Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of macroeconomics
Effect of macro economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of macroeconomics
Macropoland, a natural gas and oil importer, has a natural rate of unemployment of about 4.5% and a long run average rate of inflation of about 2%. However, there are two specific time periods where these rates fell below their potential. During the period between 1973-1974, the country had an inflation rate of about 15%, with an unemployment rate of nearly 13%. And now, they are experiencing an unemployment rate of 9% and an inflation rate of 0.4%. As their new economic advisor, it is my job to explain these two time periods. First, I will discuss the time period between 1973-1974. Because the unemployment and inflation rates are higher than normal, we can assume that the aggregate-demand curve is downward-sloping. When the aggregate-demand curve is downward-sloping, we know that the economy’s demand has slowed down. When the economy’s demand has slowed down, businesses have to choice but to raise prices and lay off workers in order to preserve profits. When employers throughout the country respond to their decrease in demand the same way, unemployment increases. There are a couple reasons why the aggregate-demand curve slopes downward. The first is the wealth effect. If the prices are higher, the money one has is worth less. It can be put into perspective by looking at it on a microeconomic level. For example, if you have a $20 bill, and the price for a ham sandwich rises from $5 to $10, you can only buy two sandwiches, rather than four. This shows that lower wealth leads to lower consumption, lower consumption leads to lower production, which means less workers will be need, leading to layoffs. The second reason is the interest-rate effect. As the prices rise, so do the interest rates. Higher interest rates hold down thing... ... middle of paper ... ...ts profit. This causes an increase in unemployment. Deflation also affects loans. When deflation occurs, borrowers are paying back loans in dollars that are worth less than expected. So one’s income may decrease, but the size of their loan stays the same, making it more difficult to pay off. In conclusion, regardless of Macropoland’s current economic condition, it is fair to say that it is all part of the business cycle. The business cycle has three parts: peak, trough, and peak. The peak is the date that the recession starts. In Macropoland’s case, the peak would be at the beginning of 1973, its trough somewhere between 1973 and 1974, and then its peak again at 1974. In the second scenario, Macropoland is either at its trough, where it is about to head up again because of its low inflation rate, or it is at its expansion, on its way to heading to its next peak.
The trends in unemployment affect three important macroeconomics variables: 1) gross domestic product (GDP), 2) unemployment rate, and 3) the inflation rate.
In conclusion, the current macroeconomic situation in the United States is characterized by moderate growth because of better economic conditions that were brought by the events of 2013. The country has experienced moderate economic growth since the 2008 global recession but has shown real signs of momentum. While the country is not concerned about recession or inflation, the rate of unemployment is still a major challenge despite improved consumer and business confidence. As a result, the Federal Open Market Committee or Federal Reserve System needs to adopt fiscal and monetary policy initiatives that help address the unemployment issue and promote high economic growth.
Monthly Unemployment for 2000-2001 was lower than average, but reached 5% towards the end of 2001. Overall unemployment steadily increased during 2001. The highest point was reached in December of 2001 at 5.7%, while the lowest point was at 3.8% in April of 2000. Controlling unemployment is discussed later in the paper.
Gustman, A. L., Steinmeier, T. L., & Tabatabai, N. (2012). How Did The Recession Of
Every few years, countries experience an economic decline which is commonly referred to as a recession. In recent years the U.S. has been faced with overcoming the most devastating global economic hardships since the Great Depression. This period “a period of declining GDP, accompanied by lower real income and higher unemployment” has been referred to as the Great Recession (McConnell, 2012 p.G-30). This paper will cover the issues which led to the recession, discuss the strategies taken by the Government and Federal Reserve to alleviate the crisis, and look at the future outlook of the U.S. economy. By examining the nation’s economic struggles during this time period (2007-2009), it will conclude that the current macroeconomic situation deals with unemployment, which is a direct result of the recession.
The business cycle is the short-run alternation between economic downturns and economic upturns (Investopedia n.d.). A recession is an economic downturn and happens in every country and some recessions are worse than others and the output of GDP and employment are falling farther and faster. The great depression lasted from 1929-1933 and was a deep prolonged downturn in the business cycle before a recovery/expansion of the business cycle occurred and GDP and employment started to rise (Krugman & Wells. 2012). The next recession lasted from 1981-1982 and was comparatively smaller than the first (Krugman & Wells. 2012). More recently in 2001 a slump in the economy was noted and was followed by the great rescission of 2007-2009 (Krugman & Wells. 2012). Recession is defined as a “period of at least two consecutive quarters (a quarter is three months) during which the total output of the economy shrinks” (Krugman & Wells. 2012). In the United States the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is assigning the task of determining when a recession begins and the NBER looks at a variety of economic indicators such as employment and production (Krugman & Wells. 2012). Every business cycle recession has a negative impact on the economy the recession’s deferrer on the strength of the impact on the country. Consider the two charts for Figure 21-5 of the more recent recessions of 2001 and 2007. The Recession of 2001 did not last as long as the recession of 2007 and did not have as much of an economical hardship on the business cycle and as shown 2007 dipped greatly in industrial production. In the second chart it demonstrates a recession at the point the economy turns from expansion to recession or the business-cycle peak. Then in the char...
