Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality in pop culture
Morality and values on television
Morality and values on television
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morality in pop culture
"The Quiet American"
How long can you sit on the fence and not get involved? How long before you're forced to choose sides? Thomas Fowler learns the answers to this dilemma the hard way.
Fowler at the onset of our story, describes himself as being an objective observer, purposely not taking sides, just telling over the facts. "My fellow journalists called themselves correspondents; I preferred the title of reporter. I wrote what I saw, I took no action- even an opinion is a kind of action. (20)" He even goes to the extent of frequently using opium so as not to have an opinion about his own well being. It came to the point where he felt that being alive was neither a good nor bad thing. "Aren't we all better off dead? the opium reasoned with me. (10)"
It seems Fowler doesn't even develop an opinion about the relationship between Pyle and himself. In response to Vigot's statement about being friends with Pyle, Fowler responds "I am a friend
Why not? (9)". Thomas also has a relationship with Phuong, but only views it in terms of a physical aspect and a service aspect, not letting emotions get involved. Thomas uses Phuong for her body and to prepare his opium pipes. Even when faced with the challenge of losing Phuong to Pyle, he only expresses her meaning to him exaggeratedly to his wife back home and not to Pyle or Phuong. And in the end, Fowler only "wins" her back as a result of Pyle's death, not anything he did.
Fowler wasn't judgmental of anyone. When trying to accurately describe Pyle to Vigot, Thomas says "A quiet American, I summed him precisely up as I might have said a blue lizard,' a white elephant.'(9)" The final way that Fowler decides to describe Pyle, even after setting him up to be killed is in three words, ...
... middle of paper ...
...That Pyle's importing of weapons and plan to intervene is really causing so much devastation. Pyle was still thinking that there had been a mistake that really, it wasn't supposed to be a market day and that there was supposed to be a military march. Pyle was going to keep acting on his plane to intervene unless Fowler stopped him.
So when do we choose sides, when do we stop being objective? Fowler remembers what Vigot said, "What was it he had said? Something about all of us getting involved sooner o later in a moment of emotion. (160)" When we are free and clear of the problem and it doesn't truly strike a chord inside us; it's easy to maintain our objectivity. However, when we are finally pushed into a corner with our backs against the wall, and that certain something forces us to choose, we do and we stop being uninvolved.
all quotes are from the quiet american
When there is a dilemma that affects a group of people, actions by the right people can be
acts mean towards Huck, even though Huck is his own son. Not only is Pap
In chapter four Huck sees Pap's footprints in the snow. So Huck goes to Jim to ask him why Pap is here. Jim gets a hair-ball that is the size of a fist that he took from an ox's stomach. Jim asks the hair-ball; Why is Pap here? But the hair-ball won't answer. Jim says it needs money, so Huck gives Jim a counterfeit quarter. Jim puts the quarter under the hair-ball. The hair-ball talks to Jim and Jim tells Huck that it says. "Yo'ole father doan' know yit what he's a-gwyne to do. Sometimes he spec he'll go 'way, en den ag'in he spec he'll stay. De bes' way is tores' easy en let de ole man take his own way. Dey's two angles hoverin' roun' 'bout him. One uv'em is white en shiny, en t'other one is black. De white one g...
Many people in the United States society believe that people of all cultures, races, and ethnicities are now on an even playing field. People with this belief support their logic with the argument that since equal rights for people of color and women have been required by law for some time now, we are all inherently as equal as claimed in the Declaration of Independence. Many believe that race is no longer an issue, a viewpoint frequently referred to as color-blindness. National polling data indicated that a majority of whites now believe discrimination against racial minorities no longer exists. (Gallagher, 96) Color-blindness allows a white person to define himself or herself as politically and racially tolerant and then proclaim their adherence to a belief system that does not see or judge individuals by the “color of their skin.” (Gallagher, 98) Many Caucasians in particular are of the opinion that because they listen to hip-hop or cheer for their favorite black, professional sports player that they are not racist. Still others believe that because they have a black president, we see black people in the commercial of products we consume, or enjoy television shows with black people that they are actually acknowledging race. In order to examine and dismantle this series of misconceptions, we will turn to the work of various scholars of social justice and privilege, including Peggy McIntosh, Patricia Hinchey and Johnathon Kozol as well as the story of Patricia J Williams. Through a careful examination of these works with the support of some key statistics, it is the goal of this paper to demonstrate the existence of a privileged and unprivileged America, despite the color-blindness many may profess to have integrated into their p...
The book, Volunteer Slavery, is Jill Nelson’s account of the racial problems she faced as a Black employee in a White company. Working for the Washington Post was a terrible experience for Nelson whose race prevented her from fitting in with co-workers or agreeing with management. Alex Kajtar says, “...Jill Nelson's account of an authentic African-American experience is a disturbing, disappointing and upsetting image of present-day American society...” (Kajtar). Many people would agree with this statement if they read the book, too. However, the problem is that most Americans will never read her book, and will remain ignorant to the plight of the Black American. Thus, the problem is not that Blacks cannot assimilate into White society “properly,” it is that Whites prevent Blacks from developing their identity.
Thomas Fowler in the novel is the more sinister character. Despite his obvious wit he is very cynical, and has an almost pessimistic outlook upon human relationships. It is Pyle in the novel that we are slightly softer towards, for Fowler is quite bitter. He says that he doesn't care for Phuong's interests, he just wants her and her body, and that he'd rather have a woman in the room with him that he didn't love rather than no woman at all.
