Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cartoon analysis essays
How do political cartoons affect the public
How do political cartoons affect the public
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cartoon analysis essays
Deriving from the Dutch word “karton” and the Italian word “cartone,” a cartoon is “ a form of two dimensional illustrated visual art” (toonsmag). A cartoon can typically range from being a child’s pastime to going as far as confronting the socioeconomic and political issues in a country. People known as editorial cartoonists draw these cartoons, often called political or editorial cartoons, using tools such as hyperbole, artistic proficiency, and satire in order to poke fun at and inform the public about a certain issue. One famous editorial cartoonist who is known for his cartoonist is Gary Markstein. “The Iraq Surge”, one of Markstein’s lesser-known works, and the “Five years in Iraq” both deal with the Iraq War. The Iraq war was an invasion …show more content…
Juxtaposition is defined as “the act of place two or more things side by side” (Merriam-Webster). Markstein juxtaposes two scenes together in his cartoon: one of George Bush in the White House and the other of the Grim Reaper sitting in a chair. The juxtaposition of these two scenes creates a link between them. The Grim Reaper, in this cartoon, is merely a façade for our president’s ulterior motives and his consequences. This is most likely a hit at President Bush since he was public blamed for the deaths of “ nearly half a million people who have died from war related causes” (Abrams). Despite the rising death toll, President George Bush, infamously, still requested at least twenty thousand extra troops be poured into Iraq (Abrams). Another curious observation I made while glancing at the cartoon was that the Grim Reaper had no discernable facial features. This could be another hint dropped by the artist stating that the President Bush is acting based on the interests that both he and the Grim Reaper share. The viewers can assume from a lack of facial features that President Bush is merely a puppet of the Grim Reaper. In the “Five year’s in Iraq” cartoon the three billion dollar cost casket is juxtaposed between the Sunni and Shi’ite caskets. The placement of these caskets shows that despite the crippling debt we face due to the Iraq War, the human damage is simply sickening. This political cartoon attempts to dissuade Congress from continuing the war effort and informs the audience about the true cost of this war on terror. The caskets for the Sunni and Shi’ite are proportionally larger and placed purposefully in the center of the cartoon, however the death of American soldiers and the cost of the war are placed off to the side and is smaller, respectively. This prioritizes the consequences as a result of the US led invasion of Iraq. It lets one infer
Many political cartoons often contain rhetoric device, such as pathos, ethos, and logos. Ethos often is the speaker, pathos is the audience, logos is the subject. In my political cartoon, Barack Obama is holding an image of the Pope and the Pope is smiling, there is a blurb from Obama saying "Thought you might like this!".
After an analysis of the preliminary speeches Former Senator Robert C. Byrd gave in the early 2000s one may deduce that the senator had the welfare of his fellow Americans in mind as the copious amounts of people around the world might be effected by this war. These speeches are in regard to the grand dilemma that presented itself over a decade ago. This conflict happened to be whether or not we ought to go to war with Iraq. The vein of the initial speech, Rush to War Ignores U.S. Constitution, is cautionary. Byrd is attempting to emblematically pump the breaks on the notion that we have a duty to wage war. In the second speech A Preordained Course of Action on Iraq, Byrd continues to convey his disapprobation as well as recurrently referencing
The artist Leo Tanguman painted morbid murals within the walls of the Denver airport. The scenes signify death and rebirth. One mural shows dead women, destruction of our world, and a little girl with a Mayan tablet representing the 2012 doomsday which is the phase of rebirth. Secondly, another portrays a military figure with a gas mask, gun and a sword. The figure is stabbing a dove which symbolizes peace. Furthermore, painted are weeping women surrounded by deceased girls holding lifeless infants behind the military figure. A smog or gas seems to engulf them along with dead children. Even more, a third painting shows children from all over the world giving weapons to a German boy who is molding them into an uncertain object showing there is no longer a need for weapons in a New World. In addition, the military man is dead with 2 doves above him signifying such peace that has been brought. The final image is of a man in the middle signifying Jesus. This mural symbolizes the New World where everything is in peace and harmony after massive, ugly
I have learned that to be a political artist a few things you need to have down are: an education in politics, skills in the drawn arts, and a good brain for creating scenarios that involve social and political issues. I don’t think I would ever pursue a career in something like this but to anyone who has done this before and maybe does these things as a hobby I say Bravo. Political cartoons are a great way of getting your message out about an issue you care about are more fun to look at and analyze then reading a long written editorial.
Since the mid-nineteenth century, American newspapers have used political cartoons to provide a unique commentary on current events. From 1884 to 1912, Teddy Roosevelt was the subject of many of these cartoons. As his political career progressed, so did his portrayal in these drawings. These changes not only show the evolution of Roosevelt, but also of the Republican (and later the Bull Moose) party.
When Iraq invaded and occupied the country of Kuwait in August 1990, the Bush administration was faced with several dilemmas. From a foreign policy point of view, this action could greatly destabilize the balance of power in a part of the world that was vital to U.S. interests. The United States was dependant on a continuous flow of oil to drive its economic machine, which Kuwait supplied greatly. In addition, this move would put more power into the hands of a government that was not only unfriendly to the U.S., but a sworn enemy of the state of Israel, a strong U.S. ally. In addition to, the fall of communism had created what George Bush had described as, "A new world order," and would become the first major test of how the U.S. would handle its role as the sole remaining super power in this "new world order." There were many challenges facing the Bush administration as to the manner in which they would handle this first major international crisis. The Bush administration had to develop a consensus of the major remaining powers, and appear not acting alone in its response to President Saddam Hussein's actions of invading Kuwait. They also yearned to keep Israel from being involved so as not to alienate the remaining Middle Eastern nations. Lastly, they faced a domestic dilemma, in that much of the American public had significant reservations about involving U.S. troops involved in a foreign conflict. There remained a bad taste of Vietnam among the American public, and there were very mixed responses to American involvement in Somalia, Nicaragua, and Grenada. For the Bush administration, Hussein was not a merchant who could be bargained with, but rather an outlaw who would have to be defeated by force. The Bush administration was faced with a task of developing (more or less) overwhelming support from the U.S. people to take any action in Kuwait, which was accomplished by a dramatic public relations move to demonize Saddam Hussein in the eyes of the American people.
