. The demand to deceive the public in the email scandal ultimately hurts Hillary’s ethos. Hillary failed Pizan’s behavioral manual due to deceiving people she represents, which causes her to be “not well regarded” in Pizan’s perspective. If Hillary had followed Pizan’s advice to speak the truth, rather than persuade, she would be in a more successful position during her campaign to be the first female president of the United States.
Using Feminist criticism to analyze the discourse surrounding and as well as by the speaker, Monica, I aim to reveal how women's place in society led by the Feminist's has changed due the sex scandal and where it maybe headed next. In looking at this aspect of the scandal it becomes crucial not just to analyze the discourse of Feminists and Monica but to find it in a larger scheme of a society which shapes many of the gender roles and pressures put on individuals to look and act in certain ways. There is an evident change in the role of women in American society that has occurred as a result of the scandal which is important not just to the Feminists and their supporters but to any female who enters the public arena and is faced with pressures and expectations put on them as a result of their gender.
Traditional female characteristics and female unrest are underscored in literary works of the Middle Ages. Although patriarchal views were firmly established back then, traces of female contempt for such beliefs could be found in several popular literary works. Female characters’ opposition to societal norms serves to create humor and wish- fulfillment for female and male audiences to enjoy. “Lanval” by Marie De France and “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” by Geoffrey Chaucer both show subversion of patriarchal attitudes by displaying the women in the text as superior or equal to the men. However, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” also incorporates conventional societal ideas by including degradation of women and mistreatment of a wife by her husband.
Caroline Walker Bynum raised several thought-provoking claims in her book Holy Feast and Holy Fast, but her main argument of the mindset of medieval women with regards to their status in society was the most intriguing. Rather than simply agreeing with most traditional medievalists, she analyzes the male/female difference in terms of which symbols each gender used, and how these symbols tied in to their distinct religious concerns. She maintains that women accepted their place in society and religion, and instead of succumbing to the misogyny, they used their association with the flesh and humanness to connect themselves to the humanity of God. Her arguments regarding medieval women and their practices also implies that she is accepting of the idea of gender as a valuable category of historical analysis.
Looking back through many historical time periods, people are able to observe the fact that women were generally discriminated against and oppressed in almost any society. However, these periods also came with women that defied the stereotype of their sex. They spoke out against this discrimination with a great amount of intelligence and strength with almost no fear of the harsh consequences that could be laid out by the men of their time. During the Medieval era, religion played a major role in the shaping of this pessimistic viewpoint about women. The common belief of the patriarchal-based society was that women were direct descendants of Eve from The Bible; therefore, they were responsible for the fall of mankind. All of Eve’s characteristics from the biblical story were believed to be the same traits of medieval women. Of course, this did not come without argument. Two medieval women worked to defy the female stereotype, the first being the fictional character called The Wife of Bath from Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. The second woman, named Margery Kempe, was a real human being with the first English autobiography written about her called The Book of Margery Kempe. In these two texts, The Wife of Bath and Margery Kempe choose to act uniquely compared to other Christians in the medieval time period because of the way religion is interpreted by them. As a result, the women view themselves as having power and qualities that normal women of their society did not.
Naivety as well as the longing to fit into society with a loving man and stable, well-to-do peasant family deceived an honorable woman. Bertrande de Rols’ young marriage had difficulties from the start. With the guidance from family, the Catholic Church and Basque customs, Bertrande attempted to follow the sixteenth-century expectations for women, but was misled by her own fear, loneliness and catastrophic past.
4. Judith L. Kellogg, “Le Livre de la cite des dames: Reconfiguring Knowledge and Reimagining Gendered Space” in Christine de Pizan: A Casebook edited by Barbra K. Altman and Deborah L. McGrady, New York: Routledge, 2003.
de Pizan, Christine. “The Book of the City of Ladies”. The Norton Anthology: World Literature. Volume B. 3rd Edition. Ed. Rosalind Brown-Grant trans. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 781-807. Print.
Men are to represent both the man and the women in the social realm and are the “breadwinners” and women are to be the domestic housewives. This difference in roles is especially prevalent in Thucydides’s text. He asserts that citizenship in Athens was closely tied to the honor of battle and the political sphere. Citizens were expected to be active in the social and political sphere, as well as die with honor in battle. Because women could not defend themselves and represent themselves, they could not obtain citizenship, and it is precisely because they did not have citizenship that they could not represent themselves. This allowed for men to look down on women because they could not perform the civic duty that they were not even allowed to do. Therefore, there was this confusing cycle that women were trapped in. Christine de Pizan, however, challenges this notion that women have no say in the social sphere. She does this personally in her life when she manages her own land, and writes her own books. Again, her case is extremely rare in that influence and background as the wife of a nobleman allowed for this. Her education also was a great asset and in normal circumstances, had she been a woman with no social standing, this would not have been possible. Pizan also challenges the cultural role set in place; she is on one hand, still a mother who takes care of her children, but on the other hand she is also the “breadwinner” of the house. It is precisely because she is able to do both of these things, that she is able to stress the equality of both genders in both spheres of
Robin, Diana, Anne B. Larsen, and Carole Evans, eds. Encyclopedia of Women in the Renaissance: Italy, France and England. Santa Barbara: Abc Clio, 2007.
Throughout the texts we have read in English thus far have been feminist issues. Such issues range from how the author published the book to direct, open statements concerning feminist matters. The different ways to present feminist issues is even directly spoken of in one of the essays we read and discussed. The less obvious of these feminist critiques is found buried within the texts, however, and must be read carefully to understand their full meaning- or to even see them.
While neither Machiavelli’s The Prince nor Shakespeare’s Henry V focus explicitly on gender roles, they both make assumptions and implications sufficient to illustrate their opinions about the nature and place of women in relation to men. In Machiavelli’s The Prince, men and women are depicted in traditional gender roles with women as tricky and unreliable, but ultimately yielding to men who are portrayed as tough and immovable. Shakespeare’s Henry V acknowledges these ideas, but also portrays women as able to influence events within the small domain they are given.
Much discrimination and misogyny still permeate our social stratosphere, but while reading written words one cannot help but to be placed in the author’s shoes, and therefore accept their words as our own. Cain writes, “Many of the texts written by women during this time reflect the idea that there are natural differences between the sexes. Usually a female narrator…privately addresses a mainly female audience about issues that might seem mainly to concern women” (825). Because the text is written in a female voice, the reading adapts themselves to that voice, and gives credit to the
The woman of the Middle Ages tended to be pawns of men in religion, politics and economics (Gies). "Although a woman could
The question of women’s agency, in moving history holds a long history dating back to the ancients, then turning away from that in small degrees during the Renaissance. Most notable in this change comes from the capital of education, the Italianate states. Home to rife differences in attitudes towards women, it also hosts the origins of the discussion around women’s purpose. The current field largely finds inspiration from writers during the American 1970s women’s rights movement, and it shows in the modern origins and their influence. However, the field’s creation date loom farther back than such a recent movement, easily dating back to Plato and Aristotle. Beginning with a negative view of the female sex as inferiority, the study of women and their rights progressed to Giovanni Boccaccio’s creation of female biography in 1374, and further developed with a female voice in 1405 under the pen of Christine de Pizan. Clearly, none of the prestigious scholars could have predicted the alterations and growth of the discussion surrounding a people group often considered subhuman.
eastwood, kay. women and girls in the middle ages. 305.4. manhattan: crabtree publishing company, 2004. Print.