The Pros And Cons Of Cloning

706 Words2 Pages

The cloning of any species is wrong because it is experimental and very unpredictable. Cloning is a way to make exact copies of an animal or person. This can be done several ways. All of these ways require scientists to do the research, time for the procedures, and patience for the embryos to grow. This whole process is expensive and not without loss of life. Cloning can be the separating of cells from one embryo to grow as another embryo, creating a twin with the exact same DNA. Cloning can also be removing the nucleus and DNA from an egg and transferring it into a somatic cell (any other cell in the body that is not a sperm or egg). This will make the cell act like a fertilized egg or embryo. These embryos need to be put into surrogate mothers so that they can grow into living things. I do not believe in this process because I think it is disrupting the balance of nature.
People and scientists think that cloning is a good thing, but really it is not as successful as they say it is. ¨More often than not, however, things do not work out quite right. It may take 100 tries to get one embryo to develop inside the mother.¨ I believe it is wrong that people are using other living things for their work when most of them die before birth. Of those that are born most of them die very young with defects. How can this unsuccessful process keep animals alive and ensure the survival of all living things when 99 out of 100 cloned animals die?
Another reason cloning is not a good idea is that it is very expensive and is such a long process. ¨Clones
Sohn, Emily. “Animal Clones: Double Trouble?” Science News for Students, 21 Oct. 2016, www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/animal-clones-double-trouble.
Weisberger, Mindy. “Attack of the (Adorable) Clones: Puppies Are 'Reclones' of First Cloned Dog.” LiveScience, Purch, 27 Nov. 2017,

