Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
1. According to the Self-Serving Attribution theory, how will Tina explain the situation if she wins? Will she make an internal or external attribution?
According to self-serving attribution theory states that people typically take credit for successes by making internal attributions. In contrast, they blame situations (external attribution) for failures (Aronson, et al., 2016). If Tina were to win against Phil she would most likely make an internal attribution. She would associate her winning with her skill as a bowler.
2. According to the Self-Serving Attribution theory, how will Tina explain the situation if she loses? Will she make an internal or external attribution?
On the other hand, if Tina were to lose against Phil she would
…show more content…
Therefore, Tina could explain dropping his ball and breaking his little toe as justice for him taunting her. Due to his negative behavior (taunting her) he was punished by breaking his little toe.
4. According to your textbook, what are the three reasons people make self-serving attributions and how does each reason apply to this situation?
One reason people make self-serving attributions to preserve self-esteem, the second is to present ourselves positively towards others and the third is based upon personal knowledge about past performances (Aronson, et al., 2016). In the scenario above Tina would use a self-serving attribution to preserve her self-esteem because she feels like she is a good bowler. The second would be to present herself positively to the other bowlers. She would want them to also recognize she is a good bowler and if she were to lose would want them to assume it was due to circumstances. The final reason Tina would use self-serving attribution would be based upon her knowledge of her past games. Tina has experience as being a good bowler so if she were to lose this time, despite prior wins, she would assume an external factor resulted in her
This upsets her mother and causes a public disturbance more humiliating to Waverly than receiving unwarranted praise, reinforcing that an act of concession is the most effective way to triumph in the struggle to win. In short, Tan presents several conflicts that investigate the factors in win-lose situations, each conflict reiterating the notion that one
on page 3 which demonstrates he tends to drink a bit too much. But he
Self-serving bias, described in module four, is defined as the tendency to perceive oneself favorably. The story begins with an example of this, “Although his was an extremely slight case;” the readers don’t actually know if Giovanni Corte is an extremely slight case
I think this practice is best exemplified when people are stuck in agitated/unsettled states. For example, when there’s a long line at the bank and a specific person is taking a long time with one of the tellers. Someone in line who is late for work might begin to project the negative aspects of his/her situation towards the person holding up the line, who is unintentionally making him or her even more late. The person working with the teller likely has no intention on making the person in line late, however it is easier to blame others for our situation rather than to accept personal responsibility. I see it more as way to push our own problems on
The self-serving bias is the tendency for an athlete to accommodate to factors that paint the athlete in a favorable light. In the athletic realm, individuals portray the self-serving bias to foster future, effective performance in a sport. Whereas an athlete will attribute positive events to the doing of themselves, an athlete will attribute negative events to the doing of others. Although an individual may be inaccurate when imputing a factor, the self-serving bias is a method by which an individual safeguards esteem. It is this protection of esteem that is paralleled in the attribution theory. For instance, an athlete uses the self-serving bias to attribute success as a byproduct of the team. On the other hand, the athlete uses the self-serving
Scapegoating is a better way to experience success. Margaret Atwood speaks the truth when she states “When societies come under stress these kinds of things happen. People start looking around for essentially human sacrifices. They start looking around for somebody to blame.” In “Half- Hanged Mary” by ……. they used Mary as a scapegoat by blaming everything on her which lead to her hanging. Therefore I defend Margaret Atwood that a world under stress will eventually lead to people being demolished so they can feel better about themselves.
