Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reconstruction policies after the civil war
Essay on the rise and fall of reconstruction in the south
Essay on the rise and fall of reconstruction in the south
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reconstruction policies after the civil war
From the book The Warmth of Other Suns, the author Isabel Wilkerson writes of the economic disparity and the abject poverty suffered by African Americans during the reconstruction. “Sharecropping, slavery’s replacement, kept them in debt and still bound to whatever plantation they worked. But one thing had changed. The federal government had taken over the affairs of the South, during a period known as Reconstruction, and the newly freed men were able to exercise rights previously denied them. They could vote, marry, or go to school…even college set-up by northern philanthropists, open businesses, and run for office under the protection of northern troops.” Claiming their rights to citizenship created strained …show more content…
relationships with the former slave owners who now employed them. However, the federal government could now enforce the principle of equal rights and gave black Southerners their rights to vote and hold office. Professor Vernon Wharton was struck by the flowering of second-level leaders in Mississippi. “Something amazing about the suddenness with which, all over the state, (local leaders) emerged from the anonymity of slavery to become directors and counselors for their race. …Negro leaders were preachers, lawyers, or teachers from the free states…” In Fayette, Reconstruction enabled men (not women) the right to vote and to hold office. The first African American Sheriff in Jefferson County was Merriman Howard; he was a Republican (Party of Lincoln). Our family’s connection to the Howard family is that his nephew Radford Howard married Sarah Lillian Jackson, great granddaughter of Delaney and Easter. In an article written in 1937 Mrs. Effie Harrison Snyder gave her description of the time post-Civil War: “Mr. Harrison (papa) was the owner of many slaves and all were good and faithful servants. Only one, Merriman Howard, who became Republican Sheriff of Jefferson County ever gave trouble. He was doing well until influenced by three Republicans who nearly caused his destruction. They made Merriman their tool, but Judge Geo. W. Shackleford, Mr. Dick Truly, Sr and Mr. Harrison (papa) went to his assistance and saved his life. He went to Washington City (Washington D.C.) and until his death was to Mama and Papa most faithful and respectful. Merriman had been papa’s slave. His mother was left free and she herself bought Merriman free for a small sum before the Civil War.” The article was written just before she died. Sheriff Howard in addition to becoming the first sheriff of Jefferson County, was a Board Member at Alcorn College. He served under Senator Hiram Revels, the first African American Republican Senator in Congress and the first president of Alcorn. Merriman left Jefferson County, MS, and as stated, moved to Washington, D.C. He took various jobs and left a last will and testament giving his son Comanche Merriman F. Howard his remaining estate of about $300. He died at the age of 80. Post – Civil War Labor Post-Civil War, the landowners and former slaves were often engaged in labor contracts (the contract was created and supported by the federal government written by the Freedman’s Bureau.) ”... Agreements between freedmen laborers and planters stating terms of employment, such as pay, clothing, and medical care due the freedman; the part of the crop to be retained by him; and whether a plot for growing subsistence crops was to be provided.” Working relations between the landowner and the former slaves were tense. The white planters not wanting to adjoin into these contracts with the newly freed slaves, tried immediately after the war to hire white workers for the fieldwork but found them not to be good workers. White workers would work one or two days and quit. Thus, the Freedman’s Bureau had to negotiate labor contracts for those former slaves, both men and women, so that contracts and wages were fair.
