Revelation 21: 1-22: 5: An Apocalyptic Amoenus Locus?

7348 Words15 Pages

Revelation 21:1-22:5: An Apocalyptic Amoenus Locus?
ABSTRACT
It is possible that readers of Revelation might have approached the text of revelation, not via Judaism or the Jewish scriptures, but through the literary conventions of the Graeco-Roman world.it is suggested that the amoenus locus motif would have provided an introit for such readers to engage with the heavenly visions found in Revelation 21.

Introduction
The literary character of Revelation embraces may different types and genres. In this article, it is suggested that the literary motif of the amoenus locus, found predominantly, but not exclusively, in pastoral poetry provides a literary form which may be helpful in analyzing the visions of the heavenly Jerusalem given in Revelation …show more content…

Its dimensions are unreal: the dimensions, if taken literally, would be structurally unsound (21:16-17)[footnoteRef:87], and of little defensive value.[footnoteRef:88] It is manufactured from luxurious materials (21:18-21) which are far from conventional or realistic, as in the size of the pearls which make each gate (21:21).[footnoteRef:89] At this point, the amoenus locus motif resonates with the late first century CE. The Silvae effectively combines themes of technology, luxury and nature. A similar juxtaposition of elements is found within these descriptions: technology in the description of both wall and city structure (21:12, 16-17), luxury in the elements from which the city is constructed (18-21)[footnoteRef:90], and nature in light (21:23, 22:5), waters (21:6, 22:1-2a) and foliage (22:2). Luxury functions to portray a higher philosophical or theological value, not some materialism desirable only in itself: there is a difference in quantity and quality of the wealth of Babylon and the New Jerusalem.[footnoteRef:91] [87: Caird, The Revelation, 273-74.] [88: Witherington, Revelation, 269.On the other hand, Gundry, “The New Jerusalem”, 260 sees the architecture symbolising a safe people, but not a geographical city.] [89: Caird, The Revelation, 278-79.] [90: Whilst the possible significance of the twelve jewels remains disputed, they certainly indicate a phenomenal degree of …show more content…

In 21:3, a permanent relationship is promised with God. This is further developed by a motif of intimacy and relationship: son-ship through adoption (21:7),[footnoteRef:102] by the best of patrons.[footnoteRef:103] This intimacy is confirmed in two ways by 22:4. Firstly, believers are described as known to God by name, signifying that they are subject to his authority,[footnoteRef:104] fulfilling one of the promises set out in the Letters to the Seven Churches (2:17, 3:5,12). Secondly, the people of God see God face to face (22:4).[footnoteRef:105] Such an immediate experience of God again obviates the need for mediation or distance between the believer and God. [102: Aune, Revelation 17-22, 1129-30.] [103: Malina & Pilch, Social-Science, 246.] [104: Malina & Pilch, Social-Science, 56-57.] [105: Neil Gillman, Traces of God in Torah, History and Everyday Life (Woodstock: Jewish Lights Publishing, 2006),

Open Document