Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Intricacies of ethics
Intricacies of ethics
Chapter 9 ethics and the law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Intricacies of ethics
The Principles of Situation Ethics
For centuries people have based their moral rules on religious
grounds, for example the Decalogue or Ten Commandments. However, at
the end of the last century an alternate base to peopleÂ’s morals was
offered, called Situation Ethics. Situation Ethics was an idea
developed by a man called Joseph Fletcher, an Anglican Theologian.
Situation EthicÂ’s is considered to be a compromise between Anarchy and
Totalitarianism. Fletcher rejected the idea that people should follow
a set of rules. So, Fletcher developed three ways of making a moral
decision. These are the antinomian way, the legalistic way and the
situational way.
======================================================================
The antinomian way is a way of making a moral decision without
regarding law or principles. To follow this way you would have to make
a decision on “gut instinct” and what feels right at the time, on no
bases at all. The Antinomian way was where Existentialism surfaced,
this was already a principle developed by a 19th Century Danish
philosopher called Soren Kierkegaard. His theory was that the best way
to make a moral decision was for individuals to find their own unique
basis for morality. This argument was based on the foundations that
no object or rational basis could be grounded in moral decisions. The
antinomian approach basically says that in each unique situation the
situation itself determines the ethical solution.
======================================================================
The legalist approach to making a moral decision does regard laws and
rules. A legalist would live their life by following a set of certain
rules. For example a Jew would use the Torah to make a moral decision.
Or a non religious person would make a moral decision by following the
laws of the land. For example, JohnÂ’s best friend girlfriendÂ’s auntie
cousin twice removed is dying a slow and painful death and he wants to
die and asks John to commit Euthanasia. John would use the law of the
The vignette described a woman who comes in for a session in an agitated state. The psychologist has worked with her for a few weeks and she was not overtly suicidal or homicidal. On this visit, the psychologist decided to refer her to an inpatient due to her becoming unreliable and taking 17mg of Xanax in 30 hours instead of 2.5mg prior to her appointment.The decision making process for this vignette is very important because of the dilemma involved. The ethical decisions-making process I am going to engage in will be the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologist and the decision- making process that accompanies it.
There have been several famous legal cases where an individual commits a crime decades ago before it was revealed. The question here is whether the person who committed the crime long ago should still be punished even though he/she has been clean ever since the wrongdoing. Some people would say that it depends on the severity of the crime; some would say you should pay for your crime no matter what you have committed. The matter of whether a person should be punished for what he/she has done long time ago arises in the Law and Order episode “White Rabbit”. In this episode, Susan Forest was found twenty-three years after she took part in a robbery intended as a protest against the Vietnam War. During the robbery, a policeman was killed and the case here is whether Susan should be punished for a crime she participated long time ago. According to rule and idea of Categorical Imperative given by Immanuel Kant in his work Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Susan should be sentenced for the crime she did no matter how long ago it happened or how upstanding of a member she is in the society.
In 1991, when Joseph F. Fletcher passed away at the ripe old age of 86 (ref 1) there were very few present to observe his passing. There are not many people who even recognize his name. This was a man who probably influenced modern society as much as Charles Darwin or Sigmund Freud.
According to Pozgar (2016), the consequential theory of ethics asserts that the ethical merits of any action can be determined by examining the outcome, or results, of that action. An action is considered ethical if the outcome is more positive or good, than negative or evil. Regarding the case of Smith v. Friends Hospital (PA Super, 2006), where the plaintiff alleged that she was beaten and sexually assaulted by hospital staff while she was hospitalized, the consequential theory ethics can seemingly be easily applied. Certainly, the physical and sexual assault of anyone would not be considered ethical behavior because it results in an evil outcome. Despite the intentions of the “attacker,” a person is harmed, and therefore this behavior
The text defines ethical dilemma as situations that have two or more values in conflict (Woodside & McClam, 2015). As a human service professional, there may be times when situations may emerge and an individual might be uncertain of the proper action to take. A human service professional must look at all points of view. In addition, they must establish a list of problems and examine the multiple viewpoints. Furthermore, they must develop potential outcomes and analyze the impact each decision may have. This will assist the profession to have the ability to have an understanding of critical thinking, professional code of ethics, and to form rapport (p. 270). Ethical behavior has six principles that is shared among members of the human
...” in that it is a “creative act of moral decision” and is only significant from the inner standpoint (387/389)). With these criticisms dispelled, Campbell can finally claim Libertarianism as the leading philosophical viewpoint.
Kozier and Erb's (2015) refer to veracity as telling the truth. Sometimes the nurse is left in a dilemma whether to tell the patient the truth. The nurse is left with the question whether, to tell the truth which may cause anxiety or a lie that is likely to relieve anxiety and fear? In reality lying to the sick persons would rarely justify. It is important that the nurse to weigh any benefit derived from telling lies to the patient versus the loss of trust the patient can have the nurse and the anxiety caused by not knowing the truth
Positive ethics allows a psychologist to be aware of potential ethical dilemmas they face while striving to achieve their best in clinical practice. Positive ethics allows me to think through difficult situations that may arise and resolve ethical issues that may occur. For this reason, a clinician must be able to describe how they will apply positive ethics into their decision-making process. From my perspective, I plan to apply the five general ethical principles into my decision-making process because they share a set of core values. Principal A is Beneficence and Nonmaleficence meaning psychologist will strive to benefit those whom they take care of and do no harm. By applying this principle into my decision-making
It is important to first understand the difference between law and ethics. Ethics examines the values and actions of people. Often times there is no one right course of action when one is faced with an ethical dilemma. On the other hand, laws
The Help chronicles a recent college graduate named Skeeter, who secretly writes a book exposing the treatment of black maids by white affluent women. The story takes place in 1960s Jackson, Mississippi, during the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement. The death of Medgar Evers triggers racial tension and gives the maids of Jackson the courage to retell their personal stories of injustice endured over the years. The movie depicts the frustration of the maids with their female employers and what their lives were like cleaning, cooking, and raising their bosses’ children. The Help shines a light on the racial and social injustice of maids during the era of Jim Crow Laws, illustrating how white women of a privileged society discriminated not only against black women, but also against their own race. The movie examines a very basic principle: the ethical treatment of other human beings.
The Natural Law stated that humans have a moral knowledge/reason that makes us able to decide what’s right. This has caused various debates on whether people did the right because it was the right thing to do or whether they did it because that’s
As a function, ethics is a philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct, and of the rules and principles it should govern. As a system, ethics are a social, religious, or civil code of behavior considered correct by a particular group, profession, or individual. As an instrument, ethics provide perspective regarding the moral fitness of a decision, course of action, or potential outcomes. Ethical decision-making can include many types, including deontological (duty), consequentialism (including utilitarianism), and virtue ethics. Additionally, subsets of relativism, objectivism, and pluralism seek to understand the impact of moral diversity on a human level. Although distinct differences separate these ethical systems, organizations