“The Bureau encouraged former major planters to rebuild their plantations and urged freed blacks to return to work for them, kept an eye on contracts between the newly free laborers and planters, and pushed whites and blacks to work together as employers and employees rather than as masters and slaves.” By 1872, Congress abruptly abandoned the program, effectively shutting down the Bureau and of course, once the Freedman’s Bureau ceased operation in the area, these contracts were voided and planters/farmers went back to the old way of doing things. A rigid paternalistic society continued once the bureau was disbanded. Exploitation of these freedmen again reappeared in the form of reduction of wages, cost of the crop to market, lodging (quarters/shack), and subsistence crops. The property owner would now deduct what he said was owed from the salary and announce that this pay period was a break-even …show more content…
week. Standing as a silent witness to the slave trade, the cruelty and ugliness of it all, one would think the only thing to learn here was fear, hate, and anger. Delaney Jackson came away with his own observations from the slave trade and from observing the slaveholder. He learned how to use basic business skills; having also observed how to determine the value of land, how to bargain and trade property, and the art of negotiation, which would serve him well in later life. The best of times for Delaney was that he could now own land and he did; the land where he toiled and worked with his own hands, where he was enslaved, and in April of 1868 he became the owner of 50 acres in the Norris Field of Poplar Hill Plantation. Two writers and historians have written articles that explain the issues of Reconstruction, Eric Foner and Jason Phillips. Both agree that Reconstruction was a failure. The following excerpts are from their web-based articles: “Reconstruction was a significant chapter in the history of civil rights in the United States, but most historians consider it a failure because the South became a poverty-stricken backwater attached to agriculture, while white Southerners attempted to re-establish dominance through violence, intimidation and discrimination, forcing freedmen into second class citizenship with limited rights, and excluding them from the political process.” Historian Eric Foner argues, "What remains certain is that Reconstruction failed, and that for blacks, its failure was a disaster whose magnitude cannot be obscured by the genuine accomplishments that did endure." The struggle of reconstruction was also spoken of in the online publication called “Mississippi History Now”, part of the Mississippi Historical Society. The article “Reconstruction in Mississippi 1865 - 1876” authored by Jason Phillips, who wrote: ‘It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way’. “With these words, Charles Dickens began A Tale of Two Cities, his novel about the French Revolution in the late 18th century. The same language could describe post-Civil War Reconstruction in Mississippi. Depending on your perspective, reconstruction was the best or the worst of times, an age of political wisdom or foolishness, a time of heartfelt belief or profound doubt, a brilliant period of limitless possibilities or the darkest chapter of our past. … Reconstruction for Mississippi’s black and white citizens was particularly intense. Black and white Mississippians grappled with a devastated economy and a new social structure.” Delaney, in his lifetime witnessed all of this. In the case of Jefferson County, it truly was the best and the worst of times. The worst of times was the inequality of those who lived through the dark days of slavery with its cruel and inhumane treatment of men and women; the enslaved, and then after emancipation those who ran the countryside with an iron fist to keep things as they once were. By 1877, Reconstruction had succumbed to bitter opposition and backroom politics. Federal troops then occupying the South were withdrawn, and white supremacists were left to reestablish the racial hierarchy that had existed before the war. Across the former confederacy, informal practices of racial discrimination were written into law. States instituted poll taxes, literacy tests and other requirements that disenfranchised Negroes. They passed “Jim Crow” laws, which imposed segregation and other restrictions on blacks.
A few blacks challenged the system of legal discrimination. In New Orleans, a man named Homer Plessy deliberately defied the Louisiana State law requiring separate rail cars accommodations for blacks and whites. He was arrested and jailed. But the incident led eventually to the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy argued that the law infringed on his 14th amendment right to equal protection. But, most of Justices disagreed. The court’s opinion read, in part: Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS): "Legislation is powerless to eradicate racial instincts, or to abolish distinctions based upon physical differences… if one race is inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane (1896).” This was a landmark constitutional law case of the US Supreme Court. It upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but
equal". The Court affirmed that segregation was constitutional as long as accommodations were “separate but equal.” It also left it up to the individual states-not the Federal government-to guarantee equal standards. As the lone dissenting opinion, Justice John Marshall Harlan, wrote: “The thin disguise of “equal” accommodations… will not mislead anyone, nor atone for the wrong this day done.” Plessy versus Ferguson became a landmark decision. It sanctioned a system of institutionalized racism that would persist for decades.
