David Kennedy’s Over Here: The First World War and American Society demonstrates Americans connection to global society. President Wilson “called the newly elected 65th Congress into special session on April 2 to receive his war message.” Wilson’s message would impact America socially, economically, and politically; that would continue to influence America throughout the twentieth century. Wilson presented to Congress four proposals on how America was to wage war: a bold tax program, a compulsory draft of young men into the nation’s service, “for the enforced loyalty of all Americans in a cause to which many were indifferent or openly hostile, and, by implication, at least,” and the expansion of presidential powers. There are several social implication that were affected by these four proposals, mainly centering on the immigration …show more content…
population.
Kennedy points out that “according to the census of 1910, one of every three Americans in that year had either been born abroad or had at least one parent born abroad. Of those 32 million persons from families with close foreign ties, more than ten million derived from the Central Powers.” Many immigrants still supported their Old Country; German agents had committed acts of sabotage to prevent the delivery of war materials to the Allies during the American neutrality period, 1914-1917, causing Wilson to expel German representatives from the country. Wilson (and others) believed American disloyalty was prevalent within the immigrant population, and in 1915 and 1916 launched attacks “against so-called hyphenated Americans. “There are citizens of the United States, I blush to admit,” Wilson told the Congress in his third annual message, “born under other flags but welcomed under our generous naturalization laws to the full freedom and opportunity of America,
who have poured the poison of disloyalty into the very arteries of our national life … Such creature of passion, disloyalty, and anarchy must be crushed out … [T]he hand of our power should close over them at once.” In an effort to suppress disloyalty, Wilson supported “100 percent Americanism,” to eliminate hyphenated Americans, for example German-American and Irish-Americans, by eliminating old traditional ethnic and religious barriers and sponsoring nationalism and Americanization. An example of these efforts is demonstrated by The Committee for Immigrants in American and the Bureau of Education collaboration of the “War Americanization Plan that sponsored English and citizenship classes in schools, community halls, and factories.” The disloyalty question is just one of the many social discussion Kennedy presents in Over Here. He provides detailed analysis on the cost of war, how funds were raised, who were affected by the tax proposals, and the creation and sale of “Liberty Bonds.” The formation of the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) through the conscription draft, presented several social problems both at home and abroad. There was Congressional objection to the formation of a national army, most believed in providing funds, ammunition, and food to the Allies, but not men. The addition of black men in the draft, the racial problems that occurred and the “black question” of whether to integrate or segregate. Volunteerism, those wanting to fight but were still required at home on the farms and all areas of industry – factories, mines, and railroads. This sparked the exemption policy debate, of those needed at home and those able to join, but later expanded to whether married men should remain at home with their families. Conscientious objectors became a problem, resulting in the formation of boards to decide whether individual would be exempted or not. Finally, the debate on the utilization of the AEF, amalgamation or not. The Allies wanted to incorporate American units in their own units and under their leadership, but General Pershing wanted to maintain a separate unit under his total control and not to engage in battle until he possessed the strength to overwhelm the enemy. Presidential power is another area Kennedy discusses in-depth that had extensive social implication. Following the declaration of war, the Espionage Act was enacted into law, suppressing those who opposed the war by granting governmental powers in the “punishment of any interference with the activities of the armed services, including recruitment; and control of the mails to prevent their use for the dissemination of allegedly treasonable material.” The Lever Food and Fuel Act created the Food Administration and allowed the President to control wheat and fuel prices, ultimately at higher prices that benefited farmers and corporations in the coal and oil industries. The Overman Act gave “the President great discretionary authority to reorganize executive agencies without consulting Congress in each case.” In the long run these Acts helped in the war effort that some can view as successful, but later Wilson was “increasingly condemned for this highhanded and “dictatorial” behaviors.”
In the book, America’s Great War: World War I and the American Experience, Robert H. Zieger discusses the events between 1914 through 1920 forever defined the United States in the Twentieth Century. When conflict broke out in Europe in 1914, the President, Woodrow Wilson, along with the American people wished to remain neutral. In the beginning of the Twentieth Century United States politics was still based on the “isolationism” ideals of the previous century. The United States did not wish to be involved in European politics or world matters. The U.S. goal was to expand trade and commerce throughout the world and protect the borders of North America.
Based on Wilson’s war message to Congress, It was believe that the United States had a moral and humanitarian obligation to intervene in World War I and “make the world safe for democracy” (Wilson). Luce’s point in The American Century was not imperial, but idealistic. It was America’s time to shine, “to be the powerhouse from which the ideals spread throughout the world and do their mysterious work of lifting the life of mankind from the level of the beasts to what the Psalmist called a little lower than the angels” (Luce). Both sources demonstrate that the ideals of Woodrow and Luce inspired many Americans and shaped much of the foreign policy for the remainder of the twentieth century and on. The more significant viewpoints are the differences.
