Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Coca cola supply chain analysis
Strategic choice of coca cola
Coca cola supply chain analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Along with Pepsi, Coca cola is among the two leading carbonated soft drinks brands in the world. The two companies are always competing with each other to gain market share and revenues through innovative product offers and marketing stunts. But both the companies depend on a value chain that is similar has the same properties. Concentrate producers – this component of the CSD industry has a low bargaining power. This is so because the raw materials that are used are easily available and therefore entry into the market in this aspect is easy. However Coca Cola has a very specific formula for mixing of the elements to make the concentrate and therefore not every firm that wishes to become a supplier for Coke can become one. On the other hand Hence the company has a number of options to replace an existing supplier with a new one. Therefore Coke can choose suppliers based on need and costs (Carpenter & Sanders, 2014). Since there are a number of such suppliers ready to tie the knot with the world leader in CSD, therefore there is significant rivalry between them. There is also no threat of substitute products as far as suppliers of concentrate are concerned. This is so because, the concentrate uses a very specific formula that create the taste of Coke soft drinks. Hence this cannot be replaced by anyone and everyone. hence it can be concluded that the buyer – Coca Cola, enjoys the upper hand in its dealings with concentrate suppliers. Bottlers – another very important component of the CSD supply chain are the bottlers. The function of the bottlers is to manufacture and package the CSD into bottles. The business of bottling uses some basic technology which is not tough to acquire apart from the regular paper work and finances, entry barriers into this business are low and hence there is threat of new The bottlers are an integral part of the supply chain of the company that it cannot do without. The bargaining power of suppliers for the bottlers is also low as there are a number of suppliers with an abundance of the raw materials used for bottling. The machinery and technology is also abundantly available. Hence the bargaining power of suppliers is low. Industry rivalry would be considered to be high due to the ease of market entry and the availability of raw materials and the technology needed for the process. Retailers – the end point of the supply chain of Coca cola are the retailers who sale the CSD directly to the clients. Now for Coca Cola, the retailers are the buyers and the company can do virtually nothing without the retailers. The bargaining power of the retailers is high compared to the seller – Coca Cola, since they are the ones that actually conduct the sale – sometimes even through push selling and exclusive company branding where rival products are not kept. For this however Coca Cola has to incentivize the retailers into doing
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
The Beverage Industry is a highly competitive one and tends to be dominated by a few major actors. The two biggest worldwide known and most influential companies are Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The limited growth opportunities make this competition very intense, requiring companies to follow the trends and be always aware of the competitors' progress. However, the demand for the products depends a lot on the economic conditions within the society. Those few big players enjoy the benefits of the strong loyal customer base during the growth and stability stage in the economy, whereas in times of economic difficulties customers turn to cheaper substitutes. Thus, although the key feature of the industry is that it is very difficult for a new unknown company to enter the market and compete with well-known long-established businesses, the companies should pay significant attention to the new entrants, especially in times of economic instability. Consumer tastes are also seasonal, meaning that the demand for the carbonated beverages is higher during the hot months of the year. Shifting consumer preferences bring the concern of operating uncertainty, which greatly affects pricing strategies. The large companies pay reliable dividends...
Bottling Network: Both Coke and PepsiCo have franchisee agreements with their existing bottler’s who have rights in a certain geographic area in perpetuity. These agreements prohibit bottler’s from taking on new competing brands for similar products. Also with the recent consolidation among the bottler’s and the backward integration with both Coke and Pepsi buying significant percent of bottling companies, it is very difficult for a firm entering to find bottler’s willing to distribute their product.
People can afford to buy more soft drinks under current economic situation. Recessions do not seem to affect sales of CSD. Although produced by main market players soft carbonated drinks cost more than similar products of local and private label manufacturers, consumers are willing to pay an extra price for the name, particular taste, and image. Fierce competition in CSD industry forces Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to expand into new and emerging markets which present high potential for the company’s development. However, some foreign markets proved to be highly competitive. Coca-Cola Company’s operation in China faced antitrust regulations, advertising restrictions, and foreign exchange control.
Analysis of the Coca-Cola Company The Coca-Cola Company is the world's leading manufacturer, marketer and distributor of soft-drink concentrates and syrups. The Coca-Cola Company is the world's leading manufacturer, marketer and distributor of soft-drink concentrates and syrups. The Company markets many of the world's top soft drink brands, including Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Sprite and Fanta. Through the world's largest and most pervasive distribution system, consumers in nearly 200 countries enjoy the Company's products at a rate of more than one billion serving a day.
Coca –Cola (KO) is one of the world’s largest beverage companies. Company was incorporated in September 1919 under the State of Delaware law and headquarters is located in Atlanta Georgia. But from 1886, company established its brand in US (Coca-Cola, 2012, p. 1). Currently company is providing for more than 500 varieties of non-alcoholic sparkles to the customers around the world. Apart from this, company also serve for still beverages that includes enhanced water, water, ready-to-drink, juices, energy drink, sport drinks and so on.
Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
The case study "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century" focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. This analysis of the Cola Wars Continue case study will focus mainly on the profitability of the industry by carefully considering and analyzing the below questions:
On the opposite side, Coca Cola invested in suppliers relationships. More than thousands of Coca Cola suppliers make Coca Cola distribution activities more efficient comparing with peers. For Coca Cola vertical integration is not a solution as expensive mode...
In order to understand the situation of Cadbury-Schweppes in the CSD industry, the product, which is soda, needs to be analyzed.
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
Look SDmart, Retrieved 05/16/07, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1365/is_1_31/ai_63974359/print. Coca-Cola: A Technological View, retrieved 5/18/07, from http://projects.olin.edu/ahs/HOT2004/PolarBears/content.htm. Coca-Cola Our Company- Around The World, retrieved 5/18/07 from http://www.coca-cola http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/ourcompany/aroundworld.html Nutrition Business Journal. Penton Publishing. October/November 2005.
...Soft Drink (CSD) industry have shifted the focus to healthier drink alternatives and are forcing companies to diversify into different products. The Coca-Cola Company has found a niche in the market with the original Coke product and any changes to the product line will be secondary to the primary focus. A recent report in Forbes Magazine states,
This proven track record for the company can be attributed to a number of factors, the first which is relatively crucial is the company's secret formula for Coca-Cola, which comparably tastes better than what competition has to offer in the market. The company's ability to come up with new products while at the same time reinventing the old products has offered them a competitive edge over their peers. The company boasts of having the world's most diverse and comprehensive distribution networks, this offers them accessibility to billions of people in areas that would prove rather difficult for their peers to distribute their products. The African continent has been cited as an excellent example, it is more often than not to see a distribution outlet for coke on a remote location on the continent