Even when the Amendment abolished slavery in 1865, and the black people embraced education, built their own churches, reunited with their broken families and worked very hard in the sharecropping system, nothing was enough for the Reconstruction to succeed. Whites never gave total freedom to African Americans. Blacks were forced to endure curfews, passes, and living on rented land, which put them in a similar situation as slaves. In
In the late 1940’s and early 1950’s there were many issues that involved racial segregation with many different communities. A lot of people did not took a stand for these issues until they were addressed by other racial groups. Mendez vs Westminster and Brown vs The Board of Education, were related cases that had to take a stand to make a change. These two cases helped many people with different races to come together and be able to go to school even if a person was different than the rest.
In “The Warmth of Other Suns” by Isabel Wilkerson, the three main characters that the story follows face a great deal of inequality and racial prejudice in both the Jim Crow south that they left and the north that they fled to. Through their stories, as well as the excerpts from Wilkerson that serve to dispel some of the common myths and to explain some of the inequalities that others faced, one is able to make many connections between the problems that Ida Mae, George Starling, and Richard Foster, among many others, faced in their time and the obstacles to equality that our society still to this day struggles to overcome. A large reason as to why these obstacles still exist is that many have preconceived ideas about African Americans and African American Communities. However, numerous obstacles still survive to this day as a result of certain racist ideas.
The court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson created nationwide controversy in the United States due to the fact that its outcome would ultimately affect every citizen of our country. On Tuesday, June 7th, 1892, Mr. Homer Plessy purchased a first class ticket on the East Louisiana Railroad for a trip from New Orleans to Covington. He then entered a passenger car and took a vacant seat in a coach where white passengers were also sitting. There was another coach assigned to people who weren’t of the white race, but this railroad was a common carrier and was not authorized to discriminate passengers based off of their race. (“Plessy vs. Ferguson, syllabus”).Mr. Plessy was a “Creole of Color”, a person who traces their heritage back to some of the Caribbean, French, and Spanish who settled into Louisiana before it was part of the US (“The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow”). Even though Plessy was only one eighth African American, and could pass for a full white man, still he was threatened to be penalized and ejected from the train if he did not vacate to the non-white coach (“Plessy vs. Ferguson, syllabus). In ...
...ant commissioners to apply jurisdiction in such cases (Weitzel 2011, 22). Labor relations were re-evaluated to allow hiring of the freemen. The bureau assisted in drafting of contracts on favorable terms to ensure that the planter and worker met their end of the bargain. Finally, the bureau enacted an educational system that allowed blacks to study so that they could take part in normal activities and protect themselves from discrimination that they had faced earlier.
Because of the 13th and 14th Amendments freeing slaves and granting equal protection under the law grants Jon the same rights to ride the train as any other citizen. Santa Clara County v. Southern Public Railroad, Even though the case was not about the 14th Amendment, Justice Morrison Remick Waite made it so by arguing that corporations must comply with the 14th Amendment. Santa Clara County v. Southern Public Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886). Plessy v. Ferguson, Homer Plessy sat in a whites-only train car, he was asked to move to the car reserved for blacks, because state law mandated segregation. The court held that segregation is not necessarily unlawful discrimination as long as the races are treated equally. The impact of Plessy was to relegate blacks to second-class citizenship. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896). However, this is not equal
The ex-slaves after the Civil War didn’t have a place to settle or money. They had no skills other than farming to procure jobs, so they couldn’t earn money. Freedmen’s Bureau provided shelter, resources, education, and taught necessary skills to get jobs (Jordan 386). Though the issue of slavery was solved, racism continues and Southerners that stayed after the war passed Black Codes which subverted the ideas of freedom including the actions of state legislatures (Hakim 19). Black Codes were a set of laws that discriminated against blacks and limited their freedom (Jordan 388).
