Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare socialism, communism and capitalism
Compare socialism, communism and capitalism
Compare socialism, communism and capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare socialism, communism and capitalism
The economic structure referred to as Socialism is the system where the ownership of goods and the means of production are shared by the citizens of a society. Socialism is often regarded as the contrasting society compared to Capitalism. It is generally considered the theory that, when in practice, is run and controlled entirely by the government. To understand socialism and its potential effects as a movement, system, or theory, within a society, it helps to know the meaning behind other society shaping factors. Economic Freedom is social right that can affect a society’s economic liberty. Economic Freedom can be described as the availability of great opportunities and the ability to achieve an improved quality of life. There is no universally …show more content…
Using Socialism methods, the entire class of a University either fails together or passes together. However, if the entire class were to fail, the University would lose profits and the economy would be affected negatively due to the lack of an educated workforce. Arguably, this means the entire class of the University would have to pass to achieve positive feedback in the economy. As a result, the mass of students looking for jobs, whether qualified or not qualified for these jobs, will increase. This could damage the economy by providing a job to an individual who, although was able to succeed in school, is unfit for the position. This could potentially provide opportunities to a mass amount of** ill-suited students and take away positions from students that are more deserving. A potential solution to this issue could be removing the grading system, but still measuring the success of a student with diverse approaches. One of the most common grade replacement approaches involves narrative evaluation. In this type of educational society it is believed that the pursuit of knowledge should be promoted above grade documentation. This method could allow Socialism and evaluation to coincide within a University. However, this system does not involve taxing student’s work and spreading it equally across the student population. The complete redistribution of student …show more content…
Morale within the student population is often influenced by the mark that is rewarded for a student’s effort. A Socialist approach to University grading can eliminate the encouragement of effort. In this system, students that are not committed to achieving a high grade can refuse to work and still be rewarded a grade. Although the motive behind this system encourages justice, fairness, and quality, it can be argued that the Socialist approach in a University setting achieves the opposite results. In theory, a student that works hard will receive the same grade as a student that does no work at all. This can potentially cause a high amount of students to refuse work and can result in a lower grade average among the students. This is turn will have a negative effect on the University’s economy. Large amounts of uneducated students also have the potential to damage the workforce after University and create a domino effect that damages the entire economy. Although not an ideal solution, an increase in tuition can encourage students to increase their effort and improve their
In his essay, "Why Colleges Shower Their Students With A’s,” Staples claims that student grades are increasing for the wrong reasons, causing college degrees to become meaningless. Staples provides evidence that average grades have increased significantly over the last several decades, but claims that it is not because students are working harder. The real explanation for grade inflation, he argues, is the effect of grades on both students and their professors. Teachers give more A’s to receive better evaluations and increase job security. Students give more importance to their grades as a result of the rapidly increasing cost of a college education. Staples argues that modern
In the op-ed, “Grade Inflation Gone Wild,” Stuart Rojstaczer addresses the concern of grade inflation and its effects on students. Rojstaczer uses several different methods to prove his point of view to the reader. Rojstaczer links grade inflation to the sinking quality of education, as well as the rise of college alcoholics. While this op-ed does a satisfactory job appealing to the reader on a person-person basis, many of Rojstaczer’s main claims do not hold any scholarly evidence. This analysis over “Grade Inflation Gone Wild” will discuss whether Rojstaczer has written this editorial solely to convince readers of his opinion, or does Rojstaczer present a credible claim in higher education’s grade inflation.
“Making the Grade” by Kurt Wiesenfeld Newsweek magazine, June 27 1996 brings to light an issue that has been glazed over by society for some time, grade inflation. It’s highly disturbing that “we lament that schoolchildren get “kicked upstairs” until they graduate from high school despite being illiterate and mathematically inept, but we seem unconcerned with college graduates whose less blatant deficiencies are far more harmful, if their accreditation exceeds their qualifications”. The issue of grade inflation is not simply an issue of students feeling entitled to higher grades than they have earned, it is a problem that directly impacts our society in a multitude of negative ways. Perhaps the “gold star” mentality started out with the good intentions of creating children with positive self-esteem, however, a direct result is lazy adults with a sense of entitlement for no reason, who lack qualifications to adequately and safely perform their jobs.
In “What is a Grade” by Pat Belanoff, she explains the pros and cons of the grading system. In Pats ' essay she states “Perhaps the solution would to abandon grading altogether in writing class. I confess that this a solution that appeals to me greatly.” (151). Grades should not be present in the way we test students’ learning ability. School seems to be more about learning the material for a brief moment just to get a good grade rather then to actually learn and think about the information being presented.
