Understanding Stuttering: Habits and Behavioral Interventions

1726 Words4 Pages

This paper will discuss Habits and stuttering as it pertains to inappropriate behavior using multiple baseline designs. Habit is a behavior learned that an individual repeats often without thinking about it. Some habits are healthy and helpful such as one brushing their teeth before and after eating and before going to bed. Another good habit is buckling the seatbelt when one gets into a car for safety measure. These habits reinforced and build upon on purpose in achieving a positive aim. Habit reversal procedure is an intervention or treatment used to treat anxious habits, thumb-sucking, stuttering, tic, and disparate habit disorders. Self-management techniques may also be used as an intervention to use in modifying and people stuttering. …show more content…

Stuttering is also known as dysfluency, stammering, faltering and a few other layman terms. It is more noticeable when children are angry, excited, upset, uncomfortable, or tired. This faltering over words is quite different from individuals with dysfluency. Dysfluency is stammering that starts amid a youngster's years of intensive language learning that usually resolves without anyone else at some point before pubescence. Normal dysfluency viewed as a typical period of dialect improvement. Around 75 out of 100 kids whom falter/stutter show signs of improvement without treatment. This can be a difficult stage for both children and adults. Participant 1, Claudette and Participant 2, Janet feels uncomfortable and self-conscious due to other children and certain family members laughing at …show more content…

Claudette and Janet stuttering through the pre-planned define stutter as repetition of a word or part of a word, drawing out of word speech sound; or blocking a pause pursue after an articulation starting with the ability of audible tension. Bloodstein (1981), asserts stuttering roughly occurs in 1% of the adult populace (Cooper, et al., 2013), and 5 percent of children in the U.S. age 3-17 have a speech issue that went on for a week or longer amid a prior 12 months period (Woods, 1995). The speech rate as the aggregate number of syllables articulated every moment of talking time. Such as time taken through the discussion partner was excluded. The natural speech pattern ratings measured the social validity of the outcome of intervention (Wagaman, Miltenberger, and Arndorfer,

Open Document