Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Trait theories of crime
Feminist perspectives towards criminology essay
Essay on marxist feminist
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Trait theories of crime
Feminist criminology is basically a theory amongst feminist that show their concern with the victimization of women. This theory suggests that most female criminals commit crimes due to constant discrimination between men and women. The main goal many feminist have is to eliminate any barriers between men and women. Feminism can be broken up to four different branches. Although each branch is fighting the same cause their battles are different. First it's Liberal Feminist which are focus on the theory that the main problem with equality is sexism. They believe women do not get the opportunity to move up in life because men immediately subdue them due to their gender. Second it's Marxist feminist. This branch of feminism is solely focus on …show more content…
investigating how the world today suppresses females. Third it's Radical Feminist which can be describe as extremist. For example most Radical Feminist are rebellious to today society. They believe that men are the main reason for society down fall. Their main goal is to eliminated mans power over the world, they believe it is time for women to take over. Finally it's Socialist Feminist which basically are a mixture of both Radical (but less intense) and Marxist feminist. In a different era these theories would have been a plausible explanation for most female criminal. For one thing women from the past were suppose to obtain certain standers and if a women spoke out against any injustice done against a female or the roles they are given they were usually punish by execution or exile. Most women who were criminalize back then were standing up for what they believe in such as religious belief or something so simple as just expressing themselves in a patriarchal system. Whereas female who are incarcerated today are there because of their own decisions. More rights were given to women, they were now able to express themselves how ever they please and began to live life to fullest. Females became more rebellious and as life went on that rebellious attitude grew more unruly in certain females causing a good amount to be incarcerated. Society began to accept the fact that females were equal to males. With this major switch in the tide more females became more ambitious and aim for bigger and better things. Unfortunately their urges and desires begin to become unmanageable and eventually they act on them. Some aim for to much and were willing to do whatever it takes to get it. For example Annugetta "Ann" Pettway a women whose sole desire was to become a mother. Being a mother was look up as the biggest accomplishment for some women and as Ann seen every ad or show her desire to become a mother progress. Unfortunately she acted on her urge. On August 4, 1987 Joy White and Carl Tyson had taken their daughter to Harlem Hospital, she was only 19 days old and had a constant fever. Ann Pettway disguised her self as a nurse and wiggled her way into the family heart. Eventually Ann convince Joy White to go home and take a shower and come back. At that time Ann proceed with her plan and kidnap Carlina White. Ann convince her family and friends that she was pregnant and gave birth, she renamed Carlina Nejdra Nance and raise her as her own. Ann acted on her urge and took a child from her actual mother she broke a family up and was eventually arrested for her crime. All in all women now in days act on there own behalf and become incarcerated due to their own decision. In many cases after a crime has ended many of the victims of the crime suffer emotional and physical damage and need help in order to move on with life.
Every state has a crime victim compensation program. This program is a government program that reimburses victims of violent crimes. For example, base on a study held at Iowa State University victims of rape was at estimated $450 billion a year. A big portion of the estimate cost goes towards medical bills . For instance checking to see if the victim had contracted any STD because with rape the possibility of contracted and STD is higher then normal. When it comes to rape the pain does not stop just after the assault for many the pain continues until the victim takes a stand and decides not to be the victim any longer. As a matter of fact base on Rape Crisis center of Medina and Summit counties survivors of sexual assault are more likely to abuse alcohol and drugs and sadly attempt to commit suicide. Because of this the government offers counseling for victims. As a result of counseling many victims are able to move on with life and become more then just a victim. The government can also pay for lost of wages for victims who are severely injured. For example victims of aggravated assault which is a whopping $145,379 each assault. Another crime the government pays for is for victims of murder, which tops $17.5 million. This estimate includes the medical expenses as well. For example the medical examination of the body. …show more content…
Another big portion of this estimate goes towards funeral or burial expenses. The government also pays for victims of armed robbery which has estimated to about $332,733 each robbery. These amount was based on a new study held in Iowa State University that calculated the cost of incarceration to lost productivity stemming from murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault and burglary. There are numerous theories that attempt to explain victimization such as The Victim Precipitation theory, which basically blames the victim of the crime.
This theory believes the criminal was provoked or encourage by the victim. Then there’s the Deviant Place Theory, the best way to explain this theory is being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Then there is the Routine Activity Theory, a theory that can be calculated by different risk factors in your life, for example, if you live in a bad neighborhood and you go on vacation your risk of getting robbed is higher. Finally is the Lifestyle Theory. This theory basically states that you are as good as who you hang out with. Personally I agree with this theory. I believe that some personalities can be molded by the people they hang out with, so if they hang out with people with negative personalities eventually they will develop negative traits. For example, on Oct 26 2012 Joshua Smith made a decision to take his mother's life. As a young teen he would hang out with thugs and always tried to get ''street cred''. Eventually Joshua Smith became aggravated with his mother because she wouldn't allow him to do things his so called crew did. In the end he made the decision to take his mother's life and is now serving 25 to 27 years in
jail.
