Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negotiation techniques sample essay
Negotiation techniques sample essay
The importance of a negotiation strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negotiation techniques sample essay
Negotiation extends well beyond the borders of sitting at a table and simply exchanging different proposals. The process of negotiation involves working through a series of phases to learn about the other individual. Working together to solve a problem may not be simple and negotiation is all about getting the other person to fold before an agreement is settled on. Negotiation takes motivation and perseverance. This essay will present personal negotiation styles and means for improvement along with examples to follow.
Summary of negotiation questionnaire
In completion, and evaluation of my own personal bargaining questionnaire #1 there was a lot of information to be learned. First of all I learned that I am sincere when it comes to others decisions and making them happy before my own self is typically a characteristic of mine. I don’t care what others think about me at any cost, and getting what I want isn’t particular important to me in most circumstances. Categories that involved challenges or getting ahead of another person I ranked myself very high in because of my competitive attitude.
Across the board in an argument I am a great listener but lack the comeback skills that are needed in many heated arguments. Typically I would expect myself to be a good listener as I am not always stern when it comes to my superiors. I tend to sit back in larger groups and let the leader do all the discussion. I occasionally throw my opinions in there but only if I am asked first. According to Blanchard (2012), leadership can be elusive and developing great leaders remains a challenge. Perhaps developing the characteristics to be gr...
... middle of paper ...
... Skills in preparation and execution are the core fundamentals to keep in mind in every negotiation. Simple negotiations can be better resolved through a series of steps that are considered and analyzed before entering the trap set by the other negotiator.
References
Blanchard, K. (2012). Critical leadership skills. Retrieved from
www.kenblanchard.com/.../critical_leadership_skills.pdf
Coburn, C. (2013). Negotiation conflicts and negotiation styles. Retrieved from www.negotiators-101.org. Harvard University. (2013). Negotiation conflict styles. Retrieved from hms.harvard.edu/.../NegotiationConflictStyle.pdf Practice Fusion. (2013). Negotiation styles. Retrieved from http://www.how-to- negotiate.org/personal-negotiating/ Strangler, P. (2012). What is Compromise? Retrieved from
http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/compromise
My negotiation style questionnaire indicated that my negotiation style was collaborating and accommodating. In addition, I will not avoid negotiation. I felt the result was reasonable because I like negotiation and have never avoided negotiation when I have a chance. I always try to enlarge the size of the pie to be negotiated. However, the class taught me I sometimes accommodated too much and missed a chance to create value in the end. One of the reasons is that I am afraid of getting nothing and overly cautious. This leads me to compromise before maximizing the pie. I believe I can take more risks to create value.
Communication skills are important in professional negotiations and in personal life. This book discusses why we find some dialogue difficult, why we avoid it, and why we often address it ineffectively. Most important, the authors suggest methods for more effective, productive, and rewarding, interaction.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. ISBN-13: 9780073530369
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
McCarthy, A. (n.d.). 10 rules of negotiation. Negotiation Skills. Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://www.negotiation-skills.org
Negotiations styles are scholastically recognized as being broken down into two general categories and those are distributive bargaining styles and integrative negotiation styles. Distributive bargaining styles of negotiation are understood to be a competitive type of negotiation. “Distributive bargaining, also known as positional bargaining, negotiating zero-sum, competitive negotiation, or win-lose negotiation, is a type or style of negotiation in which the parties compete for the distribution of a fixed amount of value” (Business Blog Reviews, 2011). This type of negotiation skill or style approach might be best represented in professional areas such as the stock market where there is a fixed goal in mind or even in a garage sale negotiation where the owner would have a specific value of which he/she would not go below. In contrast, an integrative negotiation approach/style is that of cooperative bargaining, or win-win types ...