Thought processes can greatly influence people's social interactions, and the way that they live their lives. Cognitions develop how people perceive themselves and others on a daily basis. It is important to investigate how people attribute actions and behaviors exhibited, not only by themselves, but also those around them. These attributions shape the way an observer feels and reacts to others, and how people feel about themselves due to their own actions. The correspondence bias (fundamental attribution error) and the self-serving bias are two errors made in attribution by virtually every human being (Baron & Byrne, 2000). Both of these biases can be shown not only in adults, but also children (Guern, 1999). Even sport spectators display these biases when watching their favorite teams (Wann & Schrader, 2000). When the self-serving bias is absent in people's cognitions, they will show the self-defeating attributions. It is important to study people that demonstrate self-defeating attributions, because these individuals also show symptoms of depression (Wall & Hayes, 2000). Clearly, attributions are an imperative aspect of social cognition. Attributional bias is discussed by Marie Beesley. It is also important to investigate the factors that affect people's judgment biases in decision making and reasoning skills, which is explored by Amanda Wheeler. Because these two processes are so vital to the way in which people perceive themselves and others, and to the way a person chooses to behave, it is important to understand the factors that can cause inaccurate judgments. Judgment biases affect the way people form conclusions and make attributions about others, as well as abou...
One social psychological perspective depicted throughout Easy A is the attribution of the Actor-Observer Difference. This social concept states that the actor of a particular situation is more apt to acknowledge a behavior to situational attributions, while the observer is more likely to contribute the behavior to the actor. The Actor-Observer Difference is a unique case that can only be applied under certain conditions. These conditions include that assumptions vary f...
The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) is a concept within social psychology that assumes when someone is aggressive, it is due to a flaw in their personality as opposed to a reaction to their personal circumstances (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). However, there is typically a situational reason for the other person’s behavior that is not taken into account through the FAE (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). I have been guilty of making the FAE myself; for example, I can think of two situations where my frustration led me to believe that there were flaws in my antagonists’ characters. Recently, my mother wanted me to assist my brother in scheduling classes for the semester. Since I was annoyed that my mother was insisting that I assist him when
Similarly, we often attribute other people's success to their environment and our own success to our character. That's because we like to believe that we
The text defines self-serving bias as the tendency to perceive oneself favorably. This bias leads us to believe that we are immune to the influences that affect the rest of humanity. In the self-serving bias, our successes are attributed to internal causes (effort or ability), while our failures are attributed to external factors (bad luck). Time and again, experimenters have found that people readily accept credit when told they have succeeded, yet attribute failure to such external factors as bad luck or the problem's inherent "impossibility." Imagine getting a promotion. Most of us will feel that this success is due to hard work, intelligence, dedication, and similar internal factors. But if you are fired, well obviously your boss wouldn't know a good thing if it were staring her in the face. The self-serving bias has been demonstrated countless times: the majority of Americans believe they are smarter and better looking than average; most drivers (even those hospitalized for accidents) believe themselves more skilled than the av...
I begin by noting some distinctive features of this argument that distinguish it from more common arguments for moral skepticism (section I). This is followed by an elucidation of the virtue of self-worth (section II). I then consider some connections between self-worth and moral knowledge (sections III and IV), and, more briefly, the extent of self-worth among persons (section V). Finally, I respond to an objection that may be made against this argument (section VI).
Self handicapping. What is it? It’s a self-destructive behavior in which people construct obstacles or claim that there are obstacles in their way which interfere with their personal successes. Self-handicapping is used for self-esteem protection by creating excuses for failure and possible failure. People typically engage in self-handicapping behaviors to prevent others from creating bad inferences of them based on poor performances. This kind of behavior is so common and subtle that most of the time it goes unnoticed. Self-handicapping applies to all areas of life. For an example, an athlete complaining of a sore ankle right before a big race. The athlete complains about the ankle before the race so that incase they don't perform well they possess something to fall back on. Another example, a student who doesn't obtain a sufficient amount of sleep before a extensive test and if they don't receive a good score they can blame it on their lack of sleep. When people make these excuses, if the result is beneficial they could say “considering all these obstacles I did pretty well.” In the case that the event does end badly, there is already an excuse for the reasoning behind it. By
How the Attribution Theory in an attempt to assign meaning/understanding to events on the basis of eith...
Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual's behavior, we attempt to determine whether it was internally or externally caused. That determination depends largely on three factors: distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency. Our perceptions of people differ from our perceptions of inanimate objects.