...y residents would most likely be categorized as a cultural theory because he focuses more on “the roles of ideas in causing criminal behavior” (Vold 184). Not only would I classify Anderson’s theory as a cultural theory due it its prominent argument crime is learned through association, but I would constitute “code of the streets” as a cultural control theory. One assumption Anderson is able to conclude is how “street” people justify their criminal behavior, such as the denial of responsibility as seen throughout the article when the criminals claim the victim should of known better. This directly correlates with the control theory concept that people naturally commit crime and it is the bonds we make and restraints we form which will inevitably categorize our behavior as “street” or “deviant”.
They studied the criminals lives and show how the link as juveniles and the factors that led them to become a criminals. Statically showing, most people that become criminals fail high school. Showing if a person continues their education the likely hood of becoming a criminal become less and less. These individuals come from broken homes, little education, little money and lack of resources. Growing up in a broken home or family, the child begins to suffer because of either neglect or lack of supervision from a parent figure, either they are not home or work low wage jobs just to make it. Since there is a lack of family support, the child will look for support from another source. The supports they usually find are products of their environment, usually gangs or other bad influences. Even with places that helps less than fortune kids have a role model or after school activates, but most of the time, they do not seek these programs which could help the child on a better path, rather than a life of crime joining a gang or even just commit crime altogether. The main influences on our lives are our families and society that we grow up in, and has a great effect on the individual which can dictate what they do with their lives. When looking at the theory, the effects come from homelessness, abuse neglect, subcultures,
Arguably, these theories are the individual vulnerability model and the psychodynamic theory. According to Siegel, the individual vulnerability model postulates that there is “a direct link between traits and crime: some people develop physical or mental conditions at birth, or soon thereafter, that affect their social functioning no matter where they live or how they are raised” (Siegel, 2016). Perhaps the component of this theory which deserves the greatest emphasis is the contention that the matter of environment and how a criminal is raised truly has no bearing on their propensity to actually commit criminal acts. As discussed herein, Ted Bundy’s environment and upbringing is described as perhaps among the best one could expect. Ted Bundy was socialized to embrace Christian values (and it should be noted biblical principles are completely adverse to murder, one of the ten commandments being “thou shalt not kill”), had parents which were more than decent, and had many friends all of which behaved in a socially acceptable manner. Further, to reiterate, Ted Bundy was seen as a “well-rounded” or “normal” individual, no one had even the slightest clue he could be capable of such deviance. Despite the fact he claims the influence of media violence was in fact the cause behind his
This theory seems to be the one to stand out more as my favorite theory. The reason I say this is because of the fact that it can be tied in with Rational Choice theory. According to the udemy blog, it says, “This theory suggests that people think before they proceed with criminal actions; that when one commits a crime, it is because the individual decided that it was advantageous to commit the crime. The individual commits the crime from his own free will being well aware of the punishment” (Tania, 2014). I can relate to this theory based from my brother. He placed himself into a situation where he could have been placed in jail. Once he was placed in handcuffs and stood in front of the police officers, my parents, and myself; under his free will, he had the option to get away from the trouble or continue to be with his so-called friends. My brother knew of the consequences behind committing this crime, but to his advantage; he made himself a part of the crime
...ifferent crime patterns and thought processes of criminals. The reasons can only come from these theories and will help the justice systems become more prepared to react towards different crimes. However, with adding some enhancements, projects and experiments these two theories have the potential to change the criminology realm forever.
Traditional positivist theories advocate determinism, or the belief that factors outside of an individual’s control are to blame for criminality. The positivist’s theories were also the first school of thought to use the scientific method in research. Early, traditional positivist’s theories included only biological explanations of crime, such as Lombroso’s concept of atavism. However because positivists theories are based on the concept of determinism, Merton’s strain theory is also classified in this category. Providing a non-biological explanation for criminality traditional strain theory states that lack of structural opportunities lead an individual to crime. Specifically
Many of the traditional criminological theories focused more on biological, psychological and sociological explanations of crime rather than on the cost and benefits of crime. More conservative approaches, including routine actives, lifestyle exposure and opportunity theories have clearly incorporated crime rate patterns as a fundamental part of analyzing the economics of crime. Crime statistics are important for the simple reason that they help put theories into a logical perspective. For example, a prospective home owner may want to look at crime rates in areas of potential occupancy. On a more complex level, it helps law enforcement and legislators create effective crime reduction programs. Furthermore, it also helps these agencies determine if crime prevention programs, that have been in effect, have been successful. There are many factors that influence the rates of crime including socio economic status, geographical location, culture and other lifestyle factors. More specifically, Messner and Blau (1987) used routine activities theory to test the relationship between the indicators of leisure activities and the rate of serious crimes. They discussed two types of leisure actives, the first being a household pastime, which primarily focused on television watching. The second type was a non-household leisure event which was consisted of attendance to sporting events, cinemas, and entertainment districts. The focus of this paper will be to study the effects that substantial amounts of leisure activities have on the offender and the victim. Leisure activities not only make a crime more opportunistic for offenders, it may also provide offenders with motivation to engage in criminal activity. On the other hand, it may also be argue...
