Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of effective decision making
Importance of effective decision making
Importance of effective decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of effective decision making
Blink- essay #1
Everyday of our lives we all make snap decisions. We don’t even think about them, we just do it. We make unconscious decisions all the time. Blink explores and explains the power of our unconscious decisions that we all make everyday. “Blink is a book about the first two seconds.” (pg.8) Throughout the book Gladwell is building his main message that the spontaneous decisions we make are often just as good as, or better than the carefully planned conscious decisions that we make, although there can be risks and dangers to them. Gladwell conveys this message in a very interesting and unique way throughout the book. Gladwell conveys this message through the interesting and effective way he structures his book, the use of logos
…show more content…
He uses logos to further prove his theory about why and how the mind does certain things. Gladwell uses the IAT test as an example of logos, "But the IAT measures something else. It measures our second level of attitude, our racial attitude on an unconscious level - the immediate, automatic, associations that tumble out before we've even had time to think."(pg.85) By using the IAT test, he gets to see that students "unconscious attitudes may be utterly incompatible with our stated conscious values."(85) The IAT test provides a logical explanation that uses an actual test with real results that helps Gladwell’s message to be conveyed. Gladwell also includes information about a man called John Gottman who can predict if a married couple will stay together. "If he analyzes an hour of a husband and wife talking, he can predict with 95% accuracy whether that couple will still be married fifteen years later." (pg.21) Gladwell uses real numbers and evidence from actual tests and experiments that helps his argument and message. This research and use of logos that Gladwell has included backs up his message with logical reasoning which further helps him convey his message to his …show more content…
Does the author use complicated words and intricate examples or does he use common words so the book will appeal to the audience? In Blink, Gladwell utilizes both types of diction; complicated and simple words. Since Gladwell uses both of those types, the tone and diction helps him greatly in conveying his message to his audience. “If we are to learn to improve the quality of the decisions we make, we need to accept the mysterious nature of our snap judgments.” Gladwell says this just after he has given an example of snap judgements in real life. This would be an example of the more serious and complicated diction. This helps Gladwell convey his message because it is backed up by an example which builds on to the main message. Gladwell also uses the rhetorical question very often, this makes the readers think outside of the text and into their own lives. “How is it possible to gather the necessary information for a sophisticated judgement in such a short time?” Gladwell’s use of rhetorical questions throughout the book helps him convey his message because it helps the readers think about what he is saying and apply it to their own
He draws attention to his argument by using statistical evidence and methods of persuasion. The methods that the author uses to better explain his argument of this book include that of researched evidence and rhetoric of ethos, and logos. Examples of each can be found throughout the book. For the researched evidence an example is all the quotes the author uses to better each argument of almost every paragraph of this book. When using quotes, the author can show that he has done research because he pulled the quotes out of multiple sources. An example of ethos is on page 32 chapter two, it states “Tolstoy once wrote what fascinated him about war was “its reality” – not the strategies of generals or the maneuvers of troops but the “actual killings”. “He was more interested to know in what way and under the influence of what feelings one soldier kills another”. This is a prime example of ethos because it evokes emotion of the reader, not only this but it talks about emotion which is in fact ethos. For an Example of logos, the reader can look at page 250 paragraph one, the example is that of the death toll of the Union soldiers. This is logos because it appeals to logic by using statistics to make a logical assumption that lots of Union soldiers were killed and the war was brutal for both the North and the
Pathos is the author's use of emotions and sympathy to urge the audience to agree with his or her standpoint. And lastly, logos apply sound reasoning (logic) to attract the typical ideas of the audience and to prove the author's point of view. "Lockdown" by Evans D. Hopkins is a fine example of an author using these appeals to persuade his audience. Hopkins uses of the three appeals are easy to locate and relate to throughout the entire passage. He undoubtedly uses rhetoric to try and keep his audiences focused and to persuade them to feel the way he does about the treatment of prisoners.