On the other side, Wilson was determined to revise the imperialist practices of earlier administrations, promising independence to the Philippines and making Puerto Ricans American citizens. But Wilson's own policies could sometimes be high-handed. His administration intervened militarily more often in Latin America than any of his predecessors. In the European war, American neutrality ended when the Germans refused to suspend submarine warfare after 120 Americans were killed aboard the British liner Lusitania and a secret German offer of a military alliance with Mexico against the United States was uncovered. In 1917, Congress voted overwhelmingly to declare war on Germany.
Not four months earlier, the American people re-elected President Wilson, partly because of his success in keeping the United States out of this European war. However, a series of events, such as the Germans continuing submarine warfare and the attacks on five American ships, led President Wilson to sever diplomatic relations with Germany and send the United States into what would be labeled as World War I. As a result of the war, Government enacted the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 which led to the suppression of anti-war documents and sentiments, as well as the prosecution of over two-thousand individuals. # Despite earlier resistance to the war by the American people, once war was declared patriotism swept over the nation. However, patriotism rose to it?s peak and quickly turned into an intolerance for any kind of dissidence from the war. With a general intolerance for opponents of the war the government began to repress groups advocating against the war, as did private organizations.
There are, however, some negatives to this act as well. Some voters speculate that instituting this bill will create a large scale “chain migration”. They feel that this act is only a “magnet” for the famil...
upon the United States is hereby formally declared” (Bailey 10). In conclusion, after a rhetorical analysis of Woodrow Wilson’s address. to the war congress on April 2, 1917 the reader is more aware of all of the
Being afraid and being aware that the Germans were the problem were both wins for the American community. Now that the people were afraid, the American government could step in and imply laws that had never been implied to another man. For instance, there was a case where a famous conductor by the name of Dr. Karl Much had his own experience with this American support. This man was “accused o...
In his book, “Woodrow Wilson Revolution, War, and Peace” by Arthur Link, Link walks step by step through President Woodrow Wilson’s career beginning from the time he was born and focuses on his role during and after World War I. Through his entire book, Link acts as an apologist for the actions of Wilson as well as argues against the opinions of other historians. Link speaks about Wilson almost as if he idolizes him; as if despite what other historians and public opinion might say that he can do no wrong.
The American home front during World War II is recalled warmly in popular memory and cultural myth as a time of unprecedented national unity, years in which Americans stuck together in common cause. World War II brought many new ideas and changes to American life. Even though World War II brought no physical destruction to the United States mainland, it did affect American society. Every aspect of American life was altered by U.S. involvement in the war including demographics, the labor force, economics and cultural trends.
World War I may not have made the world safe for democracy, but it did help to lay the groundwork for a decade of American economic expansion. The war began in Europe in 1914, and the United States entered the fray in 1917. The 1920s saw the growth of the culture of consumerism. A significant reason for United States involvement in the war was the nation’s economic links to the Allied Powers, and especially to Great Britain. American soldiers returned home in May 1919 with the promise of a prosperous decade (Baughman 197).
One of the first acts by FDR that got America involved in the war was discussed in his fireside chat “The Great Arsenal of Democracy”. This fireside chat occurred after Roosevelt
Therefore, reforming the immigration policies today should not be based on racism, or nativism. In addition, it is important to dispel the misconceptions of the Latino/a immigration today because it is a mistake to formulate policies based on preconceptions of racialized groups. Works Cited Aoki, Andrew, and Okiyoshi Takeda. Asian American Politics. Polity Pr, 2009 -.
In addition to the aid Germany would provide, Zimmermann also proposed to grant many American states to Mexico after the war. Wilson, livid at the telegram, immediately released it to the press. The country replied with its own indignation after hearing of Germany’s plot, and while the president still looked for ways to avoid the conflict, his “cabinet voted unanimously in favor of going to war” (James and Wells, 26). Wilson took on the persona of the leader of a “righteous war”, and with much support from the people, approached Congress asking for a declaration of war (James and Wells, 26). While not everyone was supportive of the war, the vast majority were extremely pro-war.
The United States is in the midst of a major debate over immigrants and their place in our economic and political life. As during other times in our history, immigrants, are being blamed for causing or contributing to the social, economic and political ills of our society. Politicians from both major parties, at both the national and state levels, are promoting a range of punitive legislative proposals that single out immigrants for adverse treatment by the government. Many violate basic civil liberties principles.
The study also took a close look at how the courts deal with the issue, the administrative interpretation of the law, and the application of the reform to be very critical and increasingly impossible. The author discovered that immigration reform has chronic problems, citizens’ disinterest to participate in the political process, government inefficacy, and centralized decision making away from the very communities imparted. The lack of enforcement is mounting pressure on states’ budgets (appropriation and allocations) of resources as the number of beneficiaries for social services increased. On the other hand, Dorsey and Diaz-Barriza (2007) studied President Barack Obama stands on immigration when he was then senator and compared them to conservative and liberal position. In the research, the author lamented that then senator Obama called for a comprehensive immigration reform that would deal with the issues of border security, employers sanction for hiring illegal individuals and a path to earned citizenship. Both sides agreed in part, but disagreed with the issue of path to citizenship which created gray lack. Today, the debate continues between the both political parties and the states leading the president executive action on immigration in recent