Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contemporary issues in occupational safety
Essay paper on OSHA laws
Contemporary issues with osha
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contemporary issues in occupational safety
1) Any work stoppage can affect the production and goals of the company. Imagine an automobile manufacture that has faulty equipment. The faulty equipment could cause serious safety risk to employees and damage to the vehicles being made. One would think that once safety risks has been identified, managers would automatically address the safety concerns and fix the equipment. However, in the automobile manufacturing industry safety is often overlooked. In recent news, we have seen companies like General Motors (GM) overlook blatant safety risk. Their major concern is the cost to fix the safety areas rather than the safety of its employees and potentially the customers that purchase the vehicles. A former employee for the company stated that GM knew of the safety risk involved in the faulty ignition switch but refused to fix the problem due to the lead time required and most of all the cost which was estimated at $1 per car (Valdes-Dapena, 2014). This unethical business decision eventually cost twelve deaths over a ten year period. If GM acted in this manner toward the safety of its customers, how do they act toward the safety of their employees? Do they overlook the need maintain and fix equipment? Are employees working in a hazardous environment? Since companies like GM often overlook these safety concerns, the government has stepped in to protect employees and their right to work in a safe environment. This law is the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) of 1970. The OSHA law states that “employees have the right to a safe workplace and require that employers provide their employees with working conditions that are free of known dangers” (OSHA, 2014). OSHA also gives employees the right to refuse dangerou... ... middle of paper ... ... plastered on student lockers. New Jersey is also allowing advertisements within its school system since the state cut an estimated $812 million dollars from the public school system’s budget. The new advertisements will be placed on the side of school buses and will earn at least $1,000 per bus. There are few people who oppose this move and so far the advertisements have not had a negative effect on the school, children, or the parents. If done tactfully, advertising in schools is not morally wrong. Backpacks, health cereal and anti-bullying ads are all great advertisements for children. All in school advertisements should be educational and should not include false or unproven claims. Reference Ford, A. (2010). Captive Audience: Has Advertising in School Gone Too Far? Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2028060,00.html
...ate the effects that an accident can have on both their company and the rest of their industry.
Several measures have been put in place to try and control safety concerns. The leading areas of concern is poor working conditions for drivers, driver exhaustion, hour of service, drivers shortages, fuels prices, driver
..., it is necessary to describe them in detail to the patient and to give a prognosis, as far as available medical knowledge will allow, regarding the outcome of pregnancy and postnatal development. To assist the patient in making a decision on the disposition of the pregnancy, prognostication should include medically documented risk figures. Ethically, pregnancy termination should not be recommended made to the patient and her family and significant others. This option should be discussed, but the ultimate decision of whether to continue the pregnancy should be left to the patient and her family and significant others. Furthermore, I think, it is better to refer her to the teratogen or genetic counselor to help her by providing the patient with as much information as possible and encourage her to make her own decision regarding whether to continue the pregnancy.
When a mother finds out she is pregnant it is a wonderful experience. Most people are excited to see their first “picture” of their baby, the ultrasound. Even more exciting is getting an ultrasound to find out the sex of the baby. But ultrasounds are useful for more than just getting that first image of the fetus or finding out whether it is a boy or a girl. While it is something most parents dread finding out when pregnant, an ultrasound can also detect a birth defect. There are many different birth defects that can be detected by an ultrasound during pregnancy like Spina Bifida, Down syndrome, and abnormalities with the heart and lower urinary tract, and the importance of detecting them with an ultrasound is shown in the benefits of discovering the birth defect early, and the options it gives the parents after discovering the birth defect.
Another risk is an ectopic pregnancy; these aren’t as common but occur in every 1 in 50 pregnant mothers. It occurs when the fertilised egg implants outside the uterine cavity. This unfortunately needs immediate destruction of the foetus.
No work is important enough to risk the safety of our employees or harm to the environment. Everyone has the right and responsibility to stop unsafe working conditions. In addition, weapons, threats, and acts of violence will not be tolerated.
