Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
. INTRODUCTION
The book of Hebrews is hailed by many scholars particularly for its Christology. The authorship of this great has been a complex puzzle that scholars are yet to provide the needed solution. Roger Haln confirmed the above when he said “The literary form of the book is uncertain. The author and time of writing are unknown. The logic and flow of thought are unusual for most modern people.” Some scholars even call Hebrews as a delight for the person who enjoys puzzles.
The rhetorical skills of the author coupled with the background of the addresses make the book of Hebrews instructive for understanding of mother tongue biblical interpretation. The book of Hebrews like any other work in mother tongue uses categories, examples, and cultural assumptions best understood by addressees to communicate profound truths. Mother tongue biblical interpretation enables indigenes to build their own theology without necessarily having to think and reflect about God; in other words doing theology through other people’s cultural assumptions and language. The book of Hebrew makes a strong case for mother tongue biblical interpretation that which this paper seeks to establishes and makes a case for mother tongue biblical interpretation in Ghana. The arguments will be made considering the literary form,
BACKGROUND TO THE BOOK OF HEBREWS
The document was known and quoted before the end of the first century, but not under its traditional title ‘Pros Hebraious’; the title goes back to the last quarter of the first century.
Luke Timothy Johnson has observed that cotemporary scholars find Hebrews fascinating for the subtle combination it gives to diverse philosophical and religious symbols of the first century. Indeed Hebrews is a f...
... middle of paper ...
...influence on the letter . Hebrews made use of primal world views of both Jewish and the Greeks. For instance the book of Hebrews had a dual view of the cosmos, as consisting of the heavenly and spiritual realm and the material and the mundane world. As in the primal world view, the epistle regards material and spiritual reality as the sides of one coin with logoi of Jesus . Gatumu asserts that if Hebrews perceives reality from the perspective of the primal world view, it is appropriate to interpret it using primal resources, in view of its affinity with primal religion and world view.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Bob Smith, ‘Basics of Bible Interpretation, Texas: Word Books, 1978
2. James Moffatt. The Epistle to the Hebrew
INTERNET SOURCE
1. http://www.gotquestions.org/Book-of-Hebrews.html
2. www.search-the-scriptures.org/book_of_hebrews_pt1.htm
Hodgson has been working in Tanzania for 20 years, since 1985. She first worked in the Catholic Diocese of Arusha in the Arusha Diocese Development Office and later taught at Oldonyo Sambu Junior Seminary. She worked with Maasai in a religious context and so was led to her research. She wrote her book “The Church of Women” after noticing the gendered differences in evangelization. In her book Hodgson first addresses the history of Maasai religious practices. Women were imperative to most religious ritual and even nonritual practices. Their God was often referred to with female pronouns, though a certain level of gender fluidness was apparent. She then chronicles the history of the Congregation of the Holy Spirit, or Spiritans, in Tanzania. She interviews three American missionaries who worked with the Maasai in three different time periods. With the interviews Hodgson comprises the history of the approaches taken to evangelize the Maasai. She uses the next two chapters to compare men and women’s responses to the missionaries, following three communities. She ends the book with an exploration of this new Maasai Catholicism, a mix of Maasai and Catholic ritual and spiritual practices the Maasai have
A paradox is a statement that contradicts itself. After Guitar suspect that Milkman has taken and hidden the gold, Guitar feels betrayed by Milkman. When Milkman is in Shalimar, Guitar leaves a message warning Milkman that he is going to kill him. The conversation between Guitar and Milkman is paradoxical because a best friend would not try to kill you, and an enemy would not help and warn another enemy.
When reading The Sermon on the Mount, it is important to note who the intended audience was, the crowds of people who were there to witness Jesus. These crowds of people most likely were not the most educated; however, Jesus attempted to educate them about the Word of God. To facilitate his teaching, Jesus employed rhetorical techniques such as the metaphor. This crowd required simple and relatable ideas to become educated on his teachings of the Word of God. Many of Jesus’s teachings during The Sermon on the Mount were symbolic in nature, and not meant obeyed explicitly; Jesus merely employed these rhetorical devices to help the followers understand the underlying message, which was to be obeyed.
