The Poisoning of America

1014 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of food additives in the body

Most of us have enjoyed that hot bowl of Campbell soup after a cold winter day. Did you know you are also enjoying a big helping of monosodium glutamate? Don’t know what that is? Well, you’re not alone. Not many people realize what it is they’re putting in their bodies. It can be quite shocking to read some of the side effects that come along with many common items found in most kitchens throughout this country. It is a common assumption that the FDA has the American people’s best interest in mind. If that is so, why are there so many unknown ingredients in the majority of the food we eat? Some of the additives found in FDA approved food can cause serious health risks. The FDA does not, however, conduct its own testing. It also does not approve product labeling or what is included on the nutrition label. The FDA can should change the way they test and market items that are potentially dangerous. Americans have the right to know just what that is they’re eating.
The Federal Drug and Food Administration, or FDA, began in 1906 as part of the Pure Food and Drug Act. The 1906 Act was passed due to a culmination of bills passed that were focused on severe abuses in the consumer market. Laws and guidelines were created by the FDA to monitor food safety. Product manufacturing facilities are inspected to show they are in compliance with these laws and guidelines. The FDA does not, however, test to see if food is safe for human consumption. The manufacturers are responsible for testing food, and then give their results to the FDA for inspection. Unfortunately testing done on food today does not show us the long term effect of new additives and chemical compound. It may take several years for a new chemical or additive to cause side effects...

... middle of paper ...

...blic knowledge. It will enable consumers to make conscious decisions on the food they are serving to themselves and their families. Using labels that include scientific names of additives, but no additional information is confusing to consumers. Additives like BVO or GMO’s can have the potential for health problems for some individuals. If the FDA required proper labeling of these ingredients, people could make the choice themselves. It is misleading to not include any ingredient in a product.
The FDA can and should change the way they test and market items that are potentially dangerous. Every person should have the right to know what they are putting in their bodies. Food should be about supporting a healthy body and not a healthy wallet. Cutting corners and adding food that causes long term health issues is more expensive than using dangerous chemicals in food.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of What's Eating America By Michael Polla

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “What’s Eating America”, Michael Pollan starts off his article by providing his audience with a background on the history of corn and its production. Additionally, he goes through both the sinister and positive sides in the history of corn, all while building a connection with his audience through his utilization of ‘we’ pronouns and by having direct conversations with his readers inside parentheticals. He continues to develop this connection throughout the text in order to slowly inch the reader towards his argument, which he presents in the final paragraph of the piece as a climax to the slow buildup of facts that previously followed the main argument. In addition, he surprises his readers by drawing grisly connections between corn and Zyklon B, amongst other images, creating a visual in the minds of his readers of corn as a malicious entity. He does this in order to to bolster his argument against the industrialization of food production, placing it in a gory, gruesome frame,

    Read More

  • Junk Science by Lee Ann Fisher Baron

    1609 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Lee Ann Fisher Baron’s “Junk Science,” she claims that the “food industry with the help of federal regulators” sometimes use “[a science that] bypasses [the] system of peer review. Presented directly to the public by…‘experts’ or ‘activists,’ often with little or no supporting evidence, this ‘junk science’ undermines the ability…[for] everyday consumers to make rational decisions” (921). Yet Americans still have a lot of faith in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to a 2013 Pew Research study, 65% of Americans are “very favorable” or “mostly favorable” of the FDA. When it comes to what people put in their bodies, the FDA has a moral obligation to be truthful and transparent. The bottom line of the FDA’s myriad of responsibilities is to help protect the health of Americans. Deciding what to eat is a critical part of living healthily, and consumers must be able to trust that this massive government agency is informing them properly of the contents of food. While the FDA does an excellent job in many areas, it has flaws in other areas. One of its flaws is allowing the food industry to print food labels that are deceptive, unclear, or simply not true (known as misbranding). This is quite the hot topic because a Google search for “Should I trust food labels” returns well over 20 million results, many of which are blog posts from online writers begging their readers not to trust food labels. HowStuffWorks, a division of Discovery Communications, published an online article whose author claims that “[the food industry] will put what they want on labels. They know the game….” While the food industry is partially at blame for misbranding, the FDA is allowing it to happen. If a mother tells her children that it is oka...

    Read More

  • GMO Labeling Essay

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    A non-GMO label doesn’t necessarily mean “healthy”. White sugar, flour, and processed ingredients if not genetically modified are considered non GMO. Recently Cheerios made their ingredients GMO free. This label made Cheerios seems as a “healthy conscience choice” when in fact they are not healthy at all. The truth is that this breakfast cereal is highly processed and is best to be avoided despite the “healthy halo” of being approved by the National Heart Association and GMO free. The truth appears on the nutrition label and the ingredients (Wartman). “If you can’t pronounce it, don’t buy it” The voluntary labeling places a burden on the consumer. The average Americans are forced to navigate confusing and cluttered food landscape” (Wartman). A mandatory labeling law is vital to give clear and concise information to citizens.

    Read More

  • Regulating Dietary Supplements

    2092 Words  | 5 Pages

    To begin, the Federal Food and Drug Administration does not have the power to regulate supplements like it does with drugs. Once a product is out on the market, the FDA has to prove that it is dangerous or has illegal additives before it can be removed. The FDA has targeted around seventy tainted weight loss products after learning that they had been mixed with undeclared stimulants, diuretics, and antidepressants (Trebilcock 2). The Federal Food, and Drug, Administration is responsible for ensuring that the manufacturers of foods provide safe ingredients and the correct amount of dosages for their products.

