More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths of self determination theory
Constructs of self-determination theory
Components of self-determination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Following World War I, the collapse of once formidable empires (such as the Ottoman and the Austro-Hungarian) left the international order increasingly unstable and in disarray. When combined with massive physical and economic devastation of Europe, even the victorious Allied powers (such as Britain and France) were struggling to remain viable. Allied powers simply did not have financial or military resources to be concerned with remaining on top of the international hierarchy or exercise any degree of hegemony. Colonial territories of former world powers, primarily located in Africa and Asia, were ready to take advantage of the crippled international system and shape it to meet the desires of the people. Namely, to break the chains of colonial …show more content…
dependency and experiment with radical new ideas concerning self-governance. It was the words of President Woodrow Wilson, however, that people in oppressed colonial territories latched onto and would spearhead the radical anticolonial movements that swept the world. Although initial anticolonial movements after the war ultimately collapsed under the weight of importance given to Wilson's performance at Versailles, this resistance would form the foundation of a modern world order based upon a sovereign nation-state. Central to the development of anticolonial movements after World War I is what Erez Manela coins "The Wilsonian moment" in his work The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism.
The Wilsonian moment generally refers to the short time period between the entry of the United States into the First World in 1917 and the death of Wilson in 1921. The Wilsonian Movement, according to Manela, "captures the fact that, during this period, the American president became for millions worldwide the icon and most prominent exponent of the vision…[concerning] a just international society based on the principle of self-determination" (Page 6). It was during his Peace Without Victory speech in January 1917 that the President first eluded to the idea that he supported an international world order based on democratic forms of government under the guidance of international law. In the speech before Congress, Wilson said, "…every people should be left free to determine its own polity, its own way of development--unhindered, unthreatened, unafraid, the little along with the great and powerful" (Page 23). Wilson firmly believed that the United States, through diplomatic action, could be a "universal moral authority" that could usher in this new liberal world …show more content…
order. These words emphasizing the equality of nations reverberated throughout the colonial world; after all, the President's words certainly seemed to directly counter the dominant European imperialism of the day. Anticolonial revolutionaries throughout the globe accepted Wilson's vision of a new world order based on the principles of self-determination with open arms. Manela frequently discusses the impassioned letters anticolonial intellectuals sent to Wilson, each letter adapting to his sensibilities by crafting its verbiage based upon the unique circumstances of the territory in question. For instance, Syngman Rhee, who would later become the leader of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea, sought to remind Wilson of the high educational levels of the Korean people. Rhee's rationale was simple: since thousands of Koreans have studied abroad (often at American universities), its people were already civilized and did not need a gradual transformation into absolute independence from Japanese rule. Rhee himself was a product of Ivy League schools, and even knew President Wilson from his time at Princeton. Despite personal pleas for discussion of Korea's status at Versailles and the million people that participated in the March First movement, Rhee was denied admission into the conference. The State Department merely stated, "Korea was part of the empire of Japan and therefore a domestic Japanese matter about which the United States could do little" (211). It is clear that President's vision of self-determination did not apply to non-European peoples. Instead, self-determination for non-European colonial territories would be a gradual process, allowing time for civilization and training (Page 25). This notion is best demonstrated by the US occupation of the Philippines and Haiti. When asked about the question of self-determination for the Philippines, Wilson responded that the people of the island "would have to learn colonial administration…painfully" (page 28). In this manner, self-determination for the Filipino people would come gradually if outside observers and advisors (of the League of Nations) saw measured progress towards civilization.
Wilson would apply the same logic to justify US presence in Haiti beginning in 1916 and lasting for nearly twenty years. US takeover of Haitian custom houses and the lucrative sugar cane industry, however, detracts from Wilson's central argument that the US was there purely to "civilize" and advance the wellbeing of the people. Wilson would repeatedly say that the "…theory of colonial trusteeship, [should] take into account the "interests of the populations concerned" (Page 220). "Interests" are subjective and are not appropriately interchangeable with demands or
necessities. Anticolonial revolutionaries did not understand that Wilson's stress on self-determination came with an asterisk attached that regulated it to Anglo-Saxon people in practice. However, it is difficult to label the revolutionaries as ignorant due to the systematic manner in which Wilson's words were dispersed throughout the globe. This was due to the Committee on Public Information (CPI), which George Creel lead as Wilson's chief "propagandist". Creel was able to effectively spread a positive image of the United States "to every community in the US and to every corner of the world" (48). This rapid dispersion of information that glorified the United States was due to the daily news bulletins that were sent to foreign press offices that often-printed Wilson's gospel verbatim. Additionally, the CPI made use of wireless radio repeaters to insure Asia and Africa were indoctrinated into the virtues of Wilson's liberal world order. Wilson, however, largely ignored the expected natural consequence of this global information campaign - energized colonial territories demanding independence. The sharp divide between Wilson's actions at Versailles and his speeches leading up to the conference would become more apparent as the conference languished on. Wilson would later comment, "When I said those words, I said them without knowledge that nationalities existed… [my words have caused me] anxieties as the result of millions of people having their hopes raised by what I have said" (215). Although Wilson failed to entertain the desires of the revolutionaries where it mattered most in Paris, his words gave the revolutionaries the ammunition needed later to fight for political autotomy independent of the US or the League of Nations. The same prominent anticolonial revolutionaries that Wilson disregarded would later rise to prominence as leaders of solidified, sovereign nation-states. For example: China's Mao Zedong, who first positioned China as ready for self-determination at age 25 in 1919, would become head of the Chinese Communist Party in 1949. Syngman Rhee would serve three terms as the President of South Korea, and the Indian National Congress (INC) is the leading political party in India today. The failure of the Wilsonian moment would spark a revitalized nationalistic movement that diluted the influence of the US in world affairs. This would lead to the creation of the dominant political paradigms centered around the nation-state present today.