Logos appeals to reason, which are things like facts and statistics, and it works in the writers favor because it gives more information to the reader, which in turn builds the writer’s case. Nemko opens up almost right away with a “killer statistic” that warns of the fact that even if a student is giving an extended amount of time, if he or she did not graduate from high school in the top half of their class it is very unlikely that they will earn some kind of college degree. That is one statistic that is never heard, which is why it is stunning and a great way for Nemko to start off his argument. The fact that Nemko applies logos to his argument is the first reason why I agree with his proposal that too many young adults go to
He uses Logos in his speech to show the reasoning behind what he is saying. For example, when Fredrick Douglass was speaking about how he will see America’s Independence Day from the slaves’ point of view. He doesn’t hesitate to declare that it never looked blacker to him due to the character and conduct of the nation and slavery. He explains his statement with reasoning making the rhetorical appeal Logos. Fredrick Douglass also uses Pathos during his speech to provoke emotion in the audience. An example is in the third to last paragraph he was expressing his anger for what America has done and that they should be punished severely. “Had I the ability, and could reach the nation’s ear, I would today, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.” This contains many strong words that he wants to use to provoke an emotion of rage or disapproval in the audience. He also wants to show how he feels about America’s slavery and the punishment they should face. These are two rhetorical appeals Fredrick Douglass uses in his speech to persuade the
H.G.Bissinger, through his novel Friday Night Lights, creates an appeal to pathos to persuade readers to care about his opinion that the emphasis placed on High School Football has a dangerous impact on the lives of students. To support his opinion, Bissinger employs methods and techniques which help create an appeal to pathos. Pathos is an appeal which heavily relates to a reader’s emotion on various different aspects. To establish the fundamental problem Odessa, Texas has when it comes to football, Bissinger shows the religious like attitude the game is conceived with. By adding testimonies, Bissinger ties in emotion while strengthening his argument. Lastly, Bissinger uses personal stories
For “Ketchup Conundrum” I think that Gladwell mostly focuses on logos. More of logical facts are presented to the readers to show his research in the field of mustard and ketchup. Logos means persuading by the use of reasoning. It is used by Gladwell. Gladwell uses it to show the clarity of his claim, the logic of its reasons, and the effectiveness of its supporting evidence. Gladwell uses it in terms of induction and deduction. In “Something Borrowed” Gladwell uses two main ways or rhetorical appeals to convince his audience. First, he uses Logos to give logical facts about the copyright laws and his true opinion about them. The opinion could be classified to be Ethos because he was talking about an area of his expertise. In ethos, which means credibility, Gladwell covers his ideas so he can express his feelings towards the central problems of argumentation is the text to leave an impression to the reader that he is someone worth listening to. In other words he made himself stand on such a position in the authority on the subject of the paper that the audience will believe that he is someone who is likable and worthy of respect.
The books Brave New World by Aldus Huxley and Anthem by Ayn Rand are both valuable twentieth-century contributions to literature. Both books explore the presence of natural law in man and propose a warning for what could happen when man's sense of right and wrong is taken from him. In this essay, I hope to show how these seemingly unrelated novels both expound upon a single, very profound, idea.
