Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the definition of happiness
What is happiness? essay
What happiness is and how it can be achieved
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the definition of happiness
French author, journalist and philosopher, Albert Camus writes, “but what is happiness except the simple harmony between man and the life he leads.” In his book, The Geography of Bliss, Eric Weiner sets out on a journey around the globe to “places that possess, in spades, one or more of the ingredients that we consider essential to the stew of happiness: money, pleasure, spirituality, family, and chocolate, among others”. (2) According to the World Happiness database, these are the keys to the happiness of several countries he visits. However, when he explores the nation of Bhutan, he encounters an entirely contradictive idea of happiness. The Bhutanese believe that less is more. From the beginning of his visit in Bhutan he finds that from their daily life activities, to their economics, to their ideas about self, the key to their happiness is simplicity. Simplicity is defined “as the state of being free from complexity, intricacy, and division; the absence of luxury or pretentiousness; of having plainness and sincerity; basic”
An example of this simplicity is apparent in the activities of daily life. Weiner encounters the vast, natural beauty of the Himalayas as his plane makes its approach to Bhutan. After he disembarks, however, he is not greeted by a glitzy, multimillion dollar airport but by what he describes as “barely an airport…just a tiny hut of a terminal” (53). As are all visitors to Bhutan, Weiner is assigned a guide. He makes note of the simple, traditional Bhutanese dress for men, a gho, which is shapeless, practical in that it can carry any manner of items within its folds, and devoid of bright colors or patterns. Weiner describes what the Bhutanese consider a national highway, which consists of one road, wide eno...
... middle of paper ...
... of archery. There is a balance, a harmony, in their daily life; in wealth and lacking; in living and in dying. This balance is achieved not by complicated bureaucratic policy, but taking what you need; living practically and practicing being attentive, compassionate and cooperative within your community. The question remains whether advancement, this progression will impact the acceptance of the simple life that the Bhutanese currently have. Less is more, but will the controlled introduction of outside influences change this idea. The question of whether happiness is “in here” or “out there” remains to be seen in Bhutan.
Works Cited:
Weiner, Eric. The Geography of Bliss. New York. Twelve, 2009. Print.
“Camus, Albert”. Wikiquote. Wikimedia Foundation. 15 Jan. 2012. Web. 19 Feb. 2012.
"Simplicity." Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. 19 Feb. 2012.
In contrast to Aristotle, Roko Belic’s documentary “Happy” provides a fresh perspective that takes place far more recently. The film sets out to similar goals of Aristotle in defining the nature of happiness and exploring what makes different people happy in general. Unlike Aristotle, however, the film’s main argument refers to makes people happier. In this case, the film argues that merely “doing what you love” is what leads to happiness (Belic). The argument itself appears oddly self-serving, considering that message is what underlines the foundation of happiness, yet there is a subliminal message that a simpler lifestyle is what leads to what the film is trying to convince you of. The message itself is obviously addressed to Americans, considering
The struggle between happiness and society shows a society where true happiness has been forfeited to form a perfect order.
Dale Carnegie once expressed, “Happiness doesn’t depend on any external conditions, it is governed by our mental attitude.” Analyzing this quote, it is crucial to note the underlining theme that happiness, true and genuine happiness, requires a shifting away from conformity and the status quo in order to discover the treasure found in one’s own self. Therefore, finding out who one’s self is mandates a state of solitude which acts like the green pastures by the still waters that restores the soul. However, with its roaring and hungry fire that sends up flutters of red and yellow and orange and white fireflies soaring into the carnivorous night, conflict is the key ingredient in shifting away from acquiescence and society’s present state of affairs.
Archery, in this book, was the way that the author found his way into Zen Buddhism. One of the most important lessons that Herrigel’s master taught him was, to correctly master the art of ar...
Happy is a documentary that brings to light the different types of livings of people around the world and contrasts how they define happiness. The movie starts out in Kolkata Slum, India, with a man Manoj Singh. Manoj is living a relatively impoverished life. His house isn’t the best, in fact the roof is just a tarp however he says “my home is good.” Manoj is quite happy with his life and it’s not because of his minimal possessions but the community around him. His happiness lies in the fact that he can see his son smiling every day and he is so grateful for his neighbors and friends. He even states himself that he doesn’t consider himself as “poor but the richest person.” Manoj’s happiness is described as the same as the average American.
In this documentary, Roko Belic an American film producer and director tries to explain happiness by traveling the world from Louisiana, United States to Okinawa, Japan to learn more about happiness of different ages, classes and ethnicities of people. He explains that in his documentary by interviewing several normal people about their
Happiness plays an important and necessary role in the lives of people around the world. In America, happiness has been engrained in our national consciousness since Thomas Jefferson penned these famous words in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson). Since then, Americans have been engaged in that act: pursuing happiness. The problem however, as Ray Bradbury demonstrates in his novel Fahrenheit 451, is that those things which make us happy initially may eventually lead to our downfall. By examining Guy Montag, the protagonist in Fahrenheit 451, and the world he lives in we can gain valuable insights to direct us in our own pursuit of happiness. From Montag and other characters we will learn how physical, emotional, and spiritual happiness can drastically affect our lives. We must ask ourselves what our lives, words, and actions are worth. We should hope that our words are not meaningless, “as wind in dried grass” (Eliot).
