Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of The Book of Hebrews
The Book of “Hebrews” The book of Hebrews is similar to no other books in the New Testament. Hebrews is loaded with support, urgings and stern warnings. Hebrews is generally referred to as a letter; however it doesn't have the commonplace type of a letter. It finishes like a letter yet starts more like a sermon. It expresses that the book starts without a welcome and excludes the naming of the writer and locations. The statement in 13:22, “I have written you only a short letter,” recommends a letter written in the style of a sermon (Abraham 1994). After researching I have also found that Dr. William Lane has even says "Hebrews, is a sermon in actual life." It is, at the same time, a sermon reduced to writing" (Lane 1991). The writer of …show more content…
Researching I have found that the author was a master of the Greek language, and the verse of Hebrews 2:3 “how shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;” (Abraham 1994) designates that the author had neither been with Jesus during his earthly ministry nor had received special revelation directly from the risen Lord, as had Paul; who was one that most commonly verbally expressed that the book of Hebrews was written by Paul and it was additionally called “The Epistle of Paul to the Hebrews” (Abraham 1994). There are many scholars that believe that the book of Hebrew was not witan by Paul. In spite of the fact that the message of Hebrews is somewhat similar to that of Paul’s doctrine in that the Law has supposedly been done away with because the book of …show more content…
Which I believe that it was written before the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in or preceding A.D. 70, because the author consistently uses the Greek present tense when speaking of the temple and the priestly activities connected with it in 7:8; 9:6-7, 9, 13. The author might not have made these remarks if the temple had been destroyed. In our text book “The New Testament” I quote that “any date between A.D. 60 and 95 is possible. Most of the evidence however, points to a time of writing prior to A.D. 70” (Black
Covenant according in bible's point of view is a promise made by God to man. According to the book of Genesis, Chapter 6 Verse 13, as a result of human's disobedient and evil ways on earth, God had planned to put an end to humanity with flood. The covenants between God and Noah was established in Genesis Chapter 9 Verse 11. God promised Noah and his descendants, never again would he destroy the earth by flood of water because of the pleasant sacrifice offered to God by Noah. God also confirmed his covenant by putting up signs in the sky in the form of a rainbow. The reason Noah and his family weren’t destroyed in the flood was because Noah found grace in God's sight. What this means is that God do not establish any kind of covenant with just anyone. Clearly Abel, Noah and Abraham were unshakable, upright and obedient towards God’s command.
Throughout many of Paul’s letters there are many debates pertaining to the authorship, destination, date, and the purpose. In the book of Ephesians many scholars debate on the authorship and if Paul actually wrote the letter, or if it was a scribe. Although there are some debates on whether Paul actually wrote it or not, he does refer to himself twice in the letter. In 1:1 and in 3:1 Paul states himself, 1:3 states, “For this reason, I Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles” (NIV) In verse 1:3 Paul states that he is a prisoner, therefore it is debated that he did not specifically write this because he was imprisoned in Rome at this time. According to Wallace “This, of course, is not to say that the letter must be by Paul, but it is to argue that without such internal testimony, no such claim could be made” (Wallace). Many scholars also debate on the vocabulary usage and the structure of the letter. Some believe that the structure is similar, but the vocabulary seems to be different than his New Testament epistles. Hoehner claims that,” Though the book has a close affinity with Colossians, critics claim that Ephesians is uncharacteristic of Paul” (Hoehner 613). The destination of Ephesians is somewhat debated, but many do believe that the letter was sent to the church of Ephesus. “Some to claim that Ephesus is a better starting point, others suggest Caesarea.” (Wallace) Although this is an argument that has many valid points, it is obvious that Paul was imprisoned in Rome while he wrote Ephesians. It is said by Hoehner that “Ephesians was probably delivered by Tychicus (Eph. 6:21-22), who also took Paul’s letter to Colossians (Col. 4:7-9)” (Hoehner 613). As for the date goes m...
The author of the book is Zechariah, he whom the lord remembers. The book was written to the Jews in Jerusalem that had returned from their captivity in Babylon. The book was written in and around 520 B.C.
I found quite a few sites that believe that Paul did not write II Thessalonians but don’t get me wrong there are also some who do believe the he did write this book but I will not make a decision because there because it is not clear from my readings of both books who is the actual writer is. I agree that this is an important part of Biblical history because it helps us date the writing of II Thessalonians.