One social problem that has caught my attention is racial inequality. Racial inequality refers to the racial advantages and disadvantages among different races. These might be shown in the appropriation of riches, influence, and life openings stood with individuals in view of their race or ethnicity, both noteworthy and cutting edge. These can be viewed therefore of noteworthy abuse, imbalance of legacy, or general partiality, particularly against minority bunches. Race inequality is not a new issue, just an issue that has been swept under the rug. It was more of a problem during and after segregation, but is reportedly no longer exist.
In the U.S. race-based affairs are often difficult to address because society has made racism a taboo topic and therefore has avoided discussing its fundamentals. Many would agree that disregarding the root of the problem is a faulty and counterproductive solution. Yet several people take this approach when confronted with racial matters by using colorblind ideologies as both a defensive mechanism and a way to avoid the conversation about race all together. Ignoring the prominent inequalities amongst racial groups only encourages the artificial idea that the U.S. is some kind of utopia that has politically overcome racism. The theory of color blindness is grounded on the idea of discounting race-based differences as a way of combating racism; the idea that
This seems to be what Palmer speaks about for the rest of the essay, and this is clearly shown through his main quote; “In a dark time, the eye begins to see” (Roethke). He uses the words of the great poet Theodore Roethke frequently throughout the essay, almost as though to reassure its readers that out of our dark and hatefully time now will come a new era filled with understanding and peace. He says himself that “... the best therapy for personal problems comes from reaching out as well as looking in” (Palmer 4). With this we are reminded to learn our own opinions about our problems, and at the same time express them to others so that we collectively as a people can learn from our mistakes. For example, he tells stories of how pro-life and pro-choice supporters were able to hold a more respectful difference when they shared the stories that compelled them to choose their side of the issue. “When two people discover that parallel experiences led them to contrary conclusions, they are more likely to hold their differences respectfully” (Palmer 5). This sounds to be an easy task, but in our world sadly it isn’t. If we all begin to listen to other people's opinions instead of screaming ours, perhaps we can reach a mutual understanding. We have been shown the problem and presented its answer: “...I need to listen with openness and respect, especially to “the other”, as much as I need to speak my own voice with clarity and conviction” (Palmer 43). This is why in today’s world we need to start closing our mouths and opening our
For the author, having experience with this sort of discrimination gives him more credibility than if a white person were to write a chapter on racial discrimination. One potential weakness of this piece could be that it is so old, and, theoretically, outdated, however, sadly, much of these situations are still occurring in the United States every day, so the content is still quite relevant. In the podcast assigned for today, I connected both Miss Buchanan’s and Linda’s struggles with this reading. Miss Buchanan suffered the loss of her job because of children like Linda being able to attend “white” public schools. This is similar to the struggle for people of color to maintain the different parts of their identity at an equilibrium, rather than giving up one for the
Throughout this unit, surprisingly, I learned a lot about perspective and middle ground. As we progressed along in Frankenstein, I found myself in many instances where I would ask the question, “Who’s side am I on?” with a tag along question, “Who is right?”. I would get stuck and ponder over these questions for long before I realized: I couldn’t pick a side. It just wasn’t that simple for me to choose that one person is right over the other. It felt like I was torn because I could see in both ways. Half of me was siding with one person while the other half pulled me in another direction. Struggling to choose, I chose to stay in the middle.
Personally, I think the strategies the court used were understandable. The issue of racial inequality is such a delicate topic in the United States, not only historically but today as well. Perhaps the Supreme Court didn’t move as fast as others would have liked or took to small of steps as a part of their strategy to get to the ultimate goal. But the goal was reached to a certain degree and separate but equal was finally diminished.
A new racial structure has emerged In the 1960s even though research found a reduction in racial inequality in America. Blunt racists make sure blacks remain in the subordinate position at the economic and social level. Research in the 1980s found blacks mostly worked in agricultural or service jobs. Blacks entered working class occupations after WWI. Blacks earned less income than whites because they usually worked low skill jobs nobody else wanted. Recent research found that an employment gap between blacks and whites during the 1970s and 1980s. Whites get seven more hours than whites and get more jobs when compared to blacks. Tests and high school diploma requirements screen some blacks out from high level jobs. Education attainment do not
Anand Giridharadas’ book, The True American, combines both sociology and history into a story that describes the constant struggles people have to endure daily. By bringing together the lives of many different people, Giridharadas describes what living in the United States is really like for the different cultures. He indirectly uses the story as an example of the false assumptions regarding certain groups of people and shows how things aren’t always as they seem. The True American argues that instead of living in a unified society, a great divide between immigrants and the American poor exists, which is caused by contradicting beliefs regarding the importance of family, as well as the prospect of education.
The fight on racial equality has been a war on American soil since the 1950s. A fight longer than the war against Afghanistan, lasting thirteen years, the longest war in American history until the realization of the battle we continue to peruse today. This war has lasted throughout the past sixty-five years and continues to deteriorate our country as a whole today, in 2015. As a young American citizen in the year 2015, I believe it’s time for a formal apology for the cruelty, hatred and humiliation we as a people have set forth on the minorities of our country. As a nation we are based on a set of morals, one for instance called freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press; meaning, unlike other countries around