Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural and biological adaptation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural and biological adaptation
Julian H. Steward was a neoevolutionist in the mid-20th century that rejected the then-popular theory that a people’s culture could only be traced by historical links to past cultures. “Together with Leslie White, [Steward] contributed to the formation of the theory of multilinear evolution, which examined the way in which societies adapted to their environment” (New World Encyclopedia, 2008). Steward argued that, as opposed to the theory of unilinear evolution that suggests that cultures develop in a regular linear sequence, changes are not universal and though some aspects of culture can develop in similar ways, few cultural traits can be found in all groups and these different factors (ideology, political systems, kinship, etc.) push culture …show more content…
The idea that they are connected implies an environmental determinism instead of relative determinism and verges on controversial because it implies a predisposition for a particular cultural development based on environment instead of causality from human decisions, a concept that not many are comfortable with. Cultural ecology involves three processes. “First, the anthropologists analyze the relationship of the technology used in production to the environment in which it is used. Then they relate other behavioral patterns to subsistence. Finally, they can ask how these behavioral patterns affect other aspects of the culture, such as kinship, warfare, and religion” (Townsend, 2008). Steward focused on subsistence technology and related features of socioeconomic life and called this the cultural core. He said once could determine what is in a population’s so-called cultural core by using cultural ecological method. The cultural core encompassed the “technology, knowledge, labor, and family organization used to collect resources from the environment” (Tucker, 2013). However, his cultural core idea proved to severely underestimate the complexity and variability of environmental and social systems (Geertz, …show more content…
Still following Steward’s work, many anthropologists consider themselves cultural ecologists and use his methods to study how “societies respond to change in their environment and in the cultural core” (Townsend, 2008). Before Steward put together this approach, human-environmental theories were incredibly broad and generalized or only emphasized lists of cultural traits instead.
Steward’s approach made it easier to delimit the field of study and produce a cause and effect relationship. “Steward delimited the field of human-environment interaction by emphasizing behavior, subsistence, and technology” (Moran, 2008). Those who now continue to use Steward’s methods tend to use it for researching pastoral groups, rural societies, preindustrial farmers, and especially hunter-gatherer groups, and in fact has led to a new understanding of
In the essay “Cultural Baggage” by Barbara Ehrenreich in The Norton Mix, Ehrenreich claims that she possesses no type of heritage. She goes on to explain that in her life, she never learned any specific cultural values, and that her family has always lived with borrowed traditions. She closes by stating that she is proud of her lack of heritage and believes that the world would be better off without culture. Having no cultural background is a well-developed and agreeable idea because of the number of people who come from mixed and confusing backgrounds, the complexity of a mixed family tree, and the changing times and their effect on traditions.
William Haviland, Harald Prins, Dana Walrath, Bunny McBride, Anthropology: The Human Challenge (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011), 58.
Jared Diamond, author of the Pulitzer Prize Winning, National Best Selling book Guns, Germs and Steel, summarizes his book by saying the following: "History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves." Guns, Germs and Steel is historical literature that documents Jared Diamond's views on how the world as we know it developed. However, is his thesis that environmental factors contribute so greatly to the development of society and culture valid? Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History is the textbook used for this class and it poses several different accounts of how society and culture developed that differ from Diamond's claims. However, neither Diamond nor Traditions are incorrect. Each poses varying, yet true, accounts of the same historical events. Each text chose to analyze history in a different manner. Not without flaws, Jared Diamond makes many claims throughout his work, and provides numerous examples and evidence to support his theories. In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture, and compare and contrast it with what I have learned using the textbook for this class.
There are many cultures throughout the world, which may be far apart and yet still have similarities. Two of those such cultures, the Basseri, that live in Iran, and the Nuer, whom live in Sudan, have their differences, but also have some similarities. Many of the differences and similarities come from their subsistence strategies and the social and political organization of their societies. With the regions of the world, both the Basseri and the Nuer live in, they’ve had to adapt to the environment they live in along with the limitations imposed by that environment.
“History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples’ environments, not because of biological differences among people themselves.”(Diamond 25) This statement is the thesis for Jared Diamond’s book Guns Germs and Steel the Fates of Human Societies.
Throughout ancient history, many indigenous tribes and cultures have shown a common trait of being hunter/gatherer societies, relying solely on what nature had to offer. The geographical location influenced all aspects of tribal life including, spirituality, healing philosophy and healing practices. Despite vast differences in the geographical location, reports show various similarities relating to the spirituality, healing philosophy and healing practices of indigenous tribal cultures.
Anthropocentrism has been a central belief upon which modern human society has been constructed. The current state of the world, particularly the aspects that are negative, are reflective of humans continuously acting in ways that are in the interest of our own species. As environmental issues have worsened in recent decades, a great number of environmentalists are turning away from anthropocentric viewpoints, and instead adopting more ecocentric philosophies. Although anthropocentrism seems to be decreasing in popularity due to a widespread shift in understanding the natural world, philosopher William Murdy puts forth the argument that anthropocentrism still has relevancy in the context of modern environmental thought. In the following essay, I will explain Murdy’s interpretation of anthropocentrism and why he believes it to be an acceptable point of
In the article The Clash of Cultures, William Cronon and Richard White delve into “the interrelations between people and their environment,” (11) specifically, between the American Indians and the Europeans and the Americas. The reason Cronon and White wrote this article was, “In part, a result of our current concern with pollution and the exhaustion of valuable natural resources, but it has also proved to be a valuable way of learning more about how people of past generations and different cultures dealt with nature and with one another.” (11)
...ferent cultures and lifestyles influence the movement and effects of civilizations and their environment worldwide.
Ember, Carol R., Melvin Ember, and Peter N. Peregrine. Anthropology. Thirteenth ed. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall, 2011. Print.
Boas, F. (1930). Anthropology. In, Seligman, E. R. A. ed., Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences. Macmillan: New York.
Culture and society, while important terms to the field of anthropology, are often misunderstood or misused by new students. They are frequently used in daily life, but with a somewhat different context and meaning than those used in anthropological discussions, hence the misunderstanding. They refer to concepts which act as foundations of this field, and it is difficult to make sense of both old and new studies or ideas without them.
Throughout all of history, humans have been evolving not only genetically, but also culturally. Of the two evolutionary processes, cultural evolution happens more quickly, and has had a more noticeable effect on the environment compared to genetic evolution. Early hunter/gatherer societies evolved to agrarian society, which then had technological changes that affected the culture of the society. Unfortunately, while humans have been culturally evolving towards what is perceived to be progress, the environment has been compromised, marginalized, and degraded as it is continually exploited for human benefit and consumption.
According to Laland and Hoppitt (2003:151), culture is mainly about the socially learned and transmitted behaviours in a certain group; however, more and more social scientists find that culture is too complicated to give a perfect and reasonable definition (2003:151). Boesch and Tomasello (1998:591) point out that culture is suggested to be viewed as an evolutionary process rather than an actual thing. Ironically, it seems that working on humans’ own culture cannot satisfy them so that they tend to figure out if culture exists in other biological populations. This also could be regarded as a good sign that humans are continually exploring their knowledge about evolution in connection with other species especially some hominid species like
In the end, what we learn from this article is very realistic and logical. Furthermore, it is supported with real-life examples. Culture is ordinary, each individual has it, and it is both individual and common. It’s a result of both traditional values and an individual effort. Therefore, trying to fit it into certain sharp-edged models would be wrong.