Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of community in society
Importance of community participation
Importance of community participation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of community in society
Contemporary social movements such as Arab Spring and Kony 2012 use the Internet and social media as potential tools towards change. But why are some more successful than others. This paper argues that when news outlets see the potential for change, they “premediate” (Richard Grusin) its possibilities, and make that change ever more possible in their coverage. On the other hand, extant stories that are more reactionary do not get the same amount of new exposure, and remain static. In other words, our media - not just social media, but news organizations - play a great role in shaping current events. I will compare and contrast the unfolding of the Arab Spring story, and how little changed regarding Kony 2012, as cases in point. Both of these events were propelled by something we use in our every day lives: the internet. The network of connections that internet has, was able to bring these two social changes to not only there home countries but also to the entire world. With the rise of social media and the increasing news coverages, the Arab Spring and Kony 2012 were able to show just how much power the internet can have on change in the world. Margaret Mead once said, never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. These words hold true for many different reasons as change cannot happen without the idea because with that idea comes on what could happen and how things could turn out. Richard Grusin’s work helped define statements like this by narrowing in on coining a term called premediation. He states that premediation “accounts for what he saw as a confluence of cultural logics across different media sources.” In order to ... ... middle of paper ... ...ture-of-social-media-in- revolutionary-movements>. O’Donnell, Catherine. New study quantifies use of social media in Arab Spring. washington.edu, 12 Sept. 2011. Web. May 6, 2014. . Ruge, TMS. ‘Kony 2012’ Is Not a Revolution. NY Times, 14 March. 2012. Web. May 5, 2014. . Safranek, Rita. The Emerging Role of Social Media in Political and Regime Change. Discovery Guide, March. 2012. Web. May 5, 2014. . Waters, Preston. Downfall Of KONY: The Social Media Effect. Elite Daily, 19 March. 2012. Web. May 5, 2014. .
The issues of how technology is influencing our nation today has come into play with social media and surveillance in our personal lives. We use twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. to express our opinions on things and as a voice to inform people on what’s going on in today’s society. We have learned how to use the tools we’ve been given to change our lives forever; our government has access to all of our personal information in exchange for our protection against terrorism. In Bijan Stephen’s article on “Black Lives Matter” and Rebecca McKinnon’s chapter on “the Arab Spring”, they both touch on the power of technology in negative and positive ways.
Kony 2012 is a prime example of how new technology is changing the effectiveness of political documentaries. Production costs are decreased because digital cameras and editing software are easily accessible. The video was released on Youtube, a streaming platform, which has changed distribution models for documentaries by enabling videos to expand their reach tenfold. Additionally, because Kony 2012 was produced by a founder of Invisible Children there was a synergy between the documentary and the activist group, which legitimized their multiplatform distribution plan and guerilla media strategies, allowing a new model of political effectiveness to take shape through the network public sphere. However, Kony has not been captured and the movement has since died down. One must ask, what is the effectiveness of this political do...
Gil Scott-Heron’s song “The Revolution Will Not be Televised” has been praised as a slogan for activists after its release in 1971. Scott-Heron sings about people “not [being] able to plug in, turn on and cop out” in defense of the activists who are actually working towards change (Scott-Heron). Malcolm Gladwell, a Canadian journalist, tackles the same subject in his essay, similarly titled “Small Change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted”. Gladwell recounts historical events of activism that were not perpetrated by social media, and goes on to explain that regardless of what the media says, social media has not in fact “reinvented social activism”. Despite Gladwell’s examples, however, it is clear through events such as the unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, that social media can have a crucial part in social activism.
In Harry Potter in International Relations, Nexon and Neumann argue that “popular culture is a crucial domain in which social and political life are represented” but that “such representations are not merely passive mirrors; they also play a crucial role in constituting the social and political world.” Durkheim explains that social life is created through human agency, consisting of entities that, as Durkheim asserts, exist “as realities external to the individual” and “as a product of human agency.” The production of these facts is not founded by individual opinion but through collective understanding, manifested in popular culture. Popular culture artifacts, then, assume the agency of the individual in predetermining the interpretation to be accepted.
Griswold, W. (2013). Cultures and societies in a changing world. (4th ed.). United States of America: SAGE publications Inc.
A way young people evaluate their self-worth is through social media. Today, one has sites such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram available to them from a very young age. While some say it is a normal due to the technology driven world we live in, access to these media sources greatly impacts developing minds. One comes to believe that it is not personality that matters, but the number of followers and online friends that one can build up. After being on Instagram for over four years, I have a following of about 500 people. When I get over eighty “likes” on a photo I am shocked. Although my numbers are miniscule compared to the 300 plus “likes” my roommate usually receives, my surprise comes mainly from the fact that I could not name eighty
While the liberty of speech on Internet strengthens the democratization, it also provides political dissidents with channels and arranges to undermine. McLaughlin (2007) reveals that in Middle East, the Internet offers non-state dissident actors a potentially potent tool to accomplish their political objectives. Consequently, without the nation-imposed constraint...
Safranek, Rita. 2012. The Emerging Role of Social Media in Political and Regime Change. s.l. : Proquest, 2012.
