Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abortion review of related literature
Social concepts about abortion
Abortion in the 1800's
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abortion review of related literature
The Shift in Abortion Policy in the 1800s
"In 1800 no jurisdiction in the United Sates had enacted any statutes whatsoever on the subject of abortion... Yet by 1900 virtually every jurisdiction in the United States had laws upon its books that proscribed the practice sharply and declared most abortions to be criminal offenses" (Mohr p. VII).
Societal Changes from the Early 1800s to the Mid 1800s
During the early 1800s, abortion at the beginning of a pregnancy was neither immoral nor criminal. Common law held that before 'quickening,' the first perception of fetal movement by the mother, usually during the second trimester, the fetus was not alive or independent. After quickening abortion was a criminal offense, because the fetus had demonstrated the beginnings of independent life (Mohr p. 1). Since the point of quickening varied from woman to woman and depended upon her word, it was near impossible to prosecute criminal abortions (Mohr p. 2). Most of the laws of the early 1800s were aimed not at prosecuting women for obtaining an abortion, but rather to protect them from medical malpractice such as poisoning, physical harm, and unwanted abortions (Mohr p. 21, 28) (see mollie smith case link).
Information on abortion was available to women primarily through home medical manuals and journals. Abortion information was usually available in two sections of home medical books: how to ?release obstructed menses? and ?dangers? to avoid during pregnancy. The latter section was a sort of how-to in reverse that could be effectively put to use by the reader. The most widely consulted work, Buchan's Domestic Medicine, advised emetics and a mixture of prepared steel, powdered myrrh, and aloe to ?restore menstrual flow.? Under caus...
... middle of paper ...
...tives, sixth ed. Worth Publishers. 2001
Mohr, James C. Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800-1900. Oxford University Press: New York, New York. 1978.
New York Times, Aug 23 1871, Aug 27 1871, Aug 30 1871, Aug 31 1871, Oct 29 1871.
Shryock, R. H. Medicine and Society in America: 1660-1860. Ithaca, NY: Cornell. 1960
Starr, P. Medicine, "Economy and Society in Nineteenth century America," Journal of Social History. 1977. pp10, 588-607.
Taverne, Dick. "The Huge Benefits of GM are being Blocked by Blind Opposition," The Guardian 3 Mar. 2004: 24.
Wertz, R., and Wertz D. Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America. New York: Free Press. 1997
Wilson, Richard K. "DNA: 50 Years Later," St. Louis Post 27 Feb. 2003: B7.
Zeitz, Joshua M. "The Big Lie about the Little Pill," NEED NAME OF PAPER OR JOURNAL27 Dec. 2004: A17.
In American History we are currently studying the concept sectionalism. Sectionalism is division within a country based on regional beliefs and interests. In the early 1800’s, sectionalism in america grew as slavery divided the Nation. Slavery was ignored, compromised, and argued about by the states until the conflict drove our country into the Civil War. Although regional differences are not as distinct these days, many issues are currently causing division among the states and people of our country. These issues lead to what our history class describes as “modern sectionalism.” One such issue is abortion.
Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood by Kristen Luker, analyzes the historical and complex sociology of abortion. Luker focuses on three important factors: a historical overview of abortion, the pro-life and pro-choice views, and the direction the abortion debates are going (11, Luker, Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood p. 000). Abortion has always been seen as murder and with the idea that those who are already living have more rights. Back in the days, the laws didn’t give fetus personhood. Also, the laws against abortions weren’t strictly enforced upon anyone. In addition, abortion didn’t seem to be a huge problem, which explains why abortion was ignored in the past.
Noonan, John T, Jr. A Private Choice: Abortion in America in the Seventies. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London: 1979.
Otto von Bismarck once said, “Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made.” The arduous process that a bill undergoes in order to become a law may seem grueling and pointless; however, the processes high caliber of difficulty allows for the extreme prestige and exclusivity of bills that are passed. Because the process is so exhausting, and filibusters, subsequently requiring a super-majority vote to pass a bill, have always been such a threat in Congress, historically, bills that attempt to reform sensitive issues have not fared well in the legislative branch. However, when Congress does pass controversial laws, it then also faces the task of effectively enforcing them. But, when the process is carried out to completion, laws that are enforced have significant impacts on the everyday lives of the American people—such as laws concerning abortion rights. In the United States, the government and Congress have significantly affected the rights of women with regard to abortions through laws that either restrict or guarantee their legality and availability, while the government’s capacity to do so is affected by the principle of federalism along with that of the separation of powers.
