Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of changes in organization
Effects of change in an organization
Effects of change in an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of changes in organization
Change is inevitable within organizations. From the beginning of organizations, there has been changes. From the beginning of towns, wars, and businesses, individuals have seen reasons and the purpose in changing parts or whole organizations to make them better and more efficient (Sutevski, 2014). Many factors, leadership styles, and data go into the creation of the organizational change.
Factors that contribute to the organic evolution of change
Many organizations are faced with change for one reason or another. Some of the factors creating the need to change are competition, technology, desire for growth, need to improve processes, and government regulations (Joseph, 2014).
When an organization finds they are lacking in technology, they may decide to upgrade their technology to give them the market advantage. Obtain different capitol resources may prompt the organization to adjust the supply chain functions and increase the amount of production being done within the organization (Cole-Ingait, 2014). The brick-and-mortar strategies might be affected by the online strategies of distribution due to the increase of information systems (Cole-Ingait, 2014). As the technology is upgraded, the employees within the organization need to be trained to understand the advanced technology standards (Joseph, 2014). Technology has been shown to help increase the customer service and help with efficiency within the organization (Joseph, 2014).
The competition around an organization may lead a company to change (Joseph, 2014). When a competitor moves into the same territory as a similar competitor, this will take away some of the market (Joseph, 2014). If the organization wants to maintain the same level of market share they had before...
... middle of paper ...
... Retrieved from Change Management Tutorial Series: http://www.change-management.com/tutorial-change-process-detailed.htm
Sutevski, D. (2014). Evolution of Organizational Changes. Retrieved from Entrepreneurship in a box: http://www.entrepreneurshipinabox.com/443/evolution-of-organizational-changes/
Toppazzini, K. (2013). The Psychology of Organizational Change: It doesn’t have to be so hard. Retrieved from Quality Digest: http://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/quality-insider-column/psychology-organizational-change.html#
University of Michigan. (2011). NextGen Michigan Program Change Management Guidebook. Retrieved from University of Michigan: http://nextgen.umich.edu/methodology/documents/NextGen-Michigan-Change-Management-Guidebook.pdf
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(67), 1-9. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
An organization might have a structure in place for change but they must also look at the finances. An organization must have appropriate finances to handle the change and must keep the organization profitable (Nielsen and Abildgaard, 2013). Both finances and the social environment within in an organization are resources that can potentially limit an organization from
Spector, B. (2013). Implementing organizational change: theory into practice. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
Kegan, R. & L. Laskow Lahey. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
A theoretical framework provides guidance as a project evolves. The end results will determine whether the knowledge learned from implementing a project should create a change in practice (Sinclair, 2007). In this project is relied on the Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory. Burnes (2004) states that despite the fact that Lewin built up this three-step model more than 60 years prior, it keeps on being a commonly referred framework to support effective change projects. The three steps are unfreezing, moving and refreezing. Lewin decided in Step 1, unfreezing, that human conduct is held in balance by driving and limiting powers. He trusted this equilibrium should be disrupted with the end goal for change to happen (Burnes, 2004). Step 2 or moving, includes learning. Learning incorporates knowledge of what the conceivable alternatives are and proceeding onward from past practices to new practices which will...
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
From information gathering and research, organizational change management is similar in a way that psychology explores people’s behaviors in the workplace by creating theories and set of principles to compliant with the o...
Middlebrook, B., Caruth, D., & Frank, R. (1984, Summer 85). Overcoming Resistance to Change. Management Journal, 50(3), pp. 23.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
The world is constantly changing in many different ways. Whether it is technological or cultural change is present and inevitable. Organizations are not exempt from change. As a matter of fact, organizations have to change with the world and society in order to be successful. Organizations have to constantly incorporate change in order to have a competitive advantage and satisfy their customers. Organizations use change in order to learn and grow. However, change is not something that can happen in an organization overnight. It has to be thought through and planned. The General Model of Planned Change focuses on what processes are used by the organization to implement change. In the General Model of Planned Change, four steps are used in order to complete the process of change. Entering and Contracting, Diagnosing, Planning and Implementing, and Evaluating and Institutionalizing are the four steps used in order to complete the process of change in an organization. The diagnostic process is one of the most important activities in OD(Cummings, 2009, p. 30).
It is apparent that the only thing constant in business is change. Organizational change is often an overwhelming challenge for business leaders, managers and employees alike. The need for change may be the result of market shifts, economic environment, technology advancements or changing work force skill-set demands. Today Organizational change occurs for reasons that originate external to the organization (Chandler, 1996: Hannan & Freeman, 1984), as well as internal to the organization (Baker 1990: Prechel 1994). Thus, External constraints, internal constraints, resource dependency and increasingly growing competitive markets force organizations to change in order to maximize economic potential. Although organizational changes are usually a response in reaction to an event, companies and leaders should still expect to encounter issues. Organizations need to be more proactive and contingent on how to handle the problems that will inevitably come about. This will make the process of organizational change go smoothly as well as reduce resistance through proper management techniques. Resource dependency argues that both environmental and organizational constraints impact organizational change (Pfeffer & Salancik, 2003).
Individuals go through a reaction process when they are personally confronted with major organizational change (Kyle, 1993; Jacobs, 1995; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Within this process there are four phases that it consists of: initial denial, resistance, gradual exploration, and eventual commitment (Scott & Jaffe, 1988; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Resistance to change is the initial area to focus on. The issues of organizational change and resistance to change have received a lot of attention over the past decade (Macri, Tagliaventi & Bertolotti, 2002). The perceptions of individuals play a fu...