Chapter # 2 Literature Review
a. Transactional Leadership
As per chronicles foundational stone of transactional leadership was laid upon leader-member exchange leadership theory. According to Pastor and Mayo (2008) through leader-follower exchange transactional leadership can be identified. It shows that benefits, incentives, perquisites and rewards are provided only on one condition when employees work in accordance with organizational objectives, values, norms, culture and give their required effort. Odom and Green (2003) proposed that transactional leadership mostly ponders on the central content. In other words, transactional leaders focus more on meeting desired results through organizational processes which includes reward practices, implementation of organizational strategies, plans and workflow procedures (Sarros and Santora, 2001). But this doesn’t mean that transactional leaders cannot adapt a moral mindset.
Kanungo (2001) deduced that transactional leaders believe that the means are only proved by the ends. In other words, transactional leaders can adopt a machiavelian belief of an organizational life. If we analyze the primary rules and standards of leadership elaborated in Machiavelli’s “The Prince” in critical manner it would be surprising to believe that they have no relation with the method by which transactional leadership is vastly defined. Necessarily transactional leaders doesn’t consider people as a meaningful vessels. Otherwise, some type of debauchery can be rendered by any of leader-member exchange.
Aronson (2001) describes that in several ways moral leadership can be ascertained. He asserted that in reality utilitarian beliefs are articulated by transactional leaders. Kanungo (2001) concludes tha...
... middle of paper ...
...on”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1442-1465.
The role of managerial values and goal orientation”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 340-58. transformational leadership”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 9-16. vision”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 19-31.
Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 115-34.
Walumbwa, O.F. (2002), “The relationships between leadership styles, cultural orientation, wards”, Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 2 No. 5, pp. 225-34.
Waveland, Illinois.
Westley, F. and Mintzberg, H. (1989), “Visionary leadership and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 17-32.
Wheatley, M.J. (2002), Turning to One Another: Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the
Yukl, G. (2006), Leadership in Organizations, 6th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Jay, J. (2012). Strategic Leadership Review, Volume 2, Issue 1. In Scholasticahq. Retrieved Janurary 26, 2013, from https://scholasticahq.com/supporting_files/397/attachment_versions/394.
Carter also utilized some older leadership style approaches, one being transactional. Transactional leadership focuses on the exchanges that occur between leaders and followers and at various points, his leadership could not be any more blunt at times (Northouse, 2015). Carter exchanged the ability to play with signing and obeying the contract, when the contracts were broken, he took away the ability to play. He again provided another transaction by making the grades improve to bring back the team and opportunities for the team to play, win games and tournaments.
Borkowski (2015) distinguished between transactional leadership and transformational leadership by explaining that: transactional leadership is directed toward task accomplishment and the maintenance of good relations between the leader and subordinates throw consideration of performance and reward. And, Transformational leadership, contrasting transactional leadership, is directed toward the influence and management of institutional change and innovation through revitalization and
In Leadership Theory, Application & Skill Development, transformational leadership is defined as “seeking to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and presenting a compelling vision of what a new organization could be” (Lussier & Achua, 2013, p.331). This theory, in combination with the exercise regimen, CrossFit, is the focus of the book Transformational Leadership and High-Intensity Interval Training by Carol R. Himelhoch, PhD. Himelhoch illustrates a correlation between a leader’s ability to tap into the transformational leadership style and their consistent participation in intense workout sessions. A transformational leadership style benefits from High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) via challenging the participant, which imparts a sense of achievement when they complete a demanding Workout of the Day (WOD). HIIT encourages the individual to push themselves and take risks, not only during the workout, but also in their leadership roles at work.
Growing up in a rough neighborhood, positive role models were not present in my everyday life. Fortunately, I created a personal understanding of what it took to be a true leader when Marcelo Neveleff became my coach. Coach Marcelo was my club soccer coach throughout my teenage years, and Marcelo demonstrated three key tenets that made me realize what it took to be a great leader. From his guidance and inspiration, I have drawn that in order to become a successful leader, I must be goal oriented through determination within myself by leading from the front. This reflects that there is a specific goal that I, as a leader, must be willing to reach that will inspire others to do the same. To become a successful leader, I must also be empathetic
"Developing a Philosophy of Leadership." . Leadership Paradigms Inc., n.d. Web. 12 Nov 2013. .