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation Readings, Exercises and Cases (6th ed.). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
Negotiation, as we’ve learned, is the process of communicating where parties can discuss problems and/or targets and attempt to solve them via dialogue in order to reach a resolution. While many individuals feel successful negotiations are due to a natural skill, the truth behind reaching a prime agreement is preparation. You need to know the issue, know yourself, and know your party. This type of preparation also includes knowing your needs and limits, understanding what the other party wants and anticipating their limits, asking the right questions, and being creative in your counteroffers.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2006). Negotiation: Readings, Exercises and Cases (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
The topic for my real world negotiation is to come to an agreement with my supervisor for a promotion as well as an increased salary. I currently work as a student assistant at the student services Planning, Enrollment Management, and Student Affairs (PEMSA) department. My goal is to increase my hourly pay from $10.15 to $12.70, a 25% increase. Having worked in this department for three years, I have taken on tasks not part of my job description such as processing return mail, data entry, and supervision.
Negotiating styles are grouped into five types; Competing, Collaborating, Comprising, Avoidance, and Accommodating (Colburn, 2010). Even though it is possible to exhibit different parts of the five types of negation styles in different situations, can see that my tendencies seem to default to, Compromise and Accommodating. In reviewing the course work and reviewing my answers for Questionnaire 1 and 5, I find that the data reflects the same assumption. The accommodating profile is one where relationship perseveration is everything and giving what the other side wants is the route to winning people over. Accommodators are well liked by their colleagues and opposite party negotiators (Colburn, 2010). When analyzing my accommodating tenancy in negations, I find often it is easier to give into the demands when they are within a reasonable range. I often consider it the part of providing a high level of customer service. It has been my experience that continued delaying and not coming to an agreement in a topic will only shorten the window in which you will have to meet the request since. The cons to this style are by accommodating highly competitive styles the accommodator can give up to much ground in the process. “Giving away value too easily too early can signal to your negotiation counterpart that you've very deep pockets, and your gift is just a taster of bigger and better gifts to come”. The other negations type I default to is compromising. Compromising “often involves splitting the difference; usually resulting in an end position of about half way between both parties’ opening positions” (Colburn, 2010). In the absence of a good rationale or balanced exchanged concessions, half way betwee...
During this course, I have learned a lot about negotiating. We learned about almost every negotiating technique there is. We learned about cross-cultural negotiations, body language, Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), variables in negotiating, and many more. Before this course, I did not know that much about negotiating. I thought that negotiating was just about trading or convincing someone to give you what you want and you did not care about the other side, resulting in a win-lose. I now know that negotiating is about getting what you want, but also giving the other side what they want as well to result in a win-win. This paper is about how I am going to improve my negotiating skills over the next six months. In order for me to improve my negotiating skills, I believe I need to improve the following skills- my body language, communication, planning, and my interpersonal communications. By improving those skills, I can become an effective negotiator.
Negotiation is the process enacted by two or more parties, to resolve a difference and ideally create a solution benefiting all involved parties. Negotiation is all about knowledge, strategies, your preferred stance taken in the process, how much concession you can afford to yield, and what your ultimate goal is. Is your goal to take all the share and value of the available resources? Or are you the kind of person/company that is willing to take the extra mile to create equal value for both parties, ultimately adding value to the relationship? The process will always depend on the company, each team players' personality, trust and situation. A good negotiator will study their opponent, gain all knowledge needed and be able to adapt to the nature of the deal in short notice. We use the method of negotiation to solve problems and disputes taking place in business, government, between countries, and even in our day-to-day life, such as marriage and divorce, parenting and family.
Negotiation has been used as a vital communication tool not only in business but also in social intercourse. It helps people make common agreement and avoid conflict. So we need to use the tactics which we learned from this course and books to do more practice, only in this way we can gain advantages in negotiation.
By acting within the presence of the negotiation I will better be able to recognize when the negotiation is wandering or not allowing for off-track issues to cloud the main points needing settled. Keeping the negotiation centered and focused. It will be important for me to monitor how I interact with the other party and to “size-up” how the party reacts and responds. It is necessary for me to keep the context of the conversation relevant by paying close attention to how others are reacting and shape my responses accordingly. Respectfully listening, then taking a moment to formulate my best