'Thomas Jefferson On Black Colonization'

365 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Notes on the notes of thomas jefferson

Unlike the original document which consisted of Jefferson describing physical characteristics of Blacks and Indians and how he perceived their lifestyles. The second document “Thomas Jefferson on the Indian’s Future” actually talks about Jefferson’s political stance regarding the Indians, which is essentially he wants to steel all their land. In his letter to Harrison Jefferson talks in detail about his plan to force the Indians into giving up their land. He states, “we shall push our trading uses, and be glad to see the good influential individuals among them run in debt, because we observe that when these debts get beyond what the individuals can pay they become willing to lop them off by a cession of lands.”(7) Jefferson writes that eventually the settlements will eventually …show more content…

The premise of the letter is he and Monroe are discussing about possibly making a black salve colony. Jefferson is apprehensive of having a colony like this a port of the union, he states, “questions would also arise whether the establishment of such a colony within our limits, and to become a part of our union, would be desirable to the State of Virginia itself, or to the other States- especially those who would be in the vicinity?”(10) Jefferson spend the rest of the letter discussing the various places they can send them. One of the main differences between this letter and the original letter is that in this one seems more impersonal. It’s less that he’s stating his own opinions, but more giving Monroe options on what to do. At the end of the letter Jefferson expresses his concerns in sending the slaves to the West Indies by stating, “The possibility that these exiles might stimulate and conduct vindicative or predatory descents on our coast, and facilitate concert with their brethren remaining

Show More
Related

  • English Colonists vs Native Americans: Property Rights in the New World

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    To many of the English colonists, any land that was granted to them in a charter by the English Crown was theirs’, with no consideration for the natives that had already owned the land. This belittlement of Indians caused great problems for the English later on, for the natives did not care about what the Crown granted the colonists for it was not theirs’ to grant in the first place. The theory of European superiority over the Native Americans caused for any differences in the way the cultures interacted, as well as amazing social unrest between the two cultures.

    Read More

  • Treachery for Cherokees in The Trail of Tears” by author Dee Brown

    625 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay, “The Trail of Tears” by author Dee Brown explains that the Cherokees isn’t Native Americans that evaporate effectively from their tribal land, but the enormous measure of sympathy supported on their side that was abnormal. The Cherokees process towards culture also the treachery of both states and incorporated governments of the declaration and promises that contrived to the Cherokee nation. Dee Brown wraps up that the Cherokees had lost Kentucky and Tennessee, but a man who once consider their buddy named Andrew Jackson had begged the Cherokees to move to Mississippi but the bad part is the Indians and white settlers never get along together even if the government wanted to take care of them from harassment it shall be incapable to do that. The Cherokee families moved to the West, but the tribes were together and denied to give up more land but Jackson was running for President if the Georgians elects him as President he agreed that he should give his own support to open up the Cherokee lands for establishment.

    Read More

  • The Concept Of Presentism In Douglas L. Jefferson And Paul Finkelman

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    His writings show how he truly views slavery. In the first document, found in the Declaration of Independence, he claims that King George III is violating the rights of Africans by taking them and selling them into slavery elsewhere in the world. In the last document, written to Holmes regarding the Missouri Compromise, he states how people would be happier having a greater surface for the slave trade. This is a perfect example of how Jefferson was hypocritical; he simply contradicted himself. Although these documents were written forty years or so apart, I believe that it is still important to note his hypocrisy. This is mainly because Jefferson owned slaves throughout this entire time

    Read More

  • Native American Policy: The Board Of Indian Commissioners

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two items which are defined in the document are “(1) The tribal organization. (2) The Indian reservation.” For one, the United States government set up the Indian reservations, creating poor living conditions that would hinder the ability to progress at the rate that the Untied States formulated for them. The soil, for instance, in Oklahoma, where most of the reservations were at during this time, were awful for farming. Therefore, the Indians would starve and be in ill health. Again, the United States contradicted itself in regards to Indian policy, by choosing to ignore the most crucial parts of history that led to the poor conditions of the

    Read More

  • DBQ on Jackson and the Indian Removal

    1646 Words  | 4 Pages

    The generalization that, “The decision of the Jackson administration to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s was more a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790s than a change in that policy,” is valid. Ever since the American people arrived at the New World they have continually driven the Native Americans out of their native lands. Many people wanted to contribute to this removal of the Cherokees and their society. Knox proposed a “civilization” of the Indians. President Monroe continued Knox’s plan by developing ways to rid of the Indians, claiming it would be beneficial to all. Andrew Jackson ultimately fulfilled the plan.     First of all, the map [Document A] indicates the relationship between time, land, and policies, which affected the Indians. The Indian Tribes have been forced to give up their land as early as the 1720s. Between the years of 1721 and 1785, the Colonial and Confederation treaties forced the Indians to give up huge portions of their land. During Washington's, Monroe's, and Jefferson's administration, more and more Indian land was being commandeered by the colonists. The Washington administration signed the Treaty of Holston and other supplements between the time periods of 1791 until 1798 that made the Native Americans give up more of their homeland land. The administrations during the 1790's to the 1830's had gradually acquired more and more land from the Cherokee Indians. Jackson followed that precedent by the acquisition of more Cherokee lands.     In later years, those speaking on behalf of the United States government believed that teaching the Indians how to live a more civilized life would only benefit them. Rather than only thinking of benefiting the Indians, we were also trying to benefit ourselves. We were looking to acquire the Indians’ land. In a letter to George Washington, Knox says we should first is to destroy the Indians with an army, and the second is to make peace with them.      The Indian Trade and Intercourse Act of 1793 began to put Knox’s plan into effect. The federal government’s promise of supplying the Indians with animals, agricultural tool...

