Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of obesity
The effect of obesity
Effect of obesity on individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of obesity
This year, 5,000 more of New York’s citizens will fall victim to an epidemic raging across the country. Obesity can affect anyone, from our children, to our mothers, and even the elderly, and its nestled its way into the plaque filled hearts of 1/3 of America’s population (Bloomberg et al.). For this reason, New York City’s Mayor Bloomberg has proposed a ban on soda pop sales over 16 ounces. This has proven to be a highly controversial decision, with those opposing the ban claiming that it inhibits their freedom of choice; others state that the ban will not work because consumers can purchase more than one 16-ounce drink. Nevertheless, the ban has sparked an important discussion on healthy consumption. With soda being such a large contributor …show more content…
But will the ban cut enough calories out of the average New Yorker’s diet to make an impact? The soda pop ban may restrict drink sizes, however, it doesn’t restrict the quantity of purchasable beverages. Notably, this means that consumers can simply purchase more than one drink, entirely bypassing the ban. If New Yorker’s are interested in shedding a few pounds, Bloomberg’s ban seems like an awfully ineffective method of doing so. As Robert Higgs, who has a Ph.D. in Economics said, “[Customers] would have chosen to consume X even had [they] known…about its risk, because [they] would have regarded the risk as worth taking in order to gain the expected benefits” (Higgs, p. 4). Given the known risks associated with drinking excessive amounts of soda, consumers would still drink to their hearts content because of its sweet and addictive taste. New York City’s soda pop ban won’t stop consumers from buying more than one 16 oz. drink. However, by outright prohibiting the sale of larger soda sizes, consumers will learn that a 32 oz. soda can be more detrimental to their health than they first were aware. For instance, the “Distinguished Professor of Economics,” James Buchanan, argued that learning the
Professor of human evolutionary biology at Harvard, Daniel E. Lieberman, in his op-ed article, “Evolution’s Sweet Tooth,” published in the New York Times on June 6, 2012, addresses the topic of obesity in the United States and argues that human beings have evolved to crave and store sugar, yet in this day in age, sugar production, as well as consumption, has directly contributed to the unhealthy trend of obesity and obesity-related diseases, such as Type 2 diabetes and heart disease. He supports this claim first by responding to Michael R. Bloomberg’s “plan to ban the sale of giant servings of soft drinks in New York City” in order to explain that this will ultimately be a violation of human rights, second by teaching his readers the history
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
The New York Soda Ban is a step in the wrong direction and efforts should be put towards making life better, rather than focusing on a movement that will have little to no effect. Realize that I am not stating the soda should be drank, because even I know that soda is harmful towards the body and is one of the leading causes of obesity. However, I believe that the soda ban will have little effect and that time and money should be applied somewhere where the act would have an effect of making life better. The reason I do not believe this ban will do as much good as stated, is because the ban is flawed. This brings me to my first point, which is, one cup of boysenberry juice has 256 grams of sugar, equaling to 225 calories. One cup of Cola only
The Prohibition or the Eighteenth Amendment was a huge failure for a law in 1920. There were many factors that led to its downfall that included illegal means, rise of gangsters, and the Twenty- First Amendment. Despite the Prohibition, it did not stop the people from drinking it and accessing it through thousands of speakeasies. It became a most lucrative business for criminals that led to dangerous competition. In 1933, the failed amendment was repealed and most people rejoiced that alcohol was legal again. The Eighteenth Amendment was an experiment that went horribly wrong and did absolutely nothing to bring any positive change. This was proof “that you don’t have to be drunk to come up with a really, really, bad idea.” (Carlson. 141)
spending a day working very low paying jobs, men would visit a saloon and spend all of their wages on alcohol (7,39). This destroyed marriages and families because not only then would the family not have any money to spend on food or the simple necessities for the women and children. Also, the incidence of domestic violence increased as a result of men’s intoxication. (7,40).