A trend analysis of the unemployment rates, inflation, nominal GDP, and real GDP were tabulated and graphed as shown below. From the graphs, it is evident that inflation and unemployment rates have a non-deterministic curve and fluctuate over time. The progression occurs because inflation and unemployment can be caused by many other factors apart from the economic growth (Mankiw 58). For instance, changes in international market prices, advancements in technology, and the use of different methods of production.
Many programs that were created during The Great Depression are beginning to haunt our governmental institution even today. Programs such as Social Security and the Welfare systems are creating a substantial amount of debt within our country. According to the article titled “Perils of Price Deflations,” “Two decades ago, worrying about deflation was like worrying about a shortage of pigeons in Trafalgar Square. But now that inflation rates are near zero, periodic deflations are much more plausible” (Carlstrom 1). Deflation has many negative effects. Within Charles Calstrom’s article he names three “dangers of deflation” (1). The first is nominal interest rates. These cannot fall below zero percent and therefore, deflations can increase real interest rates. These high rates discourage investment spending and decrease economic activity. The second is that employers are unable to reduce nominal wages so deflations increase the real wage discouraging employment growth. The last is that these effects can lead to large redistributions of wealth” (Carlstrom 1). In an ideal economy supply equals demand in both work and goods, however, especially in times of economic difficulty this ratio becomes very skewed. Thus resulting in high prices of goods. Often the most negative effect is the redistribution of wealth that follows deflation. “Shocks that
The economy starts at point U, and the government's decision, it hopes to reduce the level of unemployment, because it is too high. Therefore, the 5% decided to stimulate demand. Will soon start to lead to inflation in the demand for goods and services is growing, so in the increase of employment will soon be destroyed, people realize that, there is no real increase in demand. It is along the Phillips curve from u to V, companies began layoffs, the unemployment rate once again return to the W. next in the enterprise and consumers are ready, and expected inflation. If the government insist on trying again the economy will do the same thing (W to X to Y), but this time at a higher level of inflation. Any attempt to reduce inflation below the level at U will simply be inflationary. The rate U is the natural rate of unemployment.
In an economy, aggregate demand (AD) accounts for the total expenditure on goods and services. It has five constituents; Consumer expenditure (C), Investment expenditure (I), Government expenditure (G), Export expenditure (X) and import expenditure (M), This gives us: AD= C+I+G+X-M. Aggregate supply (AS) on the other hand is the total supply of goods and services in the economy. Increasing AD and decreasing AS both cause demand-pull and cost-push inflation respectively. Demand pull inflation occurs when aggregate demand (AD) continuously rises, detailed in Figure 1. The AD curve continuously shifts to the right, as demand continuously increases, from point a to b to c. This consequently causes an increase in the price level of goods and services. As prices rise, costs of production also increase, causing producers to reduce output (a decrease in aggregate supply (AS)), shifting the AS curve to the left and leading to yet another increase in prices, (t...
There exists a clear relationship between unemployment and inflation. These two important terms of the economy are inversely related to each other. This relation posts an intuitive sense among the economists. A.W. Philips first reported the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation, it has been called after him as Philips curve. The simple logic between this is that workers will be needed to push for higher wages as unemployment increases. Philips curve suggest that it is not possible to maintain both the factors at same level. If one of the factor increases then the other would certainly decrease.
It is difficult for government to achieve all the macroeconomics objectives at the same time. Conflicts between macroeconomics objectives means a policy irritating aggregate demand may reduce unemployment in the short term but launch a period of higher inflation and exacerbate the current account of the balance of payments which can also dividend into main objectives and additional objectives (N. T. Macdonald,
...DP and Unemployment Levels. The AS-AD model shows a negative relationship between level of inflation and unemployment. In other words, with supply shocks because of rise in oil prices, a fall in GDP rate is experienced and this increases the unemployment rates. So higher prices of oil will not only lead to high inflation but also high unemployment and reduced economic growth. This same effect is shown in the Philips Curve. (Parkin)
The debate of the relationship between inflation and unemployment is mainly based on the famous “Phillips Curve”. This curve was first discovered by a New Zealand born economist called Allan William Phillips. In 1958, A. W. Phillips published an article “The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wages in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957”, in which he showed a negative correlation between inflation and unemployment (Phillips 1958). As shown in figure 1, when unemployment rate is low, the inflation rate tends to be high, and when unemployment is high, the inflation rate tends to be low, even to be negative.
The economy in the United States was recently experiencing what is now called the Great Recession which occurred from December of 2007 to June of 2009. During this recession we experienced a decrease in our gross domestic product and experienced an increase to our unemployment. Since 2003 the American economy has been seen inflation rates as low as .1% in 2008 and as high as 4.1% in 2007. Rates such as these detail the increase and decrease in prices of products throughout the economy and has a considerable influence on the supply and demand of goods from cars to bread. In the past ten years inflation rates have continually seen positive values w...