Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories and constructs of race
Essays on race theory
Essays on race theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories and constructs of race
As we know, polygenism is a theory that believes that human origins came from different lineages. Co-adamism is one of the branches of Polygenism. Co-adamism is a theory about God created other human besides Adam and Eve at the same time. Co-adamism or often called double-adamism is a theory developed by Henry Home, Lord Kames from Scotland. He began with the languages and the origins of man and then he theorized that the new world was emerged from below the sea.
Kames’s view came after examining the differences in men, and he came with a conclusion that these differences were so great that men could not all be in the same race with others. He saw all the differences in their faces, hair, skin, shapes and basic moral quality. He then thought that God must have created many types of human races called multiple adamism referring to both externally and internally differences that every human has.
So, we can say that co-adamism is a theory that there were other human with different races besides Adam and Eve as the first people on earth. It believes there are other races referring to the major differences that every human has. Co-adamism also serves as a plausible view for the Christian. Kames himself made an effort to put his theory in accord with the teachings of Bible.
Another scholar who believed in Co-adamism is Giordano Bruno (1548 – 1600). He is a co-Adamist who believed infinite number of Gardens of Eden exist during Adam’s time. In 1591 Giordano Bruno stated that because it is impossible to imagine that the Jews and the Ethiopians came from the same ancestry, God certainly has created different Adams.
Charles White was another believer of co-Adamism, but he used science to support his views. White's Account of the Regular Gr...
... middle of paper ...
...irm that skull could be one of the evidence to differentiate human races, he differentiated the size of skull then he divided the size of brain as well. Like Cuvier, Morton is also proponent of polygenesis theory. According to Morton theory, he assigned Europeans as the owner of the highest brain capacity, then Chinese, Southeast Asians, American Indians, and the smallest capacity is Africans and Australian aborigines.
Third, the factor that became consideration is the human quality in their civilization. From these three things (skin, skull, and quality of relation) Cuvier concluded that human origin could be ranked as this following stage, the top was the white race according to appearance and brain capacity. In the middle was yellow race, and black race at the bottom. That is why polygenesis could be one of the reasons why racism has existed in the human life.
Throughout history race has been a pivotal part in decision making. Since the first interaction of populations from different geographical regions, with physical differences, the assumption has been that these differences were fundamental. These physical differences, based mainly on the color of skin, have been classified as race. Over time physicians have tried to pinpoint certain characteristics that are more prominent in one race than another, in order to prove race and that there are subspecies of humans. One of the first examples of this is Johann Blumenbach work “On the Natural Variety of Mankind”. In his work Blumenbach introduced five categories of race; caucasian. mongolian, malayan ethiopian, and american. These classifications revolved around not only skin color, but also physical morphology. Blumenbach supported this by using a collection of physical evidence, like the structure of the cranium, to support his thesis. This marked a shift in thinking of race in terms of geography to physical appearance. Published in 1775, Blumenbach’s dissertation started the scientific approach to finding
Humanity became fascinated with the idea of evolution with the work of Charles Darwin and the Scientific Revolution. People began hunting for fossils that would prove that man had an ape derived ancestry (Weiner, 1955). After various years of searching, a piece of physical evidence was found in England that was said to confirm the theory of evolution (Weiner, 1955).This confirmation came from Charles Dawson’s discoveries from 1908, that were announced publicly in 1912 (Thackeray, 2011). Dawson was believed to have found the fossil remains of the “missing link” between ape and human evolution, the reconstructed skull of Piltdown man (Augustine, 2006). The material was found in stratigraphical evidence and animal remains that were, at the time, adequate enough to confirm the antiquity of the remains (Weiner, 1955). In 1915, another specimen, Piltdown man II, was found further proving this theory (Augustine, 2006). However, this was merely a hoax proven by fluorine relative dating in 1953; the artifacts and bone fragments discovered turned out to be altered to fit the proposed scenario (Augustine, 2006). The skull found was actually composed of a human braincase that was younger than the complimentary orangutan lower jaw (Falk, 2011). Both sections of the skull had been stained to appear to be from the same person of the same age (Falk, 2011).The perpetrator of this act was never caught and there are many theories proposed for the motive of this hoax (Augustine, 2006). Many people have been taken into consideration for this crime, such as Chardin, Woodward, Hinton, and Dawson (Augustine, 2006). Nevertheless, the evidence that proves that Dawson is guilty of this crime against anthropology is quite substantial compared to the evidence...
And then in the Iroquois story two twins created the world. And even there is a quite big difference as well: the Iroquois don't beliefs,
Culture, Not Race, Explains Human Diversity, Mark Nathan Cohen, Chronicle of Higher Education, April 17, 1998, pp.B4-B5. The term race refers to a biological subdivision of a species. At one time, scientists held that there were as few as three such subdivisions in the species Homo sapiens: Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. Mark Anthony Cohen points out that this is an antiquated view, yet it lingers as a common belief in society. Mark Nathan Cohen makes an interesting point in his article “Culture, Not Race, Explains Human Diversity”. While the article does deal wholly in the realm of the opinion, it is supported by numerous scientific facts. In fact, Cohen’s usual method of drawing in a reader is to make a blanket statement and then “beef it up” with several scientific facts.