“They are both ONE uprising. One world, one revolution. Often people think in terms of “Contagion” or something. But, in reality, we have been ready, we people of the Internet, for a revolution to start anywhere in the Arab world. We’ve been supporting each other and trying hard since a long time, and you know how important Internet was for the revolution” replied, the Tunisian Minister of Youth and Sports , Slim Amamou when asked about the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions (as cited in Filiu, 2011). In 2011, a volcano of keyboard-generated revolutions erupted in the Arab world, driven by one secret ingredient: ‘cyber activism’ (Ghrer, 2013). The first setting sailed in Tunisia on the 14th of January 2011, when President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, stepped down after a whirlwind twenty-eight-day series of protests (Filiu, 2011). The next stop was in Egypt on the 25th of January 2011 when President Hosni Mubarak stepped down, following an eighteen-day protest across the entire country (Filiu, 2011). Several factors trailed behind the success of such historic mind blowing revolutions, specifically cyber activism which served as a vital ingredient for such revolutions. According to Howard (as cited in Eaton, 2013), cyber activism is “the act of using the Internet to advance a political cause that is difficult to advance offline”. In simpler words, cyber activism can be defined as the use social media, in particular Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, as a call for political transformation and reform brought by emotion evoking videos, comments and pictures. Many believe that social mediums such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, served as the common grounds which united the voices of...
In the media crazed society that we live in, with or without our knowledge we are constantly being influenced by our everyday surroundings. Just as we are persuaded by political campaigns, swayed by news coverage and pressured by marketing teams, we are equally impacted by social media. The main purpose of social networking is to share content and interact with other online users. Online interactions have become just as frequent in ones day than face to face interactions. Many wonder how this affects our communication skills and what this means for our society. Does online interactions strengthen our social skills or hurt them, and if they hurt them, how will our society ultimately end up? While many believe there is a black or white answer
However, if they have the knowledge to work with and without technology, then most of the criticisms I mentioned are irrelevant. It is simply an opinion if a person distinguishes when it is better to use technology versus the old-style methods. As time goes on there will always be new innovations and new methods of completing tasks that the previous generation will criticize because it is different than what they learned is right. The invention of social media was encouraged by Millennials, while Generation X was skeptical due to privacy issues. Selena Simmons-Duffit, a guest Millennial on NPR Radio, claimed that today because of Millennials, social media has become one of the main tools “transforming some of the most important stories into news” – news that every age group is now exposed to (Simmons-Duffit). Although the presence of “constantly being on” serves as an advantage to keep up with events and communicate quickly, it is also can be a distraction from reality, which should be limited. Millennials’ regular use of technology and social media both curtail negative side effects if used excessively, but it also serves as the driving force that Millennials use to produce change and innovation which, in result, has already shaped the world for the better.
There are about one and a half billion users of social media worldwide. It can be used to meet new people, find old friends, chat the day away, join interest groups, or even to share pictures. Social networks were mostly created so people could meet and find new friends. What most users of social media don't know, are the dangers of using social media. One example is when you meet a person online, because they are not always who they say they are. If someone is not who you may think they are, who could they be? They can be a stalker or a person that wants to steal your identity; which could be done easily thanks to new developments of new technology. Also thanks to new technology it is now easier for people using your information to track you. Posting personal information can risk your family and friends lives. Social media can be used as a weapon against you. It can even lead to a kidnapping, or even someone's death. Many people use social media to help to waste time, but could also become an unhealthy addiction. Also social media can damage your future. When you are a teen you tend to post pretty much anything you want. This is dangerous because you can post too much personal information. What most teens don't realize is that what they do on social media now can affect them for the rest of their life. It can even come back to haunt you in the future. Social media is dangerous because it makes it easier to be stalked, identity theft to happen, kidnappings and murders, and also can ruin your future.
Social media, a quickly growing and popular knowledge outlet, can become dangerously addictive if the user lacks self-control. There are so many wonderful outcomes from the invention of social media. The biggest being how quickly news can spread. Anyone can share the news that they desire with a few taps on a screen. The fault in this action though, is that false testimonies can be spread just as quickly as true ones. The question is, does the positive outweigh the negative enough for a person to proceed with using social media? Without this innovative creation, though, communication would be dull and boring, so by all means, social media should be used.
Social media has become a part of our daily lives. We can see the extent in which it influences through our behaviors and actions. Individuals, also known as users, “use” social media. These users are the core to technological advancements and the implementation of social media in their social lives. Change agents are typically the first to use a technological advancement and share their opinions, where other users then debate about incorporating it into their lives (Chayko 9). Therefore, the users decide what types of technology succeed and attract attention, and what would be considered as a failure. The reasons behind social media use are infinite, anything from politics to a way to make yourself feel better. Each use is driven by specific
Social media is a controversy topic in today’s society. Some people think that social media destroys human interaction and real life human relationships. While others think that social media is a bless to humanity. Social media makes human interaction much more convenient and much faster than real life human interaction, it makes globalization a reality, it gives a chance for introverted people to express themselves, and it also benefit develop international relationships whether its business or social.