Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of Nazism
The impact of Nazism
Critical evaluation Nuremberg trials
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of Nazism
Immediately following World War II, the Allied leaders had a tough decision to make. They had to decide what to do with the hundreds of Nazi military criminals. The Allies decided to form an International Military Tribunal (IMT) in order to charge the Nazi criminals based on four areas of crimes: “Conspiracy to wage aggressive war, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity” (Timeline: The War in Europe and Its Aftermath N/A). This tribunal did not try those accused of similar crimes on the Allied side. These judgments were passed solely onto Nazi supporters and the tribunal considered the majority of the charges passed in the category of, “Crimes against humanity” (Holocaust History N/A).
These charges were placed upon 24 Nazi men who had actively or passively supported or been apart of the atrocities regarding the concentration and death camps. One of these men committed suicide before the actual trial began, one committed suicide before the trial began, and a third was not healthy enough to withstand the trial. The other 21 men were brought in front of a panel of eight men, who formed the International Military Tribunal. Each man consecutively entered a plea of “not guilty” and so the trial began. These men were the most dangerous men who were possibly deserving of death. After this main trial finished, there were many other courts that dealt with the smaller war crimes that did not necessarily deserve death (Timeline N/A).
Hermann Göring was the chief defendant during the main war criminal trial and before he entered his plea, he attempted to make a statement to the court; but the judge did not allow him to voice what he desired to say. Hermann Göring “had been commander in chief of the Luftwaffe, presid...
... middle of paper ...
...hat severe prison terms and three men were acquitted. The 12 men received just punishment for the evil that they had partaken in and the other nine men were most likely given more leniency than they deserved. Once this first and primary trial was completed, many smaller and less significant trials took place in order to properly punish those responsible for the Holocaust (Timeline N/A).
Works Cited
"Holocaust History." The Nuremberg Trials and Their Legacy. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2012. Web. 08 Mar. 2012.
Kohl, Christiane. The Witness House: Nazis and Holocaust Survivors Sharing a Villa during the Nuremberg Trials. New York: Other, 2010. Print.
Spielvogel, Jackson J. Glencoe World History: Modern times. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 2005. Print.
"Timeline: The War in Europe and Its Aftermath." PBS. PBS, 03 Jan. 2006. Web. 08 Mar. 2012.
"World War II in Europe." 10 June 2013. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 18 March 2014 .
If you have been in a History class you have probably heard of an event that happened after World War Two called the Nuremberg Trials. These trials were conducted by the United States. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was appointed to lead the trials (Berenbaum). During these trials they charged with Crimes against the Peace, War crimes and Crimes against Humanity (Berenbaum). Many major Nazi leaders committed suicide before officials could hang them or before even being caught. The famous Doctor Goebbels killed his children then him and his wife committed suicide (Berenbaum). Only twelve out of the twenty-two who stood trial were hanged, twelve, while the rest just got prison time. Besides major Nazi officials, Physicians were put on trial, the people who were part of the mobile killing squads, Concentration camp officials, Judges and Executives who sold concentration camps Zyklon B. You can expect that they had many excuses, but m...
ade Manifest: The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Virginia University, 10 Mar. 1997. Web. 5 Apr. 2011.
Was the Rosenberg trial a fair trial? This has been a very controversial and debated question throughout the 20th century. Many people believe that the Rosenbergs where innocent but had an unfair trial. Others believe that the Rosenbergs had a fair trial and are guilty because of their involvement with espionage and the Soviet Union. Overall the Trial is still a very controversial because of their involvement with communism, their convictions of espionage, and their show of treason against he United States with the Soviets. Before the Rosenbergs were convicted of espionage, events took place first that made America anti-Communism. According to Douglas Linder, on March 1917 the Russian Revolution began which was the beginning of Communism. Another event was in 1939, when Britain and Germany went to war (James Sweeney). America looked down on Communism after confrontations with Germany and the Soviet Union. In 1917 an Espionage Act is put into terms (Douglas Linder). According to Douglas Linder, in 1923, a Communist Party was formed into the United States. Megan Barnett thought that the Rosenberg's joined a Communist Party due to Hitler's carnage.
