Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of religion on moral values
Moral dilemmas
Essays over ethical dilemmas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of religion on moral values
As the ship sank, people gathered around to secure their safety in the only boat that remained. But the problem was that the boat could only hold 50 people. With the weight that was currently added of 25 people more, the boat could easily give off and shatter. With that to worry, there was still the issue of the 100 remaining passengers that were in the open water, and by all counts there is a total of 125 people who will die tonight. The big question is who will be saved? The young, elderly, rich or poor? Since the people all agreed upon the decision of making me the head leader due to my courage, intelligence, and experience in ethics they have decided for me to point out who stays and who leaves. Since I have short time on my hand, …show more content…
As of now there is already an excess of people on the boat and more trying to get on it. Fear is a great feeling that overwhelms us at our most critical time. In this case fear has taken over the passenger’s actions in which they fight over each other in order to be able to get on. As things have calmed down a bit and with the power that has been given to me by these humble people I know face the most challenging and drastic decision making that I have ever faced. Now I gather the attention of the people and make my …show more content…
God literally defines what’s right or wrong. But through this process it might involve some complications as the book states, “If God willed murder, theft, or torture, these deeds would be morally right. (Lewis V. Page 11) Through this standpoint it’s quiet difficult to decide. Mainly because people follow the belief that God is a good being which will never command us to commit heinous acts. Following the divine command theory, we must do actions which will be an action of goodness even if it sometimes creates and negative outcome. In this case a person following this theory would save the children and mothers, then educated people. The outcome of goodness surpasses that of badness. Now on the case of someone following the Egoism theory is somewhat similar to the divine command theory, in the case of choosing. The direct definition of Egoism stated by the book defines that a right action must advance one’s own best interests. This theory is provocative doctrine, because it forces us to consider two opposing attitudes in ourselves. On one hand we tend to view selfish or flagrantly self-interested behavior as wicked. And on the other hand we tend to give priorities to our own needs and desires. (Lewis V., Page
A coast guard helicopter is responding to two mayday calls by two different ships that are sinking in the Pacific Ocean within a mile of each other. One ship carries a middle aged man, his wife and their two children under the age of ten. The other ship contains five middle aged men. The coast guard helicopter has the capacity to hold five survivors and the helicopter is equally likely to save either ship because it is an equal distance from each incident, but it only has enough fuel to make one trip. Which ship should the coast guard rescue?
"If we do let an extra 10 people in our lifeboat, we will have lost our 'safety
Everyone needs to listen to what people have to say because it can really make a difference. The captain in “Wreck of the Hesperus” does not listen to the sailors concern about the ...
These are examples within the essay that do not get much explanation and leaves some readers confused for a bit. When he speaks of the safety factor of the boat and explains how if the space goes unused from others than they can use it as storage space or other things, what are those other items going to be? Are there other resources in the boat? If so, would that not take up room for those other ten people to get in? We know what the carrying capacity is as far as people for the lifeboat, but is there a weight factor to it also? Everyone on that boat is not the same age. Some would die soon because of several different reasons (age, food, resources, etc.). As far as other parties boarding the boat it should be the ones left in the water, “…we shall have to be constantly on guard against other boarding parties” (291). If the other boarding parties are from other boats, they should not have a reason to join other boats unless they are after more resources because they ran through theirs so
Macbeth, Brutus from Julius Ceasar, John Proctor from The Crucible, Hercules, Sirius Black from Harry Potter, and Spiderman all have a common fate, they are all tragic heroes. A tragic hero is a great or virtuous character in a dramatic tragedy who is destined for downfall, suffering, or defeat. Every hero has a downfall and a purpose; typically it is for the greater good for everyone else. In The Oedipus Plays of Sophocles, there are two characters that could be defined as tragic heroes, they are Antigone and Creon. Bounteous people do not envisage Antigone as a tragic hero, these people believe she was crazy, had no purpose, and did not help the kingdom. Although, countless people do not comprehend that she actually did save the citizens of Thebas, and tried to help Creon.
Psychological Egoism is a claim that one’s own welfare is the governing aim that guides us in every action. This would mean that every action and decisions humans make come with an intention for self-benefit, and personal gain. The fundamental idea behind psychological egoism is that our self-interest is the one motive that governs human beings. This idea may be so deep within our morals and thought process that although one may not think selfishly, the intention of their action is representing to a degree of personal gains.
A tragic hero is defined as a person of high social rank, who has a tragic flaw or flaws that lead to their downfall. These heroes’ downfalls are usually either complete ruin or death. Tragic heroes face their downfall with courage and dignity. While many characters in Julius Caesar could fit these conditions, the person who fits the role of a tragic hero the best is Marcus Brutus. Brutus develops into a tragic hero throughout the play, and this is shown though his qualifications of a tragic hero, his high status, his tragic flaws, and his courage in the face of his death.
