Theoretical Framework and Principles

1100 Words3 Pages

Introduction

In inquiring on theoretical framework to serve as the base for the research and analysis at the core of our dissertation it is crucial to comprehend the construction and the element directing the theory we are adopting for months to come. Stewart, Harte and Sambrook (2010, p223) have determined the relation that the theory plays with the evolution of the research process and its designer “In summary then the concept of theory is inextricably connected to notions of science that, in origin at least, refers to investigating the world according to a set of rules and principles.” Those rules and principles will be the guide and limitations to direct the inquisition once adopted and accepted by the authors and its advisors the dissertation will be bound to follow the direction set by the theoretical framework. We will establish the foundation of our paper and setting two main paradigms and further decide which one will be the more pertinent.

Theoretical framework

Easterby-Smith, Thorpe and Jackson (2012) have exposed the foremost epistemological methods centered on positivism and social constructivist, the latter component will be the approach retain to inspire our research. Form this model we must develop a theoretical framework in relation with the subject of our dissertation, we will investigate the influence of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions (Hofstede, 1980) on organizational learning inside SME in China. Learning is an individual and collective process that encompasses different realities, multiple experiences, and distinctive perspectives need to be assembled in a consolidation of quantitative and qualitative methods. This is in complete harmony with the constructivist position detailed by Easterby-Smith, Thorpe ...

... middle of paper ...

... the aspect of organizational learning. Being aware of the future weight of those elements we required the intervention and guidance of our peers and scholars to provide a much-needed opinion regarding the relevance of the concept and theoretical feature of our future study.

Conclusion

Philosophical paradigm are the soil in which the rest of the production of the dissertation will take roots, the second phase in the adoption of a theoretical framework to help design the methodology and methods that will serve as the skeleton determining the composition of the research. At this point we established a tentative approach to create a bilateral framework enclosing the two main aspects of our project, cultural dimensions and organizational learning. Hopefully some criticisms and suggestions will materialize assisting us to preserve a final version of those components.

Open Document