There is no internal, direct evidence for the date of the composition of the Gospel of Matthew. There is, however, a piece of internal, indirect evidence to consider. The Gospel of Matthew transmits several sayings of Jesus that concern the role of the Temple in the life of the Jewish people (Matt 5:23-24; 12:5-7; 17:24-27; 23:16-22). On the assumption that the author would not include sayings of Jesus that were not longer relevant to his readers, it might be argued that the Gospel of Matthew was written before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Do you find this convincing?
The book of Hebrews is directed at Christians, but it places an emphasis on those that come from Jewish descendants. This part of the Bible was written after the ascension of Christ at about A.D. 30 and before the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70. It is believed Hebrews was written before the destruction of the Jerusalem because it does not include a mention of that event. This estimation in terms of when Hebrews was written based on the content. Hebrews is written in a form similar to a letter. The author of Hebrews has never been established for certain, but it has been referenced as The Epistle of Paul to the Hebrews (McCruden, 2013).
This book of Hebrews contains many of the controversial teachings of the church of Christ. Many of the teachings have been seen as a direct assault against Judaism, and have caused serious tension and conflict between the two religious groups. However, one section of the book that has been called “The Hall of Fame of Faith” (or something similar) is likely to be found (mostly) agreeable to both groups.
The issue Paul addressed in Philippians 3 that he already was forced to address in his letter to the Galatians is the justification by faith in Christ and the vision of freedom from the Mosaic Torah. Paul’s mood during this part of his letter was angry. While using the Hebrew language to indicate how he feels.
Yes, in answering the two questions (see premise #2), Jesus’ teaching was fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in 70 AD. On the other hand, yes, Jesus’ prophecy of the events associated with 70 AD are a likely prototype of a time that is yet to come. Often in studying prophecy in the Old Testament, we see this similar thing occur. The hermeneutic of the immediate/future fulfillment is seen in many OT prophecies. One example is found in Isaiah 7:14 which says, “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” As New Testament believers we automatically will say that this verse, although written 600 years before Christ, was fulfilled by the Virgin Mary giving birth to Christ who was conceived by the Holy Spirit. This is how Matthew saw it in his Gospel (Matthew 1:22-23). Isaiah 7:14 had a future fulfillment in Christ. However, the contemporaries of Isaiah would not have read this verse the same way. They would have looked for an immediate fulfillment of this prophecy in their lifetime specifically because King Ahaz was told to be looking for the sign of a young woman giving
In Acts 11:19 the story now goes back to the time of the persecution following the martyrdom of Stephen. In other words, the events described in the next verses took place before the conversion of Cornelius.
Paul often quotes or refers back to the Old Testament to give his teachings merit. Moo states a book like this is necessary when one reads Romans as current day Christians are often Old Testament illiterate. For example, when Paul speaks of the “righteousness of God”, he is using a term from the Old Testament which can mean one of three things. It can either speak about God’s justice, God’s promised relationship, or God’s saving ability. Moo believes here, Paul is referring to the final meaning, of God’s saving grace, in this section. The readers of this letter would have also been drawn to Paul’s mention of all who believe, showing this letter was not simply addressed to Jews but Gentiles as well. They would have also realized Paul was stating God’s saving grace was limited to a person’s response. While God calls all, only those who respond in faith are drawn into relationship with
The Book of Jasher is a tale of many people told on a grand scale it seems. We know that the Book of Jasher was in existence at some point, just what version is the correct version or has it ever been found? The book was mentioned in a few different scriptures in the Bible for example 2 Samuel 1:18 "he said it[a] should be taught to the people of Judah; behold, it is written in the Book of Jashar. [b] He said: (2 Samuel, 2016, para. 3)." The problem now is that what we have as the Book of Jasher no one can confirm if it is the actual true book.
Authoritative oral and written sayings played a major role in this formation. For instance, God engraved the Ten Commandments in stone, and Moses provided written documentations of the Book of the Covenant and the Ten Commandments. In Micah 3:9-12, the prophecy led to King Hezekiah’s repentance. Furthermore, individual books marked the second stage of the canon’s formation. Exodus includes the Book of the Covenant, which was deemed authoritative through Moses. Later, some additions were made to some books because of new sayings or writings, which resulted in two versions of certain books. Moreover, book compilations determined the third stage in the canon formation. Moses’s books underwent revisions between the time of Ezra and Nehemiah. The writings included in the Law consists of the books Genesis through Deuteronomy, while Jeremiah was included in the Prophets. Psalms composes into five books. Later, the canonical books were organized into three sections: the Law, the Prophets, and the
In my opinion, the good society for ancient Hebrews consists two major factors, having order and have faith in God.
According to 1 Thessalonians the date of writing was around A.D. 52 to a community of believers who had been Christians for only a