Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To what extent mussolinis domestic policy a success....essays
Mussolini's domestic policy
Successes and failures of Mussolini fascist policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Successes and Failures of Mussolini's Domestic Policies in Italy Between 1922 and 1939
Similar to those of Hitler, Mussolini’s main goals were to create an
Italian state with a strong identity and role within Europe with a
powerful military force. From the day he became Prime Minister on
October 29th, 1922 of a coalition government, he lacked a certain
skill in organization. It was not quite clear what exactly Mussolini
wanted to do, and it seemed as though he made decissions with no
previous planning, as opposed to Hitler and the Nazis who knew exactly
what they were striving for. Nevertheless, Mussolini knew that he
wanted to have full control over the Italian state and successfully
did as he introduced the ‘Legge Fascistissime’ – allowing Mussolini to
become a controlling dictator. He soon realized he wanted to carve
Italy into an Empire similar to that of the Ancient Romans. New
policies needed to be put in place to transform the Italian society
into a war machine while mainting a prospering economy to ultimately
fulfill the goals of the ‘Duce’.
Amongst Mussolini’s successful policies was the ‘Battle for Grain’.
With this project, Mussolini hoped to boost his prestige while
simultaneously helping Italy to become a self-sufficient state in
times of war. Before this project was applied, Italy had had to import
large ammounts of grain to sufficiently feed the population. In a time
of war, this could lead to starvation if import supplies were ever
stopped from abroad. Mussolini’s campaign was supported by government
grants for farmers to buy proper equipment. Other incentives included
free advice on farming techniques, and hi...
... middle of paper ...
...reate an Italian state
which resembles the Ancient Roman Empires power and role in Europe,
and one that is self-sufficient in a time of war, I think it is safe
to say the the Duce greatly failed to achieve this. At the time the
war broke out, Italy was not near the state of being self-sufficient.
As Mussolini had hoped, Italy did not have a powerful military to
boast about. All in all, Mussolini encountered some successes while
overcoming his obstacles of his primary aims. I think it is fair to
say that Mussolini failed as a leader to accomplish his ideal state.
Bibliography
Robson, Mark. Italy: Liberalism and Fascism 1870-1945. London: Hodder
& Stoughton, 1992
Blinkhorn, Martin. Mussolini and Fascist Italy. England: Routledge,
1884
Mann, Richard. . 2001
These were pivotal times in the annals of world history in the 20th century. Mussolini and Hitler’s rise to power was clearly a threat to the freedoms of the United States and its Allies. Through God’s grace and omnipotence, the US alliance, industrialization and intellectual might, we had the resources required to overcome the fierce and mighty threat of Fascism in the Free World.
To begin, he enacted parliamentary decrees, calling for a personal tax on bachelors to fund the Protection of Mothers and Children (Doc 1). The emphasis on protecting the mothers and their children shows Mussolini ’s need to reinvigorate Italy through a higher population. With the women and children surviving, Mussolini created a way for his population to keep rising.
Ginsborg P (1990). ‘A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics: 1943-1980’ Published by Penguin; Reprint edition (27 Sep 1990).
The positive effects of Benito Mussolini’s reign in Italy benefitted the country greatly. By putting Cesare Mori in charge of eliminating the mafia, he caused 11,000 of Italy’s criminals to be arrested, which caused the country’s crime rates to plummet. The nearly absolute end of the mafia brought peace and order to Italy, which the country’s citizens desperately needed. He also defended his country’s interests by going against the allies for not giving Italy the land that was promised to them if they joined them in the first world war. Mussolini also upgraded infrastructure in Italy and improved the Italian economy.
the Treaty of London, the deal made with B and F was not given to
Multiple historians have touched on the change in government during Fascist Italy’s reign in World War II. In Italian Fascism: Its Origins and Development, Alexander De Grand clarifies the many promises Benito Mussolini fabricated for the Italian people in order to get them to join his cause such as the improvement on poverty with the rise of a new Roman Empire. De Grand also gives an opposite view, with some citizens seeing Fascism as a “model of efficiency.” In Melton S. Davis’ Who Defends Rome?, t...
