According to our text, Hall states that each one of us has three different levels of identity and these three levels are personal, relational, and communal. The first one is personal identity, which means our own perception of ourselves as an individual and different from all other people. The second one is relational identity. It is based on particular relationships we have with others. The last one is communal identities tend to be seen as even broader in nature and are more resilient. They are typically associated with large scaled communities such as nationality, ethnicity, gender, or religious or political affiliation (Hall, 2005, p.109). For personal identity, I see myself as a cheerful and sensitive person. If something bad happens in …show more content…
I care too much about what other people say about my friends and also that other people’s comments can upset me easily. I think if you see yourself as a sensitive person then you won’t have a lot of friends. I remember my mother told me, if you care too much about other people’s comment, you probably would have a really hard life. So I tried to not listen what other people say about my life, the only thing I need to do is to be myself. For relational identities, I see myself as a student, a sister. In school, I am a student who needs to spend their time on study and get good grades. Back into China these days, the only thing a student should do is to study. All the parents think that students shouldn’t have a job while they are still in school because parents think that students should only focus on study in order to get good …show more content…
Avowal means the title we give to ourselves, Hall says when we try to fit ourselves into our idea of what is allowed and expected of the identities we envision for ourselves (Hall, 2005, p.118). Ascription is the process of having an identity assigned to us by other people (Hall, 2005, p.120). I had an experience with my professor, when I was studying at UWB last year. My English professor assumes me as a cheater because my identity is Chinese. One day in English class, we are taking an in class test. He separated all the Chinese students into different places in the room, even though he has two different versions of the test. All the Chinese students have the same embarrassed look on the face including me. Personally, I felt uncomfortable by how he separated all the Chinese students. As I mentioned earlier I am a very sensitive person, so at that time I am very worried about how others will think of us. After taking the test, I asked my friend to come with me and ask the professor why is he doing that to us. I told the professor how I feel when he separated us and how we feel uncomfortable about this. He said all the professors had a meeting together to discuss about how to stop international students cheating on the exams and some professors had reported about most of them is Chinese students and they use cell phones to cheat. When I
Although the concept of identity is recurrent in our daily lives, it has interpreted in various ways.
Identity is very important in a person’s life. It can induce pride or shame, provide a community or provide a way to distinguish one’s self from others. But, where does this identity come from? It is easy to assume we are who we are because of who raised us, but this is not the entire case. Andrew Solomon, author of “Far from the Tree” introduced two different forms of identity, vertical and horizontal. He defines vertical identity as the attributes acquired and shared by the people we are raised by and horizontal identity as the attributes different from those who raised us, but are shared and acquired through a peer community. These two types of identities generally do not intersect and, depending on the circumstance, one can greatly impact
they do not want to do. They will not always bear the impose roles on
The social identity theory is a person’s sense of who they are based on their social
There is many different ways which the concept of identity has been defined and studied by social scientists. Some of these scientists include, Coatsworth, Shwartz, Srivastava, and Furstenburg. The actual dictionary definition of “identity” is, the fact of being who or what a person or thing is. An individuals’ personality characterstics also relate to their sense of identity. These types of characterisitcs are known as, the “Big Five'”. This is a term used to describe the five broad traits of humans.
Identity, an ambiguous idea, plays an important part in today’s world. To me identity can be defined as who a person is or what differentiates one person from another. Identity would be a person’s name, age, height, ethnicity, personality, and more. A quote by Anne Sexton states “It doesn't matter who my father was; it matters who I remember he was”(Anne Sexton). This quote helps me define identity because I believe it is saying that identity is what people are remembered by. When some people think of identity, words such as, uniqueness, distinctiveness, or individuality may come to mind. However, I disagree with this because when I think of identity I think of mimicry, self-consciousness, or opinions.
What is personal identity? This question has been asked and debated by philosophers for centuries. The problem of personal identity is determining what conditions and qualities are necessary and sufficient for a person to exist as the same being at one time as another. Some think personal identity is physical, taking a materialistic perspective believing that bodily continuity or physicality is what makes a person a person with the view that even mental things are caused by some kind of physical occurrence. Others take a more idealist approach with the belief that mental continuity is the sole factor in establishing personal identity holding that physical things are just reflections of the mind. One more perspective on personal identity and the one I will attempt to explain and defend in this paper is that personal identity requires both physical and psychological continuity; my argument is as follows:
The quest to find one’s identity and have a sense of individuality is rampant in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. The humanistic urge to have purpose is embodied in the characters of Kathy, Tommy and Ruth very differently. They each know that their life’s purpose is to donate until “completion,” yet on the way there they explore themselves and find out there is more to each of them than their vital organs, even if that is how society has labeled them.
