Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Realization about metacognition
Metacognition thinking about learning
Metacognition thinking about learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Realization about metacognition
Theory Of Knowledge
‘Don’t give me any more facts! I need to make a decision right now!’ Although one can question knowledge endlessly, one cannot forever suspend judgment while researching and reflecting. What would it mean to act responsibly in a situation where one cannot possess certainty? How would one justify the decision?
Within all individuals, there is a basic necessity to obtain certain answers to questions, which is known as gumption. The satisfaction of this “gumption” in certain cases, becomes the basic factor of life needed to function. Hence, people often search for explanations to these uncertainties. This endless search will only lead to losing the truth.
Gumption is the attempt to have answers to for everything in order to be able to function. In other words, it is an innate need to answer things; curiosity. People try to get all these answers in vain because either way there are too many variables to assess and hence it would be impossible to attain certainty. It is towards satisfying this gumption that most of our actions are steered. It is towards satisfying this gumption that most of our actions are steered. Humankind needs to stop trying to acquire knowledge to be able to function; they need to coming up with temporary answers through the use of common sense and intuition. As Bertrand Russell said, “All human knowledge is uncertain, inexact and partial.” People cannot rely on common sense, the mind cannot organize anything. Common sense and beliefs are but just mere memories of past experiences. We rely on memory to acquaint us with the continuance and exert of this succession of perceptions.
This is where the metacognition comes in. People need to be metacognistant, this is, they need to realize that they could never know everything possible. Searching for answers is pointless. As David Hume said, “It is impossible to know everything so we need to concentrate on what we know.” A decision not to decide but to leave the question open is in itself a decision and this will lead to the risk of losing truth. Metacognition.
Skepticism also plays a big role in this life long argument. As Jostein Gaarder said in SOPHIE’S WORLD, “…man cannot know the truth about the riddles of nature and of the universe. In philosophy a view like this is called skepticism.” People tend to be skeptical, where knowledge is uncertain. They want to avoid error.
People who are inquisitive ask questions about why or how something is the way it is. They are not satisfied with a simple explanation of how something works, but always search for a deeper, more involved answer or explanation. Curious people question everything that interests them, even if the circumstances are not right to do so. In Anthem, Equality 7-2521 possesses these traits. As a child, he questioned everything about the world that his Teachers did not teach him, even if the Council of Scholars told him that there were no mysteries about those topics. He wanted to know everything about the world he lived in. He demonstrates his curiosity when he says, “And questions give us no rest. We know not why our curse makes us seek we know not what, ever and ever. But we cannot resist it. It whispers to us that there are great things on this earth of ours, and that we can know them if we try, and that we must know them. We ask, why must we know, but it has no answer to give us. We must know that we may know” (24). This is a desire which is never satisfied, since there is always more to learn about the world. Equality 7-2521 is naturally curious, and yearns to learn more at all
... from previous experiences and bases future decisions on what they have experienced. When a person makes a decision that isn’t justified, they unknowingly change how they view future problems. If the decision has not been based in truth, it allows them a certain amount of unearned freedom to make wrong decisions, as opposed to when one make a proper decisions. It is crucial that every decision made is justified in order to keep their moral compass steady and to make the proper decisions when the choice is hard.
Socrates once said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” He questioned the very nature of why things were the way they were, while never settling for simple, mundane answers. Socrates would rather die searching for the truth than live accepting what he considered a blatant lie. I like to think of myself the same way. I too would rather examine the wonders of life rather than accept what I am just told. The truth is some can’t handle the truth. I on the other hand welcome it with earnest anticipation and fervent enthusiasm.
