The Use of Personification in An Essay on Criticism
“An Essay on Criticism” was written by British writer Alexander Pope
around 1709. This poem was written in heroic couplets and its purpose
was to express Pope’s opinion on literature as a poet and critic.
Pope is responding to the debate over whether or not poets should
write “naturally” or base their work on a set of pre-determined rules
as done by ancient poets. Pope’s poem can be broken down into three
main points. The first section is used by Pope to give general
principles of good criticism and poetry. The second section
identifies the flaws a critic is prone to. The third section
addresses the moral traits a good critic must have and gives examples
of outstanding critics. Pope’s use of personification throughout the
poem allows him to expand his ideas and secure his argument while
creating a very memorable poem. His use of personification allows the
poem to come to life with detail (Pope 2476).
Pope begins the poem by stating it is less offensive to “tire our
Patience, than mislead our Sense” (Pope 4) meaning it is much more
harmful to be a bad critic than a bad poet. “‘Tis with our judgments
as our watches, none/ Go just alike, yet each believes his own" (Pope
9). Here Pope uses a watch to personify judgments. Everyone may have
their own opinion that they believe is right. “Most have seeds of
judgment in their mind; Nature affords at least a glimm’ring light”
(Pope 20). Men at one time do have “seeds” of good judgment, but Pope
says that in the search wit they are defaced by false education and
loose their common sense. “Some neither can for wits nor critics
pass, as heavy mules are neither horse nor ass” (Pope 38). This line
refers to those who never became intellectuals or good critics. They
are somewhere in between, not worthy of a name. Instead they are
referred to as “half-formed insects on the banks of Nile” (Pope 41).
The bugs represent the critics who swarm every work of literature with
their malicious criticisms.
Pope recommends following nature as the first rule “By her just
standard, which is still the same […] One clear, unchanged, and
universal light” (Pope 68). Pope here states that rules are necessary
in order to criticize poetry. He compares theses rules to “unerring”
nature which is believed to be the epitome of ideal order and
harmony. The rules of the Ancients are useful guidelines for the true
critic, for they are “Nature Methodized” (Pope 89). He believes that
many recent critics have used the rules without understanding them.
Personification is presented by the author as the only explanation for the narrator’s consumption. “The Blue Estuaries” begins to stir the narrator’s own poems (line 24) until she bores down on the page once more, coming back into what is perceived by the reader as a much more clear state of mind. Then, the narrator claims to have “lost her doubts” for a moment (line 34). This was a turning point in the narrator’s tone- signalling a shift in her thoughts, and was a strikingly out of place claim- especially coming from somebody so preoccupied- making the reader wonder what she had thought about for a moment. The narrator then begins to read once more (Line
Ken Kesey in his novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo 's Nest question a lot of things that you think almost everyday. With this famous portrait of a mental institute its rebellious patients and domineering caretakers counter-culture icon Kesey is doing a whole lot more than just spinning a great yarn. He is asking us to stop and consider how what we call "normal" is forced upon each and every one of us. Stepping out of line, going against the grain, swimming upstream whatever your metaphor, there is a steep price to pay for that kind of behavior. The novel tells McMurphys tale, along with the tales of other inmates who suffer under the yoke of the authoritarian Nurse Ratched it is the story of any person who has felt suffocated and confined by our
Since she could not own, much less lose a realm, the speaker seems to be
But Cady Stanton saw opportunity in public criticism. ‘Imagine the publicity given our ideas by thus appearing in a widely circulated sheet like the Herald!’ she wrote to Mott. ‘It will start women thinking, and men, too.’ She drafted lengthy responses to every negative newspaper article and editorial, presenting the reformers’ side of the issue to the readers. Mott sensed her younger colleague’s future role. ‘Thou art so wedded to this cause, ‘ she told Cady Stanton, ‘that thou must expect to act as pioneer in the
Krstovic, Jelena O, ed. Introduction to Hartmann von Aue. Classical and Medieval Literature Criticism. Detroit: Gale Research Inc., 1993.
The speakers and audience in poem are crucial elements of the poem and is also the case in these poems. In the poem Untitled, it can be argued that the poem is being written by Peter based on what his father might say to him...
