Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay sutable political cartoon
Critical analysis of the montgomery bus boycott
Rosa parks impact on civil rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay sutable political cartoon
Cartoons help the audience analyze the author’s ideas and messages in a visual aspect, rather than with words. This particular cartoon from The Washington Post contains both a visual message as well as written words with a message. In terms of the rhetoric triangle, these two aspects join together to help understand the subject that the speaker brings across as well as the speaker’s ideas and beliefs to the audience with the subject. In this cartoon, the author uses the senses of ethos, pathos, and logos to show their beliefs on the ideas Rosa Parks presented. In order to analyze the political cartoon, one must distinguish the use of ethos, pathos, and logos, where the cartoon first appeared along with its political leanings, and the interaction …show more content…
of the written text and visual images.
Appealing to ethos, pathos, and logos requires the author to provide sense of emotions while providing statistical data in a credible and trustworthy manner. The cartoon and visual words provides the idea of ethos. In appealing to ethos for this particular subject, the reader must distinguish the credibility and trustworthiness in the author. The Washington Post published the political cartoon. America considers The Washington Post as the oldest daily newspaper. This newspaper won 47 Pulitzer Prizes to this day, the second highest number ever given to a newspaper. According to quora.com, The Washington Post readers appeal to unbiased reporting than in any other city newspapers. This shows the credibility in the Washington Post in terms of ethos. In order for the reader/viewer to view the …show more content…
political cartoon in a clear, concise manner, the person who published the cartoon must be a source with credibility. The audience not only appeals to ethos, but to pathos as well. In the particular subject of Civil Rights and Rosa Parks, pathos becomes present when appealing to the emotion African Americans felt during the time period. Beginning as early as before the Revolutionary War, discrimination and racism grew in populations, especially in the United States. Following the Civil War, reconstruction initiated. The Reconstruction Era (1865-1877) provided segregation to arise. But, in the early 1900’s, racism and discrimination against African Americans became widely prevalent. The lives of African Americans grew more difficult as segregation and violence arose. Whites called blacks “dirt”. Blacks obeyed to whites as power remained in the white population. In the political cartoon, pathos develops an emotional appeal towards Rosa Parks. She stands in front of the gates of heaven appealing to her reverence in her actions in the civil rights movements. Appealing to logos helps the audience analyze the political cartoon in a sense of logic. In appealing to logos, one must also acknowledge the counterargument against the author’s ideas. The political cartoon makes it obvious that the author thinks of Rosa Parks as an angel. The counterargument for this contains Rosa Parks’ actions as mistakes to society. But, this counterargument could not be supported easily. Rosa Parks, a woman, stood up for not only herself, but for her whole race. Throughout all of history, women became visible in lower aspects than men. As mentioned earlier, African American discrimination and racism widely spread. Rosa Parks, being a woman and an African American, made her task of standing up to her rights extremely difficult. But, did this stop her? Of course not. With the help of the NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Rosa Parks not only stood up for her and all black civil rights, but also received the Eleanor Roosevelt Woman of Courage Award in 1984. Rosa Parks, considered one of the most important Civil Rights Activists in all of history, changed the world for African Americans and whites.
The author of the cartoon focuses on Rosa Parks outside of the doors to heaven. But, what did Rosa Parks do to earn this position? After working as a seamstress all day on December 1st 1955, Rosa Parks boarded the Cleveland Avenue bus home. All buses in Montgomery required segregation on public transportation. Buses contained a line roughly in the middle to segregate whites from blacks. Whites, being the dominant race during this period, sat in front. Blacks filled seats in the back. On December 1st 1955, Rosa Parks refused to give her front seat to a white individual. She did such an act because she stated “I was not physically tired, but tired of giving in”. Rosa, along with many other African Americans, found segregation laws extremely unfair. Their political leanings include the belief in the same rights and freedom for all. “We should have been free and given the same opportunities,” stated Rosa Parks during an interview with Scholastic. Since Rosa would not give her seat to a white individual, the authorities arrested her and placed her in jail. Following this act began the Montgomery Bus Boycott where mostly African Americans and some whites refused to use the Montgomery Public Transportation in order to show feelings towards segregation. Rosa Parks held a position as a civil right activist hero all around and continues seen