She uses testimonial device to bring in the well-known reliable source known as Llewellyn Hinkes-Jones from “The Atlantic” to help support her case. She uses pathos to appeal to her audience’s emotions by pulling on their heartstrings. She uses the logos to provide support to her article which she means to convince her audience by use of logic, reason, or statistics. She uses euphemism to make something harsh or distasteful sound in a somewhat positive way. She uses ethos to convince her audience of her credibility. There are very few weaknesses in her article which are greatly outweighed by the many strengths in
Sowell begins his analysis of visions by citing Walter Lippmann’s astute observation: “At the core of every moral code there is a picture of human nature, a map of the universe, and a version of history. To human nature (of the sort conceived), in a universe (of the kind imagined), after a history (so understood), the rules of the code apply.” Sowell argues that social visions differ in their basic conceptions of the nature of man: “The capacities and limitations of man are implicitly seen in radically different terms by those whose explicit philosophical, political, or social theories are built on different visions.” In Sowell’s estimation, advocates of different visions conceive of “[m]an’s moral and mental natures…so differently that their respective concepts of knowledge and institutions necessarily differ as well. Social causation itself is conceived differently, both as to mechanics and
She mentions how one’s ACE score directly affects their life. Information via pathos is not in statistics, but rather just words and how it is brought across the audience. Her word choice is strong throughout her talk, giving a question to the audience in the beginning of her talk asking, “How many of you know/knew someone has/had a mental illness when growing up.” This appeal to emotion grabs the audience’s attention as Harris attempts to relate her talk to everyone there. Harris’s logos are directly related to her pathos as her logos backs up her pathos. Without logos, Harris’s pathos would have been nothing as no supportive information would be
John Steinbeck must have loved using slang and natural dialect. All of his characters spoke with a very heavy accents. "Tell 'em ya dong's growed scence you los' your eye." (P. 180). Granted, this does add some realism. But sometimes, its just a little too thick. This can make the book harder to read (as if it really needs any help in that department...). That style of writing is very useful when working on something that is going to be heard, but it doesn't work quite as well when it is read, I have noticed. Slang is also another element that can both help and hinder a book. Some words change meaning in time. A good example would be "cool". 100 years ago, if someone were to say that the clothes were 'cool', people would think "I should wear those during the summer, to stay cool". Some other words just don't have any meaning now. The phrase "tom-cattin'" was used to describe Al. That term is rarely, if ever, used today. The only reason that you can tell what it means is by its use in the sentence.
“It illustrates how language can be the core of a person’s reality, how it can be used to obscure the truth, and even how it can be used to change the past.” (Berkes) Just think of your world, powered by a government that has no end or suppression. Sometimes we all think that the government is in a bad place, but with Orwell’s work we can see that indeed it can be controlled even more. “Predicting the future wasn’t Orwell’s goal” (Fischer), but it was used as a tool to warn the future that if we don’t govern what our country is doing, it can slowly take over our lives. “Language is one of the key instruments of political dominations, the necessary and insidious means of the ‘totalitarian’ control of reality.” (Rai) Communication and language have shaped our world and will continue to help expand the reaches of human existence; as with anyone’s reality, your thoughts and dreams are all made up of communication and ideas. Its only when someone treads on your deepest sense of personality, that you understand the power of human thought and language. “Orwell’s novel validates that language, when used in a manner that has a political standpoint, can tread on the very existence of reality.”
In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch employs logos and repetition in his closing argument to the jury and people of Maycomb in order to persuade them to see beyond their prejudice and free Tom Robinson.
Initially I would have never read a book like this unless it was not part of the summer work. However this book has sparked an interest in me to find and read more books such as the Tipping Point. Reading this book was very rewarding if was opened up to a new horizon of thinking and how the world operates. When the author talked on the Law of the Few it made me thinks which category I stood in was I connector, maven, or a salesperson or maybe a mixture. Due to the fact that Gladwell had done such in depth research for this book I learned many new stories such as how Sesame Street was created and how a community of women was able to be educated upon breast cancer. As well as the idea were in the midst of a crisis and there are multiple people around and no one call for help, because they assume there neighbor has called or will called but when they are alone they arise to the problem. That is why in a crisis it is important to make eye contact or some sort of contact with another individual to call 911 or find help. Gladwell 's theory on the power of context was very relatable with the idea that once we become adapted to a certain atmosphere it is very likely we will change to adapt to that atmosphere. A theory such as this I am able to relate to my own life in my tenth grade Spanish class there were many eleventh and twelfth graders who were slackers and in order to fit in I became a slacker so I could adapt to that environment. As well as when my cousins came to
2. Lederer gives certain examples to inform the reader that authors all use short words. Each example that Lederer illustrate made me realize that not all writers use big irrelevant words. Authors use words to connect with the reader and many times the author tries to make clear to the reader.