Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on diversity in america
Diversity in the united states essay
Diversity in the united states essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on diversity in america
Diversity, as it relates to thoughts, ideas, ethnicity, race, and a host of other areas, is the quintessential ingredient needed to establish a free nation. Amendment I of the United States Constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Through this simple statement made so many years ago, the founding fathers laid down not only the framework for the basic freedoms that Americans cherish, but also the foundation for establishing a diverse nation. You see, without diversity, there cannot be freedom, and without freedom, there cannot be America.
Since diversity is so vital for all free nations, it can also be said that diversity education is essential for the citizens of these nations. Without diversity education, people forgo the opportunity to broaden their horizons through the myriad of ideas and thoughts that exist in ...
Aspects of diversity are in concordance with age, cognitive means, cultural factors, disability and other significant determinants. In partners develop at least two definitions of diversity as it is any mixture of items characterized by differences and similarities. Another one is its reference to differences between individuals or any attributes that may lead to the perceptions that another person is different from self. Diversity is truly confounding, as numerous different ethnic and cultural organizations have afforded to the social, monetary aspects and cultural standards of our society. It’s just a matter of considering the brighter side of this matter. It is due to these contributions of the diverse society, people will be even more connected in our general objectives, and united
Queenie is confronted by Lengel at the check-out counter for the way they are dressed which causes her and the others to blush. In responds to this she says "We weren’t doing any shopping. We just came in for the one thing." Lengel still tells them that they aren’t decently dressed and cause a big embarrassing scene for the girls. Queenie stands up for them by saying "We are decent,".
Georgia (1976), the United States Supreme Court reversed the Furman decision when the court held “the punishment of death does not invariably violate the Constitution” (Wilkinson, 2016, p. 324). The United States Supreme Court were further and outlined circumstances where “punishment is excessive and unconstitutional” (Coker v. Georgia, 1977). The circumstances the United States Supreme Court established is as follows: “(1) make no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment, and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” (Coker v. Georgia, 1977). The United States Supreme Court made is clear that public opinion would influence decisions regarding the death penalty(Coker v. Georgia, 1977). Lastly the United States Supreme Court stated, “in certain instances the death penalty is in proportion to the crime committed” (Wilkinson, 2016, p. 325).
What they did not realize was that they were making both employees and the store’s other customers uncomfortable with their appearance by the comment from one of the cashiers “Oh Daddy, I feel so faint” (150). The narrator, Sammy, quickly gave each girl a nickname in his mind and calls them “Queenie and Plaid and Big Tall Goony-Goony”(150). “Queenie” lead the pack, showing the other two girls how to walk in the store, head held high, body straight. “She had talked the other two into coming in here with her, and now she was showing them how to do it, walk slow and hold yourself straight” (149). The other two girls appeared to be more uncomfortable walking around the store in just their swim suit. The leader, “Queenie” most likely enjoyed the attention she and her friends were receiving from the people in the store considering she came in with the straps of her suit down below her shoulders. When Lengel, the store manager, saw and confronted them, they got embarrassed and tried to tell Lengel that they are wearing decent clothing. The girls were no doubt more embarrassed about being confronted than they were about what they were wearing when even Sammy “began to feel sorry for them” (150). With the employees and other customers watching the encounter, the girls quickly left the store after they paid for the snack with hopefully a
...uld not allow this defense of extreme hatred to stand in cases involving attacks against gays. Homophobic hatred cannot be employed as an affirmative defense for criminal acts. Not only is this morally wrong, but the costs to the nation are simply too high if we allow juries with individual prejudices make such critical decisions. We still have a long way to go in the fight against homophobia, but the justice system can act as a catalyst in this process by refusing to allow this defense to exist. There must be an end to the use of the homosexual panic defense; it can no longer be used to excuse the brutality and murder in our society. Judges around the nation must follow the example of Judge Barton Voigt in Aaron McKinney's case and simply reject this specious defense. We should be proud of how far we've come but we must be aware that we still have a long way to go.
Capital punishment is the most severe sentence imposed in the United States and is legal in thirty-eight states. The death penalty is a controversial subject, especially because the U.S. is the only western democracy to retain this consequence (Scheb, 518). I personally believe that the death penalty is a valid sentence for those who deserve it. Some believe it is not constitutional, but those who face this penalty are clearly suspect of a savage offense and therefore should be at a loss of certain rights. The arguments don’t end there once one considers that “the controversy over capital punishment becomes more heated when special circumstances arise” (Sternberg, 2). This issue brings up more arguments against the death penalty because of the constitutionally protected ban on cruel and unusual punishment which is protected by the Eighth Amendment. There have been nearly 15,000 executions that have taken place in America, the first in 1608 with the death of Captain George Kendall (Siegel, 410). Most of these were sentenced to death because of their own action of killing others. However, more and more crimes are now able to be punishable by death. This is the result of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which “dramatically increased the number of federal crimes eligible for this sentence” (Scheb, 520). Even so, the federal government has yet to put someone on death row for a non-homicidal case. The arguments for and against capital punishment are lengthy and strictly opinionated, but are also important to see the evolution of our society as the majority view changes and new influences come about.