David Kennedy’s Over Here: The First World War and American Society demonstrates Americans connection to global society. President Wilson “called the newly elected 65th Congress into special session on April 2 to receive his war message.” Wilson’s message would impact America socially, economically, and politically; that would continue to influence America throughout the twentieth century. Wilson presented to Congress four proposals on how America was to wage war: a bold tax program, a compulsory draft of young men into the nation’s service, “for the enforced loyalty of all Americans in a cause to which many were indifferent or openly hostile, and, by implication, at least,” and the expansion of presidential powers.
Imperialism destroyed relations with international colonies, and increased tension among each nation. (Document 5.) European countries desired overseas expansion and strived to obtain markets for consumer goods. However, these expansions interfered with the rights of overseas citizens, and caused a series of conflicts to prevail. While colonial inhabitants were politically, economically, and socially unstable, imperialist forces competed for leadership. Competition among European nations divided the regions. War was on the horizon for countries like Germany and France who sought after the same region, Morocco. Similarly, both Britain and France desired the territory of Sudan, while Russia and Austria-Hungary battled for the Balkans, evidently intensifying rivalries, and possibly leading to war. Imperialism was a competitive force that inevitably led to crises among rivaling nations. Due to severe opposition and competition as well as discontent in colonized regions, imperialism can be considered a major factor leading to World War
...n and defeated, Wilson believed firmly that his vision of America leading a world community of nations would eventually be embraced by the American people. Twenty-five years later, the United Nations built its headquarters in New York, a tangible symbol of the bipartisan support that Wilsonian ideals had gained after a second world war. But Wilson's legacy was not confined to foreign policy. His progressive domestic programs helped stabilize and humanize a huge industrial system, and his success in making the presidency the intellectual and political leader of the American government enabled the United States to deal effectively with the challenges and threats of the modern world. But don't forget the credit of Roosevelt's "New Imperialism", it became the hallmark of American foreign policy in the new century, positioning America as the leader of the western alliance.
When World War I broke out in Europe, Woodrow Wilson announced that the United States would stay out of European affairs and remain neutral. Wilson was aware that the United States had no interest in the matters that did not directly affect the interests of America citizens. He hoped that the United States would remain neutral and continue to trade with warring nations. The American view of neutrality meant we were entitled to safely and freely trade with either side at war as long as it was out in the open seas.
In his book, “Woodrow Wilson Revolution, War, and Peace” by Arthur Link, Link walks step by step through President Woodrow Wilson’s career beginning from the time he was born and focuses on his role during and after World War I. Through his entire book, Link acts as an apologist for the actions of Wilson as well as argues against the opinions of other historians. Link speaks about Wilson almost as if he idolizes him; as if despite what other historians and public opinion might say that he can do no wrong.