Historically, criminology was significantly ‘gender-blind’ with men constituting the majority of criminal offenders, criminal justice practitioners and criminologists to understand ‘male crimes’ (Carraine, Cox, South, Fussey, Turton, Theil & Hobbs, 2012). Consequently, women’s criminality was a greatly neglected area and women were typically seen as non-criminal. Although when women did commit crimes they were medicalised and pathologised, and sent to mental institutions not prisons (Carraine et al., 2012). Although women today are treated differently to how they were in the past, women still do get treated differently in the criminal justice system. Drawing upon social control theory, this essay argues that nature and extent of discrimination
It also includes the factors of social environment. It recognizes more factors of influence, building on trait theory. Arousal theory provides that individuals have different levels of arousal affected by the nervous system, chemistry in the brain, and heart rhythm. The basic idea of this theory is that certain actions, including the act of committing a crime, causes a “thrill” to some. They seek out the thrill and stimulation provided by these actions. Thus, a feeling that is positive, created by an action, will cause someone to seek out that feeling. Genetic theory is another trait theory. Genetics being the sole influence that might make a person behave in a certain way is the explanation of this theory. A certain genetic configuration causes personality traits, and determines behaviors the individual will be likely to have. Attachment theory uses psychology to suggest that criminal behavior is linked with a lack of a personal relationship or attachment as an infant. This lack of positive attachment to a motherly figure leads to psychological problems, such as antisocial behavior. Nature theory is that criminal activity is based on IQ, whereas a low IQ means more of a possibility of criminal behavior. Social structure theory provides that social and economic events and
Feminist Theory is an aspect of considering feminism as having been based on socio-phenomenon issues rather than biological or scientific. It appreciates gender inequality, analyzes the societal roles played by feminists in a bid to promote the interests, issues and rights of women in the society. It is also based on the assumption that women play subsidiary roles in the society. The whole idea of feminism has however experienced hurdles in the form of stereotyping by the wider society. This paper tries to examine some of the effects of stereotypes that feminism goes through, what other philosophers say and the way forward towards ending stereotyping.
Life course theory has five basic concepts they 're cohorts, transitions, trajectories, life events, and turning points. These concepts are used to analyze people 's social, structural and cultural standpoints. And with the knowledge of these five basic concepts they help me understand myself as a person who didn 't commit crime compare to my peers who I met and reconnect with who did. Sadly they end up being unhappy in their lives due to the crimes they committed and troubles they caused in their lifetime. Necessarily they weren 't bad people, but like the theory says crimes can be affect due to circumstances of within structural, social, and cultural standpoint during their lifetime, which may also be the cause of their choices. One example of this is if a person would to resort to stealing through life events such as a father who stole in front of them as a child, they will then learn that behavior. The life course perspective takes a look at things on more macro level perspective from social aspect such as family life at home, bad neighborhoods, and lack of income. What prevent me from committing any crimes is that I had a good family relationship with my parents and sibling, so in other words my lfie course perspective or cohort was rather healthy compare to my peers. Through these example the assumptions can be made that social
Also, this theory states that is a young person is not guided, no rules, role models, no positive feedback they will get into trouble and problems because he or she has not been taught anything. On the other hand if a child grows up in a good environment with positive people, guidance and support, the child will have much better chance growing up with a clean slate. In Paul Bernardo’s case though he had both parents he lacked support and positive guidance create a negative image of females. This later escalated into dark fantasies and his abuse path began where he felt no remorse towards his victims. Secondly Mask of Sanity, which is a clinical description of psychopath.
The word violence has many different meanings and has many ways of impacting people. It can beat someone down not just physically, but emotionally. Unfortunately, violence and abuse is not uncommon within families and intimate relationships. Webster 's Online Dictionary says that violence is "the use of physical force to harm someone, to damage e property, etc., great destructive force or energy" (Websters,2014) It includes abusive words, actions and criminal acts that seek to degrade, humiliate or harm a woman or child.. Often, the term violence is used to refer to specific, usually physical, acts, while the word abuse is used to refer to a pattern of behavior that a person uses to gain or maintain power and control over another. This essay
Feminist criminology is the study of crime in terms of gender for example why men commit more crime than women, why women do more petty crimes, like shop lifting, than violent crime, sexism in the court system, and female victimization. Feminist criminology contains many branches. Liberal, radical, Marxist, and socialist feminism are widely recognized, although other "strands" exist such as postmodernism and ecofeminism. Most feminist criminology involves critiques about how women offenders have been ignored, distorted, or stereotyped within traditional criminology, but there is no shortage of separate theories and modifications of existing theories.
Psychological theories of criminal behavior emphasize criminal thinking patterns or personality defects. These theories emphasize individual differences in behavior and the approaches to thinking, feeling, and decision-making that make some people predisposed to committing criminal acts.