Bush demonstrates that with the use of metaphors, personification, and also repetition. Using metaphor, he compares America to steel, saying that America is like steel, but not pliable. Portraying that whatever dangerous act comes to America, America will stay strong and not move. Personification is to explain the reasoning behind the terrorists’ operations and the motives behind this move. Bush gives feeling and visualization traits to the nation, consequently putting it in the nation’s point of view, highlighting what the nation felt and saw. Repetition is to bring America together and strengthen everyone. It is to show that this heartbreaking event did not just affect the victims, but it affects the entire country. The way Bush uses repetition to get the people of America together makes America stronger because the more a country is together, the more power and strength it will possess. As a final point, President Bush’s usage of these three rhetorical devices grabs the attention of the people and helps Bush express the type of tone he wants to get
This article really caught my attention and my eye. This article is very historical and has facts within it that date back to the 1700’s. The article talks about how political cartoons play a part with an election. Specifically the presidential elections and how each and every year cartoonist depicts the candidates as a some sort of superhuman. I believe that this article gives people some background on political cartoons and how they have helped play a part within the U.
Political cartoons are more complex than they may seem. They express compound political issues in unassuming and amusing ways. This is done to make a point about the issues and flaws that the cartoon is conveying. When in reality, most cartoons usually convey less information than mumbling or gesturing. Attached is a political cartoon about ObamaCare. This cartoon title is “’Obamacare’ or ‘Republicare’”. On the ObamaCare side is a picture of a donkey to represent the Democrats....
The Great Depression, which began in October of 1929, was a time of great troubles for the United States of America. President Herbert Hoover thought it was merely “a passing incident in our national lives”, and so did not do much to change the situation. The American people were not liking Hoover’s decisions, and a new president was elected after Hoover’s first term. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt stepped into office, he immediately took action. He enacted a series of programs (including Roosevelt’s Emergency Banking Act, ending Prohibition through the 21st Amendment, the Tennessee Valley Authority Act, and the National Industrial Recovery Act), many of which were enforced by the first 100 days. These programs and acts were collectively
The political cartoon relates back to the chapter 7 because its broadcast media. I feel that the illustrator is trying to say that the technology that was invented, is not providing the same purpose today. The radio and television were created to inform the society by useful information and news. The man with the headphones states “another copter down in Iraq…” and the other one responds “sorry, no time. Britney shaved her head..” shows that the celebrity story is more important than what’s happening in the world. I feel that the television programs chose the topic to talk about that will increase their ratings. They corrupt that standard that was created between the people and their elected leaders. The media try’s to connect with younger
The United States (US) has always had some amount of political division, and this has become much more visible over the years. Much of the American public appears to genuinely believe that the Republicans and Democrats are fundamentally different and that these differences are near unreconcilable. Such beliefs were brutally apparent during the 2016 US Presidential Election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Despite this being the commonality, there are some outliers, some of which suggest that this division is nothing more than a façade. Illustrating his belief that the entire system is a fraudulent sham, Ben Garrison (the Rogue Cartoonist) draws an entity of truly massive proportions, marching onward as ever before whilst crushing people underfoot. Garrison uses a variety of symbolic images, including the enormous figure, the people on the ground, and the large megaphone to represent his perspective on the American political system.
The exigency of the political cartoon stems from the United States’ failure to help the people that are starving and homeless while The Hunger Games film is making immense profit. Granlund illustrates this by showing the film, The Hunger Games is now playing, with two impoverished men outside. The throng trying to burst and fight their way into the door shows the deindividuation from the loss of their own morals, self-awareness, and responsibility. The crowd of people looking straight at the door ahead of them aren’t even taking notice the two destitute men standing on
Political and editorial cartoons are created as a way to visually bring a topic to the public's attention. These cartoons often times satirize a political figure, event, or problem occurring at that time. These illustrations are meant to simplify an event while also allowing the viewer to see the creators opinions and attitude toward that event, often times these opinions are biased ones. The cartoons chosen begin with the debate that Americans had over the war in Iraq. The controversy started with whether or not the United States should go to war at all. Back when it was published in 2003 the United States and Iraq went to war in order to remove Saddam Hussein from power, and it seems as though the citizens of the United States were more outspoken than ever about opposing the war. The two political cartoons shown below, by Adam Zygl and Mike Lane, offer two very different perspectives on the price people were paying for this war. The first shows the burden the American taxpayer at home had to
e. At first the analogy had the narrow meaning of pointing out the unprovoked annexation of foreign territory: just as Hitler had invaded Czechoslovakia, Saddam had swallowed Kuwait, both transgressions against internationally recognized borders. Quickly, however, even during the first Iraq war, the metaphor came to signify the brutality of the Iraqi regime or, rather, the brutality of the Iraqi regime in its occupation of Kuwait. During the second Gulf war, the use of the metaphor became more emphatic: the brutality of the Iraqi regime to the Iraqi population itself and, especially, to ethnic minorities (e.g., the Kurds, the treatment of whom displayed a genocidal character). Moreover, the nature of the international threat posed by Iraq changed.