Thomas Jefferson is the first person to truly articulate a theory on race in the united states. Jefferson believed in democracy and freedom but had to justify slavery of non-white individuals. He did this by posing the notion that there is something inherently different about whites and non-whites that make blacks inferior to whites. Thomas Jefferson played an important role in the creating of scientific race by trying to figure out what it is scientifically that makes “blacks inferior to whites”. This sets scientists up on the path of creating scientific race because if that’s the question posed by scientists, then that is what will be answered. Louis Agassiz played an important role in the creation of scientific race by being influenced by American racism and transforming his long held belief in the unity of mankind. He co-authored a book called Types of Mankind, which is a compilation of research that justified the argument that African-American, Native-Americans, Asians, etc. were different species. Both Thomas Jefferson and Louis Agassiz laid the foundation and promoted the idea that race is biological, and there are inherent differences which played an important role in creating scientific
Racism is often considered a thing of the past, with its manifestation rarely being acknowledged in the United States today. Race: The Power of an Illusion, is a documentary that addresses the legacy of racism through its significance in the past, and its presence in society today. To understand racism, it is vital to understand the concept of race. Race is a social invention, not a biological truth. This can be observed through the varying classifications of race in different cultures and time periods. For instance, in the United States, race has long been distinguished by skin color. In nineteenth century China, however, race was determined by the amount of body hair an individual had. Someone with a large amount of facial hair, for example,
Yudell, M. (2011) A short history of the race concept. Race and the Genetic Revolution:
In society, race clearly affects one’s life chances. These are the chances of getting opportunities and gaining experience for progression. The social construction of race is based on privileges and availability of resources. Looking at society and the formation of race in a historical context, whites have always held some sort of delusional belief of a “white-skin privilege.” This advantage grants whites an advantage in society whether one desires it or not. This notion is often commonly referred to as reality.
Through research of DNA samples, scientists have been able to declare that race is not biologically constructed due to the similarities between human genes. Nevertheless, in reality, people still emphasized on biological aspects such as skin color, or hair texture to categorize others into different races. This in turn, denied the true identity of race, which it is culturally constructed. Ethnicity, by definition is also culturally constructed, therefore it greatly resemble race. There is no real clear line to distinct the two.
Social Construction Race Race has been one of the most outstanding events in the United States all the way from the 1500s up until now. The concept of race has been socially constructed in a way that is broad and difficult to understand. Social construction can be defined as the set of rules determined by society’s urges and trends. The rules created by society play a huge role in racialization, as the U.S. creates laws to separate the English or whites from the nonwhites. Europeans, Indigenous People, and Africans were all racialized and victimized for various reasons.
In later years, many European scientists defined race by separating Homo Sapiens into three to six different groups. * Australoid: those from Australia, Melanesian islands * Caucasoid: Europe, North Africa, South west Asia * Mongoloid: East Asia, Siberia, the Americas * Negroid: Central and Southern Africa * Native Americans * Polynesians The scientific justification for these six groups was that members of these groups shared similar physical characteristics and originated in a particular region of the world. During the nineteenth century theories of race were advanced both by the scientific community and in the popular daily and periodical press. One idea that was taken into belief was racial standing based on skull size and features. The human skull was us...
The beginnings of racial difference can be traced back to the Age of Exploration, during which England was expanding its trading routes and was highly involved with trade in Africa. The English traders noticed distinguishing differences between themselves and the African people, both in physical appearance and cultural primitiveness. It was not until the 18th century when the word race began to enter languages and vocabularies, and this idea of a difference between peoples was prodded further into existence through the work of Carolus Linnaeus. Linnaeus composed a list of subspecies of human beings based on racial differences. There were several other scientists, such Georges Cuvier and Charles Darwin, as who created subspecies of man. Social Darwinism, alluded to the concept that eventually one greater subspecies of man would prevail and be the most elite of all of human kind. These lists often categorized the order of species with the white, European man at the top of the list and the darker skinned, African man at the bottom. An example of a concept of categorization was the Great Chain of Being, through which all things, including man and the subspecies of man, are given ...
To understand our existence, we interact with other members of society and develop a set of shared notions, institutions, and structures. Sociology, the systematic study of human society, helps us understand these interactions and developments. In particular, applying the sociological imagination to the social construct of race yields insight into its fallacy and utility. This essay examines the historical origin, functions, and societal implications of race in the United States. I also connect the social construct of race with the writings of Barbara J. Fields, Kingsley Davis, Wilbert E. Moore, Marianne Bertrand, and Sendhil Mullainathan. In a larger context, the social construct of race is a system of schematic classification; race
Kvam, Kristen E., Linda S. Schearing, and Valarie H. Ziegler. Eve and Adam: Jewish, Christian,
In “Race and Human Variation”, the main point in this section regarding human genetic variation is. RACE as a division of the human species basically depends upon the distinct in physical features that are actually known by the heredity. Whereas, Darwin saw the origin of the species as just like a single gene pool from which all humans share descent.