Ever since the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973, abortion has changed its course in society. With the new decision made by the United States, abortion is now legal. Many abortions were performed before the Supreme Court decision, but the settlement made it less risky for the doctors involved. Abortion has caused society to be divided between a pro-choice group and pro-life group. Two groups with struggles that will never end.
In 1900 a law was passed banning women from having an abortion. Before 1900, abortions were a common practice and usually performed by a midwife, but doctors saw this as a financial threat and pushed for a law making abortions illegal. From 1900 until 1973, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a women’s right to have an abortion, women who wanted to have an abortion did so secretly. These secret abortions were performed
Until the mid 1800s, abortion was unrestricted and unregulated in the United States. The justifications for criminalizing it varied from state to state. One big reason was population control, which addressed fears that the population would be dominated by the children of newly ...
...s. It is clear to see that since abortion became widespread and open in the community it was deemed a criminal act.
In the year 2001, women can receive legal abortions. That was not the case just a small time ago. Imagine candle light vigils, signs that state “PRO LIFE IS A WAR TO THE END” and religious fanatics preaching the words “You Must Repent”. These are the things women must endure to this day just to enter the doors of a women’s clinic. Regardless of a routine Pap smear or a termination the lingering words of a protestor can be heard just to enter a clinic. The movie “If These Walls Could Talk” takes you through three different time periods, the 50’s, 70’s and the 90’s, and each time period deals with a story of a woman and her dilemma in dealing with abortion. Whether it is legal or not in that time, one idea stays the same. Equality Now, it is our choice as women.
The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”
Since human recognize the material, biomaterials have had initial development. As early as 3500 BC, the ancient Egyptians used sutures made of cotton fiber or horse hair, and in 16th century gold plate was used to repair jaw bone and ceramic materials were used to make dedendum, and so on. With the development of medicine and materials science, especially the success of the research and development of new materials, such as the rapid development of polymer materials in the 1940s provides a great opportunity for the research and application of biomaterials. It could be said that in addition to the brain and most
In recent years, researchers around the world have been showing an increasing interest in the area of nanoscience. Nanotechnology is the research and development of materials, systems, and devices with properties different from those found on the scale of molecules and viruses (Patil et al). A branch of nanotechnology, called nanomedicine, holds strong promise of future medical advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases (Patil et al). Nanomedicine is a science and technology which involves preventing traumatic injury, relieving pain, and maintaining human health (Patil et al). With nanomedicine it will be possible to extend a human’s life span by quickly repairing a variety of fatal physical injuries. Medical robots, or nanobots, will be able to efficiently cure the majority of the diseases that people suffer from today. Nanotechnology has the potential to become a core technology for not only modern medicine and dentistry, but others fields such as chemistry, physics, and engineering (Patil et al). Once scientists determine a system that eliminates the dangers of nanoscale materials and regenerative medicine, nanotechnology will without doubt become the fundamental technology of modern medicine.
The aim of this essay is to discuss how the social perception of nurses has changed throughout history leading up to the present day. This will include how Florence Nightingale challenged the social class that the nursing profession was put into by society, alongside the effects that social media and news reports have had on the way people view nursing as a whole. Carrying on from news reports and social media, this essay will read into the Francis Report, this being one of the main reports having the biggest impact on how nurses are regarded by the general public. Another topic that will be drawn upon is the changes and progression in nursing legislation and the effect it has had on the standard of care given by nurses.
Nanoparticles have got considerable attention globally in recent years due to their wide range of applications in many fields like pharmaceutical applications environmental pollution control, catalysis, biological tagging, drug delivery systems, photonics, optoelectronics and material chemistry (Ghosh et al., 2012). Nanoparticles are considered to be the building blocks of next generation of electronics, optoelectronics, and various chemical biochemical sensors, in therapeutics and diagnostics (Pavani et al., 2013).
Eureka. “Nanotech medicine to rebuild damaged parts of human body.” Science Daily, 18 Jan 2011. Web. 20 Nov. 2011.