    Read More

  • Benjamin Banneker Analysis

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    The aim of this letter was to challenge Jefferson on the topics of slavery and racism, highlighting the hypocrisy and hopefully inspire him to take further action. Banneker’s tone is polite, and he spends

    Read More

  • Dbq Indian Removal Act

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    When John Marshall made his decision, President Jackson said, “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it.” He was so pleased with the act and was very dedicated to setting it out that he said, “It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages,” in the Second Annual Message to Congress. Georgia and other southern states passed laws that gave them the right to control the Cherokee lands when gold was discovered, which President Jackson supported.

    Read More

  • The Vast Influence of Thomas Jefferson

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Jeffersons Influence on the United States -Program No. 35.” VOA Learning English. n.p. n.d. Web. 25 March 2014.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson, the Hypocrite

    528 Words  | 2 Pages

    ideas of Hamilton destroyed that hope in the bud, We can pay off his debts

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Negrogroland: A Memoir By Margo Jefferson

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    What is/are the social problem(s) that the author is discussing in this book? Why did it/they develop?

    Read More

  • Native American Perspective on Indian Removal Act

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...convince us Indians that our removal was necessary and beneficial. In my eyes, the agreement only benefited Andrew Jackson. It is apparent that Jackson neglected to realize how the Indian Removal act would affect us Indians. When is the government justified in forcibly removing people from the land they occupy? If you were a Native American, how would you have respond to Jackson? These questions need to be taken into consideration when determining whether or not Jackson was justified. After carefully examining these questions and considering both the pros and cons of this act, I’m sure you would agree that the removal of Native Americans was not justified under the administration of Andrew Jackson. Jackson was not able to see the damaging consequences of the Indian removal act because of his restricted perspective.

    Read More

  • Role Of African Americans In Reconstruction

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    First of all, they would not agree with the ownership of land section, as Native Americans believed that land could not belong to individuals in the first place. The African Americans in the Declaration of Wrongs and Rights also say “as natives of American soil” when in reality, the true natives of the land were the Native Americans. Also, the document continues to talk about how African Americans claim the right to remain in said lands. Native Americans were moved from their native lands several times. The Homestead Act in 1862 could be seen as an example, new settlers were encouraged to take “free soil” but at the same time move over Native American settlers. Another example of this can be seen with the Osage who already lived on a reserve, they had already been removed and deported. Railroad companies wanted to use their land and were willing to pay for it. Then another railroad company saw the same opportunity and tried to convince them to move. The Osage refused to move and then the government intervened with the 1870’s removal law, which moved the Osage and sold their land for 1.25 dollars an acre. Eventually the situation got better for the Osage since there was oil in their new lands. Another example of this would be the concentration attempts of the Lakota. It nevertheless made sense to the authors since African

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson's Moral Dilemmas

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    It stated that the right to the port of New Orleans was to be suspended, even after the privilege was guaranteed in the Pinckney Treaty of 1795. Without that allowance, the lower half of Mississppi would be virtually closed off to American shippers. Westerners clambered for any possible solution, even if it meant going to war with France. Jefferson, being completely aware of the actions that must be taken knew he was in a predicament. Even after threatening alliances with Britain, Jefferson still wasn’t keen on acting upon it; yet he wasn’t in favor of going to war with France after he had thoroughly advocated for their

    Read More

  • Prejudice And Racism In Thomas Jefferson's The Notes On Virginia

    352 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Notes on Virginia (1788) written by Thomas Jefferson purpose of this writing were to explain that African Americans are inferior to Anglo-Americans afterward portraying prejudice and racism. During this time Jefferson addresses this issue to his fellow political leaders informing them of what was going in the state of Virginia and not to allow African American into their country for a particular reason.

    Read More

  • Review of the Article “How the West was Lost”

    1092 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first point he made was how the Westward expansion affected the Plains Indians. The Plains Indian tribes consisted mostly of the Kiowa, Kiowa Apaches, Comanche, Sioux, and Cheyenne. As the white settlers made their way across the country taking land, the Indians pushed back by raiding settlements and killing the occasional settler. More and more white settlers were pouring into the West in search of gold and silver. As the settlers came into the territories, large herds of buffalo were killed, much of the time just for the sport of it. This had an adverse affect on the Indians since they relied on buffalo not only for food, but also for hides and blankets as well as to make teepees. Another factor was the pony herds; the U.S. Army frequently seized herds and a herd of upwards of one thousand was killed just so the Indians would not be able to use them. The soldiers that were on patrol in the West kept pushing the Indians, driving them away from their hunting and fishing grounds.

    Read More

More about 'Thomas Jefferson On Black Colonization'

Open Document