In a world in which a person is not compensated for his work, he would no longer work as diligently. Often times, a person will work in order to receive a reward. This reward then helps him to gain more rewards in the future. This can be seen in a game of rummy when a player must play each hand carefully in order to benefit himself in later hands. This is precisely what occurs when students receive GPAs that have been weighted; so, as a result of the extensive amount of work required to receive the same grade in an Advanced Placement (AP) course as in a base level course, the students of Saint Bernard deserve to benefit from a more accurate representation of and award for their work: weighted GPAs.
I have always valued school and enlarging my intelligence; I receive a sense of pride from earning a decent grade on a paper or on a particular assignment. Alfie Kohn wrote an essay titled “From Degrading to De-grading”; in it he suggests a different view on the current education system. Even though students expect marks and even seem dependent on them, grading should spur on a love of studying not deter it. Grades tend to reduce a student’s inclination for stimulating tasks, and lessen students’ interest in erudition.
In today’s society we feel the need to be graded in order to learn. The topic of the grading system has sparked three essays, by three different authors, about the pros and cons of the grading system. First, Jerry Farber, professor at University of California at San Diego, wrote A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System (333). Next is Steven Vogel, professor at Denison University, who wrote Grades and Money (337). The last two authors in this compilation are Stephen Goode and Timothy W. Maier. They both are journalists for Insight on the News. While each of these authors have their own point of view on the grading system, all three essays talk about how being graded affects learning.
The Consequences of Grade Inflation When students arrive at university, professors expect them to understand the material to an exceptional standard. The problem is that grade inflation is occurring more regularly in secondary schools and universities across the country and when these students’ marks are sent to universities or colleges, the student may be given multiple scholarships for something that he/she should not have earned. Grade inflation is conceived between both students and teachers, meaning that the students are given higher grades when they have inadequate learning, reading, and verbal skills, while the teachers do not have to grade as many papers as they should in the real curriculum. There have been multiple examinations that have confirmed that grade inflation is very real and still occurs today. Students seem to think that they do not need to put forth much effort in school to do well, and grade inflation encourages this thought.
Capitalism is a social system based on the principle of individual rights, and can be commonly named ‘economic individualism’. Capitalism’s basic premise is the goal of self-interest and that the right to own private property is morally defensible and legally accurate. Ultimately, capitalism believes that state exists in order to protect individual’s rights. In a...
Capitalism is an economic system in which the production and distribution are privately owned, the government involvement is minimal,and there is free enterprise. In Capitalism, the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit in a competitive market. Also the economic investment, ownership and profits are all owned by individuals. Under capitalism the state is separated from the economy, which means that the government has no role in business. In other words, everyone works for themselves. The market forces in a capitalist country runs by supply and demand which it determines the price and later on it turns into profits. Supply is the quantity of goods and services a business is willing to sell, while Demand is the quantity of goods and services consumers are willing to buy. Therefore, Capitalism is the best economic system because it rewards the ones that work hard and since the government does not control trade, there is a large variety of goods and creates options for consumers to fit their personal needs.
Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.
The complex and pervasive in EDU that it defies resolution the issue of grade inflation is the concern to college student faculty, administrations and future employers the much gnashing of teeth, some veiled threats and wringing of hands and bad written and oral discussion of the precise topic but a lot of grades inflation persists a few of the colleges have a lot attempted to curver grade inflations through the various grading policies that are of in rejected the grades inflations issue arose from observations based on statistics one of the reasons are that grades cannot be normally distributed is that a variety of selective pressures operate to take less qualified student out of the pool of grades.grades may be close but they are normally distributed in all universities.grades are about imperfect in schools and in colleges because of grade inflation and all of it even grades in school are because of grade inflation to solving grade inflation causes however they cannot just wait for each university in the U.S to make every little change on their own as all of you seen that dose not work to solve our problem about grade inflation once in for all the U.S government collegiate up with the scale that all of us can do some thing success without grade inflation some over us need to do what we need to do without grade inflation and it is hard to do stuff with grade inflation and we can not go our full potent own our own so we do need help some time but it is because of the grade inflation that everyone in colleges even school are getting more and more A’s than we can count and grade inflations need to stop because of the help of the garde inflations what i say is that we need to do what we need to go all the way in our own way in schools and colleges and to do our own dreams are to get rid of grade inflation because it is cause us to not go to our own future and not to go to our own future and it is sad to not go to are own future because of grade inflation and it is
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately every one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored by school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life. Although learning has its own rewards, some students respond better to money. This essay explains how students will be paid and the reasons that they should receive money for getting good grades. Some reasons that students should be paid are: if students received rewards for having good grades fewer students would drop out, graduates would be better educated, people would seek higher education, less crime would be committed, less people would rely on the government and graduates would be more qualified for better jobs.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
If higher education’s purpose was solely based on the goal of social efficiency students would only get as much education as they needed for a job, and no more. This educational attainment is not driven by competition or status. It is a combination of private and public interest, but viewed more ...