The behavioral approaches of leadership are consisted of four parts and they are: task-oriented, relational-oriented, change-oriented, and passive behaviors leadership (Derure, 2011). Task-oriented is divided into four part and they are: initiating structure, contingent reward, management by exception-active, boundary spanning, and directive (Derure, 2011). The initiating structure of task-oriented can be built of group members, coordinating group, and determining standard of task performance to ensure that the task is perform (Derure, 2011).The transactional leader can be referred to the contingent reward because it is made clear to leader what task to perform and the rewards for meeting those expectations (Derure,
Theory of transformational leadership is founded on the notion that conditions of injustice spark the need for social change (Bass, 1996). Transformational leadership is characterized by behaviors that are geared toward relational aspects of the organization (Goodnow & Wayman, 2009). Transformational leaders intrinsically motivate followers to function as a collective to achieve a common aim (Bass, 1996). This model of transformational leadership provides a set of leadership practices that are linked to the key elements of Burns’s theory and builds on the work of Bass and Avolio. In his work he elaborated the difference between the uses of transactional leadership compared to transformational leadership. Leadership styles can be used
The Competing Values Framework is originated by Quinn and Rohrbaugh. It emphasizes the organizational problems and choices faced by managers. The framework is divided into various managerial roles corresponding situations, as well as specific organizational environments. For instance, the facilitator and mentor roles rely on cohesion and morale to bring about human resource development within the organization. While the innovator and broker roles rely on flexibility and readiness in order to receive the growth and resource needed to perform an effective organization. The director and producer roles are more applicable for planning and goal setting skills and will result in productivity and efficiency. The monitor and coordinator roles are intended to managing information and communicating. The framework can also be divided into two main roles. The first four mentioned above are the transformational roles, and the last four are the transactional roles (Belasen, 1996). The transformational roles are more aimed toward making changes and developments, while the transactional roles have strong emphasizes on managerial authorities. The key to becoming a master manager is to be a successful manager who is able to perform each role in order to cope with all difficulties being faced as a manager (Quinn, 1988). A successful manager is also someone who is perceived by others as performing all of the eight roles more frequent than a normal manager and recognizes each of its importance thoroughly (Denison, 1995). A study by Bono (2004) also shows that giving importance to any specific working environment, such as rational goal model, may lower the effectiveness of other areas. Denison and Spreitzer (1991) stated that when a manager does not gi...
Transactional leaders, focus on the proper exchange of resources. The transactional leader gives followers something they want in exchange for something the leader wants. Transactional leadership is considered more commonplace than is transformational leadership (Judge & Piccollo, 2007). A transactional leader is one with difficult standards or benchmarks who is often uninterested in other people’s opinions. It is an effective style to achieve operational goals and outcomes. Quite beneficial for creating business opportunities that thrives in an era of global competition (Stone, 2013). Bezos is task oriented, he micromanages his staff and is not often interested in others opinions; his leadership style incorporates many traits of a transactional
Certainly, an army would not be able to battle in the war without a commander who in charges of the whole strategy. Correspondingly, any organisations cannot function without leaders. Leader is the most substantial element of successful organizations. Becoming outstanding leaders, leadership skill is vital in order to drive the organizations forward. Several leadership principles are extensively used these days. Burns (1978) identified two types of leadership comprise of transactional and transformational leadership. Hence, leaders should be capable to indicate which theory should be applied in accordance with organization’s culture and objectives. This essay aims to evaluate the resemblances and the differences between transactional and transformational leadership as well as the feasibility to utilize a mixture of them by giving the definitions and examples followed by the supporting researches and studies.
). Burke et al (2006) suggested that transactional leadership, based on contingent rewards, can have a positive effect on followers' satisfaction and performance. However, a transactional leader focuses on management tasks, and will not identify shared values of a team. By contrast, transformational leaders inspire others with their vision and work together with their team to identify common values (Marquis and Huston 2009). The transactional approach is task-orientated and can be effective when meeting deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on the task they need to complete, rather than the patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).
This method implies that leaders and follower have combine motives that can be beneficial to both parties. When theses task are assigned, there is a designed reward or punishment for the followers. This method of leadership can also be associated with managing in a sense. Transactional leadership in a sense is like management in that it does not look to inspire or promote change, it is in fact more about ensuring a particular process, and procedure meets the desired results.
The transaction leader differs approach differs from the transformational leader. In general it is motivated by a change taking place. According to McLaurin and Almiri, transactional leadership is a bargaining exchange process between the leader and the follower, lead to the expected or planned outcomes, focus on maintaining the status quo, does not consider the needs of the followers on an individual basis, and the flow of power is more stable than the transformational leader.
The old system of management has undergone many changes within the last century. An employee once performed the assigned job duties during the allotted hours and then went home. Now employees are encouraged to grow, give input, and to contribute for the good of the organization. There is a plethora of information for leaders to learn why and how to grow personally thus allowing the organization to grow as well. This new emerging leader is a transformational leader.