The Pros And Cons Of Cloning

706 Words2 Pages

The cloning of any species is wrong because it is experimental and very unpredictable. Cloning is a way to make exact copies of an animal or person. This can be done several ways. All of these ways require scientists to do the research, time for the procedures, and patience for the embryos to grow. This whole process is expensive and not without loss of life. Cloning can be the separating of cells from one embryo to grow as another embryo, creating a twin with the exact same DNA. Cloning can also be removing the nucleus and DNA from an egg and transferring it into a somatic cell (any other cell in the body that is not a sperm or egg). This will make the cell act like a fertilized egg or embryo. These embryos need to be put into surrogate mothers so that they can grow into living things. I do not believe in this process because I think it is disrupting the balance of nature.
People and scientists think that cloning is a good thing, but really it is not as successful as they say it is. ¨More often than not, however, things do not work out quite right. It may take 100 tries to get one embryo to develop inside the mother.¨ I believe it is wrong that people are using other living things for their work when most of them die before birth. Of those that are born most of them die very young with defects. How can this unsuccessful process keep animals alive and ensure the survival of all living things when 99 out of 100 cloned animals die?
Another reason cloning is not a good idea is that it is very expensive and is such a long process. ¨Clones
Sohn, Emily. “Animal Clones: Double Trouble?” Science News for Students, 21 Oct. 2016, www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/animal-clones-double-trouble.
Weisberger, Mindy. “Attack of the (Adorable) Clones: Puppies Are 'Reclones' of First Cloned Dog.” LiveScience, Purch, 27 Nov. 2017,

Open Document