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. "The Holocaust." Holocaust Encyclopedia. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 10 June 2013. Web. 25 Jan. 2014.
The Milgram experiment was designed and performed by Yale University social psychologist Stanley Milgram in 1961. Milgram created this experiment predominately to determine what would have motivated Germans to so readily conform to the demands put forth by the Nazi party. Milgram wished to answer his question, “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?” (McLeod). At the time of these experiments, debates about the Nuremberg trials, particularly the trial of Adolf Eichmann, one of the major perpetrators in the Holocaust, were still ongoing. At these trials, many Nazi party officials and military officers were put on trial for committing “crimes against humanity.” Although some defendants pleaded guilty, others claimed that they were innocent and only following orders that were given to them by a higher authority, Adolf Hitler. In the end, twelve of the defendants were sentenced to death, three to life in prison, four to approximately fifteen year prison terms, and three were acquitted (“The Nuremberg Trials”)....
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. United States Holocaust Memorial Council. Web. The Web. The Web.
They held the belief that the Rosenbergs were, "hopeless victims of cold war hysteria, singled out because of their political views, and perhaps also because of their Jewishness." U.S. Ambassador Douglass Dillion said, "Nothing could be better calculated than this claim to convince waverers that the Rosenbergs, if executed, will be victims of what the Europeans freely term McCarthyism." Harold Urey, a world-renowned scientist, said: "Now that I can see what goes on in Judge Kaufman's courtroom, I believe that the Rosenbergs are innocent. What appalls me most is the role that the press are playing. The judge's bias is so obvious. I keep looking over at the newspapermen and there is not a flicker of indignation or concern.. " Albert Einstein wrote to President Truman: "My conscience compels me to urge you to commute the death sentence of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.this appeal to you was prompted by the same reasons which were set forth so convincingly by my colleague Harold C. Urey in his letter."
Josef Kramer and 48 other associates were tried for war crimes by Britain’s Military Court on June 14, 1945. Eleven of the defendants was sentenced to death, including Josef Kramer, nineteen other culprits were sent to prison for life, the remaining eight malefactors were acquitted. On December 12, 1945 Kramer and the other
United States' Holocaust Museum. "Children During the Holocaust." United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 6 Jan. 2011. Web. 08 Mar. 2015.
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “The Holocaust.” Holocaust Encyclopedia, last modified June 10, 2013, http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005425.
Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Vintage, 1997. Print.
In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends (Martin Luther King, Jr). The Nuremberg trials were a series of 13 trials put together to persecute Nazi militants for their wrong doing in the holocaust and the physical and emotional abuse they put upon the jewish community. Did the jew deserve this no they didn't because we are all people and we are all equal did hitler believe that no he didn't he believed if u wasnt a certain color certain height weight an have a certain eye color u were in the wrong an it really wasn't about that it was about the loss of the war he believed that the jews were the reason we lost ww1 when that was not the reason. These trials were held in nuremberg germany The trials
Part of this was carried out in the Nuremberg Trials. Beginning in 1945 and through 1946 they conducted the first trials which were the trials of the Major War Criminals. In the spring of 1945 just before the total collapse of his war efforts Hitler along with Himmler and Goebbels, his top two associate, committed suicide thereby exempting themselves from these trials for justice. The trials revolved around twenty-four persons and six Nazi organizations. The court was established by the four allies France, Great Britain, Russia, and the US. Each of these nations provided a primary judge and an alternate judge. The trial was the first of its kind having to be translated into 4 languages during the process. This trial scenario laid the groundwork
Ed. John Merriman and Jay Winter. "1989." Europe Since 1914: Encyclopedia of the Age of War and Reconstruction. Vol. 4. Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2006. 1874-1880. World History in Context. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.