The Three Branches Of The Canadian Government System

786 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Canada’s Federal Political System

Gurinder Virdi
9-1
Social 9
Canadian Government System
Over many years, the Canadian government has been around since 1867. The Canadian government system is fairly stable to take care of our country's citizens, values, jobs, economy, etc. Many Canadians have different point of views with our government. Some of the Canadians cannot accept the way the government runs the system. Other Canadians think that the system is excellent. However, I for one think that our system is great with how they process bills, elect MPs and much more.

Firstly, members of parliament. The MPs who are in political parties are elected to the House of Commons by Canadian voters. The first reason is the MPs represent the Canadian’s who vote for them in each region. …show more content…

There are three branches that have vital roles. The first one is the executive branch which proposes and makes laws. It also runs the day-to-day business in government. It includes the Prime Minister and Cabinet. The second branch is the legislative branch. It makes laws and also represents interests in Canada’s regions. It includes the House of Commons, Senate, and the Governor General. The final branch is the judicial branch which interprets the laws. It includes the supreme court and provincial/territorial courts. The first reason is organisation.The branches of government are in an organised way to govern Canadians. It makes it a lot easier for the government to make and pass a law. The second reason is majority government. The majority government in legislative makes it easier to pass any sort of law.For the Last reason, it prevents the head of government to become more powerful. The PM shares his powers and responsibilities with other people instead of being …show more content…

Senators represent the interests and rights of Canada’s regions specifically the minorities. Senators are able to change the bill or reject it. Usually, they don’t reject the bill. Any sort of bill cannot become a law unless it’s passed by the Senate. There have been many cases of scandals within the Senators. The first reason is that they take advantage of the money. The money that the Senators receive causes them to drain the tax payments. The second reason is the PM appoints the wrong Senators. They are not qualified to do their job properly in order to make the minorities and the rest of Canada’s lives better. The final reason is they don’t have a passion for their job only for the money. The Senators are easily taking advantage of their job with the perks that they receive. They do not have the urge to look over the content of a bill that is being processed. There are many problems with the Senate especially when it comes to the tax money going to waste and the advantages they

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of The Canada Parliamentary System

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    Canada runs on a democratic model of governing based on the British parliamentary system. Its parliament is thus divided into two chambers: the House of Commons and the Senate. Elected politicians are seated within The House of Commons while the Senate occupies qualified citizens which are appointed by the Prime Minister. Parliament’s purpose is to hold responsibility for passing legislations and the choosing of government, referring to the political party with the largest amount of seats. Depending on the results of the election, Canada has the potential of having either a majority, minority or in the rare case a coalition government. Customarily, an election in Canada usually ends up forming a majority government. The party with more than

    Read More

  • Limitations of the Canadian Prime Minister

    1053 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...n of their cabinet, while others may choose to create a new political path without consulting the views of their party. Mellon thinks that the Canadian government is under dictatorial scrutiny, whereas Barker contradicts this belief. The idea of a prime-ministerial government is certainly an over exaggeration of the current state of Canada. There are too many outside and inside forces that can control the powers the Prime Minister of Canada. Furthermore, there are several outside sources that indicate a good government in Canada. The United Nations annually places Canada at the top, or near the top of the list of the world’s best countries in which to live. These outcomes are not consistent with the idea of a one ruler power. Canada is not ruled by one person’s ideas, suggestions, and decisions, but by government approved and provincially manipulated decisions.

    Read More

  • The Six Basic Principles Of The Canadian Constitution

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    The next important principle of the Canadian Constitution is the judicial review. The judicial review is the power of the executive branch of government (Dyck 12). Essentially, the judicial review states that any law that the government makes, can be struck down by the Supreme Court if it violates the Canadian Constitution (Dyck 401). This is a prime example how the judicial review protects the rights of

    Read More

  • Senate Reform In Canada

    2054 Words  | 5 Pages

    Firstly, the bicameral system started in the 17th century and has been set up in many countries since. This system is justified on its standard of checks and balances on the governing party. The members of the two houses are elected or appointed to their positions depending on what method the country decides on. Canada is one of the countries with a bicameral parliamentary democracy, which was modeled off of England’s House of Lords. (Supreme Court 2014, pg. 720) One of the important factors of the bicameral system is the upper house of Parliament called the Senate, which has a long history and distinctive structure within Canada.

    Read More

  • The Dangers Of Factionalism In Canada

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    While having a legislative Union is preferable to him, it is not practical (Ajzenstat, 1999, 281). Like the American Founders, he acknowledged that not everyone has the same interests and values and it is not possible to eliminate these differences between citizens. The Canadian federal system instead has a legislative union while maintaining sectional freedom that comes with a federal union, with decreased threat of Factionalism because of the ensured protection of local interests. Both the Founding Fathers and Canadian Founders agree that it is best to protect as many local interests as possible because this provides lesser chance of a majority infringing upon a minority. Giving minorities avenues to express their interests and ensure their voices are being heard decreases the likelihood of Factionalism causing the breakdown of a

    Read More

  • Understanding Federalism: A Study of US Government

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are the judicial branch, the executive branch and the legislative branch. The powers of the branches are all divided by the constitution, which is called the separation of powers.

