More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspective of oral communication
Impact of verbal communication
Essay on the importance of oral communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When reading The Sermon on the Mount, it is important to note who the intended audience was, the crowds of people who were there to witness Jesus. These crowds of people most likely were not the most educated; however, Jesus attempted to educate them about the Word of God. To facilitate his teaching, Jesus employed rhetorical techniques such as the metaphor. This crowd required simple and relatable ideas to become educated on his teachings of the Word of God. Many of Jesus’s teachings during The Sermon on the Mount were symbolic in nature, and not meant obeyed explicitly; Jesus merely employed these rhetorical devices to help the followers understand the underlying message, which was to be obeyed.
After the Beatitudes, Jesus compares people
to salt. Jesus said, “You are the salt of the earth.” Practically speaking, it is physically impossible to be the “salt” of the earth. Jesus used this metaphor due to its simplistic nature, so that his followers could easily understand his argument. Salt is a preservative commonly used for food seasoning. However, if salt loses its flavoring characteristics, it is rendered useless. Thus, his followers should attempt to remain pure like salt. In the following section, Jesus tells his followers to let their “light” shine so that others can see their good deeds, like a lamp. Again, physically speaking, one cannot emit light from their body. A lamp was a commonly used item, and Jesus intentionally used this metaphor to help his followers understand his teaching of good deeds. He explains that the purpose of a lamp is not to be hidden, but rather, be allowed to shine fully and give light to everyone. Jesus wants his followers to radiate light to the world, through good deeds. Just like other biblical texts, The Sermon on the Mount is not meant to be taken completely seriously. The metaphors used in the Sermon were not intended to be obeyed explicitly, but rather, their underlying messages were to be obeyed. These metaphors allow for open interpretations of the real command that Jesus wanted his followers to obey, but Jesus knew who his audience was. And, as a proven speaker, Jesus tailored his speech so that the crowd could easily understand him. If Jesus were to give the speech today, he would most likely use other metaphors tailored towards the people of today. Again, the metaphors would not be meant to be taken seriously, but Jesus would expect his audience to obey the underlying messages.
Often people are not what they seem. According to Roald Dahl, in “Lamb to the Slaughter,” “But there needn’t really be any fuss. I hope not anyway. It wouldn’t be very good for my job.” When in public Patrick Maloney was the doting husband, but when the doors hid outside eyes Patrick revealed his true feelings. He wanted a divorce. He wanted to ruin his wife and soon-to-be child, but without anyone knowing. Thought the passage, the tone is revealed as condescending. The way Mr. Maloney talks to his wife is as though she is a small and unknowing child.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
In 1741 a Puritan preacher, Jonathan Edwards, delivered a sermon to a congregation in Enfield, Connecticut. He moved many people and helped them to become saved and trust in Jesus Christ. In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, - which is the name of the sermon by Jonathan Edwards- the author uses each rhetorical appeal to connect with his congregation. The whole purpose of Edwards’ sermon was to try and get all the unsaved men in his congregation to trust in Jesus Christ as their savior and be converted. He was a very persuasive man who successfully reached out to his congregation by digging down deep and coming in contact with many people’s personal lives and making them think long and hard about why they are lucky enough to wake up every morning. In his sermon, Jonathan Edwards uses the three rhetorical appeals- ethical, emotional, and logical- to reach out to his congregation and try and help them to see why they should trust in Jesus Christ.
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
"most students are already rhetorically savvy but unaware of their critical processes..." Author Jane Fife puts the three rhetorical analysis pieces to work, ethos pathos and logos, in an attempt to teach rhetorical analysis in a classroom. Fife uses a collaboration of all three types of rhetorical analysis. While the author does make good use of the first two pieces of rhetorical analysis, Pathos, and Logos, Fife strays away from the use of Ethos in her article. Fife applies the rhetorical appeals of Pathos and Logos to teach rhetoric to her class and the reader. However, her use of examples in a classroom backed up with little evidence to prove her authority surrounding the subject causes her readers to doubt her claim that Facebook and
Jesus used parables to his disciples as a way to educate them on how important lessons could get overlooked by many people. At some point, Jesus seemed to be limiting his audience when he suggested that, “To His disciples, the kingdom
“Sinners in the hands of an angry God”, mesmerized the public, and his congregation. It was an attention seeking speech that frightened many people. It had a huge impact on people, the public had their own opinions, however, others find it abominable, hateful, while others were paralyzed with fear and started to change their ways, repenting. The sermon was to make people realize what will happen, and what is happening at the moment.The sinners, the people, are doing nothing to appease his wrath, they are just provoking him to release them in the flames that are happily awaiting to swallow them whole.
Throughout the semester, we were assigned five essays. Beginning with paper one, a summary response, we were expected to provide our audience with a brief summary followed by our response to it. I began my paper with a question as the hook, and then I provided the author’s claim. Afterwards, I gave a sentence worth of information about what the article is about and then presented my thesis. My brainstorming process was minimal. Honestly, I did not tackle much on following the writing process. I read the article and began to write accordingly to the assignment sheet. My grade on the essay obviously reflected on that due to no proofreading or revising. There were errors amongst my format, such as, heading and font. As far as feedback, Armstrong
The Christian vision of realty is what offers us a standpoint from where we are able to see the natural world, what comes with it and from that, be able to see things that other may see as challenging or wrong. We are able to see the much bigger picture that Christianity offers. Pascal seems to easily acknowledge that the truths of Christian faith seem to do more and solve the problems that stem from human situation. He stands behind the fact that anyone in doubt and that considers themselves a skeptic, is not a bad thing and he believes that overcoming skepticism begins with recognizing the first steps that come from revelation. This perfectly correlates with the Christian vision of reality by accepting skeptics and challenging them to understand what they do not
Introduction: When the writer of Hebrews introduces his audience to the Son of God, he does so with extraordinary flourish. “Our fathers had the prophets speak to them but we have the Son, God’s son, the heir of all things. He is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact imprint of his nature. The word of the Son has the power to uphold the universe. In contrast to the angels, the Son is much superior and has inherited a more excellent name” (1.1-4).
The bible has two different forms of communicating it’s message to the world. One form being oral communication this is when a person depends mostly on verbal, audio, and some type of visual means of communication. “Verbal communication is the very first form of communication that we read about in the Bible ” (Brown, 2012). When using a form of oral communication such as an audiotape people can replay the sections over and over again. This allows them time to think about what they are hearing and relate this is their own life experiences. Oral communication allows the speaker to not only get their point across, but to provide a story with expressions and body language that can bring what they are saying to life. An example of this scripture
How do the ethics of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount differ from the values of our culture today? Give at least three specific examples. This next question highlights the stark contrast of Kingdom Living, as Jesus defined in the Sermon on the Mount, and the conforming spirit that places self in the center of one’s existence. In Jesus’ teaching he demonstrated man’s positional relationship with God, himself and humanity.