Privatizing of social security has been a subject of debate over the years ever since former president George. W. Bush suggested it back in 2004.Over 96% of the American workers benefit from the social security after paying the social security tax (Aaron 12). This is to say that over 49 million people receive some amount of money from the system which fortunately for them is much higher than the taxes they contribute towards the same. While such payment may not be more than $895, nearly two thirds of the American retired population acquires half of their income from the social security payments. For some it is the only source of income. One importance of this social security is its ability to cover the users from unpredictable economic environment including fluctuations in demand and supply and inflation rates. Additionally the security covers them against possible disability or unexpected demise of loved ones. So with the increasing economic uncertainty both nationally and globally, social security is needed more than ever before and this is why privatizing it is the worst idea ever.
Proponents of privatization say that workers should have the freedom to control their own retirement investments and that private accounts will give retirees higher returns than the current system can offer, leading to a restoration of the system's solvency ("Privatizing Social Security - ProCon.org”). In reality, however, Social Security was made in order for people to earn the right to participate by working and contributing. The program was never meant to be an investment program. With broader policy goals than private retirement plans, its intent is to provide guaranteed income to seniors, disabled citizens, survivors, and their families. Privatization would severely undermine this system. In addition, many individuals lack the knowledge to make wise investment decisions. Consequently, privatization will do nothing to address the program's approaching loss of money or solve its insolvency. Therefore, Social Security should be neither partially or fully
Diversity and inclusion should also apply to humans; by bringing people together who are different, it can create a whole that is enhanced by the uniqueness of each individual. What are the dimensions of cultural diversity? In this week’s readings, the subject of dimensions of cultural diversity were covered comprehensively in both books. Understanding and Managing Diversity presented a nicely laid out illustration. Primary Dimensions Secondary Dimensions Age Geographic Location Gender Military & Work Experience.
Diversity in classrooms can open student’s minds to all the world has to offer. At times diversity and understanding of culture, deviant experiences and perspectives can be difficult to fulfill, but with appropriate strategies and resources, it can lead students gaining a high level of respect for those unlike them, preferably than a judgmental and prejudiced view.
“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.
Feldman, Eve B. Animals Don't Wear Pajamas: A Book About Sleeping. New York: Henry Holt
The world is currently undergoing a cultural change, and we live in an increasingly diverse society. This change is not only affect the people in the community but also affect the way education is viewed. Teaching diversity in the classroom and focusing multicultural activities in the programs can help improve positive social behavior in children. There is no question that the education must be prepared to embrace the diversity and to teach an increasingly diverse population of young children.
The death penalty has always been and continues to be a very controversial issue. People on both sides of the issue argue endlessly to gain further support for their movements. While opponents of capital punishment are quick to point out that the United States remains one of the few Western countries that continue to support the death penalty, Americans are also more likely to encounter violent crime than citizens of other countries (Brownlee 31). Justice mandates that criminals receive what they deserve. The punishment must fit the crime. If a burglar deserves imprisonment, then a murderer deserves death (Winters 168). The death penalty is necessary and the only punishment suitable for those convicted of capital offenses. Seventy-five percent of Americans support the death penalty, according to Turner, because it provides a deterrent to some would-be murderers and it also provides for moral and legal justice (83). "Deterrence is a theory: It asks what the effects are of a punishment (does it reduce the crime rate?) and makes testable predictions (punishment reduces the crime rate compared to what it would be without the credible threat of punishment)", (Van Den Haag 29). The deterrent effect of any punishment depends on how quickly the punishment is applied (Workshop 16). Executions are so rare and delayed for so long in comparison th the number of capitol offenses committed that statistical correlations cannot be expected (Winters 104). The number of potential murders that are deterred by the threat of a death penalty may never be known, just as it may never be known how many lives are saved with it. However, it is known that the death penalty does definitely deter those who are executed. Life in prison without the possibility of parole is the alternative to execution presented by those that consider words to be equal to reality. Nothing prevents the people sentenced in this way from being paroled under later laws or later court rulings. Furthermore, nothing prevents them from escaping or killing again while in prison. After all, if they have already received the maximum sentence available, they have nothing to lose. For example, in 1972 the U.S. Supreme Court banished the death penalty. Like other states, Texas commuted all death sentences to life imprisonment. After being r...
Ethics and morality are the founding reasons for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, leading to the highly contentious nature of the debate. When heinous crimes are com...