    Read More

  • The Canadian Governing System is not Fair or Democratic

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are Canadian citizens who thought that the Canadian government we have is perfect, citizens who believed that every aspect of the government was truly democratic, and citizens who believe that government could do no wrong. Truly this group of believers has been living a lie. In our Canadian system of government, large aspects within are far from democratic and need to be changed. Liberal-minded people will cry out for a change in order for government to serve the people better, and on the other hand the more conservative thinkers will argue that no change is needed because our government is efficient and considerate. However, our voting system, our Senate, and the power vested to the Prime Minister are far from democratic, do not meet the actual needs of the people and definitely need to be addressed.

    Read More

  • Party Discipline In Canada

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    It was said that Canada’s MPs’ power is been minimalize completely by the Prime Minister (Kilgour, 2012 p.1). The reason for less restriction of party discipline is to give them the permission to vote according to the public and personal belief rather than under the influence of the party whip, which will result in freedom of vote for general public. The reason that members of parliament are there are that: they are the representatives of the sections; they are the voice of the people. In Canada we do not elect our MPs to be a puppet solely to be govern under the prime minister. Our country is a democratic country where there’s freedom of speech and freedom to vote. In reducing the hold on party discipline allows the governmental personnel to openly state their opinions without sparking an unnecessary controversy. Which will benefit both opposition and government in power to discuss the controversial debates and will speed up the process of decision making.

    Read More

  • Electoral Reform in Canada

    1874 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...eft our own system to fester and decay. Unfortunately for Canadians, the only way that we can actually change our electoral system is if the party in power lets us. The problem with that is the ruling party generally has been granted a phony majority from the antiquated SMP system, and so changing the electoral system is the last thing that they want to do, unless they one day find themselves on the outside looking in. In 1984 when he was campaigning for the Liberal leadership, Chretien told reporters in Brandon that if elected he would introduce proportional representation “right after the next election”6. In 1993, two elections later, Chretien would win a majority with only 41% of the popular vote, and interestingly enough noble plans for reform were soon scuttled. In 1997 the Liberals won only 39% of the vote, and in 2000 only 42%, and then in 2003 Chretien retired after ten years as our unjustly elected dictator without ever raising the issue of electoral reform. With the current minority government, we have an unprecedented chance to create real change, and we can only hope that the voice of the majority gets through and our government does what the people actually want.

    Read More

  • Democratic Deficit in Canada

    1721 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Canadian constitution is bereft of democratic legitimacy; an alluring term for political democratic deficit. Over the past years, the unsuccessful attempts to reform its laws have made passing new bills and regulations almost an unreachable goal for every newly elected prime minister. This inflexibility in adapting new laws made the fundamental principles of the Canadian constitution known only by few reforms. The lack of democratic accountability in the Canadian parliamentary democracy is demonstrated not only in its electoral system, but also in its national parliament and at the federal level of its politics. Many reforms must be addressed in order to make the Canadian democracy healthier.

    Read More

  • The Prime Minister of Canada

    1908 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Prime Minister of Canada is given much power and much responsibility. This could potentially create a dangerous situation if the government held a majority and was able to pass any legislation, luckily this is not the case. This paper will argue that there are many limitations, which the power of the prime minister is subject too. Three of the main limitations, which the Prime Minister is affected by, are; first, federalism, second the governor general and third, the charter of rights and freedoms. I will support this argument by analyzing two different types of federalism and how they impact the power of the Prime Minister. Next I will look at three of the Governor Generals Powers and further analyze one of them. Last I will look at the impact of the charter from the larger participation the public can have in government, and how it increased the power of the courts.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice System and Law

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within the Federal Government there are three main branches; “the Legislative, the Judicial, and Executive” (Phaedra Trethan, 2013). They have the same basic shape and the same basic roles were written in the Constitution in 1787.

    Read More

  • The Three Branches of the U.S. Federal Government

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are three branches of the federal government, the executive, the judicial, and the legislative. The executive branch consists of such people as the president, the cabinet, and the executive offices of the president. The executive branch is known for enforcing laws created by the legislative branch. The judicial branch entails the United States Supreme Court and the Federal Judiciary. The judicial branch must review the laws the executive branch is to enforce. There is also the legislative branch. This branch contains the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and the Library of Congress. Laws are created through the legislative branch.

    Read More

  • Stephen Harper Model Essay

    617 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though they felt the bill was at the expense of the rights of Canadians, they felt that such bill was needed for the safety of Canadians. This made it absolutely impossible for the opposition party, NDP, to vote against the bill. If there was not a majority government, the Conservative and Liberal coalition alone would still concur and the bill would be passed as a result. The policy went on to prosper due to the demands of dominant coalitions of politicians in the

    Read More

  • Government: Canada And China

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    The House of Commons is composed of 295 members who are popularly elected to serve for five-year terms. The Parliament elects the executive, the Prime Minister. Canada has a Federal system and is divided into ten provinces that have powers the way our states do. China's government is a dictatorship it is led by the communist party.

    Read More

More about The Three Branches Of The Canadian Government System

Open Document