in this manner to present day. This aspect shows the cartoonists’ agreement in Rosa Parks being considered a “hero” as she can be seen outside the gates of heaven rather than being outside the gates of hell. Discovering where Rosa Parks, the main cartoon in the picture, first appeared helps demonstrate what ideas the author tries to reach across in terms of the subject Civil Rights. Her actions remain heroic in the eyes of those who agreed with abolishing segregation laws. Seeing the correlation and interaction between the written text and visual images helps the viewer/reader understand the beliefs of the author. In the cartoon, Rosa Parks comes face to face with an angel. This particular angel reads from a book outside what appears being the gates to heaven. Seeing as these gates lead to heaven rather than hell show the author’s beliefs in agreement to Rosa Parks standing up against the ideas of segregation. Not only do visual images prove the cartoonists’ beliefs, but written text does as well. In the political cartoon, the angel in front of the gates to heaven states to Rosa, “Rosa Parks… Yes, we have something in the front row for you…”. In a literal sense, the statement said by the angel shows the audience Rosa Parks has on society. Her courageousness and actions who promoted equality for all gained Rosa the position of receiving a front row seat. Also, in the figurative sense, Rosa “figuratively” receives a front row seat from the angel- such as, front row seat where only whites could sit on busses. She earned this seat with her willingness to stand up to what she believed right. One last written text seen in the political cartoon can be found in the lower right hand corner. It states, “We’ve been holding it open since 1955”. The written text in this short phrase conveys a very powerful message over the author’s beliefs. The front row seat given to Rosa Parks in heaven continued held open since 1955, the year Rosa Parks stood up for her civil rights. This shows the admiration given to Rosa because of the values she portrayed in not abandoning her seat in order to make a white happy. The interaction between written text and visual images help the reader understand the author and the subject. In this particular political cartoon, the author gives visual images and written text showing their strong belief in thinking Rosa Parks made wise decisions with her Civil Rights Movement actions. Without either visual images or written text, the reader could not examine the ideas in a full, concise manner. In conclusion, in order to analyze the political cartoon, one must distinguish the use of ethos, pathos, and logos, where the cartoon first appeared along with its political leanings, and the interaction of the written text and visual images. Ethos can be distinguished when learning more about where this political cartoon came from, The Washington Post. Pathos may be appealed when appealing to the emotions felt towards African American racism and discrimination. Logos appeals when explaining why the counterargument to the author’s ideas seem false while providing strong evidence to support your answer. Knowing where the cartoon first appeared along with its political leanings gives the reader a clear picture as to why the author’s ideas and beliefs seem correct. The interaction of the written text and visual images provide yet again, the strong beliefs in thinking Rosa Parks made wise decisions with her Civil Rights Movements. The rhetorical triangle continued present as the reader, author, and subject all connected with one another in order to analyze the political cartoon.
The first cartoon is with Theodore Roosevelt wearing hunting gear and holding a gun. There’s bull sitting on the moon reading the newspaper. There are different names for this political cartoon, like don’t shoot, I’ll come down, the beef trust and et cetera. This cartoon was made when TR was “trust busting” small corporations. After Jungle by Upton Sinclair, people and TR wanted changed. So changes were made and the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1907, which made sure that inspections are made before meats are processed and ready to be delivered.
Starting off, I believe the first video about Claudette Colvin and Rosa Parks is a huge Pathos Rhetoric. Since Pathos is about an emotional apeal, and the first video
The Rhetorical Triangle states that writing should incorporate ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is establishing credibility, pathos is showing emotion in the writing, and logos is stating logical facts. In “Shooting an Elephant” written by George Orwell and “Nickel and Dimed” by Barbara Ehrenreich powerful messages are conveyed. However, “Shooting an Elephant” is comprised of ethos and pathos. While Orwell’s writing lacks logos “Nickel and Dimed” by Barbara Ehrenreich includes ethos, pathos, and logos. Therefore, while both conveying powerful messages Ehrenreich’s writing includes all three aspects of The Rhetorical Tringle while, Orwell’s writing lacks logos but includes the emotion and credibility.
In the “180” movie Ray Comfort outstandingly used rhetorical appeal throughout his argument in a thorough way to further grasp his audience’s attention. He used pathos, ethos, and logos during the course of his dispute of abortion and the Holocaust. Comfort uses pathos more frequently than the other two appeals, to plea to the audience’s heart strings. An example of when pathos was used was when
Deriving from the Dutch word “karton” and the Italian word “cartone,” a cartoon is “ a form of two dimensional illustrated visual art” (toonsmag). A cartoon can typically range from being a child’s pastime to going as far as confronting the socioeconomic and political issues in a country. People known as editorial cartoonists draw these cartoons, often called political or editorial cartoons, using tools such as hyperbole, artistic proficiency, and satire in order to poke fun at and inform the public about a certain issue. One famous editorial cartoonist who is known for his cartoonist is Gary Markstein. “The Iraq Surge”, one of Markstein’s lesser-known works, and the “Five years in Iraq” both deal with the Iraq War. The Iraq war was an invasion
Helen Keller, against all odds, became a mouthpiece for many causes in the early to mid-twentieth century. She advocated for causes such as building institutions for the blind, schools for the deaf, women’s suffrage and pacifism. When America was in the most desperate of times, her voice stood out. Helen Keller spoke at Carnegie Hall in New York raising her voice in protest of America’s decision to join the World War. The purpose of this paper will analyze the devices and methods Keller used in her speech to create a good ethos, pathos, and logos.
