The Psychological Ramifications of Global Environmental Change

731 Words2 Pages

It is difficult to find an issue with greater global implications than environmental change. It sounds simplistic but environment is everywhere. In fact one can correlate everything we do, feel, and experience with our environment. Whether we like it or not or believe it or not our environment has been changed significantly with a likely anthropogenic component, since mankind has been in existence. It is well understood that this man-made influence has primarily been in the past few hundred years, correlating with our desire for scientific knowledge, thirst for industrial expansion and insatiable desire for progress. From history one can point out various events or topics that have some global aspect to them but very few compare to environmental change. Most were regional or national in scope with some connections around the globe. The various twentieth and twenty first century wars were considered global due to the many nations involved but even those left some parts of the world untouched. One commonality exists among all global events; collective and individual fear (Weber and Stern, 2011).
Shermer (2011) stated there is an attraction to the many doomsday scenarios including global environmental change and that there is indeed a logical human connection; it is in our psyche. We are apparently drawn more to disaster and death than to peace and well being, getting a sort of satisfaction that we do not recognize as correlating to our ancient ancestry. Shermer also found that are brains are wired in such a way because our ancestors decision-making process concluded that danger lurked behind every bush and therefore the best way to cope was to assume that there was indeed danger everywhere; sort of a better to be safe than sorry at...

... middle of paper ...

...e expectations and outcomes; something that we do not like and that continues the cycle of angst.

Works Cited

Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265-276. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023141
Ehrlich P.R. (1968). The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine.
Ford, D., Steward, J. R., & Bacus, J. (2013). Millennium Madness! Y2K?: A Content Analysis of Catastrophic Themes in Selected Print Media. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 31(1), 89-98.
Gardner, D. (2011). Future Babble: Why Pundits Are Hedgehogs and Foxes Know Best. Penguin.
Shermer, M. (2011). The end is always nigh. New Scientist, 210(2815), 30-31.
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the united states. American Psychologist,66(4), 315-328. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023253

Open Document