Another term that is commonly used in the Communication Studies is the “identity” which defines an individual. According to Simon (2004), identity is a position in a society. Persons can have several identities of belonging in larger groups (nationality, social class, profession, political beliefs, religion etc.) or in more exclusive groups (e.g. members in a club). In the social science (Ntampoudi, 2014), there are two different theories, the Social Identity Theory (SIT) and the Social Representations Theory (SRT). The first examines how the psychology affects the sense of having an identity, while the second theory focuses on the way that people imply this sense in a societal level.
Identity is a person’s socially and historically constructed concept. We learn and determine our own identity through the interactions of family, peers, media and also other connections that we have encounter in our life. Gender, social class, age and experience of the world are the key concepts which plays a substantial role in shaping how we are by facing obstacles in our lives. According to Mead (1934) as cited in Thulin, Miller, Secher, and Colson (2009), identity theory determines
Zora Neal Hurston’s book, Their Eyes Were Watching God, reveals one of life’s most relevant purposes that stretches across cultures and relates to every aspect of enlightenment. The novel examines the life of the strong-willed Janie Crawford, as she goes down the path of self-discovery by way of her past relationships. Ideas regarding the path of liberation date all the way back to the teachings of Siddhartha. Yet, its concept is still recycled in the twenty-first century, as it inspires all humanity to look beyond the “horizon,” as Janie explains. Self-identification, or self-fulfillment, is a theme that persists throughout the book, remaining a quest for Janie Crawford to discover, from the time she begins to tell the story to her best friend, Pheoby Watson. Hurston makes a point at the beginning of the novel to separate the male and female identities from one another. This is important for the reader to note. The theme for identity, as it relates to Janie, carefully unfolds as the story goes on to expand the depths of the female interior.
A person’s identity is shaped by many different aspects. Family, culture, friends, personal interests and surrounding environments are all factors that tend to help shape a person’s identity. Some factors may have more of an influence than others and some may not have any influence at all. As a person grows up in a family, they are influenced by many aspects of their life. Family and culture may influence a person’s sense of responsibilities, ethics and morals, tastes in music, humor and sports, and many other aspects of life. Friends and surrounding environments may influence a person’s taste in clothing, music, speech, and social activities. Personal interests are what truly set individuals apart. An individual is not a puppet on the string of their puppet-master, nor a chess piece on their master’s game board, individuals choose their own paths in life. They accomplish, or strive to accomplish, goals that they have set for themselves throughout their lifetime. Individuals are different from any other individual in the world because they live their own life rather than following a crowd of puppets. A person’s identity is defined by what shaped it in the first place, why they chose to be who they are, and what makes them different from everybody else in the world. I feel that I have developed most of my identity from my own dreams, fantasies, friends, and idols.
Burke, P.J. & Stets, J.E. (2000). Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63(3), 224-237
Everyone is prejudice in some way or another. From a young age individuals observe, or are taught discrimination against others. Whether it is because of religion, sexuality, race, gender, personality, or just someone’s way of life, everyone is biased. In many ways, who we are today, is influenced by our race, ethnicity, and culture, and overall our individual identities. Every experience, positive or negative, has an impact on how we react to something in the future. Decisions others make, can impact the way we interact with others, our personal beliefs, and all together our life experiences. Along our path of life, we meet people with different goals and circumstances they’ve encountered which make them who they are and why they do certain things a certain way. But our experiences
In today's society, with the advent of modern digital communication and an increased focus upon global society and diversity, humans have a golden opportunity to evaluate themselves and how they identify both individually and in their broader culture. Although the question of “who am I” is perhaps one of the classical questions of the human cognizance of identity, our identity as both groups and individuals is directly related to the culture we are a part of, especially in regards to whether that culture is determined to be individualistic or collectivist. These differing mindsets have an inherent connection to the way that we view ourselves and the impact of interactions between different cultures.