In former Civil Rights Activist, Martin Luther King Jr.’s speech “Beyond Vietnam-- A Time to Break Silence”, he asserts that the war in Vietnam is utterly immoral and has a far negative implication, not only for Vietnam but for the United States as well. In this speech, King uses three main rhetorical devices, in order to strengthen his position on this war. The three main rhetorical devices: ethos, pathos, and logos, are universally considered as the three necessary tools of persuasion in literature.
Rosa Parks was a African American woman who sat in the front of the bus after a long hard day at work. As she traveled on the bus back home, a Caucasian male approached and asked her to get up from her seat to go to the back of the bus because he wanted to sit there. Instead of avoiding the trouble and just going to the back of the bus, she decided to stay where she was . Due to the time period, because of her not giving her seat up to the gentlemen, she was arrested and charged with civil disobedience. After her arrest was made a boycott would ensue
Moore uses a great deal of data and logos strategies to alarm the reader. Michael Moore’s overall essay is based on his pathos arguments. He is highly irritated and in disbelief of the education system. The author uses one of the most common and easy to read strategy. First, he makes a logo standpoint and then supports his argument with pathos. He does this so that the reader is engaged and taken aback by his logo argument then is in agreement with his pathos argument that follows.
Authors have many strategies when it comes to winning over their readers and on some occasions may even target their opponents, to make them look bad, in an attempt to make themselves look better. In the articles by Steve Greenberg and Michael Weinreb we will look at the way authors constrict articles to get readers to side with opinion by appealing to a person through logos, pathos, ethos, and the use of rhetorical devices. Greenberg use of a logical fallacy, using a rhetorical device against his friend, and his own use of rhetorical devices in order to convince reader through by ethos of how awful his friend and cardinal fans are, while Weinreb focuses on logos, a logical fallacy, and rhetorical devices to strengthen
The United States was a country founded on the basis of freedom. Imagine living in a nation in which The First Amendment did not exist. Where there was not freedom of speech or press where censorship reigned with a king. This picture is that of France for the entirety of the nineteenth century. During this era, Honoré Daumier was a renowned political and social cartoonist. The King and his police persecuted the lithographer Daumier, among numerous other French artists, for his political activism, including jail time and heavy fines. Honoré Daumier was a master of political and social critique. Looking at an overview of his commentaries there appear strong parallels that can be drawn to current American politics. Daumier uses a range of stylistic choices to promote critiques that are multi-dimensional which contain various overt and more subtle satires, meanings, and messages. Learning from and referencing Daumier, I created a political cartoon that mimics his style.
It all started on December 1, 1955, when Rosa Parks was on her way home from a long day at work. After she sat down and the bus was ready to depart, the bus driver asked the first row of African Americans to get up because there was a white man who didn't have a seat. Everyone got up except Parks, because she didn't want to give in and let them win. “People always say that I didn’t give up my seat because I was tired,” wrote Parks in her autobiography, “but that isn’t true. I was not tired physically… No, the only tired I was, was tired of giving in.”(history.com) Parks was done with being treated badly and tired of being discriminated against, she just wanted her rights back, according to
This article really caught my attention and my eye. This article is very historical and has facts within it that date back to the 1700’s. The article talks about how political cartoons play a part with an election. Specifically the presidential elections and how each and every year cartoonist depicts the candidates as a some sort of superhuman. I believe that this article gives people some background on political cartoons and how they have helped play a part within the U.
Politics is an ongoing controversial discussion; Everyone has the right to participate and indulge in the political movement. Although chaotic at times, it is extremely important and crucial to our future. With that being said, it is important to note that various cartoon artists take pride in replicating important issue through their art. Artist appeal to their audience by using logical fallacies, ethos, and by emphasizing or pointing out important messages within their artwork. Doug MacGregor, a political cartoon artist, had the honor to form a part of the 2016 elections by displaying his ideas in a political cartoon. The cartoon titled “It Takes Brains to be President” by MacGregor alludes to social media and political knowledge using symbolism.
Fried, Gregory. "True Pictures." Understanding Rhetoric. A Graphic Guide to Writing. The Basics. Visual Rhetoric. Readings. Ed. Dore Ripley. Pleasant Hill: DVC, 2013. 91-93. Print.