This article is talking about a mayor banning beverages larger than 16 oz. at restaurants, sports arenas and movie theaters. The reason this mayor wants to ban large sodas is because he is afraid for all of New York’s health. That’s a good thing because a lot of us don’t know what we drink and eat most of the time. We just eat our food we don’t even bother to look what’s really in side such as calories, fats and oils in our food. This Mayor is doing New York a huge favor by banning large sodas. He’s helping everyone in New York about their health but people of New York doesn’t see that. There are people who are trying to not let him pass this law because some of them probably drink 16 oz. every day of once a week or twice a week or even more.
How would you react if you were informed that Congress was passing a law that would make alcohol illegal to buy, sell or consume in the near future? Believe it or not, during the roaring twenties alcohol was banned due to the ratification of the Eighteenth Amendment. During the 1920’s prohibition was approved by Congress to decrease addiction and immoral activity amongst society, but instead it ignited the creation of organized crime. The research I performed supports why prohibition was fought for and legalized, how Americans who opposed prohibition challenged it, and how organized crime was formed.
Harold Goldstein and Jennifer Richard, California’s Soda Tax: Helping Cash Strapped Communities Protect Children’s Health, A Publication of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, www.publichealthadvocacy.org. April 2011
In May of 2012 Mayor Bloomberg announced his portion cap rule proposal (Renwick, 2013). This proposal would ban the sale of sweet and sugary beverages that are over sixteen ounces in size. This ban would affect movie theaters, restaurants, street vendors, and any other commercial entity that is regulated by the New York City health department (Yee, 2013). This proposal is commonly referred to as the New York City Soda Ban.
Similarly, the author holds that the Food and Drug Administration’s complicity in Americans’ waning health goes beyond safety to a broader lack of concern for our consumption patterns, but without compelling evidence that top-down protection measures work—like the recently invalidated New York City soda ban—his call-to-action stalls. The strongest takeaway from Salt Sugar Fat is that CEOs of major food companies don’t eat their products, so why should you? Indeed, of the authors best examples of behavior change come from some of his former product leads, including a former president of Coca-Cola now pitching baby carrots as the next great junk food. But company CEOs alone can’t fix the public-health issues the author isolates as if they were
It is sad. People from all races and backgrounds are obese. In a recent survey done at Henry Ford College, 43 percent of students were overweight. Whether it is because they do not follow a healthy diet or they inherited it from their parents. Being overweight is correlated with lacking exercise or physical activity and not watching what is on the plate. Obesity can cause many illnesses, including diabetes, which is very common. As the debate whether soda tax should take effect arises, critics say that the tax will help those with obesity-related illnesses. What about exercising and maintaining a healthy lifestyle? These two factors cannot be forgotten knowing they are the most important. Americans have consumed 12 percent of soda and become less active since 1970. A soda tax aims to stop consumers from buying soda to help those who are obese. This will not be effective. Therefore a soda tax will not be good public policy.
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans overeat because of their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed, but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation, and putting a stop to it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised to help prevent American obesity.
I do not think the soda ban would have worked because all it was only restricting a very small portion of businesses that sell sodas. While sodas may be a large contributor to the US obesity epidemic there are many other sources of sugar-laden foods and drinks such as fast food meals, energy drinks, processed juices, and sports drinks.
We shouldn't guilt trip other people into drinking healthier beverages. The Author of 'Childhood Obesity Facts' observes, childhood obesity has increased 3x since the 1970's (Childhood Obesity Facts, 2017), "A big reason why soda is so popular is that it's so cheap. "- (Cook, 2014) The government can raise soda taxes giving companies and California more money, while making us think financially before buying that 12 pack of pop. It's a win-win situation!
Schools should ban soda and candy because if they sell junk food than many students would become obese, have a high blood pressure, or become diabetic. It can ruin their childhood if they do end up having health issues at such a young age. Schools teach about eating healthy, but if they start selling unhealthy food it would go against everything they taught and would be a life changing experience for many students. Being healthy is the best thing you can be. Schools are supposed to set an example for eating right and taking care of your body.