Throughout many of Paul’s letters there are many debates pertaining to the authorship, destination, date, and the purpose. In the book of Ephesians many scholars debate on the authorship and if Paul actually wrote the letter, or if it was a scribe. Although there are some debates on whether Paul actually wrote it or not, he does refer to himself twice in the letter. In 1:1 and in 3:1 Paul states himself, 1:3 states, “For this reason, I Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles” (NIV) In verse 1:3 Paul states that he is a prisoner, therefore it is debated that he did not specifically write this because he was imprisoned in Rome at this time. According to Wallace “This, of course, is not to say that the letter must be by Paul, but it is to argue that without such internal testimony, no such claim could be made” (Wallace). Many scholars also debate on the vocabulary usage and the structure of the letter. Some believe that the structure is similar, but the vocabulary seems to be different than his New Testament epistles. Hoehner claims that,” Though the book has a close affinity with Colossians, critics claim that Ephesians is uncharacteristic of Paul” (Hoehner 613). The destination of Ephesians is somewhat debated, but many do believe that the letter was sent to the church of Ephesus. “Some to claim that Ephesus is a better starting point, others suggest Caesarea.” (Wallace) Although this is an argument that has many valid points, it is obvious that Paul was imprisoned in Rome while he wrote Ephesians. It is said by Hoehner that “Ephesians was probably delivered by Tychicus (Eph. 6:21-22), who also took Paul’s letter to Colossians (Col. 4:7-9)” (Hoehner 613). As for the date goes m...
When the Hebrew language was revived, it provided a limited range of religious topics and ignored other areas. The reasoning behind the loss of the Hebrew language was due to the fact that denotations were lost and the universally valid law was more important than knowing concrete objects. Thus, Jews were forced not to pay attention to concrete nature and objects or use words from other languages. Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the Hebrew revivalist, during the time of 1858-1922, edited Hebrew ne...
1996. “Sacrifices and Offerings in Ancient Israel” in Community, Identity, and Ideology: Social Science approach to the Hebrew Bible., ed. Charles E. Carter.
Robinson, B. A. (2008, March 30). Books of the Hebrew Scripture . Retrieved May 7, 2011, from Religious Tolerance: http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_otb3.htm
The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has been hailed by people of many religious and cultural backgrounds as the greatest discovery of manuscripts to be made available to modern scholars in our time and has dramatically altered our understanding of the origins of Christianity. Perhaps the most fundamental reexamination brought about by the Scrolls is that of the Gospel of John. The Fourth Gospel originally accepted as a product of second century Hellenistic composition is now widely accepted as a later first century Jewish writing that may even contain some of the oldest traditions of the Gospels . The discovery of the scrolls has led to the discussion of undeniable and distinct parallels between the ideas of the society at Qumran and those present in the Gospel of John.
Harris, Stephen. Understanding The Bible. 6 ed. New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2002. Print.
The Bible is the holy, inspired, infallible Word of God. Within the Bible, there are different stories and principles that the Lord gave us through special revelation. In the New Testament there were Jewish or religious groups that began teaching unbiblical doctrines. Two of those sects were the Pharisees and the Essenes. The importance of learning about these groups is so that we can see how they were wrong and to make sure we don’t mirror their actions. In this paper I will be comparing the Pharisees’ views on God and Jesus with that of the Essenes’.
It is possible that readers of Revelation might have approached the text of revelation, not via Judaism or the Jewish scriptures, but through the literary conventions of the Graeco-Roman world.it is suggested that the amoenus locus motif would have provided an introit for such readers to engage with the heavenly visions found in Revelation 21.
First I will give you a background of exegesis. Webster's New World Dictionary(1990), defines exegesis as, the interpretation of a word, passage, etc., esp. in the Bible. This definition is a worldly. To understand the true meaning and background I looked in John H. Hays book called, Biblical Exegesis, for the answer. He says that the term "exegesis" itself comes from the Greek word exegeomai which basically meant " to lead out of." When applied to texts, it denoted the " reading out" of the meaning. The noun, therefore, could refer to "interpretation" or " explanation." Thus whenever we read a text or hear a statement which we seek to understand and interpret, we are involved in exegesis.
Is the language in the New Testament problematic for the modern world view? Rudolf Bultmann’s argument in the article, “The Task of Demythologizing,” in Philosophy and Faith: A Philosophy and Religion Reader, believes it is. He challenges the theologian to strip away the elements in the language of the mythical world image and the event of redemption, and then, suggests theology needs to examine the truths in the New Testament. Theology must discover whether the New Testament offers people a better understanding of themselves leading them to a genuine existential decision. Keeping in mind, the New Testament was written for humankind’s comprehension of the world view during the pre-scientific age, Bultmann stipulates theologians may want to
Thiselton, A. C. (1980). The two horizons: New Testament hermeneutics and philosophical description. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, xix.
While the Hebrews and Egyptians creation theories bear resemblances and differences, the study and comparison of both the Egyptian myths and the biblical account allow us to comprehend the religious views of ancient civilizations in a better light. One may come to the conclusion that the Hebrews were influenced by the cultures of Egyptians by creating similarities in their own beliefs, or by drawing a line of defense of what is in their terms true, by separating from the mass ideals of the Egyptians and establishing distinct