He constantly pulls on the heartstrings of the audience by persuading them to choose a truce and freedom over violence. When listeners heard the tranquil life they could live if they followed the points, many of them eagerly agreed with Wilson. When he explained why he entered the war, he said that war “touched us to the quick” (Wilson) because the United States simply could not move on without joining in and correcting the issue. This use of language appeals to the emotions by showing America’s sensitivity and passion towards righteousness. Later, he continues to establish his nation’s morals by declaring “We stand together until the end” (Wilson). Woodrow Wilson makes the unity of his country very clear, likely inspiring others who yearn for similar connections. Also, he uses the word “we” (Wilson) instead of only referring to himself to show that this was a decision made by his whole country. He ends the speech by explaining the commitment of his people, announcing that “they are ready to devote their lives, their honor, and everything that they possess” (Wilson). American citizens are so committed to what they believe in, that they are willing to risk it all just to stand up for what they believe is right. All of these statements appeal to feelings because it is moving to hear how the citizens of the United States put their lives on the line in an attempt to achieve a state of peace for every country involved in the
The progressive era was a period of social activism and political reform in the United States. The political climate was ripe for reform and America was seeking leaders who could provide a new, more beneficial direction. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were two of the most renowned presidents of this era. One kindred goal of both of these presidents was to monitor and rectify large trust and monopolies in the U.S. Despite the fact that Wilson and Roosevelt’s domestic policies were correlative of each other, their foreign policies were very different from one another. Roosevelt tended to become more involved with foreign events. On the other hand, Wilson favored remaining impartial in foreign affairs. Wilson didn’t want to become entangled in World War 1 until the United States had been directly stricken.
Woodrow Wilson, our 23rd president, became involved in a war that he did not want any part of. Wilson wanted to remain neutral and have peace as in his first term of office. During World War I Wilson’s roles in the war became well known in all countries. Wilson wanted peace more than anything else. In seeking for peace Wilson asked Congress for the U.S. to enter World War I. which may not sound like a peace strategy but Wilson felt it was the only way to stop Germany and gain peace. Wilson wrote his speech for world peace, Fourteen Points, that he was probably most famous for. He attended and played an integral part in The Treaty of Versailles. He was the founder of the League of Nations, which he talked about in his Fourteen Points speech. .
The war reached an end on Nov. 11, 1918. The German proposition for peace came amidst the Congressional races. Against the guidance of those near him, the president chose to go to the peace gathering in Paris and battle for his beliefs face to face. Wilson not being present during congressional races shows how determined he was to keep peace in the World and finish what he started. “On December 13 he arrived in Europe. Probably no man has ever been given such an ovation. Wherever he went enormous crowds gathered, sobbing, cheering, shouting his name. (World War One Woodrow Wilson)” When the treaty of Versailles was created in 1919 many of his ideas were implemented in the treaty. However getting the Senate to agree with the Treaty was a whole nother can of worms. In search for support to overwhelm the senate WIlson started campaigning around the United States. Wilson was working extremely hard until late september in Colorado where Wilson suffered a stroke that left him paralyzed. Wilsons hard work and dedication is an example for everybody, his will to make the world a better place is unmatched and will be remembered in
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
In WWI, Wilsonian idealism meant several things. This included de-colonization. Also, Wilson strongly believed in democratic peace theory, and he thought that the United States needed to make the world safe for democracy. Furthermore, the president clarified that the United States was entering the war on a moral high ground. For example, Woodrow Wilson mentioned the U.S. was not going to war out of national security but the U.S. had a messianic mission. There were some concerns like the Zimmerman letter that asked Mexico to attack the U.S. On the other hand, the messianic mission was “a war to end all wars” and this was war to make the world safe for democracy. His ideas, which were deeply liberal principles, were embedded into the fourteen points he had created during
Introduction: The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as a proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans are aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on.
WWII has a ripple effect across the globe causing changes both internationally and domestically. Internationally, The sun finally began to set over the British Empire with the majority of her majesties colonial possessions gaining independence in the years following the war. Britain’s stage left exit from its hegemonic role resulted in the start of a new “Great Game” between two burgeoning superpowers. A new world order began to take shape with the United States and USSR vying to establish their own hegemony.
Our textbook does indeed lie about Wilson’s policy, Clearly his purpose of sending troops to Haiti and other foreign countries was to determine their president and set up treaty preferential to US, but in our books, it says “In 1915, Wilson RELUCTANTLY dispatched marines to protect” to quell disorders in Haiti, and he proposed to provide US supervision of finances and the police (710); by describing that way, we as readers cannot sense the evil intentions behind the US policies. I was also surprised to see that textbooks limited details of invasions to only Dominican Republic and Haiti, even though nations like Nicaragua and Cuba were involved too during the Wilson era (they were just marked on a map, that’s all). In Loewen’s book, he said that Thomas Bailey, the author of our textbook, knew about 1918 US invasion of Russia (as he wrote in a different venue), but again, Bailey didn’t include such fact in American Pageant.
To begin with, Woodrow Wilson, the 28th president of the United States is one of the most influential and known idealist in history. He is recognized as an idealist because of his admirable ambitions and his strive for excellence. He had a major role after World War One, when he presented his Fourteen Points. The Fourteen Points were meant to bring peace to the world and make it so that another tragic war like the Great War would not occur again. His Fourteen Points Speech is a perfect example of idealism because in the speech Wilson talked about free trade, self-determination, disarmament, freedom of the seas, and the most important part of the speech was the League of Nat...