• Once more, the ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest. Ethical egoism as diametrically opposite of ethical altruism which obliges a moral agent to assist the other first, even if sacrifices own interest. Also, ethical egoism differs from both rational and psychological egoism in ‘defending’ doctrine which considers all actions with contributive beneficial effects for an acting individual
Psychological egoism, a descriptive claim about human nature, states that humans by nature are motivated only by self-interest. To act in one's self-interest is to act mainly for one's own good and loving what is one's own (i.e. ego, body, family, house, belongings in general). It means to give one's own interests higher priority then others'. "It (psychological egoism) claims that we cannot do other than act from self-interest motivation, so that altruism-the theory that we can and should sometimes act in favor of others' interests-is simply invalid because it's impossible" (Pojman 85). According to psychological egoists, any act no matter how altruistic it might seem, is actually motivated by some selfish desire of the agent (i.e., desire for reward, avoidance of guilt, personal happiness).
...held him in the sea that swirled him out and safely over the boat to water in which he could touch. The surviving men were thankful to have survived, but learned that they really had no control over their lives. One of the most important lessons the correspondent took from the experience was, “… that “in the ignorance of the grave-edge” every man is in the same boat, which is not much more substantial than the ten-foot open dinghy on a rough sea” (Buitenhuis, web). Having survived the experience the cook, the correspondent, and the captain each believed that they could be interpreters for the sea. Crane gave each man a voice in “The Open Boat” that is uniquely theirs, but at the same time shared a common bond and struggle with nature for survival. It is up to each man (mankind) to find our own place in the universe and be open to the lessons that life can teach us.
In 1842 a tragedy occurred when a ship struck an iceberg and more than thirty passengers piled onto a rescue boat that was meant to hold a maximum of seven people. As a storm became evident and water rushed into the lifeboat, it was clear that in order for anyone to survive the load would need to be lightened. The commanding captain suggested that some people would need to be thrown overboard in order for anyone to survive. There was a great argument on the boat between the captain and the passengers who opposed his decision. Some suggested that the weakest should be drowned, as miles of rowing the lifeboat would take toll on even the strongest. This reasoning would also make it absurd to draw names of who should be thrown over. Others suggested that if they all stayed onboard no one would be responsible for the deaths, although the captain argued he would be guilty if those who he could have saved perished in the process. Alternatively the captain decided that the weakest would be sacrificed in order to save the few left on the lifeboat. Days later the survivors were rescued and the captain was put on trial for his virtues.
A tale of duplicity and impetuosity, William Shakespeare’s play Othello brings to life a cast of complex characters. The leading character, Othello, whose undoing the piece recounts, proves to be the quintessential tragic hero by fulfilling all required elements necessary to be labeled as such. Aristotle defines a tragic hero as one of a noble stature who experiences misfortune and commits a culpable act as a result of his own free will; however, the misfortune is neither entirely deserved nor does it result in an absolute loss, as the hero experiences an awakening to the disagreeable facts while accepting defeat (Arp and Johnson). Othello, a vanguard of his day, is beguiled by a confidant and ensnared by the lies that ensue. This causes Othello great mental anguish. He is plagued with the question: Is his love unfaithful, or does she remain true? Eventually, unable to discern fact from fiction, Othello repudiates his bride and their recent marriage. Misplaced trust and a jealous heart soon cause Othello to lose his composure, his dignity, his most loyal counterpart, and ultimately his life.
A leader and a fatherly figure, the Captain serves as the men's compass and keeper of order. His firm navigational commands and calm demeanor make the men a “ready-to-obey ship's company” regardless of their lack of practical experience. Ironically, the Captain is also the most physically useless man on board. Injured from the sinking, the Captain is filled with a quiet despair over his own ability to survive. A hardened seaman, he believes in the idea that a captain should perish with his ship -- to live at sea and to die at sea. The Captain even clings to the dinghy upon being rescued as if he feels a sense of obligation to remain with his boat in the briny deep. Though distraught over the fate of his ship and crewman, the Captain takes solace in providing for the dinghy’s survivors. Occupied with the well-being of others, the Captain does not contemplate his purpose or circumstances in life; he uses his energy to protect his crew and vessel, finding a renewed sense of meaning in this lesser form of leadership. Even when a callous seagull attempts to nip his open wounds, the Captain gently waves the bird away, respecting its life. The Cook on the other hand, attempts to swat it with an
Egoism is the act of pursuing a particular course of action that is driven by 'sel...
The chief officer was facilitating the crew members that were to muster on a deck and the second engineer had mustered in the engine control room. A possibility of abandoning ship by bringing their immersion suits; assuring him that all members were safe and sound. He even had the foresight to not to seek shelter because turning the ship around alone would bring some variations when there are rapid waves present. Only when weather conditions slightly improved did the master decide to repeal the mustering. He even gave the effort to remain on the bridge for the rest of the day and only took rest on the 16th. As far as I am concerned this alone shows he did that entire he could do with the given situation. There is also the mistake that the predicted forecast provided to him was not completely accurate, that may not have been the intention of those that provided this information as weather forecasts do not give a complete guarantee as to what may come to occur when on voyage. There is also an issue regarding the state of what was used to contain the