    Read More

  • FDA: A Necessary Evil

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    The FDA is vital to our country, albeit makes mistakes. Sometimes the FDA can be too

    Read More

  • Dietary Supplements

    1510 Words  | 4 Pages

    FDA regulates food supplement safety and labeling and FTC i.e., Federal Trade Commission regulates food supplement advertising and marketing. Together, the agencies maintain cooperative relationship and coordinates enforcement and educational efforts.

    Read More

  • Misleading Food Labels

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    At this point, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has started increasing regulations for prepared foods, however, only a few years ago they had some vague laws concerning these foods and companies could get away a lot more than they can now. One of the reasons for this was that the FDA was more concerned about the certain effects store bought food had on people and were less concerned about misleading labels on packaging. However, they seem to have become more aware of the fact that a lot of companies are tricking consumers into believing that their product is the best, and the FDA has started to regulate companies that have misleading advertisements.

    Read More

  • Explain Why There Should Be Banned In The United States

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    Federal Drug Administration (FDA) bans foods and drugs. The Federal Drug Administration bans things that may be a nuisance to the society. Items that may cause choking hazards or products that come from overseas that may be harmful are banned. Items that are banned may not have a good enough reason to be banned, this may cause certain people to be frustrated and angry. Although not banning items may cause commotion in some ways, it is acceptable to see what the product does to the country because the product may do good for certain people.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The FDA

    667 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Food and Drug Administration or for short, the FDA, is a federal agency of the united states department of Health and Human services, one of the United States federal executive departments. The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices. They also ensure the safety of our nation's food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.

    Read More

  • Food Label's Ugly Secrets Analysis

    787 Words  | 2 Pages

    This supports the FDA’s proposal because it lures the consumers to their side, because you wouldn’t want to be on the side that would lie to you about their products? To support this claim, here’s an excerpt from the article, “Food Label’s Reveal Sugar’s Ugly Secrets”, “Nutrition advocates say the uproar only supports their argument that unhealthy amounts of sugar are secretly added to foods.” This also helps the FDA’s proposal because dieticians might recommend a product to their viewers, but their viewers wouldn’t know how much added sugar was in the product, thus only harming the consumer. Although, if the product had a label to tell the dietitian how much added unhealthy amounts of sugar were in the product, they could advise their viewers to steer clear of those products. If you were a food company, and the government passed the FDA’s proposal, wouldn’t you lower sugar in your product to boost

    Read More

  • The Film Food Inc.

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    People think that since the FDA is a government organization then it has to be aware and fix these problems. Also they think that they FDA would be more strict on the corporate farms then the small farms.The abuse of animals and the safety of your food does hand in hand; if there is a poor treatment of animals then you can not expect your food to be healthy. In Food Inc. the cow industry was shown as the industry that was most unhealthy and it was not the fact that multiple cows make up a single hamburger, it was the threat of E. coli that made it unhealthy. Cows naturally have E Coli in their stomachs, but because of the mass production of cows, it caused more E Coli to grow in their stomachs. Like chickens, cows are fed feed that is not supposed to be in their diet just to make them grow fast. Cows who are natural herbivores are fed corn instead of grass by corporate farms, mostly because it is cheap, but corn causes more E. coli to grow in their stomachs. E.coli is then transmitted to humans by ingesting cow meat like hamburgers that has been infected by E. coli. In a study done by the Center for Disease Control has concluded that 73,000 people in the United States will get sick from E. coli alone in a year. Michael Pollan from Food Inc. showed how dangerous corn was to cow's diet by saying “ if we took cows off of a corn diet for

    Read More

  • What Are High Prices For Highly Labeled Food Companies Identify Food Products?

    558 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every day, customers at grocery stores are paying high prices for specially labeled food products. Food companies advertise to consumers by using phrases like “free of pesticides, GMOs, growth hormones, gluten, and fat”, or “grown organically, naturally, or locally” to make a greater profit. Sometimes the companies hides the usage of certain food enhancers, so they can produce more for a cheaper price. The general public is not only misled by the absence of warning labels, but also by the expensively labeled food products, causing misguided customers buying and consuming products they are trying to avoid.

    Read More

  • Food Safety Regulations

    1475 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Food Safety Modernization Act was created by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to ensure all

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Trans Fat

    816 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the FDA banned the use of trans fat it has opened the door to further government actions. The food industry is being held accountable for the long term health consequences of the American public. With the FDA and worldwide health organizations pushing for more sustainable, and holistic foods we should see improved health standards. It is the responsibility of our governments to protect us from the risks of unhealthy foods. Americans have empowered our government to ensure our foods are free of any disease, and meet every day nutritional standards. The government has been given a role to ensure food safety and labeling. It is expected that government should continue to investigate food standards and nutritional needs. There is no irony that United States government is following suit of numerous European

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Gmo Labeling

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    With all of the controversy surrounding GMO foods, a topic that always arises is the subject of labeling. Labeling has been a matter of discussion for years and surprisingly, a consensus has not been reached. In the labeling argument, big organizations that oppose labeling claim that mandatory labels would increase costs. Supporters of labels meanwhile, argue in favor of the consumers’ right to know of just what it is that they are consuming. The debate of cost over right to know seems to be what fuels the persistent war between supporters and opposers of labeling. While there is huge opposition, labeling GM foods is a necessity and needs to become a reality in America.

    Read More

More about The Poisoning of America

Open Document