My portfolio absolutely reflects my understanding of persuasive writing. Persuasive writing focuses on the ability to formulate an essay that takes an argumentative stance, but takes the opposition into consideration as well. My portfolio also represents the goals and objectives of persuasive writing. The essays I have written for this course demonstrate that I have certainly developed my critical thinking skills, and developed, or better yet, mastered my communication and personal responsibility skills; but, because of my occasional lack of analysis and issues with word choice, my writing process is not perfected.
Joseph, Mary. "The Turn of the Screw: Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism (review)." Project Muse . Volume 18.Number 1 (1997): n. page. Print.
James Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, which takes place in late 19th century Ireland, is a modernist Bildungsroman about Stephen Dedalus, a young man who, while facing the obstacles of his family, religion, and nation, tries to discover his life's purpose. Throughout the novel, Joyce takes the readers through Stephen's labyrinthine life, using techniques such as epiphanies, betrayals, and central images.
Literature gives a reader access to moral lessons that are applicable. Literature like the Canterbury Tales give lessons about the dangers of flattery and that appearance can be deceiving. This was accomplished in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale and the Wife of Bath’s Tale. Both stories offered insight into the lessons Chaucer was trying to the reader. The Nun’s Priest’s Tale tells the reader not to be a Chanticleer and be fooled by the flattery of the fox. Instead the reader is told to guard their heart aginst honeyed words. Secondly, The Wife of Bath’s Tale tells the reader to not be so quick to judge something by its appearance. There is a chance that it is not what the reader might first judge it to be. These lessons are not archaic, but revelant to modern day life. They can be applied to everyday situations and remain useful.
helps us to behave within society rules. With that being said I believe it encourages people to have a sense of moral beliefs along with guidance. Which leads me to have faith that people are capable of separating there right from wrongs. Making themselves aware and in control of their own futures. For instants when I am faced with a difficult situation I know that it is up to me to make the choice not only to benefit myself, but to be concerned of those around me as well. It also ties in with the way we act, this is known as behaviorism the claim on minds and/or mental events in which they can be expressed in terms of behaviors (“Ontology”) studied by
There are three main issues that Pope talks about in his long poem "An Essay on Man." First, the poet evokes a timeless vision of humanity in which the universe is connected to a great chain that extends from God to the tiniest form of life. Secondly, Pope discusses God's plan in which evil must exist for the sake of the greater good, a paradox not fully understandable by human reason. Thirdly, the poem accuses human beings of being proud and impious. Pope feels that man claims more insight into the nature of existence then he possesses.
The book I'm a Stranger Here Myself, written by Bill Bryson, is based on a collection of written articles. Bryson writes about everyday events and shows their negative qualities through whining or creative criticism. He attracts the readers' attention by writing ideas that relate to a normal persons life. His methods are very powerful because it attracts his main audience of common people through his simple vocabulary use and everyday middleclass situations. Also between his "complaining" he throws in little jokes that make his stories entertaining. This makes the reader continue reading because it constantly grabs their attention. Another reason of why Bryson's style of writing is very effective is because all of his stories have a main theme that gives a strong and important message to the reader. Some of these messages may be a little controversial to some readers but are very thought out and well explained.
My past year at Transfiguration was filled with wonderful memories, but one of my most unforgettable moments was when I had to go diving in the trash cans (pictured below) on two separate occasions. I would say that this experience was quite traumatizing for a slight germaphobe like me, but it was also fascinating. The first time I had the joy to dig through these trash cans was during the Modern Shakespeare Productions of Hamlet. It was time to perform when my group couldn’t find the backdrops that we had painted. It was too late to paint new ones, so our only option was to search the garbage bins for the backdrops, assuming that someone accidentally threw them out. Once we got outside, there was about 15 recycling bins and a giant dumpster
Literature is an intricate art form. In order to attempt to understand the meanings and ideas within literary work, there are many forms of criticism that propose different approaches to its interpretation. Each criticism is crucial to the understanding of how individuals interpret literary works. Since each criticism has a different approach to enrich the understanding literary works, the question is raised whether one criticism should be used over others, whether a certain combination of criticisms should be used, or whether all criticisms should be taken into account. This may all be dependent on the reader’s individual preference or opinion, but each criticism presented builds on the others to create a well-rounded and unique understanding