The Pros And Cons Of First Respond To Terrorist Attacks

1532 Words4 Pages

First Responders have a unique and difficult challenge as they attempt to prevent, respond to and defend against international terrorist attacks in their cities, counties and states. The ability of first responders to accomplish these tasks can save countless lives, protect property and bring to justice terrorists who try to harm Americans. The risks associated with trying to counter or prevent international terrorist attack are many and diverse. There are physical and psychological effects that first responders will face when responding to an international terrorist attack. They include secondary or tertiary attacks, exposure to nuclear, chemical or biological agents, and the psychological toll. There are two main risks when attempting to counter terrorist attacks; first is a lack of intelligence in helping to identify future attacks, events or terrorist personalities, the second risk is damaging community relations (especially with minority and immigrant …show more content…

This will expose first responders to harmful radiological material. Also concerning is the risk of terrorists obtaining and using chemical or biological agents. The risk of exposure to these types of materials is great for first responders. A firefighter on the 9/11 commission panel stated, “With the proliferation of “white-powder” and other threats posed by terrorists, front-line emergency responders are facing a much wider range of potential hazards for which they are ill-equipped.”(Protecting First Responders p. 33) The Salt Lake City Police Department gives its officers protective masks for certain gases and biological agents. No personal protective equipment (PPE) is provided for radiological attacks. This places these police officers in great danger if a “dirty bomb” is ever exploded in Salt Lake

More about The Pros And Cons Of First Respond To Terrorist Attacks

Open Document