Many people value the tangible over the complex. However, viewing the world solely through this definite lens is an oversimplification. Yevgeny Zamyatin’s We explores this flaw in a society founded solely upon its government’s definition of the “ultimate happiness.” To reach utopia, it eliminates inefficiency, crime, and despondency, by promoting state-led happiness. Despite these admirable goals, the One State’s methods sacrifice freedom, individualism, and, ironically, happiness itself, ultimately failing its mission. Zamyatin explores the emotionless routine within the One State to assert that happiness cannot exist when controlled and rationalized.
The Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler in “The Source of Happiness” shows that “One method is obtaining everything that we want and desire-all the money, houses, and cars; the perfect mate and the perfect body.” (Dalai Lama and Cutler 27). The Dalai Lama gave an example to how people choose to find happiness in the world and believes how pretentious these ideas can be. If a person cannot be satisfied with what they have then it allow for there to be a flaw in that person’s life. The Dalai Lama wanted us to understand that the desires that we have may just be something temporary and wants us to reanalyze what happiness is for us instead of looking for the answers in many things we see each day. Dalai Lama’s words can be inspected when he states that this way of life is flawed, due to the fact that desires can grow until it reaches a point where we cannot fulfill it no more (Dalai lama and Cutler 27). When it comes to the Dalai Lama, his answer to this was understanding that there is more than one way to live a materialistic life. Happiness itself is a goal which we should not achieve because eventually we all will lose our sense of satisfaction over these temporary things. In life, it is impossible to not long for what we want, but to enjoy what we have is a redeeming quality that Dalai Lama Mentions (Dalai Lama and Cutler 27).
“There is only one happiness in this life, to love and be loved.” – George Sand. While Sand’s quote is very popular and widely agreed upon, the two scholars under examination in this paper would not necessarily agree. Richard Kraut and Aristotle have two distinct views on the conceptions of happiness. Aristotle holds a more objective and rigid view on how to judge a happy life while Kraut holds a more subjective and flexible view. Both philosophers agree that there are certain standards and attitudes an individual must hold to in order to live happily. Where the disagreement appears is what the standards and attitudes are. Aristotle claims a more universal happy life ideal that is held by everyone equally, whereas Kraut claims happiness is
In the book, The How of Happiness, author and researcher Sonja Lyubomirsky sets her book apart from other self-awareness books by being the first to utilize empirical studies. She uses data gained through scientific method to provide support for her hypothesis. This hypothesis consists mainly of the idea that we have the ability to overcome genetic predisposition and circumstantial barriers to happiness by how we think and what we do. She emphasizes that being happier benefits ourselves, our family and our community. “The How of Happiness is science, and the happiness-increasing strategies that [she] and other social psychologists have developed are its key supporting players” (3).
As a person in any society, you are told, “This will make you happy,” “This will not.” The inconsistency with this is that each culture views fulfillment differently. Cultures based on doing good and helping humanity view joy as mutually respecting one another and turning away from temptation. In cultures that do not set a precedent on being kind to your fellow man view selfish desires, such as sexual pleasure, monetary success, and pride, as the way to fulfillment. In Sappho Poems and Confucius Analects, these disparities are obvious.
Gretel Ehrlich describes her move to Wyoming as awakening from a nap, satisfied in her new home she becomes absorbed in its tranquility and indifference. She is reborn, starts anew and creates a new life for herself. Ehrlich even cut her hair and buys new clothes to create a "new" and different person. To read and understand this essay means looking deeper into the author's story of rebirth, and how the big Wyoming skies were healing and put things into perspective for her. Thus, improving her quality of life without any fillers or distractions.
But in this debate, one question still raises its head - What is happiness? Happiness is not actually leading a luxurious life, but the luxury of living a life. Happiness is not actually about expanding your business, but it lies in expanding the horizons of life. Happiness is not having a meal in the most famous restaurant, but having it with your most beloved family. It does not lie in attending honorable parties, but to attend a party with honor.
Small landlocked mountain nation is best described as a Himalayan staircase between India and Tibet. According to Gupta,(1999), our country is widely known to the outside world for the unique philosophy unlike rest of the countries. Though the concept of Gross National happiness was floated in the 1960s by third king Jigme Dorji Wangchuk.(education, 2005) The philosophy “Gross National Happiness” as the guiding philosophy of Bhutan’s development process, was pronounced by His Majesty King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, soon after his enthronement in 1972. Over the decades, many conferences and discourses have led to increasing elaboration and development of this concept as well as its practice. Our King was clear that happiness is the ultimate end desired, but not necessarily pursued by every Bhutanese and indeed, every human being. The legal code stated that ’if the government cannot create happiness (dekid)