Animal Cloning In Frankenstein's Cat
831 Words | 2 Pages
Even though natural born animals present a higher survival rate, cloned sheep and cows show different results. Even if the cloned cows and sheep show a positive sign of survival, most of the cloned animals’ die either in the womb or after the clone exits the womb. (Anthes 63). Through this example, death dominates the choices of these cloned animals, and scientists continue the experiments for the benefits of humans. By focusing on human needs, the scientists pretend that animal welfare means absolutely nothing, but animals deserve safety just like humans. If scientists truly believe that cloning meets moral standards, than how come scientists cannot find a more effective way to decrease the failure rate of
Read More
The Opposition to Human Cloning: How Morality and Ethics Factor in
2868 Words | 6 Pages
Human cloning is the process by which genetic material from one person would be artificially transferred into a human or animal egg cell, thereby beginning the life of a new human individual who has only one parent and who is genetically identical to that parent. The once impossible idea of cloning became a reality in 1997 when Scottish embryologist Ian Wilmut and his colleagues at the Roslin Institute in Scotland announced that a cloned sheep named Dolly was born. Dolly was created by removing the nucleus from a sheep egg cell and replacing it in the nucleus of a cell taken from the udder of another sheep. This said might sound good, but there are other pieces of information that need to be known about this process. ...
Read More
Clonng: Who's a copycat
1666 Words | 4 Pages
Cloning is a real process that scientists use today to reproduce an exact living copy of DNA from the DNA of another living organism. When the idea of cloning first came about in the early 1800’s people believed it to be more science fiction than actual science. People didn’t understand the concept of cloning and therefore was naturally scared of the subject. It is best understood by how the Department of Animal Sciences at Cornell University explains it, “Cloning is a method of producing two or more genetically identical organisms by asexual reproduction. This means that there is only one parent cell, from which all the genetic information will come. Thus, the DNA sequence of cloned organisms is exactly the same as that of the parent cell.” Despite the general population’s disbelief there have been major scientific advances in the cloning process in the last fifty years. After many years of trial and error the first successful clone was created.
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Cloning
860 Words | 2 Pages
Human and animal cloning is still a debatable issue. People believe that cloning is playing God, just as Victor Frankenstein did when he created the Monster. While Victor Frankenstein’s creation ended in catastrophe, cloning’s seemly innocent side effects can still disrupt and alter the entire world.
Read More
The Positive Potential of Human Cloning
1107 Words | 3 Pages
.... Until a successful attempt of creating life emerges in upcoming history, the possibility of cloning may never reveal its truth. Matters of opinion judge the positive and negative outcomes of artificial animal reproduction, and numerous instances prove its everlasting positive outlook for world community, science, and theology.
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Cloning
929 Words | 2 Pages
...cloning can be divided into two broad category: potential safety risk and moral problems, and these concerns overweigh its achievement.
Read More
Human Cloning In Frankenstein
1339 Words | 3 Pages
But on the contrary, many scientists believe that cloning can be such a positive achievement, not only for medical purposes, but for fighting extinction. For example, what if they could clone many of the endangered species that exist today? There are very few hundred of many beautiful animals that if something isn’t done to save them, they will be extinct in a few years. So if scientists could successfully clone and create these endangered species, although it would still depend on the clone maturing correctly and being able to reproduce successfully, it could be a great
Read More
Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein '
1849 Words | 4 Pages
successful clones often have problems with their body and are subject to a short lifespan ridden with health problems. This hurts the person or animal cloned rather than to help them, making cloning an immoral
Read More
Should Human Reproductive Cloning Be Legal
836 Words | 2 Pages
First and foremost, it is important to discuss what human cloning is. It is the conception of in vitro embryos that produces “individuals that are exact genetic copies of the donor from whom the DNA was obtained” (Munson 366). In Laymen’s terms, cells are inserted from the donor host into an unfertilized egg from another host (meaning it is asexual) and the new egg is transferred into the surrogate mother where it will foster into an embryo, if effective.
Read More
Human Cloning: Genetic Advancement or Genetic Manipulation?
1725 Words | 4 Pages
First, what exactly is cloning? In biology, cloning is used in two contexts: cloning a gene, or cloning an organism. Cloning is the reproduction of a human or animal whose genetic substance is identical to an existing being, such as an embryo or fetus. This is reproductive. Cloning a gene means to extract a gene from one organism and insert it into a second organism. Cloning an organism means to create a new organism with the same genetic information as an existing one. This is therapeutic.
Read More
The Negative Consequences of Cloning
1369 Words | 3 Pages
Automatically when people talk about human cloning that tend to be negative. Most reaction is people shouldn't play god or interfere with nature. Of course there are negative consequences that could come from cloning. On the other hand there is so many positive things that could save more lives than it would cost. Yes Cloning involves risky techniques that could result in premature babies and some deaths. That is why public policy needs to be changed on cloning. The medical possibilities are endless if federal money is given to research and develop cloning techniques.
Read More
Cons Of Cloning
748 Words | 2 Pages
In order to strongly argue against cloning, there must be an understanding of its process and what exactly it is. Simply stated, a clone is a duplicate just like a photocopy. A good example of such “copies” that occur are identical twins, which are duplicates of each other. “The first step of DNA cloning is to isolate a complete gene and is to chromosomal sequences and then to gradually begin flaking the chromosomal sequences of a single DAN molecule. Then the DNA clone can be electronically labeled and used as a probe to isolate the chromosomal sequences from a collection of different types of genes, which should contain cloned sequences that would represent the whole gene. This action will produce new sets of cloned cells identical to the mother cell. The new set of cells are isolated and likewise the simplified process is repeated all over again until the cells form a complete organ. In order to produce a complete organism the DNA must be altered in a variety of way to come out with the finished product to be the complete organism.” In simple terms, a cell is taken from a donor woman. Then an unfertilized egg is taken from a second woman. The DNA from the cell is removed and transferred to the egg. The egg is then implanted into a surrogate mother. The resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor.
Read More
Reasons to Ban Cloning
591 Words | 2 Pages
Secondly, “the most the human race has to loose by playing around with cloning is that the genetic diversity would be lost (Andrea Castro, 2005).” Reducing the genetic differences will produce clones that are grossly overlarge, many animals will be born with genetic mutations, and there will be a higher “risk of disease transfer (Saskaschools, 2003). “A review of all the world's cloned animals suggests that every one of them is genetically and physically defective (Leake, 2002).” Mutations will be passed on to the younger generation because if a cloned species has a mutation in their DNA this mutation will be passed on. Cloning has been linked with diseases of ageing, arthritis and, cancer.
Read More
Cloning is Unethical
802 Words | 2 Pages
In recent years our world has undergone many changes and advancements, cloning is a primary example of this new modernism. On July 5th, 1995, Dolly, the first cloned animal, was created. She was cloned from a six-year-old sheep, making her cells genetically six years old at her creation. However, scientists were amazed to see Dolly live for another six years, until she died early 2005 from a common lung disease found in sheep. This discovery sparked a curiosity for cloning all over the world, however, mankind must answer a question, should cloning be allowed? To answer this question some issues need to be explored. Is cloning morally correct, is it a reliable way to produce life, and should human experimentation be allowed?
Read More
The Benefits of Human Cloning
1013 Words | 3 Pages
... middle of paper ... ... 9 October 2001. http://cbc.ca/news/indepth/background/cloning.html>.
Read More

Open Document

Wait a second!

The Pros And Cons Of Cloning

Animal Cloning In Frankenstein's Cat

The Opposition to Human Cloning: How Morality and Ethics Factor in

Clonng: Who's a copycat