Times Arrow Sparknotes

635 Words2 Pages

In Martin Amis’ Times Arrow, the life of a man begins after his death. In other words, Amis writes the story beginning to end but tells the story from the ending identity of Todd T. Friendly to the beginning identity of Odilo Unverdorben. His story is depicted through the eyes of an anonymous narrator who appears to reside in the inner conscious of Todd and accompanies the reader through various discoveries about his life. Additionally, the unique way his story is told expands to a style used to employ mystery, uncertainty, and exposure while following a secret so impactful the possible revelation causes a fatal car wreck for Todd. As the narrator repeats, “John has a secret. Only one of us knows what that secret is. He leaves it undisclosed, …show more content…

As a character, Todd develops naturally when the reader follows the transformation from the identity of Todd to John, from John to Hamilton, and from Hamilton to Odilo. With each new identity, a piece to the puzzling question of his past is revealed, and as Odilo the secret is unveiled. Todd is exposed as being far from innocent, because Odilo Unverdorben is a war criminal, and served as a Nazi doctor at a concentration camp in Auschwitz. For the narrator, relief is conveyed when he says, “The world, after all, here in Auschwitz, has a new habit. It makes sense” (129), because; the narrator believes that he is no longer hurting his patients, but rather healing them. For the reader who is, Todd is a mass murderer, and accordingly, spends the rest of his life transforming into identities to escape the guilt of his ghastly past.
Point-of-view is a flaw in the narrator because when Todd appears to be restoring he is actually destroying. Yet, Todd’s character is inevitably manifested to the reader as being far worse than the narrator accounts for. Amis evolves strong character development despite an untrustworthy narrator by allowing the reader to interpret the events of Todd’s life apart from the narrator. Finally, the reader’s understanding seemingly dominates the narrator’s point-of-view in accuracy and follows

Open Document