The three hardest words in the english language are “I don't know”. It’s easier to make up an answer, then it is just to say “I do not know”. The moral compass that most people have, that makes them think they know exactly what's best in most given situations should be turned off. It’s okay to not know all the answers. “In most cases, the cost of saying “I dont know” is higher than the cost of being wrong at least for the individual”(29). It’s okay to say you don’t know an answer because that motivates you to research it, and find the correct answer. The only way to find a correct answer is by knowing, exactly what the question is asking. If the question that is being asked is wrong, or poorly worded, then the answer that is given will also be wrong. Also, you have to look deeper into the question. For example, if the question asked is about the rise in crime rate you would have to research on what is causing it to rise. Collecting data such as, tighter gun laws, a surging economy, more capital punishment, more police officers, more people sent to prison and the decline of the cocaine market can help you figure out factors
While Ruth Nanda Anshen brings up an interesting thought, I believe that the answer to a question, creates more questions. When presented with a problem mankind has always wanted to answer the question and to be right in their answer. Possibly as a sense of pride, a sense of self-worth, a sense of accomplishment, the reason could be anything. The irony of it resides in that the answer to why we desire to obtain knowledge (as listed as above) is followed up then by a generic question of why? This circle of an original question with an original answer followed another question or questions. This directly correlates to my opinion on knowledge. I believe that knowledge in its broadest form possible exists as it did in Genesis, Knowledge of Good and Evil. As knowledge is obtained it sparks fear because we learn consequences. Because life can be lived in fear due to a sense of right or wrong, knowledge can act as a chain against free will. In chapter 17, Dumbledore speaks profoundly in his response to Harry, “Fear of the name increases fear of the thing itself,” ironically this ties in very well with my thought of fear above (Rowling, 298). Harry Potter in the eyes of Mary Pharr, is J.K. Rowling setting a prime example of our quest for free will. However, I believe we have an innate free will, and that our pure composition is at the mercy of free will. This contrasts with Pharr’s belief in a quest for free will as if we did not already have it at
There are two kinds of skepticism, local skepticism, which states that some areas of inquiry don’t allow for knowledge, and global skepticism, which states that we cannot know anything about the world, (Bogosian). One of the most common arguments for skepticism is the Brain in a Vat argument, which is very similar to the argument of the Evil Demon who controls us. In opposition to this is a philosopher by the name of Hilary Putnam, who uses language as proof for us not being brains in vats. I am going to explain to you why I think that Putnam is correct.
Personally, I believe that sometimes people aren't willing to accept a new viewpoint because it would go against everything they've learned. To a certain extent that is true, before Viney's lecture I had thought that the reason Copernicus and Galileo were challenging the church was because of there ideals. But it turns out that the reason they disagreed with the church was because of authority and power that the church had over the people. The same can be seen in David Freedman article "When Is a Planet Not a Planet", in which he discusses the reason why people want pluto to stay as a planet was because it has sentimental feeling for those that have learned it is a planet. This can take
We value a person's believing and deciding rationally in a way that is responsive to the net balance of reasons, and we think that is good and admirable in itself, perhaps because so deciding and believing uses our high and intricate capacities and expresses them, or perhaps because that embodies an admirable and principled integrity in guiding beliefs and actions by reasons, not by the whims or desires of the moment. (Nozick 1993: 136)
It is impossible to just have one answer. There are many different ways you can get to the answer. This is what makes it complex. With science there is no one true conclusion. Scientific results are unreliable because it is exposed to subjective methodologies. Behind science is one man that still has an interest. He can dictate what he wants to inquire about. The one scientist relates to the person who is authoritative on what their child should believe in. They should be found as equally wrong. Yes, you can give your ideas about what your beliefs are, but it is up to that one person to decide whether they wish to accept it. They also have the alternative of disregarding it and accepting a different way of believing in their own conception of the world.
The pursuit of knowledge can lead to a humans destruction and awareness. The pursuit of
As children we are born with a natural curiosity that pulls us out into the world. Going out and experiencing new things, seeing different environments; like the first time you see the ocean or snow or the Grand Canyon, it adds to the world that we know and changes our perspective on it with each new thing. But if we reflect upon it and ask what is the ocean? Or what is it that gives us life and makes us so different from a rock. These are questions which cannot be easily answ...
The Justified True Belief (JTB) theory of knowledge, often attributed to Plato , is a fairly straightforward theory of knowledge. It states that something must be true if person S believes proposition P, proposition P is true, and S is justified in believing in believing that P is true . While many consider the JTB theory to be vital to the understanding of knowledge, some, such as American Philosopher Edmund Gettier, believe that it is flawed. I tend to agree with Gettier and others who object to the JTB theory as an adequate theory of knowledge, as the JTB theory allows for a type of implied confirmation bias that can lead people to be justified in believing they know something even though it isn’t true.
It is difficult to make decisions and have intellectual judgment. Decisions are at times influenced by personal experiences, information presented, emotion, amongst other numerous factors, therefore it is a lengthy process. Even when a person is trying to make the best decision it may be the “wrong” choice due to the fact that it negatively impacts other people. For instance, allowing a person to bend the rules a bit may seem innocent, but it may hinder the other people that are following the rules (such as allowing someone to use the computer longer than what their allotted time
The chapter illustrated ten problems that lead you to come to conclusions based on information provided that may have been obtained at faced value as opposed to extensive research. It explained how one can come to a decision based on what is found on the surface and convince themselves that the finding is correct when in reality the outcomes actually support the opposite. It’s unfortunate that decisions are made like this and supported by powerful people who are influential and able to change the minds of
The quest for knowledge and learning has been occuring since the creation of mankind. Ever since the serpent in the Garden of Eden tempted Eve to eat the forbidden apple from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, promising she would wise as the gods, man has been battling with this endless pursuit. Some men want wisdom so that they may be able to live a good and righteous life. Other men want only the power that knowledge can bring them, to use it for their own sinful purposes.