Many blacks would rent land from their former masters, thus keeping them indebted to the white landowners. Henry Black recounts his days as a slave as well as a sharecropper in Henry Black & the Federal Writer’s Project. (Doc. F) He tells of rules still
It was 1865, black men were tasting freedom, the confederation was defeated, the south was defeated but the unchained blacks had no real freedom. "A man maybe free and yet not independent," Mississippi planter Sammuel Agnew observed in his diary (Foner 481). This same year General Sherman issued the Special Field Order 15, in attempt to provide land for the ex-slaves. There was 40 acres of land and a mule waiting for the emancipated slaves, this gave hope for an economic development among blacks' communities. The Special Field Order 15 put all the land under federal control acquired by the government during the war to use for the homestead of the blacks. Even thought the offer of land some slave fled ...
The Plessy v Ferguson case was an example that there was still discrimination in America. In 1890, Louisiana passed a law called the Separate Car Act that says all railroad
Separate but Equal doctrine existed long before the Supreme Court accepted it into law, and on multiple occasions it arose as an issue before then. In 1865, southern states passed laws called “Black Codes,” which created restrictions on the freed African Americans in the South. This became the start of legal segregation as juries couldn’t have African Americans, public schools became segregated, and African Americans had restrictions on testifying against majorities. In 1887, Jim Crow Laws started to arise, and segregation becomes rooted into the way of life of southerners (“Timeline”). Then in 1890, Louisiana passed the “Separate Car Act.” This forced rail companies to provide separate rail cars for minorities and majorities. If a minority sat in the wrong car, it cost them $25 or 20 days in jail. Because of this, an enraged group of African American citizens had Homer Plessy, a man who only had one eighth African American heritage, purchase a ticket and sit in a “White only” c...
After the ending of the Civil War in 1865, slavery was, at last, formally abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment. Due to the freedom of these African Americans and the South’s ever-growing hatred towards this group, African Americans were left to suffer harsh discrimination and horrible conditions. Africans Americans were left without homes, education, jobs, or money. Reconstruction was the Radical Republicans’ attempt to try and bring the Confederate states back to normal and unite both the South and the North into a whole country once again. Reconstruction was also set to protect and help the newly freed African Americans assimilate to the new society and the foreign economy they were placed in. Conditions of the African Americans in the South before, during, and after the reconstruction period were no doubt harsh. African Americans, before the Reconstruction Era, struggled to assimilate with the hateful society they were thrown in, if not still slaves. Although their condition improved slightly, African Americans during the reconstruction period experienced extreme terrorism, discrimination, pressure, and hatred from the south, along with the struggle of keeping alive. After the military was taken out of the South, African Americans’ condition after the Reconstruction Era relapsed back as if Reconstruction never happened.
Even with this government legislation, the newly dubbed 'freedmen' were still discriminated against by most people and, ironically, they were soon to be restricted and segregated once again under government rulings in important court cases of the era. Reconstruction was intended to give African-Americans the chance for a new and better life. Many of them stayed with their old masters after being freed, while others left in search of opportunity through education as well as land ownership. However, this was not exactly an easy task. There were many things standing in their way, chiefly white supremacists and the laws and restrictions they placed upon African-Americans.
“Separate is not equal.” In the case of Plessey vs. Ferguson in 1896 the U.S. Supreme Court said racial segregation didn’t violate the Constitution, so racial segregation became legal. In 1954 the case of Oliver Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka this case proved that separate is not equal. Oliver Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka was revolutionary to the education system, because colored people and Caucasians had segregated schools. The Caucasians received a better education and the colored people argued that they were separate but not equal. This would pave the way for integrated schools and change the education system as we knew it.
Plessy vs Ferguson was a case in which it stated a precedent. In 1892, an African American named Homer Plessy did not give up his seat to a white man("HISTORY OF BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION"). He then got arrested and taken to jail. Plessy than went to the Supreme Court to argue that his Fourteenth Amendment was violated. However, the Supreme Court ruled against Plessy and set the precedent that “separate but equal” is really equal("HISTORY OF BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION") .