"Italy 1900-1939, Benito Mussolini." History Learning Site. N.p., 8 Oct. 2000. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
Mussolini was considered one of the first modern dictators and he essentially paved the way for Hitler and others to follow. Italy was still in chaos after World War I and showed no signs of recovery. When Mussolini attempted his rise to power, he did it through the political channels being voted in by the people. However, rather than seeking to improve Italy, “Mussolini's new cause became personal power; he sought to place himself in the position of dictator” (Gale). The way in which Mussolini spoke captivated crowds and made Italy fall in love with him. What Mussolini lacked in height he made up for in public speaking, as one of his critics describes, “Yet by the power of his public speaking, by his gestures and tone of voice, he was capable of inspiring tremendous enthusiasm in the crowds who gathered to hear him” (Gale). Italy felt as if Mussolini’s cult of personality was never going to leave, like it seemed as if Big Brother was never going to
7 May 2010 “Fascism in Germany and Italy.” Online Essays. 10 July 2007. 7 May 2010 “Italian Fascism.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.
Mussolini, Benito. “The Political and Social Doctrine of Fascism.” The Human Record . By Alfred J. Andrea and James H. Overfield. Vol. 2. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2011. 2 vols. 399-400.
Fascism is defined as, “an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.” Peter Hyland reports that throughout the 1920s and the 1930s, an economic depression was growing and becoming widespread throughout the world. People were losing faith in their democracies and in capitalism. Leaders who gained power supported powerful militarism, nationalism, and initiated the return of an authoritarian rule. J.R. Oppenheimer says that the rise of fascism and totalitarianism in Europe and Russia instigated a “critical step on the path to war.” In 1922, Benito Mussolini held leadership in Italy, promising a proficient and militaristic nationalistic state. During his control as prime minister, he gained a large group of followers, banned the disparagement of government, and used extreme violence against his enemies within the parliament.
Mussolini came into power in 1922 and sought to make Fascism the only party in Italy, because he believed it was superior to all other parties. Both Mussolini and Hitler wanted to create a better economy for their countries, and had big plans to change the way their countries viewed things. Mussolini abolished democracy, and would not listen and shunned any ideas or citizens who opposed his political views. Although the men were quite similar in the ways they set goals for their countries, Hitler was extreme in his plans for future Germany. According to the lecture, Hitler’s plans were to make it known the Germans were the superior race, Jews and Gypsies were subhuman, Hitler promised to take back the land taken from the after the war, and Lebensraum. Both men had their countries became a part of the Axis powers, and along with Japan became Fascist nations. Mussolini’s rise to power came through his influence on the fascists people. According to the lecture it was fascists that marched to Rome in October 1922, and the people demanded that the king put Mussolini in charge of the government. It was through fear that Mussolini gained his power. Hitler on the other hand was
"The manner in which Mussolini and the Fascist Party gained possession of the government was regarded in most foreign circles as an illegal act of violence." (3) As the nation of Italy began to suffer great debts, Mussolini had been summoned by the King to form a government to aid in the economic needs. This marked the birth of the Fascist Party in Italy. In the beginning of his rise to the top, Mussolini was popular amongst his people. His popularity was high, and people began to trust in his judgment and ideas. (4) He was, in essence, saving the people from the turmoil that had ensued the nat...
Exploring the Similarities and Differences Between the Foreign Policies of Mussolini and Hitler Similarities - Both foreign policies geared to achieving great power status o Hitler: lebensraum, wanted to have living space for the expansion of the German race and control over other groups o Mussolini: wanted control over Mara nostrum, Abyssinia, …an empire - fascist states o had anti communist feelings; o both signed anti comintern pact 1937 against USSR o Spanish civil war against communism helping Franco secure power o Signed pact of steel in may 1939, a full military alliance - unhappy with status quo, wanted international prestige o national grievances on Versailles, people wanted to change Versailles o Hitler, product of WW1 who was angry at Versailles and wanted to see Germany achieve great power status o Mussolini; felt that Italy had been treated unfairly at Versailles and also waned to change the status quo o Because of this both built up armies, navies and air forces.. Italian air force to block out the sun + German luftwaffe… - both Hitler and Mussolini, used diplomacy and force as well as aggression to get what they wanted o Mussolini over Greece where it undermined the LofN, used force to take Abyssinia 1935 o Hitler used the threat of force to take Austria and diplomacy as well as force to take Czech and Saarland in 193… - by 1939 both had a common enemy; Britain and France - both were aggressive nationalists and glorified warw - both wanted empires; abysinnia and lebenstraum to distract from problems at home.. Differences - Hitler was more clear in his aims and ideals whereas Mussolini was more vague and opportunistic o Although Hitler did take advantage of opportunities such as Abyssinia crises to remilitarise Rhineland he was more structured in his aims for Lebensraum, unification of all Germans, building up the army and recovering lost territories § Illustrated by Hitler’s success after success ; Rhineland in 36,
In order to keep a safe society, it is important to establish a nation with