In my point of view, every choice has consequences. General Motors ignition switch issue has affected many families in U.S., took lives, and caused injuries to many people. Replacing the part after a decade passed will prevent future accidents from happening; however it will not replace the pain and suffrage of people who lost their loved ones. Bad decision-making, poor professional conduct and dishonesty cost GM millions of dollars. Choosing company’s financial budget over lives of innocent people is wrong. No matter how much money GM will spend on replacing the ignitions, compensating the families, going through lawsuits those lives cannot be restored. Following duty-driven ethics would have prevented the disaster from taking place.
if there is fetal anomaly and no clear risk of health problems for the mother. In one case,
Jose MD, and Irma Russo, MD, "Susceptibility of the Mammary Gland to Carcinogenesis. Pregnancy Interruption as a Risk Factor in Tumor Incidence," The American Journal of Pathology, Aug. 1980
Prenatal genetic testing has become one of the largest and most influencial advances in clinical genetics today. "Of the over 4000 genetic traits which have been distinguished to date, more than 300 are identifiable via prenatal genetic testing" (Morris, 1993). Every year, thousands of couples are subjecting their lives to the results of prenatal tests. For some, the information may be a sigh of relief, for others a tear of terror. The psychological effects following a prenatal test can be devastating, leaving the woman with a decision which will affect the rest of her life.
Since the probe, General Motors had created a new post that is charged with responsibility for vehicle safety (Muller, 2013). General Motors terminated sixteen people for their role in not repairing the faulty ignition switch. The mindset throughout General Motors was to retain the bad news and keep it apart from senior supervisors. This was undeviatingly contributed to no effort being taken to remedy the faulty switch. Because of this, General Motors is directly accountable for the graves of 13
• Your baby may be examined to determine if problems were present that could recur in a future pregnancy.
Canadian health and safety legislation require companies and organizations to make a commitment towards occupational health and safety. Maintaining a safe workplace environment has numerous benefits. A safe work environment can boost employee morale, increase productivity and improve job satisfaction. For companies and organizations these benefits can lead to less turnover and increased employee retention. They can also reduce absenteeism while improving the culture and image of a company or organization. Most importantly, increased safety in the workplace can lead to fewer workplace injuries and causalities. Workplace health and safety issues are different today than there were at various points of time in Canadian history.
Although workplace accidents are very common, the majority of them can be prevented. As a company, you are obliged by the law to protect your employees, so it is important to take the necessary actions that will minimize the risk of accidents (Intelligent HQ, 2015).
In the early 1900s industrial accidents were commonplace in this country; for example, in 1907 over 3,200 people were killed in mining accidents. At this time legislation and public opinion all favored management. There were few protections for the worker's safety. Today's industrial employees are better off than their colleagues in the past. Their chances of being killed in an industrial accident are less than half of that of their predecessors of 60 years ago. According to National safety Council (NSC), the current death rate from work-related injuries is approximately 4 per 100,000, or less than a third of the rate of 50 years ago. Improvements in safety up to now have been the result of pressure for legislation to promote health and safety, the steadily increasing cost associated with accidents and injuries, and the professionalization of safety as an occupation. When the industrial sector began to grow in the United States, hazardous working conditions were commonplace. Following the Civil War, the seeds of the safety movement were sown in this country. Factory inspection was introduced in Massachusetts in 1867. In 1868 the first barrier safeguard was patented. In 1869 the Pennsylvania legislature passed a mine safety law requiring two exits from all mines. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) was established in 1869 to study industrial accidents and report pertinent information about hose accidents. The following decade saw little progress in the safety movement until 1877, when the Massachusetts legislature passed a law requiring safeguards for hazardous machinery. In 1877 the Employers' Liability Law was passed. In 1892, the first safety program was established in a steel plant in Illinois, in response to the explosion of a flywheel in that company.