Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cameras in courtroom argumentative essay free
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Equal justice under law”. Those four words are engraved on the very face of the Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. This phrase essentially means that everyone is to be treated equally and judged fairly. And yet, even with that phrase engraved on the outside of the Supreme Court building, many people are not treated fairly due to a certain policy regarding cameras inside of courtrooms. It is understood that all American citizens should have access to the goings on inside a courtroom but this is sadly not true. Due to the lack of cameras inside the courtroom, only those privileged enough to obtain a seat in the court may view the session, even though every single American has the right to view the proceedings, whether they want to or not. Cameras must be allowed in all courtrooms in order for the public to see the trials as well as for the benefit of those present.
With the knowledge of knowing that they are being recorded and watched, those participating in the trial will be alert, thus benefiting them. According to the book written by Larry J. Siegel and Joseph J. Senna, “[t]elevising trials […] ensures that judges, lawyers, and even witnesses act honestly […] especially cameras and TV, can increase community and political pressure on participants …” (395). In essence, the meaning of this quote is that people tend to be careful when they know they are being watched. The participating judges, lawyers, and participants will behave truthfully because they are feeling the pressure of being watched and judged on their actions. No one wants to make a fool out of themselves knowing that, however unlikely, the number of eyes watching could be anywhere from the lucky few in the courtroom to hundreds not present in the room. With...
... middle of paper ...
...are & Try a Winning Case. 6th ed. Nolo, 2007. Advanced Search Complete. Web. 19 Nov. 2011.
Nasheri, Hedieh. Crime and Justice in the Age of Court TV. New York, NY, USA: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2002. Ebrary. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/scc/Doc?id=10044275&ppg=98. Web. 28 Nov. 2011.
McCall, Gregory. “Cameras in the Courtroom: a Sixth Amendment Analysis.” Columbia Law Review 85.7 (1985): p.1546-1572. Academic Search Complete. Web. 20 Nov. 2011
Siegel, Larry J., and Joseph J. Senna. Introduction to Criminal Justice. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2008. Print.
Thompson, Ellia. "Courtroom cameras: issue moves in and out of focus." The Quill Sept. 2004: 7+. Academic OneFile. Web. 19 Nov. 2011.
Whisenand, James D. “Florida’s Experience with Cameras In the Courtroom.” American Bar Association Journal 64.12 (1978): 1860. Academic Search Complete. Web. 20 Nov. 2011.
Procunier case is whether the California Department of Corrections’ restriction on media-inmate interviews is constitutional or unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the California Department of Corrections ban was constitutional and did not violate the inmates’ rights of free speech. Furthermore, the regulation did not violate the media’s right to access information within a correctional
Seigal, L. J., & Worrall, J. L. (2012). Introduction to criminal justice (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
In summation, is can be identified in this paper that eye witnesses do not play a constructive role within the criminal justice system. This can be seen through a thorough discussion of the many issues portrayed through this paper. To conclude Schmechel et al. (2006) reiterates that statements this paper has presented and discussed;
Throughout history there have always been issues concerning judicial courts and proceedings: issues that include everything from the new democracy of Athens, Greece, to the controversial verdict in the Casey Anthony trial as well as the Trayvon Martin trial. One of the more recent and ever changing issues revolves around cameras being allowed and used inside courtrooms. It was stated in the Handbook of Court Administration and Management by Stephen W. Hays and Cole Blease Graham, Jr. that “the question of whether or not to allow cameras in American courtrooms has been debated for nearly fifty years by scholars, media representatives, concerned citizens, and others involved in the criminal justice system.” The negatives that can be attached to the presence of cameras inside a courtroom are just as present, if not more present, than the positives that go hand-in-hand with the presence of cameras.
Eyewitnesses are primarily used by the criminal justice system for investigating and prosecuting crimes, particularly in circumstances where it is the only evidence available (Wells & Olson, 2003). Their testimony is highly regarded as it allows for police, prosecutors, judges and juries to establi...
Byrd, S. (2005). On getting the reasonable person out of the courtroom. Journal of Criminal Law. 571-571. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/osjcl2&div=41&id=&page=
Wright, J. (2012). Introduction to criminal justice. (p. 9.1). San Diego: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUCRJ201.12.1/sections/sec9.1
"Cameras don't lie." Maclean's 3 Mar. 2014: 8. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 July
The article, “Trial Lawyers Cater to Jurors’ Demands for Visual Evidence,” written by Sylvia Hsieh stresses the importance of visual evidence. Hsieh writes
“Not only was the trial heavily covered; it changed its nature to accommodate the coverage.” This case drastically altered the scale and the hype of any media until that time. The presiding judge, allowed radio lines into the courtroom, paused proceedings to allow photographers time to snap a shot, and even moved the entire trial outside to allow every person a chance to view it. The fact that this “media event” was probably the most heavily covered hype of it’s time, but that the hype became more important than the trial itself. “The real trial, it was agreed, was taking place in the newspapers. The things the jury never got exposed to got the heaviest emphasis around the nation.” Newspapers and magazines carried innumerable articles and cartoons on the case, and telegraph operators wired stories to Europe and Australia. For the first time news of an American trial was nationally broadcast by radio, while thousands of people came to Dayton itself to take in what became a virtual carnival, complete with sideshows.
Fairchild, H. & Cowan, G (1997). Journal of Social Issues. The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and Society.
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27, 343-360. http://ccj.sagepub.com.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/content/27/3/342
It’s Time to Remove Cameras from the Courtroom! Is Judy still keeping audiences entertained by giving the court system a new attitude? Will court systems ever get back to their dignity? Not as long as the cameras still work. Cameras in the courtroom have been very beneficial in certain cases, but it has caused a lot of harm.
Stanley, Jay. "Accountability vs. Privacy: The ACLU's Recommendations on Police Body Cameras." American Civil Liberties Union. N.p., 09 Oct. 2013. Web. 15 May 2014.
Legal Information Institute. (2010, August 9). Retrieved February 17, 2012, from Cornell University Law School: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_law