Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cameras in courtroom argumentative essay free
Cameras in courtroom argumentative essay free
Cameras in court rooms and the damage it causes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cameras in courtroom argumentative essay free
INTRODUCTION
I visited Isleworth Crown Court on 8th April 2015. At First, there were two assistant who gave us the Court’s timetable and explained what cases would be trialled at different courts. Also, they explained where the jury, people in public gallery, defendant and claimant should sit. Before the Court starts Her Honour Judge gave a presentation in terms of her rule, how the Court proceed and how the cases are considered in the Court. She stated that any defendant has the right for fair trail and we presume that everyone is innocent unless proven guilty. Following this talk, according to the Court’s daily list I had to choose to attend at one of the Courts. Therefore, I chose to observe the trial (part hear) at court 8, which the case was R v Dhuper (2015), in which Mr Dhuper was accused for causing Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) contrary to s.20. Although, the trial supposed to start at 10:15am but I was not allowed to sit in the public gallery until 11am. I remained in the Court until 3 o’clock and I was not fortune enough to see the full trial, due to the time His Honour Judge gave to the jury to look at the evidence and decide whether Mr Dhuper is guilty or not.
OBSERVATIONS
There were some question asked from Her Honour Judge before the Court commences, such as, the witnesses right to remain anonym because they might be intimidated. She responded that: if a witness is fearful of giving evidence, prosecutors must contact to the police to determine what options available to them under common law and by virtue of statute. The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA) p444 sets out a range of special measures that are available to witnesses in criminal proceedings who are deemed to be intimidated. The special mea...
... middle of paper ...
...ison between the images of the scene of the crime and some photographs of the defendant which are available to the jury for the purpose of testing the witness’ evidence. It seems to me quite convenient to provide such equipment in the court to view the crime scene or able the jurors to see the photographs or video type taken by CCTV camera and bring all the evidence together and make a fair decision.
By concluding the reflection, it is significant that the court has safeguarded the interest of all the parties and tried to give such an opportunity to all parties to bring all evidence to defend their self and examine the allegation against them.
Bibliography
Catherine Elliott and Frances Quinn, English Legal System (16th Edn, Pearson, 2015), chs 19 , pp 444,
John Sprack, A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure, 13th, Oxford university press, 2011) pp. 351,353
R N Howie and P A Johnson, Annotated Criminal Legislation NSW, 2011-2102, (Lexis Nexis Butterworths 2012) 17769-1774
...cleanup of the contaminated went underway, proving that with a long, painstaking process, truth can be found. Even though the judicial process had gotten in the way and extended the longevity of the trial, it was all worth it in the end.
Ferdico, J. N., Fradella, H. F., & Totten, C. D. (2009). Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
9. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003). Legal Studies for Queensland, Volume 1, ForthEdition, Legal Eagle Publications: Queensland. 10. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003).
In the United States, jury trials are an important part of our court system. We rely heavily on the jury to decide the fate of the accused. We don’t give a second thought to having a jury trial now, but they were not always the ‘norm’.
The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.
Schmalleger, Frank, Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson Education Inc. , 2010, Page 387
The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican government, he and his fellow justices sought to perpetuate their Federalist principles in the United States’ court system. In one of the most memorable court cases of all time--the case of Marbury v. Madison-- Marshall established the idea of judicial review and strengthened the power of the judicial branch in the government. Abiding by his Federalist ideals, Marshall decided cases that would explicitly limit the power of the state government and broaden the strengths of the national government. Lastly, the Marshall Court was infamous for determining the results of cases that dealt with the interpretation of the Constitution and the importance of contracts in American society. The Marshall Court, over the span of a mere three decades, managed to influence the life of every American citizen even to this day by impacting the development of the judicial branch, establishing a boundary between the state and national government, and making declarations on the sanctity of contracts ("The Marshall Court"...
Daly, Kathleen, Goldsmith, Andrew, and Israel, Mark. 2006, Crime and Justice: A guide to criminology, third addition, Thomson, Lawbook Co.
The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely determining the issues in dispute” (Ellis 2013, p. 133). In this essay I will be discussing the role of the jury system and how some believe the jury is one of the most important institutions in ensuring that Australia has an effective legal system, while others disagree. I will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a jury system.
This is evidence that can be classified into two broad categories which is demonstrative evidence and substantive evidence, The demonstrative evidence in a trial is the evidence other than a testimony that is presented during the course of a civil or criminal trial the demonstrative evidence includes actual evidence examples include (set of bloody gloves from a murder scene and illustrative evidence photos and charts. In trial cases many attorneys view the presentation of the evidence as demonstrative. A common example of demonstrative evidence is a still photograph, photographs of plaintiffs bruises taken immediately after an accident, these pictures will be able to help jury understand and see what took place at trial even if the trial is months from that date the injuries actually happened on. In this case a photograph, which is to be considered as demonstrative evidence could possibly solve a case and answer lots of questions a jury might have also questions and concerns the jury might have of the victim. Also another example would be aerial photographs of the crime scene of a vehicular accident can show how a particular intersection is laid out and can make more clear an ambiguous description of a bind intersection given by a witness.
The English legal system is ostensibly embedded on a foundation of a ‘high degree of certainty with adaptability’ based on a steady ‘mode’ of legal reasoning. This rests on four propositions
Rackley, E (2010). In Conversation with Lord Justice Etherton: Revisiting the Case for a More Diverse Judiciary. Public Law
United Kingdom is a country with a distinctive set of legal system. It is fairly different from other countries having civil law based legal systems. The legal system in the United Kingdom consists of various sources of law, where other civil law based countries rely only on a written set of law. European influences on the English Legal System came much later in near decades. This essay will aim to examine the development of the English Legal System by reviewing applications of various sources of law in the English Legal System furthermore to discuss the recent European influences on the law of England.
The courts of England and Wales acknowledge that the above must be something of value, in order to amount to consideration. A valuable consideration in the perspective of the English La...